Resolution-PC 89-66~
~~~~~~~~ . ~.~~
~
A RESOL~UTION OF THE ANbHEIM CIT'Y PLANN'ING CONL~fISuION
THA'P PETITl'ON I~OF VARIACiC.. N0. 39~.2 T!E GR71IiTED
jr~il i~t tl
~~ ,~
- ~-,
~;, .r,..
,~~
WEiEREAS, L•ha Ai~uhoim City Planninq C.ammission did receive a
veri£ied P,~Litton for V~riance frnm VICTOR M. VAZ(~UL'Z I~ND TERRX H. R. VA2QUEZ,
2240 W. Linaoln Avonue, Anaheim, CA 92a01, owners of nertain real property
situate~ in the City of Anahsim, County u~ Orange, St~atQ of Culifornia,
describod as fotlows:
LOTS 2I ANA 22 OE' TRACT N0. zy5, IN' THE CI'PY OF
ANAf3EIM, COt°`.1TX OF ORANG~, STATF OF CAi~IFORNYA, AS
5HOWI1 ON A MAP UF THE EAST ANAFIEIM SUBDIVIDION,
R°~:ORDEn 1N k00K 14 PAGE PA3E 25 MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
iN THE OFFIC~ UF' THE COUNT~ RECORDk;R OF SAID COUNTY.
WHGREAS, l:he City Planni.~ag Commise~ion did hold a public hearing
at the Civic Cante: in the City oF Anahoim on February 27, 19F19, at 1:30 p.m.,
no~ice of said public henring tiaving bee,i duly given as required bX law $nd in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Cocle, ChapLt~r 18.03,
to hea= and consid~r ev3.dEnce for anc~ against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make findings nrd recommAnda~i~ns in connection therewiL-hs and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aEtar. du~ in~pect.ion~ invoskigation
and study made by itself• axid in its behalf, and after due consicleration of a?1
evtdence a~nd reports offered ~t said hoaring, does find and detarmine the
follawing fact~:
1. ThaL• the pQtitioner reque~ts waiver of the following to
canstrunt a 2--story, 8-unit residential condominium complex:
~T~SiN,~~~~~~4~.L.102 - Maximum fen~~~~igZi~.
and ~~31.O.k4~..QTQ (.~ fec;t permittecl alonq west property line (RS-7200
zoning]; 8 ~e~ praposQB)
2. Thr,~ the above-rnent3onod waivbr is hereby g~ranted on the
basis that th~re bre spocia~ circumstances 3pplicable to the property gueh as
size, shape, topogr.a~shy, location and surroundings whicn ~]o not apply to okher
identically zoned prop~srL•y ir. Che same vicinity; and thar.. ~trict applicatfon
of L•he Zoning Code deprives lhe property of priviiRgQ3 enjoyed by other
proparties in ttie idQntical zon~ and c'tassiEication in the vicinity.
3. Thzst ttiere are exception~-1 or axtraordi~ary circumstances or
conditioi~s applicable to tr.e property invo2ved or to tha intended usR of the
proper. ty L•hat do ~.o', apply qenerally to tt~e property or clasr~ of uee in the
sar~e vicinity bnd zone.
4. That the r~~ ~:stit eQ varianr.e is necess3ry for the
px•eservotior~ and enjoyment of 1:.unst»ntial piopert.;~ right possQ~sed by other
propQrty in the same vicinity and zone, and cl~nied to the prop9r~y in qttostion.
069~r
-1-
PCF~9-66
::;;
;~~:t
. ...~~
~~ ~
i
5. That thg requc~sted variancQ will not be materi~].ly detrimontal
t•o the public wolfare or injurious to tho property or improvemer.ts i.n auch
vicinit:y and zone in which the propQrty is located.
6. That two {2) people indirat;ed their prosence at said public
hearir.g in o~posi~ion; and thaL x~o corre~pondence was received a.n opposition
to subject ~~tition.
5~.~.F~..~.~.~'~NVIRONMEN~A~VQgALITY ACT~IrTD„~N~: That the Anaheim
City P.tanning Commission has roviewed the prop~sal to r~classify propertp
from the RS-''200 (Residexitial, Single-Fami.ly) Zone tu the RM-3Q00
(Residontial~ Multiple-Family) 'l.one and tu construct a 2-n~ory, $-unit
condomixiium cornple~: with waiver of m~:'mum ~ence hei?ht on a
rectangularly-shaged par~el oi' land consi.sting of appr.oximately 0.5U acr.e,
hav~nq a frontagc~ of approximatQly 122 fept on the west side of Coffman
Str.eat, being located approximately 90 feet ~outh of the conterl3.ne t,f
Cypresa Streek and further doser:ibec~ nc~ 217 and 223 North Coffman Street; and
does heraby ~pprove the tlegntive Doclaration u~on finding that it has
considered the Negative Declaration ~ogetlic~r with any camments received
durinq the pu:~lic review p.rocess and further finding on the basis ot the
ini.tial study and any commonts received that, there is no sula~kantial evidence
that tne pr.oject wzll have a significant effect on ths enviror.~nent.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVF~i that tbe Anaheim City Planning
Commission doos hareby grant subjoct Petitioz~ for Variance, upon the
f.ollowir.g condi.tions which are hezeby faund to bo a nQCessz~ry preroquisite to
the proposed usa of the subject property in order to preserve ths satQty and
general walfare oP the CitiLen~ of the City of Anaheim:
l. That prior to issuance of a building p9rmit:, the appropriate tratPic
signal a;csessment LeU ~hall. be pzid to the City of Anahe:.m in t~n amount
as establishQd by City Council re:aolution.
2. That a tract map to racord tho division of subjRCt proparty shaYl be
submi.ttecl l:o and approvad by the Ci.ty of An~heim and L•hen be reco:dad in
the Office of the Orange ~;ounty Recorder.
3. That subject property shall bo served by underground utilities.
4. T2iat g~tes ahall iiot be installed across the 3riveorby in a mannex wtiich
may ac3versoly af£ecC vehicular traff5.c in L•he adjacent public street.
Installatio~i ut any gates ~hal'1 conform to ~he ~:ngineering Division's
S~andard Plan ito. 402 an~3 stiall bo subject Go the roview and approval of
the City Tr.a£fic Engineer.
5. That dr~fnage of subjoct ~,roperty sh~ll be disposed of in a manner
s~ti~factory to the City Fngineer.
G. ThaL all lockable pedestrian and vcshicular access g~tes sha11 be equipped
w~th a"knox box" d~vice if requirec~ by thQ Fire and/or Falico
Deparkments.
;~,,
;;~
:.; ~:~
~~
-Z- PC89-66
~F''~7h~
7. That trash storago areas sha11 be provided ancl maintainod a.n a locatinn
accAptab].o to thd Street N~ain~enance ~nd Sanitation Di.viaion and in
accordance with approved p1~ns on file with :~aid ~ivision.
1 r'
8. That all air cox~ditioninq L•acilitiQS and other rooE and ground mounted
aquipment ahall be properly shieldgd from view, and the sound buFfered
from adjacent residerxtial properties.
9. 1'Yiat al:l plumbing located on tlie ex~erior of th~ building shall be
prvperly screc+ned frorn view by architec~ura] devices and/or lanas~~pi~~g.
10. That tihis Varianco i~ granted subjQCt to the adoption of tha Zoninq
Ordinance in connection w3Ch Reclassificati.on No. SR-69-44, now pending.
1~.. That pra.or to commencement of sL-ructura2 framing, fire hydrants shall be
in3tallerl and cha.rgocl, as require~l and approred by ~he City Fire
De~arCmen~.
12. Th~t subject proparty ~ha11 bo developed substarAtial.ly in accordance with
plans and specifications on f9.la wiL'h tk~e City of Anak~eim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 throu~h 6; provided, however, that ten (10) fiEteen ('_5) gallon
treQS sh~ . 1 be plantecl along t'•-e easterly property line as stipulated to
by the applicant at the publi.c aearing..
'~?:°,+;±'i
Y° r,~
:{:
~~~.~ ~'~~~~~~
13. That prior to issuanco of a building permit o.r within a poriod of one (1)
voar fram tho ~+.2~e of this rosolution, whichever nccurs first, Coiiditiax~
Ne~. 1, 2, 9, 5 and 10, above-menti4ned, s'ha~l bQ complied with.
Extens3ons for further Cime to complete said condiGaons may be gran~.ed in
accordance wi.th Soction 18.G3.090 of thQ Anaheim Municipal C~de. `~
~9. That prior Co fina~ building and zoning inspecl:ions, Condition Nas. 3, 5,
6, 7, 4, 9 and '12, above-mention.ocl, shall be comp2iad with.
15. That approval of t]
reques~ only to ttie
Zaning Cocle and any
include any actfon
rc~quest regarding
requirement.
~
~is appl.ication const_tutes approval of L-he propo::ed
extent that it complies witb the Anaheim i~unicipal
other z~plicable City regulations. Approva7. doas not
or fi~idings as ta ~:o~~pliarice or approval ot• the
an~• other ~sppli.cahle ordin~n~+~, regult~tion or
BE IT FURTHEF RCSOLVI~A that che Ar-aheim City Planriing Commission
does hereby £inQ and detormine that adoption oi "~is Res~lutien i:~ expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all ~f L•hQ ~conditions
2iereinabove ~et forth. Shou1Q aiiy suc:h conditions, or any pBrC thereaf, be
dec].ared iYivalid or unenforceabla by the finar judgment of any court of
competRnt jurisdiction, thon this Rosolution, and any approvals '~ereiii
con~ained, sha].1 be deemed riu11 anci .•oid.
-3-
PC89-66
~ ;i~
. ....,u :-.k
. . .. . .. ~ . . . . •-:` ~'~'ti ' f '~ ~~~~~cvr~'~11~ ~
. . . ~ , f ~ ~Sr ~ y~~.,
,r
~ 1
~,'~''- „ ^~~ ~
~ l~ ,P~
~ ' r ~, r A~j~~ i~
`.'l
,~~
THE FOREGOIIIG RESOLU~'ION is s3qnad and approved by m~ this 27th day
o~ February, 19a9.
_~'`..,, i~~ `~~~L~,.~i _ "e'
CHASRWOMAl~, ANr'~H~IM CITY PI,ANN2NG COMMxSSION i'.
~
`; i
ATTEST.: ~ . ,;;
(o ~~R~.~..~ , ' . C-~..~vt~c-~.,~_ :`T'
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CiTX FL~ANNIyG CQMMISSION i'
STATE OI' Cp.LIFORNIA ) '~
CdUNTY OI' O~APTGE ) ss. ~
CITY Ok' ANAHEIM ) ,~
T, Edith I~, Harria, SecxeCary of rhe A~:aheim City Planning ~
Commission, do hereby certi.fy L•h~t the Eoreqoi.,g r~solution was passec~ and ~(
aclopted at a meeting af the Anahezm C.ity Planxiing Conunission kield on February ''~
27, 1989, by the following vote of the membQrs therenf: ;`;
AYGS: CONAIISSIONERS: HO'JAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~ZONE
VACANT: COt~41ISSI0NERS: TWO VACANT
IN' 6~ITNES5 w'~IF.R~O~, I have hereun~o sQt my hand this 27th day of
February, 1989.
.. `~~ . ~ ~ /Q.M..c.,,.
- i-d~- ~-~
SECRETABY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COIrQdISSION
^
~;~;
.; ;
~~: ;
7' :
`f ~
~ _X
~;,,h.
f.~f
'.(j
~~'A3
' /
-4- PC89-65 '`
:~..,
,~,~;
~, J~
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - , .... . ~ . . . . .. - ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~jr ~,~~
. . . . .. _ ~ , . . ~ ~ , . , , . t: ~~ ~iy°j , ~3 ~..4~ILn~lS~ ( ~