Resolution-PC 90-163~
~E,^,, LUTT~QN T70~ P~0-•163
A~
~
A k2FSOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY kLANNZNG C~hII~tISS~:ON
THAT P~TITION FGR R~CLASSII'ICATION N0. 40-91-U1 BE GR.ANT,ED
taliEkEAS, the Anaheim City P:lann3.n5 Commission did receiva a
verified p~ti~ion for 12QClassificatiun £or cez•ta.in rea7. pruperty si~uated in
L-he City of Anah~im, County of Orange, Stat~ of California., descr.i.hed as
,, iollows:
' ALL THAT R~AL PROPI.;RTX BEING TiiE SOUTHEk2LY 255.87
F~F.T OI' THE EASTERLY 100 , 00 F~ET ()F 7'F3AT PORTION OF
LOT 7 IN' E3LUC.K 17 OF A" SUDDIVISTON OF TIiE SOL*TH
HAI'~F OF u~CTION 21, Z'OWNSIIIP 4 SOUTFi, 1tANGE lU t~EST,
SAN IIER.NARbINO BAS~ AND MERiLIAN", AS SHOWN ON A M1aP
RECORDED I27 BOOK l, PAGE 33, MISCELL~AN~OUS MAPS,
RECORAS OF SAID ORANGF' CO'UNTX, DESCRTBED TaS FOLLOWS:
'
BEGTNNING AT A POINT ON THG SOUTH LINE OF SA.TD LOT &,
SUTJTH 89° 5'_' 10" E;AST 394.40 FEE~ FROFd THE; SOUTH!VGST
CORNER THEREOF, SAIU PQINT BETNG THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE LAND CONV~YED TO WTC,LIAM L. FARROW AND WIFE,
BY DEED RECORDEU FEBRi1ARY 27, 1948 IN BOOK 1620, PAGE
497, OFFICTAL R~CORDS; TH~NC~ NOFTH 0° 33' 10" EAST
ALONG THC F.AST LINr OF SAID LAND CONVEY~D TO WILLIAM
L. FARROW AND WIFE, 36E3.87 FEET; TfiF,~ICE SOUTH $9° 33'
10" WEST 364.87 FGET TO A POINT ~N THG SOUTf~ LTN~ 0~'
SATB LOT; THENCS NORTIi 89° 51.' 10" ~IEST ALUNG SAIA
SOti'PH I~TNF, 12Q E'EF.T TO THE POIN'.C OF HEGINNING.
EXCF.PTING THER~ FRUM THE SOU~.Cfi 6~.00 I'E~:T TNCLUDED
WITHIN KATELLA AVENU~.
A PORTION OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 17 OF A SUBDIVISION UF
TF;E SOUTH HALF Ur SECTION 21 IN T04VNSHIP 4 SOUTH
RAIJGE 10 WES`T, I~I '?'FiE CTT`1 OF ANAFi~IM, TN TfIE RAIZCHO
LAS BOLSAS, R~CORDGU IN BOOK 51., PAGL 7 ~,Np
FOL~LOWING, MISCELL'ANEOLTS b1AY~, RECORDS OF SAIL ORANGT
COUNTY, AS SHOWN ON ?1 MAP THEREOI' RECORDEU IN BOOK 1,
PAGE 33; MISCELL:\i1E0iJS MAr'S, REL'ORDS OF SAID COUNTY,
DESCkIf3ED AS FqLLOW5:
BEGINNING AT T'HE SUUTHW~ST CORtdER 0~' SAIU LCT 7;
TFfE:1CE NORTH 0 DEG. 90' 20" EAST 669.60 FEE2 ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF SATD LOT TO TFIE NORT.HWEST COR~'ER
!'HEHEOF; THENCP, SOUTfI 89 DEG, 43' 50" EAST 339.00
EFET ALONC~ THL NORTH LINE OF :iAID T~OT; THFN^_F SOiJTH 0
DEG. 33' '_U" WEST 668,a7 FE~T TOT ',fH^c SOUTH LTN~ Or
SAID GOT 7; THENCF NURxH $9 DEG. 51' 10" W~:ST 34p.40
FEF.T ALONr SATll SOUTH LINE TO THE PCITNT (~F HEGTtI1~ING.
EXCEPT 1FIE W~ST. 150.00 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPT '1'Fi~' NORTH 300.00 FEET THEREOF.
1512r
_1_
PC90-163
~~s
~
WHEREAS, the City Planninc~ Commission did hol~l a public hearinq
at the Civic CentQr in tha City of Anahei.m on July 2, 1990 at 1:30 ~.m.,
noti.ce o~ said public hearit~g havinq heen du'ly given as required by law and in
accordance with. the ~rovisinns o~ the Anaheim Muniripal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and c~nsider evid~nce for and against saicl pr~posed reclassiEication
and to invusLigate and make finclings and re~commeridations in eonnoc:~~ion
l:hQrewith; and
WHER~AS, said Commis~io,l, after ciue in~pection, invostigai:ion
anc~ study made by itself anci in its behalf, and afte~.' due consideration of a11
evidenae and regorts oftered at said hea.rin.g, doQS find and dete:rmine the
£ollowing fEacts:
1. That rha ~etitioner propo~~s rr~classification of the
easterly O.fl6-acre porti.on oP subject ~roperty from the CL (Cummercial,
Limite3) to tha k2M-240Q (Residential, Multiple-Family) or a less intensc~ xone.
2, Th~L- the Analieim Genera7. F'Jan currently designates subjecC
prnperty for Commereia.l Pr~fessional lancl usos. Howover, General Plan
NnenclmQnt No. 312, appruved by the Plar ~.z~~ Gommissio;~ in r,anjunct.ion wiL•h
subjec~ raquest, recommendpd redesignation to Low-Medium Density Fesidonti.al.
3. 'I'hat Y.he propo,sed r.oclassificatian o~ subject proper.ty xs
necossa;~y and/or desir.able £or the orderly and prop~r deve.lopment ~f the
community.
4. That the proposed reclassifi.aation of subject ~roperty does
~roperly rt~late ~o the zones and their pez'mitted use~ loct~lly RsL-ablished ixi
close proa:i.mity to subject pro~erty and to the zones and their pormitted uses
qenoraJ.ly astablishe d throughout the corrununity.
5. That one persori indzcated his presence at said public
he~ring in opposition; ar,:l that. rio rorrespondsnce ~~ras received in opposition
to subject petit~on.
~~I,IF~RNIA GNVIRONMLN'rAL , t~TALI'rY, A~T FINDT,N~: That the Anaheim
Citx Planning Comm ission has re~iewed L•h~ proposal to reclassiPy properrty
from the CL (Commorcial, Limited) t~n the RM-2A00 (Resi~3entaal,
Multiple-Farriilj) or a le:,a intens~ zone t.o constr.uct a 2-stnry, 40-uniL-
(previously approved L•or 24 uriits) condominium complex on the entire
2.21-acre property ~~ith waivers of. maximum structuraJ. height ~ith3n 2~0,
minimum Rec.reational/Leisure Area, requirQd lsndscaped buffer adjaoent to
single-family i•~sidence, and minimum distanco between ~uildings on a
rectsngularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of appro~ximatel~ 2.21 acres
having 3 frontage of. approximately 340 feet un the north side of Katella
Avanue having a maximum depth o~ approximately 309 feet r~nd being lnaated
approximately 314 f eet east of the center.line of Carnplian Street and further
descr•ibed as 1575 West Kakella Avenue; and does hez•eby apnrove tho Nega~ive
DQClarai:ion upon f inding that it has considerod the Negatxve neclaration
together with any comments received during tY~e Public review process and
-2- PC90-163
;!:' t{.i~
i~;
,
~~ ; ~ ~' ~
_ . . . . . . ~ . . ~ .. . ~i;1~rr]~.~
R ;d.:,1
~-.P.~
Further tii~ding on the basl~ o~ tl~e in.iriH..l study a„ci any commants receivecl
that there is no ~ubstant.l~l evidenco tLat the proj~ct wili 2:ave a
siqniFicant effc~ct on tho o:ivirorimE~r.t.
NOW, 'PkIh:RRF'pltE, EtE IT RL•'SOLVED that the Ai~ahoim City Flanninc~
C.cmmission cl~~a horeby c~rnnt: subjecL P~3CiCion for Reclassification and, by so
doinq, tt~a~ Titl~ 18-'Loni.ny of ll~e Ai~~heim Muiiicip~l Code ba amnnded k~
exclude the above-descr.ibed ~„•~Perty f.rorn tbe C~, (Commorc.ial, Limito~) Zono
and to incorp~rate said describel proporCy inCo tho RM-'L900 (Residential,
Multip2o-Fami]I•) 7.c~n~ upon ~~3E? following conditfans which are hereby found to
ue a nPCQSSary prorequisito to th~ ~ropoadd usF of subject property in order
r,c preservo the ~afQty and gen~ra; walfare o[ cY,e CiCi•aens of tho Ciky of
Anahcim;
1. * Th~+~ .~ ;;,.~P L'o record the d.ivi;;iun of subject property sh~ll be submitted
to and approved by ~hs City af Anaheim and Chen he recozded in the Office
~f the Orang~ County Record~~r.
2. "'1'hat tho legal cwne: of subjocr pr~per.t}• shall dedic~Co te ~hs City of
Aciaheim an oaseme,it fiv~ (S) rect in w.i.dth along the ~iorth kroporty lino
tor public utilit}• ~urposr.s.
3. Thnt an unsuhordinatPd covenant sh~ll be recorded with the Office of the
Uran~e Counly Recordor ayr.oeing to provida the buyor of each ciwe2l.ing
unit wi~ch writ~en irifarmation obtained from the schoo~ dis~rlct(s)
pertaini~~g to possiblo ovarcrowdod conditions and bu~ing status ~f the
~chool(s) sQrvinq the dwelling unit. A c:opy of the covanant shall bc-
submitted to and approve~ by t:ie City Attornuy p:ior to rocordation. A
copy of [hQ recordP:i ~ovenant shall be submittecl to the Zoning Division.
4• ~I~aL prior t~ the iiitroduction of an ordinancg rot~ninq nnbject property,
a preliminary tit1Q reporr_ sha21 be furnished to the Z~ning Div.ision
show:ng the lega], vestir:g ot titl~, a leyal ctescripr_ion and conCaining a
map of the pr~pex•Cy,
5~ * That completion of r_'~ese reclassiticat:~on proceeclings is con~ingQnt upon
City Council ~pprov~l oE Cenera2 Plan 1~mendment ito. 312.
6. That prior t~ intr~du,:tion ot an orc'tinance rezoni»g subject property,
Cor.lit:on Nos. 1 L•hroagh 5, nbova-mentionrd, ~;hall be completed. Tho
prov:.sions or rig}~~4 yC';jntQd by ttiis rvsolution shall become null tsnd
void by acr.iof- of the Pl~nninq C~mmis~ion unles~ said .:onditions ere
compli.ed xith within ono !1) vear. from the date of 'r.his re3olutioa, or
such fur.ther time ~s the P]anr.i»g Comnissfon may qrant•.
~• * That apgc~~~al o!. t}lis applic~.tion ccn~tituL•QS approval af tho proposod
requpat only t:o the extent ~hat it r.omplS~es wfth the Anahairo ~Iunicipal
7.oning Code anc] any other a~plir_ab1Q Cit_-, Se~~e and Eedvral
requlati~ns. ~lpprova2 does not Include any actic~n ~r E.indSn~;s as ta
PC90-~163
•...~ 1.1'~,~r I
~
~~
~
com;~liFxncc~ ~r approv~l of Che renue.t regarding any o+:hc~r applicablo
ori~linanea, rcgulation or sec;uiremant, Ccnclitions maxkeci w.ith an xstorisk
(*) are roquirod by e~~.abl:shQd laws, codeo, reg~ilations ancl agre~monr_~
and t~ro, th~reforo, nol• subjer.t ~o neqotitit~.on.
IIF I'P FURTHER RESOL~V~:A that the Anahoim Citl Plflnninq Commisaiun does
herariy Etnd And detarmine that adopt:ion of thi~ Resolution is exprossly
predict~tad upon applicanh's compli~an:.~o with each a»d a17 oF tt~c~ conditi~ns
hereinabovo set forth. Sh~uld any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
clecla:ocl invnl3d or unantorceabJ.u by tlie T:inal judgment of t-ny c:ourt oE
cornpetent juri saic.tion, Y.hr~n L}iis R~soluti on, anil any ~pprovals hera~n
contain.acl, shall bo deemQd nul~ and v~id.
T:IE F'OREGOII~G RESOL~lTI.O~T was adopt~d at: the Planning Commission mec~ting
of July 2, 1~9n. ,;),•
! /;/ ~-~ ,, ~.~.- .
~' l./i~~,Ii ~L.•1~~ /"z~.c r~,2.('i.~,~;.:
- ------~--- -~_ -. _
CHAxRP70t~.AN, ANAHEIM CITY PLAHNYHC COMMISSION
ATTEST: /J. , ~ i `
~j, ~
, ~
,
C r ,~~ _..~_--
_ ~. ~ ~_ -~ ~ ~._
SECRETA~2Y, ANAHEIN CITY FL~I~Nt7ING CU.'yIIdI5SI0N
S';'ATE OF CALIFOFct~IA )
COLINTY OF ORI~tiGE ) ss .
CITX OF AHI~FIEIM )
I, Edith G. flarris, Secretarv cf the An~heim City Plxnninq Commiyaion, da
hereby certify that the forogoing res~lution was passed and adonted al• a
meot.inq flf tha I-naheim City Planr.inq Co-nmission held on July 2, '.~90, by tht~
followinq voL•e of the members thoreof:
AYES: COh4QISSIOlJERS: BUYD:iTUN, BOUA,~'i, FELDE~AU:;, HELLYER,
MC B(JRt1EY, AtESSE
:.,.cS: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AflSENT: COM'dISSI02iERS: HERBST
of -•~ -----, 1990.
( ` ~ ~--~ , .,~ % ~
------~'~ ~~'~~ ~-_~ _ -
StiCRETARY, AtJAN~IM CITY PT,ANNING CdN4dISSION
N WITNESS WHGRECF, I~i~ve htreunt~ set my hand tTi'.s ,~,~'__ ~aY
._q_ pC9G-163
~~~