Resolution-PC 90-126:r~'','•'~`~
~
E L TI~..N4~ p~Q_Q_,~
„ a RI:SC1LLtT:ION OF THE ANAH~TM CITY PI,AIv'NING COhII~iISSION
TtIAT PETIT]:ON FOR RECLASSTFICATION N0. 89_gp_56 ?~E GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City P~.anning Cummisszon did ini~iah~
, proce~edings Ecr certain r~al proparty sit~uatec' in Rer.lassif.ication
of Or.ang~, St.ate of California, described as fullows he City of Anaheim
. County
.APPROXIMATELY 2.78 ACRE~ LOCATEA OAI ~H5 EI#ST STDE OF
EUCL%D STKE~T APP~OXIMA,TELy 130 FEET SOUTFi OF ~'fiE
CENTEFtLINE OF WAKEFI~1;17 AVENUE AND FU'grH~;R n~~CRIBED
AS 192q SOU~H
EUCLrD STREE~'
V7H~:REAS, the Cihy P1~nni.n~
at rtlp Civic Center in tric~ ~it~, og An h in~onSMan dz~ hold a
no~ice of r public hearing
.,aid publiq hearin Y Zr• 1990 at 1;3p
g av~~ng been duly r,iven as required by law and in
accordance with the provi.sions of tl~e Ar~aheim Muni~ipal Cade~ p m•,
ta hear and cnnsider ovidence f.or and a Chapter 18.03,
~nd to investiga~e ~,nd make ~'indin ~ gair~st said nroposed roclessification
therewith; and g and recorrunendakions
i.n connection
l~IFiEREA5,, saad Commission
and study made by itself and in its behal:C a£~er ~ll4 in~p~ction, investigatxon
evicl~Tice ~nd reports offer~d ut ' an~ ~fter dtie consideratian
fol'lowing £acts: sa.id heari.nq, does find and determine the
1• That the Plannin
sux'j~~~ Prcperties from g ~p~rission proposed reclassifica~iun
RDf-2400 ~~e RM-12Q0 (gesiclential. Multipl~-Fami2 ~~
(Resider.tia1, Mu1tapl~._pamily) ~r a less .intense 7nne, y~ Zon~ to the
Z• T~at ~..he Anah~im Genera]. Plan designates subject ro ~
for Low-M~dium Density Re,idential l:~nd uses.
p P~r~y
propQrty for L~W_tde ium nensi~y1Residenti al ~1 nd use.
3~7 redesiynates subject
s.
~• That the proposed reclassificltion
necessar1~ and/or desirable for the ore~erl °~ subjecr r
co-nmunity• Y and r~ cr ~°Perty i;,
P P development ~f the
5~ That th~ propused rec.las;,ificatio» ~f subject ro ert
properly relate to thc~ zones ar.d their parmittecl uses locall
close pr.oximity to subject propert ~ P Y does
genorall Y and to the zones and ~hQar established in
y establishPd throughout the communiky. P~xmitted uaQs
5' Th~r no one indicated their
hearing iix ~pposition; and that no correspoxidence wasrrecRxved tinS old
to subject porition. Qublic
pposition
14~17r
-1- ~
PC90-1'l6
;;
. ~y?~,.1~>~;~
~ALIF R IA ENVIRONMC., :.:AL_~ALI~'Y A~T I~'~NDItT : xhat Lhe Anaheim City
Planning Conunissinn has rev.iew~cl the proposal ta reclasszfy subject proper~y
frum the RM-1200 (Rosidential, Multiple-I'amily) Zorie t.o thR RM-2400
(Res.idontial, Multiplo-Family) or a less i.ntense zone on propartg which
consisC~ oF approximately ?.78 acr~s locat;ed on the ~ast side oE Euc'lid StrPet
approxima~Qly ].30 feet sou~.h uf tho c~nterline of Wake'cield Avezaue and furt:~er
described as '1920 Sauth Euc:lid Street; a:id does h~raby aprrove the Negative
Dec].ai~tion upon finding tha~ it has conaidered the Negative L~oclarati.on
togethcr With any cummei~ts recei~~ed during the public review process and
further ~indirxg on the :>a~is oE the initial study and any corrunen~ s received
that thez'e is .r.o substantial avidence that ~he prr~ject wilY have a ~ igniiicazit
effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREEORE, BE IT RESOLVED thal the Anahc~am Citx Pl~z~ning
Commission does heroby grant subjac~ Petition for Recla~sifxcation and, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zonzng of tho Anaheim Municipal Code ne amendecl co
exclucle the lbove-clescribed property f:rom the RM-120~ (Rosidantial,
bfultip.le-F~mi1,y) Zone and to incorpor.ate said describ~d p~~verr,y into ttie
RM-2400 (Residential, Multiple-Fami].y) Zone upon tho £ollo~rinq condition wYlich
is heroby founc~ to be a nscessary prereqaisite to the proposed uso of subject
property in o•rder to pre~erve khe safaty and gen.eral welEare af tihe Citizeris
o£ the Ci~.y of An~heim:
7.. That introductian af ar ordinance rezoning subject pr~pert~l is
contingent upon City Council approval of Genera]. Plar~ Amendment No. 307,
no•,~ panaxng.
BG IT FUP~HSR RESOLVEU ~hat the Anaheim City Planning CommiSSion does
hereby L•ind and determine that adaption of th.is R~solution is exprecslx
predicated iipan applicant's ecmpliance witti each and a'17. af the conc~itions
here~.nabove set forth. Should any sucli conditions, or any part ttxereof, be
cieclar.od invalid ur u:ienforceable by Lhe final judgment of any court o~
~ompotont jurisdiction, thon this Resolution, and any aQprovals herein
con*ained, s2,a11 bo c3eemed nu'll and vaid.
THE FOREGOING R~SQLUTION was adoptec? at tli~ Flannin7 Commi5~ion
meatiny of May 21, Z990. /~
~~~~~
ACTING CHArRMF,N ~ `
Ai1AHEIM CITY PZ, NING COhIIyfISSION
A'PTESTf ~~_
~- .`ti~~~,~:~
_~~~-~ ~ " _
~ECR~'.~ARX. ANAFi~IM CT7'Y PLAPINING CQt~II~515SI0N
-a._ Pc9o-ia~
~ ~.~
';'~
:~~~
~.
~~
~
~w
e ,ut,~i Y , ~~
j ,.
~:r;l
~.~
STATE Ot' CALIFd~tVIA )
COIINTY OE' QRANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AN'AHEIM )
T, f d.f CY, L. li~rrl~, Secietax~y oE the Anaheim City Planning
Commisa3~n, do horeby certiiy thaL• the~ foreg~.ing resolutiian was passed and
adopr.ed ,~t a rnoetirg of the l~n~heir~ City Pl~nning CommiASian hold ~n M~y 21,
1990, by the following vote of the members therAUf:
~ AY~S: CUMMISSIbNERSt 80UAS, FGLDFfAUS, HELLYER, MC BURNBY, MESSE
.
NOFSt COMMISSIONERS: NONF
A23SENT: COMMISSIONERSs BOYD~TUN, H~;RHSx
;. IN WTTNESS WHEREOF, I hav~ horounto ~et my hand thi~ 1~ (lay
o f---y~~}"-~'" ----•-- ~ 19 9 G.
,.
` ----_.~:1s~,~_i,'i~ _~_~'~_~~.'_~'~-,r,_._.~
SECRETARY, A23AHEIM CITY PLANc1ING COMMTS~ION
-3- PC90-126
-,., ,, . .. .
..~....~;: ,,