Resolution-PC 89-7Hr~S~ ~ ~ rn~! ~
r1.,V~i,.
~
~ {`,tY~~ . . ~.
~..
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ` '~i~j{r
(~ ~
~ ,
~'
~ {j~~ ~ f:~~
~~.i ;;
~~i~
' J1 i
~ ~ ~ ' ~' ~, ~l
;~., ~.F~4L.IJ~ N rr ~S'~2=..Q~ ' ?`~
A RESOLUTION Of THE ADiAFICIM CITX f'LAN'NING ~OMMISSION
THAT
'~'
\~. ,
PETITION F~R VAYtIANC~ N0. 3889 BC DENIF.D ,
,-,
~~
,
;~;, WHEREAS, tho Anaheim Ciky Flaiir~ing Commission clid receive a
vQi if.ied Fo~t:it~on £or Varianco fr
om ANAgEIM GEN~RAL Hp5PITAL LTD, 3350 W. F3 ~
Ruad, ~'~naha~im. CA 92ti~4, owner, t~r
a.l
d RVABD
`
.
A.
Anatieam. CA 928Q4. ~qent for certain re~l
~
~
h
~
aa
property
i
tuated n t
e
Ci~
Qg
ilnaheim, County of Ora~ig~, State of Calif~rnia ~1FSCrib
Y
d
e
as:
PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL DiAP RS:' 7876, FIL,ED IN
f300K 124
PAGES
,
2 AND 3 OF PARC~L MAPS, RECORAS OF
~AID ORANGG COUNTX, CALIFORNIA.
.~ WHEREAS, the City Planninq Commi.^,sion did hold a p~iblic hearing
at L•he C3.vic Cer.ter in the Cit
uf
A
~ ,y
.
naheim on November ;, 19b8, at 1:30 p.m„
noti~;o of said public hoaring hat~ing beon duly gi
ven
acc
•
i
~ ~ .
ar
as r
c
ance with e uir~d
th q b
e provisions of th~ Anahei
, m Municipal Codo, C~p~ar 18a03n
to near and consider evi6enco for and against
i
*; nvestigate and make findings nnd r
Propo~ecl vari.aneR ancY rp
z
,e~ommendations
jn
said public hear3ng wns c~ntinued lo th
h; and
C
e
n
e meeting of Januarx
~ria
16~
1989s
due
and s~udy made by ~~tsplg a d in~it
inspection, investigat
ion
8
f~
~ .
s
behalf
an
evidenea anci roports offerecl u~ said hearin d`~~~•cr clue eonsideration o~ a3.1
f
ll
~
i o
ow.inc~ tacts; 9~
oas find and de~prmix~e thr
, ~" 7het the petitioner prop~s~s waiver of the following to
constriiet a 3-story, 3Q,OOU-square E
i oot medical office buildinq undPr
author.ity of Code Section 18.45.08d:
SE~T,~N~~~4~ L9~0 • q21~ .. ~Sin„~m m ~ m
_ ND 1 ~ 41 ~-' --__u bor~~p.~rkina-~n~S:~.~.
.ObfZ
O~Q
,--
(2~ roquirod: g~q Pr~posed)
2- Tha~ the above-mentionQd waiver is h~3reby d~nied
bas.is tt:~t• it will aa
on the
use an incrQase 3n traffic congestion in the imm
vicinity and adver~ely aPfQCt a
ediate
ny adjoin.ing land uses and grankin
~arkinc~ waiver will bQ detr3
mental
,
~o khe peace, health, ga~Qty and g ngrai
weltare of the c~C~~Rns of thcr City of Anaheim,
3• That thQre ere no exceptional nor
ciresunstances Qr cond.itions a~plicable~ to the property involve~~nflr~ tninth~
int~ndod use of khe property that do not apply generally to tho property or
Ci$3S of uso xn thP ~ame yicinity an~1 zone.
4• Th~t the
presPrvation and enjoyment o~E~ requosted ~~aritiuce is not n£cessary for Ch
Prnperty xn r_h~ same vicinity
a substu~itial properr.y
an3 zo
right possessod e
by o~her
nQ, and denic:d to thQ property In question.
0615+r
-1-
PC89-07
',~~
'<<'~ :~-Y.:~
IIt~MYt~N41ttX7iNtR3P'flqt?'~7tLt'?:Wh'N') Yr;Klj"-Qf,Vf.-.P~1?.~~,:~lid;:-~ ~rY,.'!5 tt4't~;>}i,sveyft':dt t'N t'~rf~'.;.h1 ~, r!, ;, ~ p
;,i. ~ . ~ ..., . . .. o ,.. . ~~ . . ~ ~.~~~ {Y ~..:^' ,~ ;,".ild! j ~7 ~~ -'Q~x ftv~ n~.r~':t ~{~~~~,~I}~~{,~1CI ~ra ~
... . i , y ,,, y~! PY~,~~
. , . . . 4.,y~
,.;,L,~,~ ~, 'N.
,,,
~~:~~ ~ a.
5. That the regueaCed variaxice w311 be materially detr3mental
#:o the rublic welfare anr~ injurious to the propar.Cy or improvem~+nts in such
vicinity and zono in whiah the pronerty in laaated.
G. That EI•re people indicated thaix presence ~~t said public `!
hearing in opposition; ancl that 7,et4:erat were reaoivad .i~ opr,osiL•ion and in ~
su ort o.f sub'eet !
PP 7 petitinn. ,
~ALIF,Q~NI~, ~;NVZRQ~M~NTAL ~QjjA~L TTY ACT ~zrrri~~: That tho
Anaheim City Planning Commission ha~ rc~viewed the proposal to construc~ a
3--story, 30,000-sq. tt. n~ed3cal office building with waiver of m.inimw~n numbrlr
of parking spaces on an irrec~uzarly-3haped parcel of land aonsisting o£
approximatel;• 7 acrES, hav,ir~g a frontage oE approximal•,ely 69 feet on the souti-
side ~f Ball k~ad, hav.zng a maximwh depth ef approximately 1,105 Feot, being
lncated approximr~tely ~,070 feet east oE the c~nterliua af Knott Strofl t and
Eurt2xer descx~bed as 3350 Wost ]3a;i1 Road (Anaheim General Ho~pital); and does
hor~by deny the Negative Declarahion upon fin~3a.ng that a.t has considered the
Nega.tive Dec'laration toyeChQr wi*_h ~.ny comment3 received during the public
reviow process and fur~her findii~g on the basis of the i.ni.tial srudy and any
commc~nts received that there is substantial evic~.eneo that t~e projRCt, as
proposed, wil]. have a significant ~ffoct on the en~•ironmerit.
AIOW, TFIE1tG~'ORE, BE IT RE ;OLVF.D that the Anaheim Cir.y Planning
Commissiun dpes hereby denx ;tuhject Pehi~ion for VariancQ on the basis of the
aforementi~ned £indinqa.
THE F'QRCGOING t,BSOLUTION is signed anu approved by mQ this 16th
of January, 1;R9.
. ~~ ~,~~'~' ~,,~,~:i y) r'~-it~a,--.'
CHAIRWOMADj~ ANAHFIhf C'ITY ~LANNING CUhII•fISSION
~TTEST:
~ ~J~~ ~, ,~~ `~ ~ ,. ~~, ~ .
~ -+~-:--:-:t~t..•~~~--:-,% _
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITX PT~A1~N'XNG C~MMTSSION
..2-
PC89-0%
',~!'
L
~".
16, 1989, by the followzng voL•e af the members thereuf:
~YES: CO2~lI:SSYONERS: 80YDSTU~I, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, IiERBST,
MESSE, TfC BURNEY'
NOES: Cnr4MTSSiONFRS: N'ONE
ABSENT: ( rS5I0NF.RS: DOUAS
I21 'AITNESS 'WHERrOF, I hc~ve hereunto set my hatnd rhi~ 16th day oF
~Tanuary. 198y. - /,
__ ~`r~ti=" ~ ~~1.~ ~.
S~CItE~ARY, ANAHE'LM FLANNtNG COMMYS52UN
. C.~,. ~.•Y
4 1~~,;: 1:': ~ r ~,i k I~tl ~ lI,S t~ Rrfl p~1~~~ h
1 )
. ~.r' 6 ~. 1 ~ 1il~~i f~. t' t~~l'~}~~}~
. . ~ ~ :. ~~rN 4
. . ~ . ~ ~ S ll l;j~ I
~ 't~~~'~~ ~
r
ti~~.
. ~ . 1 _,~,.i
1:~
~i~;
`,!~,
,~
BTATE Or CALIFORNIA ) ,.`.~:
COUNTX OE' ORANGE ) s~ . ';X
CITY OF ANAHEIid ) ,''~
i~
I, Edith L. FIttrri~v Socretary of hhe Anr~hc~lm City Planning °
Commission, do herek+y certify that L•he faregoing resolut9.on w9s passecY xnd :!~~~:
adoptec~ a1: a maeting of the Anahoim City Planning Commistaion, hc~ld on Jxnuary
_~.
~~v:. .
re;
y~l "; ~
}/1~'~
'11v K~ i,~ . ~ . . .,
rz~ .i~ iv;.. i ~,'1.
Y7~rr'~»~~ ., ~ . . . ... . . .. ~ . • . ~
PC89-•07
~
11(~~
7'
~ /'~
~.
..` - ~~,~i7t~4f~~.
ldl~~ ~u ~ s~~i! ._.1~~_uiti,..~1t~