Resolution-PC 89-96~~'~`~
RESOI~ TI N' N~_PC~$.~_~.
~
A RESOLUT7'JN Or THE ANAHEIM GIT'Y PL7~NNING COMMISSIUN
TFTA7' 1'ETT~TON FOR ~?CLAS5IcICATION N0. 88-39-46 33E GRANTED, A5 MUD7.FIED
( ~l`f
, .~~ ,
~ `~ ~ ;..G.
`~
~ ~':~+
.;:x
~~
i
~~
WIiEREAi;, ttie AnaP~oim City P].anning (`.ommi~si.on did receivo a
verified petition Fox Lceclassif~catinn from MICHAEL~ DOUCE'~TE, P.Q. BOX 6582,
Buena Yark, CA 9U622, owner aE certain re~l property situa~ed xn the City of
Anahoim, County of t?xange, State of California, described as ~~.llaws:
LOT 122 OP' TRACT N0. 1451 AS PER MAP P.FCQI2UED TN BQOK
50, PAGES 28-29 MISCELLAIIEUUS IJAPS QF SAID CUUNTX
WHEREAu, the City Plar~ning Commisaion did hUld ~ public heari~g
at th~ Ci~~ic Center in the City of Anaheim an March 2%, 19$9 ac 1:3C p.m.,
nc~tice of said public hearii~g havinc~ be~n duly given as requirecl by law an3 in
accordance w.L-h the provisions oZ the bnaheim rcun:.cipai God~. ChaQter 18.03,
to hear and conss.der evidence £or and aga.inst saicl pruposecl reclassifir.ation
and to investigate and make finclinqs and re,co~runond~:tions in conn~cCion
therewith;, and
WHi~:REA.S, said CommissiQn, aftar due in:;pection, inv~sti~ai:ian and
s~udv ma3e by itself and in its behalf, and a£ter due consideration of all
evidence a~~d reports offered at said hearing, doos find and clotermine t:he
foliowing facts:
l. ThaC the r~eL•itioner proposes recla~siEicatlon of ~ubject
property from th~ RS-7200 (Residential, Single Famil.y) zone to tk~e CL
(Commercial, Lxmited) Zone; however, the Planning Commission determine8 that
the participants should be rc~classi£i~sd to CU (Commercial,
Office/Professional~ Zone.
2. That tho Anahcim General Plnn 8+~signates subject proporty
Eor General Commercia:l. land uses.
3. That the approved reela~sification of subject prr~par~y is
nec~ssary and/~r dQSirable for 'the ~rderly and propar dQVelopment of the
conununx ty .
~-4 4. That the approvod recla~sification o£ ~ubjec~ proper.ty daes ,;~
properly relate to th~ zones and their pe,rmittAd uses lo~~ally estabYished in
close pror.imity to aubjoct property and +co the zcae~ and their permitted uses
~' gene.ra].ly establi~hed tihroughout. the aonununity. `'
,.
~ ,~:'~ri
5. Thar the approved reclassificatiun of. subjec~ properL-y 'r~
requires tho dedi.cation of abuttir~g stceety in acc~rdance with the Circulation :~
Element of the General Plan, due to the anti~ipated increase in traffic whzch '
will be generated by the intensiEic:atioYi of land use.
i; 6. That five (5) people ~ndicated their pres~nce at said
. ,,:
-..
Qublic hearing in oppositian; and that a petition containing approximat~ly •~
eiqhtaen (13) signa~.uras in opposition to subject petition was r~ceived.
~ '•
'~=: 0759r -1-- PC89-96
:t.
,-
;,
~ ; :~
;ri 1 .. . .. .. .. .. . . .......... ~.,... ~.~.~. .,-..,.;~- .a1~~xl~vwnb{ /
~~ .. , . . . . ~ ~ ' . . ~ . . . . . . .. . .. _. ... . . ~ I ~
~•:~i';!'~ I~IRhS7
CALYFORNIA ~NVTRQNMENTAL Q^ UAL,I~y ACT _k'T~~~ That the Anaheim
Ci~ty Planning Commiss.ion has reviewod the p:ropcy~al to reclassi£y sub3ect
pruperty i'rom the RS-7200 (Residen~i~l, Single iamily) Zone to the CL
(Commercial, Limit~d) Zo:ie and to pr~rm3.t the commercial uso nf a residenL•ial
str~.~cture with waivers of maximum st;ructural height and minimwYS structural
;,e tback on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land coxisisting ~~ approxirnately
0.2 acre lecated on the :~outhwest coriier of Redwoad Avenue and State College
Buulevard, having appro~:~.mate frontago5 af 62 teet on the south si~le ot'
R~:dwood Avenue and 194 feet on the west sid~ of. State College Boulevard and
further described a~ 1945 East Redwor~d Avenue; and does hsroby approve the
Nagative Declaration upon tinding that it has considerec] the Negati~cre
Declaration together with any comments received during the public review
pro cess and £urther findiny on lize basis of i:he initial sCud~ and any
commenCs rLCeivod tria~ there i~ no substantial evidence that the project wx1.I
have a significant eff~ct on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE Tm R~SOLVED that the Anaheim City Plar~ning
Commi,ssion doos hereby grant subject Petition for Feclas;tificati~n, as
modified, and, by so doing, that 'itle 18-Zoning of the Anal~eim Munioipal
Code be amended to exc3.~:de t.ie ~bove-de~cribed proparty from ~he RS~7200
~.Residential, Single T'amily) 7one and to incorporate sr~id described prQperty
into the CO (Commercial, Oftice/ProfessionaJ.) Zone u~on the following
conditions wtiich are hereby found t~ be a n~:~essa:y prerequisite to the
proposed use of subject property in order ~a preserve the safety and gt~neral
welfaro oE the Citizens of the C.:.,r of Anak~eim:
1• That the legal owner of subject ~~roperty shall irrevocablp offer to
dedicatg to the City of Anaheim a:;trip AL lana fifty three (53) feet in
width from +:he cen.terline of the street along StaL•e College Boulevard,
including ~~iftean (7.5) foot radius corner reY.urn for street widening
purposes.
2. That prior to the ir.troducti~~n of an ordinance rezc,;zing subject property,
Condition Nn. 1, above-mantioned, sha~1 be campleted. The provis.~ons or
rights yranted by ~his ^esnlution ~hall becomR null and voxd bp acrioY~ ot
th~s Planning Commissiu:~ unless ;,~i~ conditions are compli,ed witih within
on~ year from the date of t:~is resolution, or such f~zrther time ~ts the
Planning Cornmission may qrant.
3• T}-at ap~rova~. of th3s application con~titu~es appraval of tY~e pr~posed
request ~nly to thr; ~stent that it. complies w.xi;h the Anaheim Municipal
7onir.~ Code and any otk~er appiicable Cirx regulatio;ns. Ak~proval does not
include any action or finclings as to c:ompliance or apk~rovaZ of the
request regarding any othe~r applicable ordinaiice, regulation or
requiremant.
BE IT FURTHr^,R RESOLVED that the Anah~im City Planning Co:nmission
dc~es hereby Find and de~ermir~o that adoption of this Resoluti.on is expressly
predicated upon applican~'s c.ompliar.r.e with o~ch anci all of the cond.itions
hereinabove s~t forth. Should any such conclit.ians, or any part thereoF, ~,Q
deal ared invalid ox unen£orceablc~ by the final judgmen~ of any court of
competu~it jurisdiction, ~hen t:zi~ Resolution, and ang approvals herein
contained, shall be deemad null and vofd.
-2- PC89-96
ii
,'~;.
1
J~
(F f
;it~r:a
. ., .,:~~ ~`_.:r:~r` ~P~
~.~^~~;, ~~~.~ -~~~~~
~}t'~1
~
~
~'HF. rOItEG4ING RESOLUTION is 3ignad and approv~ed by me ~hiA 27th day
o£ Marcti, ].989.
,' ii~r~• ~ ~ ~:~~~' ~~ ' ~:i ,t-•,~,~ _
CHATRWOMAN,~ ANAHEIM ClTY PY,ANNrNG COA4rlYS5ION
/~
ATT~ST;
_.__ ~ ~-•-~-- ._ ~ -~'t~,.~.,~....,
~ ~ ~ --
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITX PLANNING CODIIrlISSION
, STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
; COUNTY UI' ORANGE ) ss.
! CITY OF ANAFIRII~~ )
1
1 T. Edith L. .Iarris, Secre~tary o~ the Anak-oim City P)anning
~ Commis~ion, do hereby cortify thut the fnregoing reso2ution was pass~d and
i aduptec~ at• a meetinq of fche Anaheim City Plann3ng Commission hslcl on March 27,
; 1989, by tho following vote oi' khe meicbers thereo~:
4
t AYES: COI~fIS5IONERS: BO(TAS, BQYDSTUN,. CARUSILL,U, c^GI~DFIATJS, HERBRT,
, MC BURNEY, M~SSF.
i 270ES: CONQriISSIONEkS: NONE
ADSENT: COMMISSTONERS: N027E
J
t IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hz~vR herQUnto ~et my hand tl~is 27th day of
~ March, 19A9.
;
i `~~~~~ ~ /
1 _y~-"`.u.~ ~ 4~t~~.~
SECRETARY, ANAEIBIM CITY PLANNING COF~AiISSION
. _,.'
-3- PC89-46
n°,°rt,° y~?yt7{d~~~
s-,~}:
(i+
; ~r
~<
;~
'-:,s
,;?~a
,.,
~:
~ :.r~