Resolution-PC 90-191. , It :..~~~.
1
~
~ F• or~u~.r r orr_ rro . i~ ~~i~~
A RESOLUTTON OF TEI~ ATIAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMM7SSI()23
TIi,AT PETITION FOR VARTANCE N0. 4072 BE Gi2AN'i:ED, iN 'c'ART
WFIBftiAS, tho Anaheim (:a.tx Planning Commi.ssi~ did rec.ei~rca a
verifi~d Pel.ition for Variance f~r certain real pro~p~rty .cit~uated in th~ City
af Anaheim, Caunry of Urange, 5taL•a of Calif.~rnia described as:
PARC:EL 1: THAT PpRTIUN OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 4
SQtJTH, RA.*I~E 1G WFS:i', TN THE RANCHO SAN JL'AN CAJON DE
SAI~'~A ANA, IN 7:AE CTTY OF ANAFiEIM, AS SHOWN ON A ME1P
RECORD~D IN BQOK 51, PAGE 10, MISCEI.LANEOCE MAFS,
RE~ORDS OF SAID ORANGE CbUATTY, DLSCRIBED ~S FOLLOWS:
BCGINNING AT A POII~IT ON THk; NOEtTHERLY LINc OF I,O~ 4,
AS SHOWN ON A LI(;ENSP;D SURJEYOR' S MAP OF A PORTION QF
SAIL1 SCCTIQN 9, MAll FOR F.W. FLETSCC~iANN AND 'AS SHOWN
ON A MAP OF SURVEX FECORllED IN BOOIC 1, PAGE~ 4G,
RECORD OF' SUR~JEYS, 289.82 FEET WESTARLY' FRO1Q TH~
CENT~I2 LINE OF W~ST STREET, AS SHOYVN ON SAID MA~';
.~ THENCF SOUTFi~RLY 1,175.4 F'FET PARALLEL' WITFI THF
WE57'GRLY LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTf1WEST.
~UART.ER OP' SATt) S~CTION '.rA TFiE SOUTHERLX LID'fE, TO 'PFiE
TRUE POINT OF F3EGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY 426 ~'EE'!'
PARALLF,L WITH TIiG EASTERLY LINE OF TFf~ WEaT HALF OF
THE NORTEiWES.T. QUARTER OF SAID S~CTION 9; THFNC~
WESTERLY 11~ F'EET PARALL~:L WITFi 7'HE SOUTHERLY I~INE C'F
S1ID LOT 4; TH~NCE SOUTFiFRLX 193.00 FE;ET TO TfiE
NUR!'HiVEST CORNEk OP' THE LAND CC~NVEYED TU EDWARD A.
TU'PTIER ANll WI~'~, fsY DEED RECOFDED ~7ANUA~X 30, 1951 TN
~ BOOK ?.137, PAGE 11, OI'IICIAL R~CURDS; TFIENCE EASTERLY
6 FFET PARALLFI~ WITH TI~E SOU'THERLY LIN~ OF SAID LOT 4
TO THE ~iORTFiEASTERL~Y CORNER OF THE LANll CONVEYED TO
TUFtNER; TIiENCr ~OU'TNERLY 228.00 FE~T ALONG THE
EASTCRLY I~IEN OF SAID LAND CONVk~YED TC~ TiJRNER TU 'PH~
SOUTHERLY LIN~ OF SATL1 LUT 4; THrNC~, EASTERLY' 104
F'EET 1~LONG SAID SOLlT~IFRLY' LItIE TO TFiE POINT AF
BE~INNING.
~YCF~r:ItIG TFiERBFRpM THE TTURTH 7.f3U F~ET, MEASURED
A~.ONG THE WESTERLY LINr OE' SAID LANU.
PARCEL 2: THAT PORTTOt1 pF S~CTyO~I 9, IN T4i~P7SHIP ^:
SOUTH, 1tANGE 10 WEST, uAN B~RNARDINO BASE AND
MGRIDIAN, IN T~IR CITY OF ANAHEiM, COUNTY CF O::ANt;E,
ST.ATG OF CAL?:URP7IA, DESCRFBED AS FQi,LUW~:
1579r -'1- PC90-191
,~.
> r ~~~
',, . ~ t,
~A~;l'~:r.~
H^GTIQNTNG AT A u0:[NZ' 7N TEiE NORTHERLY I~INE 4F LOT 4,
A5 SHOWIQ ON A I,ICENSED SURVFY'OR' S MAP OF A PORTION UF
SATD SECT:ION 9, MAD I°OR F.W. FGEISCFiMANN AND FII,FD IN
BOOK 1, PAGE 5G, OF' RECORD OF SURVEY.S, IN' ITS OFF'ICE
OF THE COUNTY 1t~CORDER OF' SAID ORADTGE COUNTY, 289.82
FEET WESTERLY FRODf THF CGNTER L:INE OL' WEST S'PREE~, A5
SIiOWN ON SA:ID MAP; TFi~;NC~ SOL'Tx~IERLY PARAL; ~~L WITH TH~
EA5TERLY LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF TliE NORTHEAS`1'
QUARTE~2 QF 5AID SECTION, 1176.9 FEFT IN T~IE SQUTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THG~ICF WESTEI2LY ALONG SAID
SOUTI3ERLX LINE 678 i'~LT TO 'PHE TRUE I'OTNT QF
BEGINNTNG OF 'rHE EiOUNDAR'~ O1 '.L'HE LAND HER~IN
DESCRTBED; THPtTCF~ NURTHERLY PARAI,LEL F1ITH THE
E:~STERLY LI NE OF TFIE WES'I HALF OF 7:HE rTORT~TWEST
QUARTER or SA7D SEC:CION 9, 22$.00 FEET; THENC.C
S~F.uTERLY PAFtAI,LEL WITti THE SOiJTIiEFLY LINE OF S'11I1~ LOT
4, 61 F~ET; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL G~TITH THE
EASTEkLY LINE OF THE WEST HAT~F OF THE NGRTHWEST
Q~,TARTEFt OF SAIU SECTION 9, 228.00 FEET TO T'rIE
SUUTHERLY LINh' r SAID LOT ~1; THENC~ EASTERL'~ ALUNG
SAID SOUTHERL3C LIN~: OF' LOT 4, 61 FE~'.P TO THE TRUE
POT*IT OI' REGINNING OF TH]:S DESCRIPTION,
WH~~2EA5, tYie Ca.ty 1~lanning Com~r:~ssiun did nold a p~xblic hearing
at the Civic Center in the Cit~• of. Anahois~i on Ju1y 30, 199Q, at 1:30 p.m.,
notiee of said public hearing tiaving beeiz c~.uly c~iven eZS required by law and in
ac~o:-dance with the Provisions o;: i.he A;i~hein Municipa.l Code, Chapter 18,03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to
S.nvestigate and make Pindings and recammendations in r.~nnecti~n therewith; anQ
WHEREAS, s~.id Commission, aiter due insp~~tion, investigaLzon
ancl stuc~y made by itself and iri its hehalf, and after due eoiisideratior. of all
evidence and raports ot•`ere~~ at s~zid hearing, does ~inr1 and determin~ the
following fa~ts:
1. That the petitioner proposas waivers o£ th~ following to
e:stablish a 5-lot RS-5U00 zuned residential subdivzsiona
(A) S~CT~AT 10.01.1'i0 - Rec~uir~d 1or fror,*.age.,
(All 1c~Ls x•equi.reri ~~o abut a public street or
allry; Lot Nos. 2, ~i and 4 noty~ utti.ng)
(B) ~~._ION~18~~_.~l ~~3.1U2 - Marimum, fenc~ hei~;•,n~.
and 18.?.'1.068,021
(C) S, E~TIQIJ 1~$.27.Q65.0"1C~ - Qri@iitat,i~n of st:u, ur .
(Si-~~:1e-fam.i:ly residsntial structure3 required
Lo : ear orato arterial higtiwsys; Lot Nos . ].
~ind 5 side-~r; NorLh SL•reet)
_2_
PC90-191
_. .,.,i~
,~ ,:;~,~;~
,
2. _Chat ttie above-n~erltianed waivers (A) and (C) are heroby
granted on the basis that there are speci~l circumstancos applicable to the
property suc:t~ ~s size, shagt, r~pngr~phy, location and surrc~uzidings which d~
not apply to other identically zoned propert,y in tho ~amo ~vicinity; and that
strict a~>p].ication of: tr,c Zoning Code deprives the nroperty oE privilQgds
enjoyed by other propE~r.ties i.n th~~ iden~ical zon~ and classi:Eicatian ix~ tho
vicinity.
3. T1•ia~ t;he roquested waiver (B) is hereby denied on the basis
,• that it was deletcr] iollowing pub.lic r:otification.
4, 7'haL• there are exceptional or ~xCra~rdinary circumstances
or conditions applicable to the property involved or t~ the int~ncied ~xse of
the property that do i~ot apply geiierally to ~he property or class of use in
th~ same v,icixiity and zone.
5. That thF requested variance ~s ziecessary for tlie
pr~~servation and enj~ymer:t ~f a suhstanti.a.l pr~pertv riqht possessed by other
prc~pert,y in ~he saane vicir~ity and z~ne, and de.nied ro the prop~rty in c~uestion.
G. Tkiat; ~he reques~ed variance wi11 not be ma~erially
detr:imental to t•he public welfare or injurious tc the pro~~~rty or improvemer~ts
in suc.h vic.inity azid zone in which l•.he property is located.
7. That r,o one indicate~ their prQSence ai: said public hoar.ing
ii, opposition; and that no corresp~nderice was recei~~ed in opposition ~o
subjc~ct ~E~t:itioYi.
GALIT'ORNIA FNVIRUNMENTAL,_QUAL'ITY F~T FINn. ING; That the Anaheim
' City Planning Cornmis~ion has r4vie~aed the proposal For waivers o:E requirecl
lut irontage, maximum fence height and ori~ntatiun ~f strur.~ures to est2blish
~ a 5-1ot RS•-5000 zoned residential subdivisiun on a.n irregularly•-
shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.91 acxe, having a
frontag•e of appr~ximalely 167 feet on Lhe ziorth side of North Street, having
a maximum depth of approximatoly 215 feeC, beii~g located 2T,5 feet wost of the
centerline ~t Redondo Drive West and further described as 1305-1309 We~t
rlorth Street; nn~ do~s h~reby approva the Negatzvo Declaration i.~gon findi:~q
that i~ has consiciered the Negat3.ve Declaration together with any comments
r~:ueived di~ring tho public review process and further fi.ndzng on tha basis of
the initi.:l study and any coirunents receiv~;d that tl~ere is nc substantial
evidQnce thaL- the ~roject wi11 have a significant efEect on t~e environment.
NOW, THGREE'O~E, BE IT R~SOI,VED that i:he Anahezm CiL'.y Pla;ining
Commission docs hersby grant subject PetiL-ion for Variance, in part, upon the
following conditions which are heroby £ound to be a nec~ssary preroguisite to
the propased use of the suuject property in order to preserve the ~afety and
g~nera~ welfax•e oE t~-.e Citiaens ~f the City of. Anaheim:
as
a-~~
-3~ PC90-191
;;r
,~
, ~:~. .~
-- ~ .,:.r
^
`t
~~ ~
~ ~tr~~
1. * Tht-t ~~7.~, privatca sCr~et~ shAll be dQVeloped i» acc~rdance .rith
Enq,ii~aQring S~and~rd Dr~tail No. 122 L'or }~rivatQ stroets, including
inst~aZ1~L•ion of strec~t numo ~igns. Plany Eor the priva~n ctroet
13ghting, as reguireil by the Aetr~il, stiell be submiCt~d to the Buflding
Div.ision foz~ appc•~v~J. and sha11 bQ incl~xc]ed wi~h the b~lildiny plans
prior to the is~uanco of b~.~ilfling permits. (Priva~e streQ~s ~re thase
whir.h provic9Q primr~ry access mnci/or circulation within tho projec.t.)
,_ 2. T}iat pra.~r t~ any occupancy, tc~mporary~ street name 5igns for tha new
, privat•c~ sL-ree~ sha11 ba installect iL pormanQnt street nam~ signs hAVe
not bec3ri installed.
3. * ThaC a ~ract map to record the d.ivision o£ s~.ibj~ct property sha11 be
suhmithetl to and approved by tho City pf Anal~~im and then no rocordQd in
the OPfice oE the Orang~ County Recoz•der.
4. +~ T}~at prior ~o is:~uance oP a building permiC, ~hQ gppropri.ate trafEic
signal assassmonk fee sha11 be paid to the City of Ariaheim in an amo~int
as osCabl.ishcd by CiCy Council resolution.
5. ThaC thF, private stceet :,h~ll bra con3tructod with m.inimum Cwenty five
(25) foot radiu:, curb ratucns Ts requirad b}~ ttie CiL} Enyinoer in
coi~focmancc~ witli Engi.neerinq DQpar~ment ~tandar~'.s.
6. * ~t~at gate, shal.l ciot be installed across ~Iie private streeL- in a manner
whi~h may aciversely aiCect vehir_u2ar tr.aEfic in the adjncvnt public
street. Tnstallation af ~ny g~tes Shall confur~ to Engineering Standard
Plan r'a. 402 and shall bQ siibjoct to tl~o 1~evi2w and approval oE the City
Traffic Engineer prior L•o issua:ice of a bu°_lding permit.
7. That ro11-up g~i:~qQ ~]oors sha11 bo :~hown orx plans submitted for buildinq
p~rmits. Said ~oors shs:l be in;ital.led aiid maintained as shown on the
suhmiCted plans.
8. ThaL tt:c~ devalorer shall bu rQSponsible for tho paymc~nL of abandonmont
fees for all exisCing watar ;;Qrvice easements to t~~e property, ancl shall
furtLer be r~sponsibie for thr installa~io~i of a new water ~ystom to
servico e~,ch new dwelling unit.
9. * That all ].oks within s~ibject ~ubdi.vision shall he served by ...~dorgroux~d
utilities.
].t'. * T1~at tra4h storaqe areat+ ~h:~ll be provicled and m3inta.inQd 3.n a location
3cceptahle to th~ ~tr~er. Maine.enancQ and Sai~itation D.ivision and in
accordancc~ with a~~proved p).ans on file with said division~. ~uch
informal•ion sha11 hQ spocifically shown o~3 the plans subm.itted for
bu5.ld.ing pnrmiZs.
-• ~ _
PC90-;.91
~
_~.<81.,
11. * That prior to commonc~:~en~ of strt-cCural fr,3ming, fire hydrHnCs sha11 bo
.install~c~ r-nd c:hsrgod eis required and ~ppro od by Che Fire Department.
An ~11-weather r~ad s:~a11 be i~r.ovided to L-n ~ hydrants rat all time~, as
requirUd by the Fire Dopart• ;e;nt.
12. * That firc yprink].errs shal.l be insCallo~ ti~ re.3uirc~d by the Fir.e
Departman~.
].3. ~ T'haC ~lI plumbing or other similar pip~:; and Fi.xturos locatc~d on the
~xterior of the buildi.ng sha11 br~ f.ully scroened by archirc~ctural
devices and/ur appro~r.iett~ buzlding mat;rials.: and, furth~r, such
inF.ormation shall be specitically shown on thF~ plans submitted for
builciing permits.
14. 'Chat anX fenc.ing acijacent to North Strcet ~hall be planted and
mainLained wiCh cliriging vines to eliminate grzffiti opportun.i~ies.
lti. * That this Variance is granted subjec~ to adoption of a zoning ordinance
in conr.octio~i with. Reclassii.ication N~, R8..89_32, now pending.
16. That subject property shall bo davelope~l substaiitially in accordance
wit.h p].ans and speciLi_c;ations submikc:ed tu tne City oE Anah~zm by the
petitioner and wh:icYi plans are or.. file with the Planning Department
marked Exl~ibit Nos. 1 throuyti 10.
17. That prior L-o issua:~ce oI :i building permi~ nr withzn a poxiod of one
(1) year from rhe date o:E thzs rosqlut.xt~n, whir_heve: occurs first
Condition Nos.
1, 4, 7,
10, ].3 and 15, ,
a.bov~-rnentionec~, ~ha11 be
compli.ed with. Extension., for farther ti-ne tn complr3to said conditions
may be gr~nted in accordaizccs with Section 1F3.03.090 of tho Anaheim
Municipal Cod~.
18. T.hat prior to f.inal building anr] 2oninq in~?QCtions, Condition Nos. 2,
5• 4~ 9• 1~. 14 and 16, abo•r~-m~r~t.ioned, shal. b~s complied with.
1.9. * That approva]. o[ this applicaLion c~nstitutas appr~vst of tho proposed
request or~ly to t.tie or.teriL- that it comp2i~s wit}i tixe Anahoim Mv.~iclpal
Zon.ing Code and any other applicabl.e City, State antl rederal
regulations. A~proval cioas not include any action or finciings ~s to
corn~~liancQ or approval of L•hQ requesr ragarQing any other appli~able
ordinance, rogulalion or requirement. Condit.ior,s markoc~ wil•h an
aateri~k (*) axe rQqu.ired by established laws, cod~s, regulatioas and
acreement~ and are, therofore, not subjQCt to negotiation.
BC IT FURTFiGR RESOLVFD ~hat: the Anahoim ~~ity Planninq Commi~sion s~oes
hcreby f.ind and determinc~ that ~doptiun of r.his Ro~olution is oxpr.essly
predir.atod upon applica:~t';~ compliance wiCh ~ach and all of ttie conditions
lioreinabovo sot forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thexeof, be
der.l~recl invalid or unF»forco~+blr_ by Che tina7 judg;nent of any c~urt of
comper_ont jurisdfction, tl~en ttsis Resolution, and any approvals herein
car.~ainc~d, shall be dr,c~med nu21 and void.
-5` PC90-191
i
t
. , ,,,~.
`;`
l~:',1~.` .
~~~
xHF. FORI:GOING EtF.SOf~1lTTAN was ~dapted at the Pl~nning Cnmm.ission meoting
of Jul}~ 30, 199U.
j % % ~~ %' •
_.,l_._^::/ ~l.~ ~('•~/-. =L.,~:_c.:~T < i'~/Q .~~--- ~
i..,~..:
CIiAIRWOMAN, ANAHETM CY~ PLANNING COhLtitISS20N
ATT~;iT;
..--~- ~ .t ~ _`...,.::=' 7.
~'' ~ S5C .TARY PRO Tk; PORE ~f~~~~ _~-._.__..._
~~ A~11AHcIM CTTY PLANNING COt~fISSIQN
S'CATE OF CAT,IFORNIA )
COUNTY. OF' ORANG~; ) ss .
GITY UF AtIAF3EIM )
I, Jane~ G. .7onsen, Secretary ~'ro T~m~or.e c:f the Aaaheim Cil;y Planning
Commission, do horeby cer~ify thar. the foregoing rosnlutio~i was passod and
adopY.ed ~t a meot:iuq of t}ie Anaheim City P].anning Commissio:~ held on July 3Q,
1990, by the following vote of the mombQrs therc~of:
AYES: CUhIIrSISSIO?ti,~.FtS: BOYDSTUN, NUUAS, FELDHAUS, HF.LLYER,
MESSE, PERAZA
NOBS: COMMISSTONERS: NOI3F.
VACANCY: pNE SEAT
TN W"f.~ ESS Y~F1EEtF.OP', I have herQUnto set my hand. this ,
of ~~~ ~..r~~=._. 19~0. -~~ duy
~~
~ ,.
./ ~ y.~ ' ,,~
.~ -u.,~ ~~ ~1t1J~:r_ •-~
S~G~~ TARY PRQ TEME~ORE,i/
;~ A2~1lFlE:IM CFTY FL,ANNI~C;' COMMISSION
~,
~~ PC90-191