Resolution-PC 90-156, .. ~
RE..~S(~I~iJTIQN NQe_.p~.~Q.-iS-~
A R~SOLUTION OF `rHE At1AHEIN~ C'tTX FLANNING COMMIS51'OPi
ANIEPIDING CERTAIti CONDITIONS OF aPPRUVAL OF
~AkIANCE N0. 3956
WEIEREA~, on May 22, 1989, tho P'lanning Commissi.on ~7x'anted
Variance Nu. 39-`~6. under. Kes~l ubdivispon~' toy construct WGW~e (Z)~ si qle familx
L•rontage to esL•ablish a 3 lot s
ho:nes ~t 1421 W. Crone Av~riue.
FI~IEREAS, Conciition No. 9 oE Reso.lution No. PC89-1~}3 reqilirsd
subject properry ro be developed substantially in confurmancQ with Exhibit No.
1 which shawect single-st;ory structures; and
WFiER2;AS, the potiti~ner has requasterl amendmont ~~ ~~ ns ~and
rto, g~pertaining to deve].opmen~ substantiaJ.ly in accor.clar•EXhib~.thNo. 1) and
specificat.`on~ on file with the City of Anaheim mazY.ed a.
has suhmitt~cl ~lans labeled Revision 110. 1 for two-story struc~urt~s with
Yieights at 2L` fo~t% and
WHERLAS, tlie Ci~y ~~anning Commi.ssion did ha.ld a puL .. hearing at
m „ notice
1990 at 1:3 p•
the Civic Center in t.he City of Aziaheim ozi Ju.ne 7.8, ~
iven as required by law and in
Chaptei 16.03,
oi said public hearinq haviiig buen duly y
accord.2xice with the provi.sions of: the A~iat~eim btunicip~~~ osed vari:~nca and to
to hear and consider avider.r.e Por arid a~ai:~st sa..d p P
investigatQ and make finding:~ and t~c~mmendations in connectian therowith; and
WHERGAS, sai6 Commissia ha7.f ~tand a ftor due ccon~.idAracionlof.~a11
and studr made by i.tself aud zu iCs bo
evidence and reporL-~ af£er.ed at said YiQaring, does fin~a and riotarmine thQ
following fac~s:
~,. Tn~t the de~w1twoQStory s a u~.t ares rwith~ ~ max mum height
(RS-7200) oC subject property a
limi't of 35 fe~t.
2, That an existinq ~wo-storY structure borders subject
property on the easL- side.
3, That no one ~indicated their pzesenc;~ at said public hearing
in oppositiun; ~nd t•1-aL• no corresponder~ce waa recoived in opposition to the
subjec:r_ petiti~in.
N FN L t AGT.Tz1_' A~T FINA]~: That the Anaheim C~t•Y
~AL~~S?RPIIA ~N_~1I~i9--'~L:.~~---Qt__~. roval
Ylanning Co~mnission ha3 roviewei. the propo~al to amsnc? conditions of app
perta.i.ning to ccnsL• ruction i housesQ anis doos1hQroby~determinQ ~~.h~L tit1etNngative
houses instead of otle-story ~nal approval of ~his
DQClaraLion approved iri conjunction with the orig
Variance is adaquate to serve 3s ellvironmental documentatioti in connection
with this roquest.
PC90-15b
-1-
1h96r
~ .:i,~
k~~;,
.- . It'i1~Vy1
NOW, THEREFORE, E3E IT TtESOLVEf~ Chat~ the Ar,aheim City Planning
Commission does herr~b,y amend Condi~ian o£• Approval No. ~ af: R~solution Na.
F~C09-].43 of Variance tTo. 395G based on t2ie foregoinq Eindings to read as
folloivs :
~. ~
a:
"4. That 3ubject proi:erty shall be devc~loped :~Ubstanti~].ly in ~acordanco
wirh plans uiid specifications subinittor~ to the City of Anaheim by the
petitianor and rTi~ich plans arca on F.ile with tho Planning Department
marked Revisi~n No. 1 of Exhibit No, 1, anfl ExhibiY. Nos. 2 through ~a."
THE FOREGO'Ir'G RES~LUTION was adoptecl at tfiQ PJ.anning Commiasion
~
meeting of June tf3, 1990. ~~ ,'\ /
, _.., ' . -~ ~ ,G~' l
~ ~~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ -- "'i, , i l > L;,
~__.]:z.~L._t.. -- t ~ , ',• ~_~v~ i~'
CIIAIRMAN, ANAHEI ', CITY PI,l~NNING CUMMISSION
ATxEST: 7
~.:~~ _.~ '~'~.~,~~ ----
SECRE'CAkY, ANAH~T.M CITX PLANNING COb4~!ISSI4N
STl.TE ~I' CALIFORIZIA
COUNTY ~F ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANI~HEIM )
I, Edith L. Hsrris, Sec:retary o£ Lhe Anahe:i.m City P'lanning
C4mmi:-s.ion, do hereby certify t.hat the forogoing resolution Kr~s passed and
adopte3 ~t a m~eting of tho Anaheim City Planning Commissiozi :~e~d on ,7une 18,
1990, r~y the following voto of the membor~ t2iereaf:
AYES: I:OMMISSIONERS: flO1DSTUN, BOUItS, I'ELDHAUu, H~;LLXER, FiER~RT,
MESSF
NQES: (:OMMISSION~RS: NONE
ABSENT: COi~fIS5I0PIERS: MC HURNBY
t WITNES5 WHEREOF, T have herQUnto set my hand thi~ 1~ ~'^'~ day
of .`. 199Q.
c ___ -_ ____ ~ L~' _ ~ =_.~#~~----....._
SECRE'PARX, ANI~H~IM CITY PLANNIVG COh4y1ISSI0N
~ ~~~
i i{
~~, -2- PC90-1',6