Resolution-PC 90-15f"' ,. ~ ~
RE~.S~L~JTI N N0~ PC90_1~
A RE50LUTION OF THE ANAHEIM C;ITY PLANNItTG COMM]:SSIbN
TF~AT PETITION ~'Ok RECLASSSFTCAT:ION' N0. 89-•JO-28 D~ DENTED
WHEREA~, tho Anaheim City Planninc~ Commissiori did reaeive a
vr~rified pe~ition for Roclt~ssific.at.ion for certairi real proporty ,ituated in
t.he Ci.tx of. Anaheim, C~unty o.f prange, State of California, described as
f.ollaws:
LOTS 1 TU 17 OF TRACT Y10, 11830, AS SHOWN ON A Mz-P
RECGRllED TN BODK 590, YA,GES 14, ~5, 16 ANA 17 OF
MZSC~LLANEOUS MAI'S, RECURDS OF ORANG~, COiJNTX,
CALI C'ORNIA.
WHEREAS, Lhe City Planninq Commissic;n did hold a public hearing
al: the Civic Center in the City af Anaheim ~n Jaiiuary .15, 1990 at 1;~0 p.m.,
natice of s~.id public 2~aaring having becn duly qiven as required by 1aw and in
accordance with the provi~ions of the Anaheim Muni:.~i.•~a1 Coder Chapter 18.03,
to hear and r.on~ic3er evid~nce fox and against s~id propused reclas3xfication
and to inveskiqate and make firidiiigs and recortunendations in a~~nnech.ion
the.rewihkx; and
WH~REAS, said Commissiun, after ~ue inspoct:lon, invQ~tigation
and study made ny itself aud in ii:s behalf, and after due considexation of all
evidence and reparts affered at said hear.ing, does find ai:d determine the
£olloking ~ar.ks:
1. That the pctitionor pro~oses reclasaiE.ir.ation of subject
property from tho 12M-1Q00 (TtesidenY.ial, Mu7.tiplr,•-Fami'ly) Zone tp the ML
(Industrial, Limited) Zone.
2. That t.he Anaheim ~eneral i':lan designatss subj~ct property
L•~r Medium Density Residenrial land uses; and that General Plan Amendmenc
No. 2%G, considered concurrently wit~ subject r~cxassificati~n ;o change t~c
land use aesignaL•ion to Geiieral Jndustrial was r~enied by the Planiu ng
Comrni~:aion; and, Cherofore, t;hP proposecl rea~assifir.ai:ion would be
inconsistent wa.kh the Generml Plan.
3. That the proposed reclassi.ficar~on of subject propert~~ 3.s
not n~ces:tary nor iiesirab].~ for tha orderiy and prop~L• developmont of the
community.
12 4 3 r -1- ._..pE- ~y f3~-l.4-
PC 90-t5
~ „ s-
N" '
. ~A .. ,
,~r:ti;;.ty ~r,;,~t?!~
4. That the pxapuyed reclassi.fication pf: subjoct property does
not propex~ly rel~te ~o the ~ones and chei.f: pormitted us~s 1oca11y astsblishad
in closo nroximity ~o subject pxoperty and to the zones and their pRrmittod
uses generally ostnblishQd tlirdughout th~.~ communiF.y.
5. That the proposed reclassification is denied on the basis
t:hat it is c~nsidered to bo "spot zoniiig", since the closest industrial
properly is l~cat~d approximately twa mile~ to the northeast in the vic:initx
uf the interser.tioz~ of Magnolia Avanue and La Palma Avenue.
6. That approximately sixty-fiv.- (~5) paople indicateci their
presence at said public hearinq in opposi.tion; and that a petition coni:a.i.ning
approximateiy iorty-sevan signatiures was received in opposition to subject
~eL-itior~.
~ALTFQRNIA,~ENVIR~f NMEN?;l~_'L OUAI,TTY A~T , FINDINGS: Wherea5, the
Planning Commission after reviewing draft ETR 23~. 'l95 a].ong with ~vidence,
both written ancl oral, presented t~ supplement this documQn~, dae~ find and
determin~ that there arQ ~ertain ~ignit~cant unavoidab3e adverse impacts to
tho public's health and sa£et~, inhPrent in thi.s use, or. this site, which
cannot ~e mi.tigatecl to a level of insignificpnce and wh.i.ch are riot acceptable
due to averr.iding con~~.derations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL'V~:D that the Anaheim City Plailning
Commission does hereby denx Pe~ition for keclassification on thQ basis of the
afnrementianed £indings.
THE E'ORE(;OING RESOLU'T.IO~T was adopted at Che Pla.nniny Cr~runis~ion
meeting of Janudry 15, '1990.
, ~ ~.
~-- -_~, ,,,,G': J ; ~, ~t ~~ ~ ~_\ ~ .
GHAI MAI~i, AI3AIiEI CITY P'LANNIlJG COMMISSiON
ATTEST:
,
,' . ,
/.~%~ '"~ / ~ ~.. ~ ' ' ~. - ~_ ~_ _.
AC1'TNf; SECF.ETARY, ANA.HF~7M CITY 1'LANNITIG COt~4~tISSION
i
/
STAT~ OF CALIP'ORNTA )
COUNT'Y OF ORAN(3E ) ss.
C]:TY OF ANAHEib1 )
-2- pr ~J-? 5
~ 'n
ti~:ta
Fr:. ,,
Y, .1ano~c L~. ,1Qnsen, Actinc~ Secre~ary ut the~ Anah~im City Acting
Planrcing Cc,mmission, clo herebl certiEy tht~t the foz•e•Yoi,ng resolution wau
pa~sQd ~nd aClophoci at a meeting oL the Ar~ahQim City Planning (;ommiss,ion }»ld
ois .Tan~iary 15, 1990, by tt~e followinq vc~te uf th~ mombors tli~reof;
AYES: CO2~fIaSI0NER5: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, f ELDFIi1US, HEL~YF:R~ NERBST~
MC DUF2NEY, MESSE
l~OES: COMMISSIOi3ERS: NC~HC
AEiSENT: COhII/.3:SStOtd~RS: NOhY:
IN 'AITNESS WHER~OF, I havc hercunto set my hand thig _,% ~
uf __~_._~_;.__.__ ___~.~ 1990. --__,__.~~_ day
ACTING S~CRETARY, 1-lIAHETM CTTY PLi\NidIlIG COMMISSION
_;~ _
PC 90-15