Resolution-PC 89-69~
~
RES~OL TI bT NQ~p~g9_69
i
A RESOLUTION 0~' THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMIS5ION
THAT PETITIOA~1 FUR CONDTTIONAL US~ P~RMTT N0. 3120 BE GRANTFD
WHER~AS, L•he Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a vPrified
~ Petitiori for Condit.iona7. TJse Permit from CARL KA12CF.iER RNTERF'RISES, I;7C, ].200
, N. Harbur BoulQVard, Anaheim, C~ 92E03, owner, and EARL C. MC 3URN~;Y, 1i00 N.
Harbor Aoulevard, Anaheim, CA 9T.803, agent for certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, Coun~y o.f Orango, State oi' Cali£orni~, described as:
TfiAT PORTION OF LOT 20, BLOCK K OF THL KRAEMER TRACT.,
7.N '.CFiR CTTY UF AN~FiEIM, COUNT.Y AF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SIiOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOIt 12,
PAGrS 87 AND 88 Or MISCFLLANEOU5 RECORDS OF L'OS
ANGFLES COUNTX, CALIFORNIA, F~OUNDED NORTHERLY HY A
LINE 53.OU FEET SC~UTHERLY FROM AND PA~ALLEL WITEi TKE
NOR'.~HERL'Y LINE OF SAID LQT 20, BEING ALSO THE
CEb71ERLINE OF LA PAf~MA S'TREET; EASTERI,Y BY THE
WESTERL'Y LING OF THE LAND CON(1E'YED TO THE ORAATGG
COUNTY rL00D Cc)NTROL DTSTRZCT B1 UE~D RECORDCt3
NOVEMI~ER 20, 1960 IN BOOK 5504, PaGE $ nF OFFICIAL
RrCORDS OF SAIA ORANGE COL'NT~; SOUTHEASTEP.LY BY THE
rTOR~HWE5TERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL '1 OF THE L,AND
C0.*N~:YED r0 SAID DISTRICT BY DEED TtECORDED DECEMBER
lQ, J,96G, IN BUOK 7770, PAGE 822, ()F' SATD OFFICIAL
RECORDS :~ID SOU'rI~ITaESTr'.RLY AND NOFTHWESTERLY B'1 TfiE
NORTHEASTERL~t' BOUIdDA1tY OF rHE LA.ND CONVEYED TO THE
STATE 4F CALIFORNIA BY PEED RECORDED APRIL 22, i9o3,
IN BOOK 6515, PAGE 9i39, OF SAIll OFFICIAL R~CORDS.
WFiERFAS, ~kie City Planning Commission did ho.id a public hearing at
the Ci.vi~ Center in the CiLy nf ~naheim ozi February 27, 19A9 at 1:30 p,m.,
notice of said public hearing having been du~y qiven as required by Taw and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
tn 'hear and consider Qvidence f.or and agains~ 3aid proposed c~nditional use
permit and to invesrigate and make £indings anct r.ecamrnendations in connection
t:herowith; and
WHER~AS, snic~ Corrunission, after due i.n~pection, invostigation and
stuc~y made by icself and in it~ behAlf, ar~d after due con~ideration o:E all
evidence ~tnd reports offAred at s~id hearing, does finu and detecmi~ie the
follor~iny t'acte.
1. That tho petitionex roqu~sts approval oE a conditional use
permzt under authority of Cods SAction 18.61.050.61I to wit: to expand a
drive-through re3taurant
'l. That the proposed use will not adversely atfect the adjoining
land usQS and the growtYi and developmc~nt of the area in which it is proposed
to bR located.
0701r -1- PC89-69
<~ , , . ~ _. _, ~ 4:ry1~ljiF~,;.~a,'_3~
~<' `t ~+;'~d},~ ''~ i
~ ~~1 ~:';
, . ~ ~ , ' .r''' i
. ~ ,.;i,:,~
3• Thut tha size and s.h~pe ~g ~he sitc~ proposed f-or the use i;;
adAquate to allow ~he full developmenr o.f Lhe pr4posed use in a m ~
detriine~r.~tal to ~he particular are~ zior t~ the peace, h~a~th, sa~ner r~a~ ~'~r~
general ~relt~ro of the Citizens of the City ot Anaheim, ~ety ~rid ,h,j
~~
4• 1'ha~ Y.he granting of. tlie ~andiL•3ona:1 Use Permit under th~
~:,;,
conditions im~ose~~, iE any, will not be <letrimQntal to the peacp, health,
::~, safety and qenQral welfare, of the Citizens of the City of Anr~heim.
~. That the traffic generated by the proposed use wil.l nat imp~se
an u.nduo burdezi upon the strests and hiyhwars des.igned and improved tu carry
the Lraffi.c in the a:aa.
6• ihat no one indicated their pre5ence at said public haaririg in
opposition1 and that no correspondc~nce was received in appos.iti.ox~ to the
, subject petiL-i~n.
;
~A.,L,IFORNIA FNVTRpNMENTA_L ~~~TTY A T
City P:lanning Commission has reviewed ~he pr~~~ al ~oat t'tie Anaheim
drive-through rostiaur,anr. on an irreg•ulazly•- ,ha ed `O eXpanrl a
o~ approximatelv 1.0'/ acr.os 1onaCed at t'ne sout2 oast 1 cor.ner no~~ ~a iP~ina
Ave~ue and KraRmar Hculev~rd, ar~d furt;her dFSCrined as 3110 East La Palma
Avoriue (Carl's Jr. Rostaurant
Declaration u ~% ~n3 does hereby approve the Negative
pon finding that it has consider~d the NH~ativa bec~aration
togetl.er wiL-h anx commentS received during the
further finciing on the basis a.f thct i.Zit:ial study a d1;anv ecc;mc @rit~ ~ Q, s and
that thera is :zo substantial avidence that the project wi11 rhaveVe~
signiLicant effect on L-he environment. a
NOW, THFREFORE, BE TT RE50I.VED that the An~heim City Plaxining
Commiss:on does hereby grant ~ub~ect Peti~ion for Con,ditional Use Permit~
upon tho followixig conditzons whi.ch are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisit•Q to the proposed uss of the subject property in order to preserve
the safety and general wel£are of the Citizens of thg City of. Anaheim:
1• 1'h~t pr3or to issuance oP a buiading nex•mit,
~ianal assessment fee sha11 bQ the appL•opria4e traffic
as esCablished b Pax~ to thQ City oE Anahorm in an a.^~ount
y City Council resolutian.
2• That the lt~gal owner, oE subject property shall irrevocably offer t~
dQdicata t;o the City of Ananeim, ~dditional strips of l.and twelvQ (12)
feet iu width aloxig I,t~ Palma Avenue and Kraemer ~ouleva:d, including a
curb radius return.
3• That sidewalk, shail be installed alonr~ Kraemer BoLilevard as raquirod by
~he City Enqineer and in I
~pgCi~xcations on file in the Office La the C~~~En standarcl plans an~ ~~
~ ~ineer. r
4~ Th~t sidewalhs, curbs an~ gutter.~ c~hall be repaired along La Palma
Avenue as required by the City F.:iginQer and iu accordance with standard
plans znd specificaki~ns on file i.n the Of£ice oF the City Engineer.
;,
~.
-2- PC89-69 !-'
;
, r',r~;.:.
. ~' l~. -li. .. ",I'.~ 1 ~ 1 :.f/~ 7 ryrl~:' 7 1 ~~~, 1~
' ~ ~ . , t" frt ro~(~.T~j'~{t~'~~
~+~~~ ~
~. Tha1: all drivowa~~s sha11 be rec:anstructad to 3ecommodato tian (10) foot
,:aclius curh returns. ExisLing broken or aracked driveways s.hall be
romoved anc] replacod as rec~uirod by the City Engineer; and furth~,x thrat
thQ driveway on Kraemer Boulevard sha17. k~e reconstructed and the grad2
improved Lo a maximum 8~ grade, subject to tihe satisfaction ~f the
TraFfic Engineer..
6, xhaC trash s~orage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location
acceptable to the SYroet Maintenance axid Sanitation Division and in
accordance with approvPd plans on .fil~ with s~id llivision.
7. That all air con~li~._~ning faciliti~s;; and other roof and ground mounted
equipmPnL- shall be properly shielded from view.
8. That the proposal s2-tall compl,y with all siyning requirements of the ML'
'Indusi:rial, Limited' Zon~~, unless a va.riance aYlowing sign waivers is
ar~pi•aved by the City Council, Plannir.g Commission or Zoning
Administral•or.
9. That: t.he on-site landscaping sh~ll Le maintained in r.ornplianc~; with City
stan3ards.
lQ. That the ~wner of subject property sha11 submit a le~ter roquestinr~
termination of Conditiorial Use Permit No. 2609 tu tha 7.oning Divisinn.
11. Thal: subject property shall be developed siibstantially in accordance
wit' plaxis and speci.Eicatians on file raith the City of Anaheim marked
L•xhibit Ncs, 1, 2 and 3.
12. That prior to issuance af ~ bui'ldinr permit, or wi~hin a perivd of one
(1) year from the da~e of this resolution, whichevor occurs fixst,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 10 ~bove-mentioned, sha.il be compliofl with.
Extension~ tos furth~r tirne to ~omplete said conditions may be granted
in accord~nco with Sectian 18.U9.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
13. ThaE prior to final building ana zoning znspections, Candi~;ion rTas. 3,
4, 5, fi, 7 and 1:L, above-mentiona3, shaJ.l be complied with.
14. That approval of Lhis a~~plicat.ion consti.tutes approval. of ttxe pr~posed
requesl: only to the extent ti~at it com~lies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other applicable City regulations. Approval doQs
not ?nclude aziy action or findings ~ss to comp.tiance or rapproval oE the
reqii~st regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulatiioxi or
reguiremerit.
AE IT I'URTHER RESOLVGD that t~he Annheim City Planning Commission
does hereby f.ind aiid determin4 th~t adopL•ion of t;his Resolution is axpressly
predicated upon apvlicanti's compl3.ance with each and all of the r,onditions
hereinabove set Ea~th. Should any sur;h conditiuns, ar any part th~reof, be
declared in~~alid or uneniorceabl.e by the final judgrnent oE any court ~f
compe;,ent jurisdiction, then tl~is RssoluLion, 2nd any a~provals herein
containod, sha11 be deemed null and void. ~,;`
:.,e•
~t ~;
"3` PC89-69 ~:;~1;
T~.;';!
~':
~?'
i
, . ~; . ~
,~ o ~ . ,. ;:4i
:',."li~ + i,~;i~!~ t YFN~.ir i K~,..~~ ~1 ~ ~ ~~..: iI ~.~ii, << -~~(~r i y
., i . . <. ~ e~5 r.~t ~~s if i~ ~~ r ~ S lt ~~i ~i~' aLrt ~ rr
~ ~ ~ ... , ~ ' ~ , ~i~ L. ~'.;.~a
! ' ~~+~~
~. ~., ,~'L'~
, . . IN~w~..?
TFiE FOREGOING RESOLU~'ION is signad dnci approver~ by me this 27th r~ay
ot February, 1909.
" '~ ~~`~ ~''/ - --
,t''" ' ~--' ~'~~~,ti.J
CHAIRWOMl~kT PRO T~MPORE
ANA.fiEIhx CITY PLANN,TNG CObIIrfTSSTON
ATTEST:
~ ~ "`-~^-' ~C`._-..C_'~-Q~.~l.~_-~i
SFCRETARX, ANAAETM rI~y pLp~NiNG COMMTSSIOZ~
STl#TF OF CALIFORNTA )
COi1NTY OI' OR~T ;E ) ss.
CI:7'X OF ANAF•~iM )
I, Edith L. Harr~s, Seeretary of L•he Ana2ieim City Planning
Coh~nmissyon, do heraby certif.y that t:ie foregoing resclution was passed ar~d
ad.opted at a meQting of the Az:ahPim Cit~• Planning Commission held on reibruary
27, 1y89, by fihe fr~llowi.r~g vote o£ the members thereof:
A+y~s~ COMMTSSTON~RS; HCYDSTUN, CARUSILLU, FELDHAUS, MESSE
NOES: CO2+IIrSTSSI0NER5: NONE
ABSENT: CObLtiiISSIONERS: BOUAS
VACANT: COMMISSIONERS: TWO SRAT~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 7 have hereunto ~et rr,y :~and triis 27s~h da,y o.fi
February~, 1989,
, ~~ `
SE U~2~L(j~-_~~-4.n..~
GREZARY. ANAHSTM CIT.': PLANNING COMMISSIOAi
._~ _
f,
PC89-fi9
.:.
;'r~
? :: ,. ~
t` A~