Resolution-PC 89-97•~'... .....,
.,: . .~ .,-.. .~ ,/ ~~i., . ~~.. y.. .l...r~ r~'.Ri: '. 1" 1 .
. . ... ,;. . . .
- . - ~ _ ~,; 1' . . . . . . . . . . . .
~ ~
~.E~9_t~~ I 4.~~IS2.~'_c: $.4.~1_
, t -1 1 .''+ %
A 2'ESOLUTIQN OF' T.HE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG CAMMISSIqN
THAT PETITTON FOR Cf.1NDITIONAL USE PERMTT Nb. 3132 BE GRANTED
WHEItEAS, et~e Anaheim City Planning Commission did raceiua a
veriF3c~d Fetitxon for Conditional Ilsa Permit from MICHA~L DQUCETTE, P. 0. Bo;;
G582, Btiena PaCk, CA 90622, owner of cartaln ro~1 property situatc~d in thE,
City of Anaheim, Couuty of Orange, State of California, descri.bed ass
L~OT 122 OF TRAC'.: N0. 1~{51 AS PER MAP RECORDEU I~I HOOK
50, PAGES 28-29 MISCELLANGUUS MAPS 0~' SAID COUNTY.
WflER~A5, tl:e Ci~y Planning Comrnissi~n did hold a public huarinq
at the Civic Center in the City oF Anaheim on M~rch 27, ].9A9 at 1t30 p.m.,
notice of saia publir_ hearing having been duly given as required by law au8 in
accord~nce +rith the pravisi.ons of L•he Ar.ahoim Municipal Co~]o. Chapter 1s3.03,
t~ he~r and consider. evicience for and against said pro~osed ~onditional uso
parmit anc] to invastiqate and make ~inclings and rQCOmmendati.ons in eonrier,tion.
thorewith; and
WxIER~AS, 3aid Commission, after due insper,tion, inveatiqation
and study made by itself and in its hehalf, and af:ter clue consideration of all
evidenca ana reports offerod at ~ai~~i heariiig, doas find ~nd determine the
following facts:
1. That the petie.ioner reguosts approval of H Canditi~nat Use
Formit under a~~thorfty of Co1ie Secti~n 18.41.050.:130 to permit Che commercial
use of a rasidential structure wI.th waivers af the following:
( A ~ ~ E T 0 . _ 1 @., 41 ~ 4~?~.9._1= - ~X ~_ ~~~__~.4_rSL~.~~ ~.~~i~~ •
(~r~2.~..~ fP.g~ permitted;
~~f,g~ existing and proposed)
~a) ~~~r34N I_$_L4~_,__~~~~_3.Q - L~13T~~Lrl.Um.~~~~~.~12~~~•
(~0 f~~~ roquired;
Q~?~ feQC proposod)
2. Th~t the roquested waivers are herebX granted on the basis tha~
thgre aro spacial circumstancQS applict~ble to the property such as siae,
shape, tc;pogrs~phy, .locatior anii surroundings which du ndt ~pply to other
fdenCically zoned property in the same ~~icinity; and that strict ~pptication
of the Zoning Cade deprives t'he propertv of privileges en;joyod by other
propgrties in r,ha ident.ical zone and classiffcakion in the vicini~.,y.
3. That the proposed use is horeby granted on the basis that the
ucljacent artexi~l highway, State Colleqe Boulevard, is verx heavily traveled
and subjac~. prop~rry is no longer suitablc~ for rec.tdential purposes.
0755r -1- PCno •;7
':.~
r <<
~,~
~ i .' y ~,f.:
. 7~!' , _ , i ~.~ ru!(t_i °~7 ~ ~ ~ :. i~ ~.,rdp i i
. - . . - , . . . , . ~ ~ ° . . ~ , . ~r;.,f ~
M~:,:4~~; ~?~~
4. 'rhat the proZ~usecl L19Q will not advarsQly
'land uses and the growth and clevelc~pm~nt ot the area in
to be located.
I'r~. y Sl'~ f n~ A~ r ~x u~~
~ , ~'p 4~,. ~ f fV ~11w~.7P1~,Y~+~~}W~ !"~y'
~ ~ , ~~ ~
taffect th~ adjoining
wh3r,h it is prop~~ed
5. Tl~at tho siz~ and ski~pe u~ tho giLa propnsed fcr• the use i~
adequat:e to allaw the f.u11 davelopment of t.lie prnposad usd in a me.~nner not
de~crimentaa to the ~art.icular are~ nor to the p~ace, health, safe~y and
general wel£ara oL the Ci,~iz~ns of th~ City oE Anaheim.
6. That the proposed uae, as grbnL•ed, will not adver.sol;- affect the
adjoining land use~ and the gr~wkh aiid dc~veiopment of the area in whfch it .is
~roposed to be located.
7, That tho size a~d shape oL• the siL•e propos~~d for the ~:so, as
granted, is acieguate to allow the full developmont of the proposed use in d
manner not detrimen~~1 to the particular acoa nor to the peace, liealth, sataty
and goneral wglfare of the Citizens of the Cit.y of. Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Cond3tion~sl Use Pezmit under the
conditiuns 8imposed, if any, wi].1 not bc detrimental to the peacP, h~salth,
safeGy and general welfare of t.hQ Citizens of Chs City oE Anaheim.
9, T.hat the traffic generatad by the ~roposed use will not .impo~e
an unduFr burden upon the streets and highwaps dosignec~ and improved to carry
the tr.aff3c in the area.
10. ThaL• fiv~e (5) people indicated r.heir prRSC~nce at said ~ub~ic
hearing in ppposition; aiid tliat no correspondonCe was recoiv~d in ogpo~ition
to tho subject potition.
CAI,iFQ~NIA ENVt~N~~I~~.I~.._QS1.~.I, TY A ~
•.~ _.FINnIi?~s '.~ha~ thc~ Anaheim
City Planning Corr.missi.on has reviowed thc: proposal to rec;lassify subjecL-
property from the RS-7200 (Res:iden~ial, 5inqle F'~mily) 2ox~e to the CL
(Commercial, Limitea) Zone an@ to permit the commercial u~e of a rosida»tial
structuro with waiver~ of maxirt;um structural heiyht and minimum structural
se~back on an irrequtarly-shaped parcol ~f land ~consisting of approximately
0.2 acre located on the southwr~st corner o~ R9ciwond Avenue and Stato Co13~ege
~ioulevard, having approsimate fronta~;es ot G2 Feek on the south sitlo o£
Redw~~d AvQnue an3 144 feet on the wost sids of State Co]leqe Boulovard and
fu:ther describc~d as 1944 East Rodwood .~venue; anc~ dop;, 2ieraby appr~ve the
Nagative Dec::.araric•n upon f.inCiinq that it hsa considere8 thg Negative
Aeclaration togethar wiL•h zny commenCs zec;eived durin7 the publlc review
procoats and further finding on the basi~ c-f k.he 3nitfal study and any
c~mmen~s receivtsd thak there is no substa~-tfal Qvidence tha~ the project aill
h~ve a sigaiffrant effecC on L•he c;nvironment.
NOW, THEREFORE, SE JT R~SOLVE:D that the Anaheim Cii:y P.lsnning
Commi~Yion does hor~aby grant subject Petitfon for Conditional U~e Permit,
upon the followi.nq conditions ~.~hich arR horRby found L•o be a necessary
Prerequ.iaite to the pr.oposed usa o~ the subj~act property in order ~o
precequisite tq the proposed use of the subject property in order to preaerve
khe safety and yenRral wolfaro ot the Cftizons of the Gity o:E Anaheimi
-Z-
PC89-97
~,:
~~ ;
;-~~
~~~"~'1
~~
,
~
:~, ~~~
. ..;~~_.~'~
1. Tha~ prior to isauance of a hui7.ding permi~, a tra~fi.c aignal assosament
EQe 3qualinq the difference b~tween the resid~utie-1 and commerc3~1
assos9ment ~ees sha~.l be paicY to the City oE An~h~im in an amounk as
ostablished by City Counci]. rnsoluL?an.
2. That the dr3.veway shall be remov~cl ~nd/or recoiistructed a.long Stata
Ca'11age Boulevard as roquirad by tha City Enginoer rand in aac:ordance with
standard plans azxd spocifications ~n fi:~e in the 'JEfico of the City
Engineer.
3. That drainage of subject propQrty shall be da.sposeQ of in a mannor
satisFnatory to the Ci.ty Engiiieer•.
A. That sidewalks shaX1 be installad aJ.ong State Colleqo Aoulevard tn the
newly dedieafced uJ.timare .righti-o£-way, as required by the City Engineer
and i.n accordance ~with ;sl•andard plans and specifications on fi..Le in the
d.fico of tlxe C.ity Enqine~r.
5. Tt.a~ subjc~ct property shall k~o strvec3 by underground urilit.ies.
6. That the relocated garttgo shall .,n~,~ be locaCeu in the five (5) foot wido
public uti.lity easement adjacent to the south property line.
7. 'Chat tras2x 5torage are~s ~hall be provid~d and maintaina~i in a location
ac.cepta~le to the Street Mainterianc~ and Sanitation Divici~n an~d in
accordan~~e wi.th ap,proved plans ou fi:le with said Division.
8. Tkxat a].1 air conditioning facil..ities and ott~er roof and qroun~. mnunted
equipmezit shall he properly ,hielded frc-m view, and the R;,und bu£fered
from adjacent raaidential properties.
9. Thmt clua to thQ chango iri use and/or uccupanc,y of tho builc~ing, plans
shall be +~ubmitt .d to thQ ~w~iding Diviei~n showinq compliance wiL•h t:he
minimum ~tandarrlp• o~ ctie C:ity of I~naheim, including the UniEorm Builciinq,
P1»m!~,~.y, E1ecL•rical, M~cnanir.al aiid F.ire Codos as aCiopted by t~~a CiCy of
Anaheim. The appropriate permits shall be obtainod for any nec~asarx
work.
10. That tho proposal sball comply with a11 signing requirertients ~f the CG
"Cummorcic~l, Uffice/Professional" Zune, unless a variance allawing sign
waivers i.s r~pprov~3d by the City Council, Planntng Commission or 'LQning
A9ministratar.
11. That a six (6) f~ot high maso~.~ry block wa~l shall be conatructod and
maintained alonq the west p:oporty lina excepting the front sotback where
the wall hei.ght :~.ia!.1 not e:ccoed three (3! feek.
1'l. That. any }~ro~osec~ parkina area lightfng fixturag adjacgnt to any
roaiclenr.ial groperty shall be down-lighted with a maximum height of
twelve (12) ~eet. Snid lighting £ixtures ahall be directecl ~wax .Ero~n
adjacont reci~iential properr.y l.inEO to protect, the resfclantial Integri~y
O~ tit1Q Ai'B8.
,'
-3~ PC89-97
,. .':. ~
~ :"~:
~~~
~1>_~... .
~~~
, ,
13. That the on-site 'yan~9~caping ahall be mairitained in camplianr.e ~ith City
s~andards.
14. That this Conditional Use Permit is grant~d eubject to t;h~ ado~tion of
the 'Loning Ordinance in conneetioi~, with Tteclas3ifiaation No. 88-89-46,
now pPnding.
15. Tha~ subjecc property shall be dRVeloped substnntially in accordan~e with
plans az~d specific~tions on f•ile with tho Ga.L,y oE AnaYeeim marked Exhibit
Nos • 1 an~i 2 .
16. ThaC prior to commencemenr_ of tYie activity suthorize~' b~~ this rosolution,
or prior to issuance of a builcling permit, or withi.n :.- peri~d of or~e (1)
year from the date of tYiis rosolu~ion, whichover r~ccurs ~~icst, Co~.dition
Nos. 1, 9 and ~4, above-mentioneci, shall be complied wit:h. Extensions
f.or fv.rther timQ ~o comp].c~tc~ saici conditions may be gr.antNd in accordance
with Section 18.03.090 oP the Anaheim Municipal Codc~.
'17. That prior to L•he c~mmencement oi thc~ activaty authnriaed by this
resalution, or f.inal bv.zldiiig and zonir.g ~.nspections wk~ichever. occura
flrst, Condition Nos. 2 through 8, 11, 12 and 15, above-~mentioned, sh~ll
be coinptied with.
18. That appruvnl oF this appli~ntion consti.tutes appr~val of the praposed
reque~t only to the extent that iL- compliea with tha Anaheim Municipal
Zoni.ng Co~e and any c~ttier applicable City regiilations. Approval doos not
include aiiy acCion or L•indings as to compliance or approval of the
requesL• xegardinq any other applicable ord:inance, regulation or
requiremen't.
~~
~ , ,~~
~ ~; z~
~~;;
~~~
BE IT ~URTHGR RESOLVED that the Anaheim City I'lannin~g
C~mmis~zon does hereby iind and determino Chat adoprion o£ thi,~ Resolution is
expressly predicgt9d upori applicunt's compliance with each and al1 af the
condi.tians hereinabove set farth. Should any auch condi.tion, or any part
thereof, be declared xr~valid or ~xnenforceable by the final ~udgment of any
court o£ competent jurisdictior., then this Resolution, and any apprnvals
herein containe~, shall be deemed nu11 and voia.
_~_
PC89-97
'."sl
;~,
;~
,r
;;
-...._:; .~d
~'~T ,,
r, v,;:,,~~.~
~ ~ ~~~t~~ .
~ ~R ~ ~ ~t,, ~,'E.~.
; ~;; .
. . . . .~. . ''~1~
;~~
~1'?ri
. '_'''.1~~
f.~
~v
THE FQKEGOING RP;SULUTTON is aignecl and appzoved by me ~his 27icki 1~
day of March, i9gg. ~;
`..~' i'
''~ , . ~ ~ '
:_.,i ~ ~ .! r , - , :' ~i'i .t_y1_~. ,~. ~
CFiATHW6h1AN;~ ANAHEdM CITY PC,AI~INING CC~MMxSSION '~
ATTEST. S /~J r ~ ~%~/ I
l_..J ~
---_._,~.. T
SECRFTAIty',` ANAHEIM CI'f~ NING COMM , `'
ISSION ,
STAxE OF CALIFORNIA )
CGUNTY OF ORF.NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAFI~TM )
1. Edith I.. Harris, Secretary of tlie Ant~heim City Planning
Commissxon, do k~.srdby aertify th•~t th~ foregozng xesolut.ion was passed t~nd
adopt~d at a meeting of thr~ Anahelm City Planning Commissior, held on March 27,
1989, by thQ followinq vote of t~e rnemb~~rs thereof:
AXES: COMMISST4NERS; HOUAS, BOYASTUN, CAkUSIL'L,O, FELUFiAUS, HEKE'sSx,
NOES: COMMISSIONFRS: NOI3EURNEY, MESSE ~
ASSEN~: C~~lMIS~TONERS: NONE `~
1
IN WITNESS WHFREOr, I have hereunto sc~t my b.and this 27th day
oE Marr.h, 1989,
G~~ ~ ~
SECRETARY, ~.NAHEII~ CITY PLANNING CQhA4 S$ p~
-5-
~; !
t
r
PC89-97
, ;~~
. ~~ ,{~._:~ ~r'~~~,%i