Resolution-PC 90-153.. .. . . . ; i', ~ ~ - i w:~~
~ ~''\
RE~OLUT~ti_NQ~ P:q~.~.
A RCSOLUTION OF TFIE 1~.tJAHEIM CiTY PLANNIN,r, CQMMISSION
TH~T PETT~'I~N FOR kGCLASSIFTC.ATION N0, f39-^4-50 BE DENTED
WHE22EAS, tY:e Anaheim C:.i:y Planning Comrnission did recelve a
~verified pet~itiozi ~or R~class:IL•IcaCion for cortain rer~l propArty situated in
the City of Anaheim, Coixnty oF Oranc~e, Sta.te of• Cala.fornia, desaribQd as
•f•olYows:
PAkCEL 2, .IN TFiE CTTY OF ANAFiETM, COUNTY Gk ORi1NGE,
STATS CIF CALIF'Okt1TA, AS PER Ml~P FILED I:N t300K 107,
PA~LS 36 11ND 37 OF PARCLL MAPS, IN TFIE OFFIC~ OF T~i~
C:OUNTY RrCOkDFR OF SAID C~UNTY,
AND
TF~E WEST 200. 00 k EET CF T~OT 1 Ib' HY,pCK A OF TRACT N0.
13, IN '1HE CTTY OF AN~~~EiEIM, COUNTY OE' QRArIGE, STATR
OF CALIFORNIA, AS P~R MAP RECORDBD II3 Bppl~ g, p~G$ 12
OF MISCELLANEOUu PQAPS, TN TfIE OT'FICE OI' THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTI'.
EXCENT TFI~ NORTH 286.00 FEE'T THE~tEOF.
AI,SC r^,XCEPT THA:r PORTIOPt WITHIN THE EI~;iT 197.00 FEET
O.F' TFTE SQ[1Tfi 320.00 FEET OF SAID .LOT.
AND
THE SOU7'H 400.00 F~ET OF THE tiORTH 436.00 FEET Or LOT
~ zN BLOCK A OE' TRACr N0. 13, IN THE C:ITX OF AITAHEIM,
COUNTI' QF ORANGE, STATE OF CALlFI~RNIA, AS PER MAP
REC012DEU IN i300~C 9, PAGE 12 OF' MISCET.Ll~NE0U8 M1~PS, IN
THF QFFICE OF THE COUNTY fi6'CORAER GF SAID COiJNTY.
WFiEREAS, tho City Planriing Commis~ion did raold a public; haaring
~t Y.he Civic Cenkor in the City af Anaheim c~n March ?6, 1990 at 1;30 p.m.,
not3ce ot ~aid public hearing having bQOn duly giver~ as roqu.ired by l~w and in
acr_prdaiice with the pru~isions oE the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,~3,
Lo hear and consider evidence for and ayainst: said proposed xeclas::ific~tion
and L•o investigate aild make £indi.ngs and rscammen3ations in connection
the.re•with; and that said public tiearing was c;ontinued to the Apr.il 23 and JunE
18, 1990, Planninq Commission meetings; and
WfIrREAS, saici Cammission, aEter due inspection, investiyation
and study mad~ by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and regarts offered at said hearing, doQS £:tnd a~id aaterrnine tho
fo].lowinq facts:
,~
1993r _1_
PC9U-153
+~ f~;5:,
.. ~'uy^r.~
,? ~
1, xhdt the peCitioner pi•o~~asQS ~~classi~ication of subject
prop~rly as fo]lows:
The souY.lxer.ly and easterly Portian "~." 3.2 acres from the PD-C
(Parkirig I)istrict-Commercial) Zon~ L-o tk~e 2tM-1200 (Kesid~nCial,
Multip:lt~-•Family) ~r a less inrense xone,.
The northwesterly Portion "&" 3.27 acre9 .fram ttxe CL
(CocnniQrcial, Limited) 'Lono i:o the RM--1200 (Residentia].,
Mult.iple-Family) ar a l~ss intenso zorie.
2. That ~he Ar.ahoim Genaral Plan de~zgnates subject proper*y
for General Cnmmercial, Low D~nsity RosidEntial, and 1G~~w-Madium DQnsity
Residential land usc;s; ~nd that General Pian Amendment No. 297 propasing to
change the land usc~ desiqnation t.o Mediurn Density Residentiat was denied by
the Planning Commission on June :la, 1990.
3. That tbe proposed reclassificaLion of subject ~roperty is
not necessar~• nor desirable for Lhe ordeily and. proper d~val~pment nf tho
communiCy.
4. ThnC the proposed reciassif.icatior~ of subject proper~y does
not properly relate to t.he zones and their pe.rmittQd u~os locally esCablishe3
in close proximit~y to subject prop~rhy and to the ~ones and their permitted
uses generally established throuqhout the comrnunity.
5. That 8 people indicat~d ttieir presence at sazd public
hearing in op~osirion.
~AL1F RQ 11IA ENV1RQt~ME. NTAL_ UALITI' ACT FINDIN~: That th~e Anaheim
City Planning Commissi~n has revievred the nro~osal to reclassify subject
~roporty, consi~t•inq of ?ortion "A" (3.2 acres) from the PU-C (Parking
District-Commercial) Zoz-r. to the RM-1200 (Residential, :~u3tiple-F~mi3.y) Z~ne
anc~ Portion "B" (3.27 acres) fzom the CL (Corunercia], Limited) Zone to tYxe
RM-120U (Residenti.al, Multi~le-Family) 2one, to permit construction of a
3-•story, 226-unit deck-r_ypa aparL•cnent complex with waivor of minimum
landsc~pe setback o:n an irragularly-snapad parcel of laud cohsisting af
approximately 6.47 acres ha~ing a frontage of aprroximately 353 fPar, on the
south side of L~inroln Avenue, ha~~ing a maximum depth nf approximately 600
fest, being located approximate~.y ~02 feeL• k~z~t of the centerline of Empire
Street and further described as 2144 West Lin.:o].n Avenue; anG does herob~y
d.isapprove thQ Negative Declar•,~~ion upon find,ing that it has consiiiered the
Nega~ive Declarati~n together wi.th ar~y corruneiits received ~luring the pub'! ic
review process and further finding oYi the basis of the i.nitial study and a.ny
cnnunents racei~red that there is subs~antial ~vidence that tho pr~ject will
have+ a s~.gnificar.t ef[~ct on t.he environment.
=' _~_ PC90-la3
~r;~.
;r' ~
;:. ~
;. ;
,~:
,..i
. ' .. . . . , . .. . )I~ ~ (~,'.~~ ':1,F~.
Iti~J`t1i'^1
~ ~ ~~}1it.~.
~ NOW, TFi~REFORE, liE IT RESOL~EU that the Anah~eim City Flannin
Commiss.ion doe~ hereby denp pAti~;zo.n for Reclassifacation on tho basis of th~
aforementioned ~indings, g
~
THE FOREGOTNG RESOLU:I'ION was adoptefl at the Planning Commission
meeting of. Jux~e 1~, 1990.
/;" / .~
-` '~:G•~~-~-- I "~/~ ~ `1~- ; -
CHAIRbIAN, ANAHEI ~ITY PLANN~NG COMMT g N
ATTEST:
` K'~i~~~~/1/LC..t~
-~----~-._..
SECRETAZ2Y. AN1~FiEIM CTTY~PLANN CGT OIG MMISSION
S'I'ATE Ok CALIFORNIA )
C4UNTX OF ORAN'GE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAH~IM ~
I. Edith I.. Harris ~'
Commiss.~on, do herAb • JOCr~~ary of the Anaheim City Planziing
1990 b pdssed and
`~a~p~e~ a~ ~ m~etingYof ethe An h im City [~~anri g Commilsion~held on a'
Y the Eollowing votQ uf. khe -nembers thereo~: une 18,
AYES: COMMISSTONERS: f3QYDSTI7N, F~LDFZAUS, HELLXFR, HI;RBST, tQUSSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS; BOUAS
A13SCNT: COMMTSSIONEHS: 2QC $URNEY
IN WTTN$Sa WHER~QF, T have hereunto sat my hand thia _~O ~
ciay of
-.----. I9 90 .
~ ._._ G~--~~==-"-QJ ~' .
S~CFETARY, ,~;.~;ETM~--~~~_`
PLA.I~NING COMMISSION
:r;.•
.'S,i;':~.
Of • , ,
-3-
k'C90-153
- _.,
t
~'.
;,
,
J, .,
~..
<~ t.r.
i ~t`
~;S
~ :~