Resolution-PC 89-75~
Rr^~~,QLT~TIQN N0. P~H9-75
rr
}"~"'?A
A RFSOLUxI~N OF THE ANAF~EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI~N
TFZAT YET1'TION FOR VARIANCL Np. 3909 BE GRAl~1TFD
, ~ , ~<tbr~,r~,~
~. ~
,'~~ ~
~;
f l`,',
WHEREAS, ~he Anaheim CiCy Planning Comm.ission did xe~cei;-e a
verif iec~ Potition for Variano~ Erom ~+ttL'LIAM YOCHEM AND :~ORENE XOCHErS, 2Hii`
Randy A,venua, Anaheim, CA 42806, ownecs, and MOFiLER CORPORATTON, 374 1~.
Ratavia 5treet, Orange, CA 92668, agent for cerr.aiz~ real pror+er~~• situt~ted in
tk~e City of Anaheim, Count~ of Orange, S'tat~ o~ California, described as
tollows:
THE NOR:~H 120 F'EET OI' THE V~BST 180 FEI~T OE THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER 0~' THE SOUTTiWBST Qt1ARTER OF 7'EiE
SOUTHW}'sST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, IN TOiVNSFTIP 4 SOUTH,
FtANGE 9 WEST, SAI~T EtERNAEtD1N0 HASF AND M~:RI~IAN.
WHE~2EAS, the City Planning Commissian dicl hald a public heari.ng
at t:~e l:ivic Center in the City ~f Anaheim on February 27, 19$g, at 1;ga p.m.,
no~ic~ o£ said public hez-ring haviriy been duly gi~ven as requi.recl by ].aw and in
accordance with ~Yxe pxovisians of the Anaheim Municipal Code, ChapLer 18.03,
to hear an3 cons:4,d~r evidence for and against said proposed varianca and to
investigate end makn £indirigs and racommandatior~s i.n connect.3on therewithj
and said pub:ic hearing was continu4c~ to tY~Q meeting of March I.3, 1989; anii
WxEREA:.,, said Conunission, after due inspectior~, ix~vestigation
and stucly made by its~~ f, and in its behalf, and af~e~r due consideration of all
evidence and reports c~ffered aC s.~id hearang, does find and de~ec~mine the
fallowing facts:
1. Tk~aC thR petitioner rec~uests waiver of t:ze fullav;in~ to
con:truct a 2-story, 8-un.it aPartment building.
~~) S~~N 1~.: 34 ~_SZ? . o1a. - rtaXimum • r rtur al heia~.
(1-stor~~p,g,rmi d within 150 fr~ oF ~~-7x00
zoning; ~-s ri ~~io,~Qsg~ at 50 n~1~3 feet
from east and south property 1:~nes)
(B) $.F~r~IN .'~$..~s. 3 12 - Minimum st:rliCtur~:l seC}~.,a~.
~.~~xag~..Qf 2Q f~g.~ require~•~ along Rio Vista
Stre£t; AV RAG~ - af 17,5 fee~ proposed)
2. That the above-mentianed waivers are hereby granted on the basis
that there are special circ.umstances applicabl.e to the property such ~s size,
shape, topography, location and sur.roundings whzcti do not app].y ~o ot2iRr
identically xoned property in the ~ame vicinity; ~Yid that stricl applzcation
of the T,oning Code deprives the property nf p~-ivileges onjoyed by Uther
gror~~r~ies in the id~nLical zone and ala~sification in the v3 cinity.
0719r
-1~
PC89-75
:~
~
•' ,
C`~~.~
~
:1 ~~~k ~~~
i (~
(f1:~
:~.;
':.,1
''' ~1
Y:i
1' .
:ti" '
j; ;
~s
~
~ ~~~
3. That there are except5.ona1 or ox~raordinary circumstnnces or
conditior,s applicable L-o the prnperty S.nvolved or to Ghe intenc~ed use of tY~e
property that do no~ ap~ly gexiorally ta tY~e praperty or class a~ use in the
sa.rr~e vicini~y and zone.
4. ThaL the requesteci variance is necessary for t2ie preservation
and enjoymank ot a sub:tantial prop~rt~y right possessed by other ~roperty in
the same vicini.~y and zor.e, and ~denied to the prope:ty in quosi:ion.
5. ThaL• ~he requested variance wi11 not be materially detrimen~al
to the publ9.c welf are or injurious to the property or impravements 3n such
vicinity and zon~ in whi_ch the ~roperty is 7.ocated.
6. That no one in.dicated their presence at said ~urlic hearing in
appo~ition; and ~hat no corresponc;ence was received in apposition to subjsct
~etition.
~IFORNIA FI7VIRONMENT~IL QUALITY ACT. FTNUZNG: That the Anahoim
City Planning Cummissioii has reviewed the proposal ta amend the Land Usa
ElQment of the General Plan to redesignate subjeat pruperky fram Low Density~
Residentia'1 t.o Medium Density Residential, to reclassify st~.bject property
fr.om 'the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultura.l) Zone to the RM-12Q0
(Residential~ Multiple-Family) Zone and to co~as~ruct a 2-stort, 8-unit
apartment bui~ding with waiv~rs of maximum sL•ruc~ural h~ight and mini;nurn
stxuctural setback on a r~ctang+xlaray-sha~ed parcel of land congistxng of
approximately 0.3'I acre having a frontagc~ of approximately 120 feet on the
east side ~f Rio Vista Street, having a maximum dep~h o£ 150 feet, beinq
local,Qd approximat~ly 2G0 feet south o£ the center2inP of Lincoln Avenue and
further doscrihec~ as 5t72 SouCh Rio Vista Stx~eot; and does hereby ~pprove tha
Negative Dec:laration upon £inding that it has Consideroc7 the NegativQ
neclarRtion togathRr with any cc~mm~n~s recei.ved during 1:h~ ptlilliC review
proces~ ar~d fuz~ther finding on the basis of the initial stuc3y and an~
comments re~eiv~d tliat there is no suvstantic~l evidence that the project will
hav^ a siqnificant af£ect on the environmant.
NOW, THERFCOKE, BE tT P.~SOLVED that the Anatieim City Planning
C~mmissinn does hereby~ yrant sub~oct PetiLion L•or Varia:ice, upc~n tt-e
following conditions whic;h are hereby found to be a nocess,~xy prerequisite to
L-hP proposed use of the subject property in arder to ~reserve the sa.fety and
general welfara of the Citizens of the Ci~y of Anaheim:
1. ThaL• prior tt~ issuance of a builcling permit, the appropr3ate Craffia
sig.r.al assessmer~L- fee sral]. be paid to the City of Anaheim in an a-nount
as establi~Y:ed by City Council reso.lution.
2. That the existing driveway on Rio Vista Street shall be removed and
replac.ad with standard curb anQ qutter, sidewalk and 2andscaping.
3. That the driveway shall be cunshructP~3 with ton (10) foat zadius curu
returns as reguired bx the City Engineer.
4. That each ~,arking space in a garage sn.all have minimwn dimensions of ten
(10) fee~ wide ;~y twent,y (20) ~+~et deep.
_~_
PG89-~J
r
~'~
~ ;:~
~ =!s.
~: >~:
"b;;
...v =~J
~~~ ~ :~~
5. That gttte~ sht~ll n~t be 3.nstallod across the driveway 3.n a manner which
may adversely af:Eect v~t-icnlnr traf£ic i.n ~he ada~cant public stroe~.
Installr~L•ion of any gatos sh~11 conform tu Lhe Enqinoering Div3sion'~
utaiiclard P1an No. 40~ and shall bo ~uhject to ~he revie~v and aQprova.l ~f
the C.ity TratEic. Eng3ne9r.
6. .:hat subject ~roperty sha11 b~ sarvod by unciergro~ind utilitios.
7. That txash s~orago area3 sha11 ba providod e,r.d mair.tair..ed in a Iucation
acc~ptable to the Street Maintenan.ce and Sanitat.ion Division and in
~c:cordance wiCh approved plan4 on filo with said Division.
8. That prior to fina.l building ancl zoning inspections, "No pa:king for
streQt sw~~pi.n~" signs shall be installed as rRquire~! by the Stre~t
Maintenance ~nd Sanita~ion Division and in ar.cordan~o with
specifict~tionR on ffle witn said ciivision.
9. T.hat t;he x•enter o£ each reside:itial dwollinq unit ~hall be provided with
wri~ten informat3ori concerni.ng Anaheim Municip~l Code Section 14.32.500
pHrtui.ninT to "Pt~rking rQStricted tn facilitate street s~eeping". Such
written information shali clearly iadicate Whsn on-street parking is
prohibiteil a~,~a the petialty for viol~,tion.
10. Thal: prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriatA park and
recreatian in-lieu f@R3 shall be pnid to the City of AnahRim in sn
am~unt as det.ormiued by the i;it•y Council.
11. That drainage of subjoct propQr~y shal.l be dispoaed oP in ~ manner
saL-f.sfactory to thQ Cihy ~nyineer.
12. That all lockable ped~strian and vehiculAr access c3ates shall be
equfpped with a"knox box" device, if re~uired by the rire and/or Polico
De~ artments.
13. ThaC all Uir conciitioning faci2itias acid othQr rooE and gr~und mounted
equipment sha]1 be pro~,erly shieldQd from view, gnd l•he aound buffered
from ~sdjacent rosidential propertios,
14. That grior to i~siiance oP a buildinq per.mi~., evidwncc shall bg prosented
~atistactory Co the euildinq Division that the propnsed projeat i~ in
conformance with Council policy Number 542 "5ound A*.tenuation in
Rosidential Projects" anc] with Noise Yr.sulation Stanclarda spocified in
the California Administrativs~ Cocio, Titlg 25.
15. That a six (6) foot high masonry block wa11 shal'1 be conatructed and
mainCainAd Along tho north and eaat property linas, anit that an eight
(8) fout high masonry block wa]1 s:+all be constr»cted an(t maintained
a~ong thl gouth property lir.a.
16. That subjoct property ahall be developod 3ubstantitally in acc,ordance
with planss and specificakions on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Rpvision i1o. 1 of Exhi~it Nos. 1 thraugh 5= provided, howover, th:~t
masonry block walls shall bo congtructed n~ specifioC in Condition No.
15, abovc -m~i-ti~r~ed.
-3- PC89-75
' ,A
_:;~
~
~
J.7. Tha~ prior to issuanae of a building permi.t or with3n a period of one
(1) year from the dat;e ot tY~is resalution, which~ver occurs first,
Condition Nos. ~, 9, ~, 10~ 14 and 15, abovo-mentioned, shall be
com~+liad with. F.xtansf.ons Eor furthor timo L•o com~iote said condi~ions
may be grAnhed in accord~tnce with Section 18.03.090 af the Anaheim
Municii~al Code.
18. That prfor ta tint~l building and zon3ng inspections, Condition Nos. 2,
3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 16, nbove-menti.oned, ahall he c~mplS.ed wzCh.
19. Thnt approval of this applicaC3.oa constitiites appr~val of the praposed
reqiiest on2y to the extent that it complies with tha Anahei.m Muniaipal
'1•oning Gode and any othex applir.abla City regulations. Approval cloes
not include r~ny acti~n ~r .tindings as to compliance or appr~val oF the
request regarci.ing any othQr applicabl~ ord.inan~e, regulatiun or
requirement.
BE 'T FURTHEIt RGSOLVED tha~ the Anaheim City Planning Cnmmission
doQS hereby find and cietermir.e that ado~?tion af this Ytesolution ia expressly
pred3.cal:ed upon applicant'.~ compliance with raach and a11 oE tlie candi.tions
hereinabove se~ forth. Should any such condxtions, or anl part t',areof, be
declared invali.'t or un~nEorcoab~~ by the '_`inal juclqment of any aourt of
competent juris6iction, ttisr, this Resolu~_ion, an& any approvals herein
conYained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE F'QREGOING f2~SOLUTION is signed and appxove@ by me this 13'-h
day oE bfarch, 1989.
_~~. ~ ...i / !l ' f , /~ ~ /~ _ _ (.5~,,=.~~~_"~
CHAIRWOMI~N, 1}N`AHEIM CITY PI~ANNING ~OMMI~SION
:/ .
ATTEST:
~ ~ _LL~~._.~~__~
SECk2ETARY, ANAHEIM C1.LY PLI~NNING COMMISSYON
STATE OF CALTk'ORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CI~t OF ANAiIRIM j
I, Edith L. FIarri~, Secretary of the Anahcsim City Planning Commisainn,
do hereby c~rti.fy that tr.e foregoing resolution was passed and adoptod at a
meeCing of the Anahgim CiCy Planaing Commission helc: on~ March I3, 1989, by
t:~e followfuq voto ~f the membera thezouf.:
AYES: COMMTSST~NERS: BOUAS, IIOYDST~N, CAkUSILT,O, FELDFIAUS, MESSE
NOES: C02~4+lISSTQNF,RS: NOt]E
VALANT: TWO SBATS
,~;;.f.,~
`r I
IN WiTNESS WH8RE0~, I have Yier~unto sQt my hand thi~ 13th day oE
Marc.h, 1939. ~
~
_~~~ i l
SECFtETARY, ANARETM CITY PLANNING C4hQ~tISS'.ON
-4- PC89-7 5 ~' ~
'•;;~
,,,N