Resolution-PC 90-223~~~~
1.:~
~ i'a i~ q ^t ~r~~ r
. . , . ~ y~ ~~ ~ ~ ~;'r~~'~u~rNi~as,~,~f
~ ~~n~
y~5
. . ' . . ,... ~~~~I
RF,' L,TJTTON NO,,, ~C9 -223
A~tESOLUTIOrT ~F THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COI~SMISSION
TFiAT PE'].'ITION rOR CUNDTTIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3328 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission d.id receive a veri£ied
PetiLian for Conditional Use Fexmi~ for certain r.eal propertx situated in the
Ci.ty oF ~naheim, County of Orange, Stato of Ca1i~~rnia, de~cribecl as:
TIiE NORTH ~p F~~:'T OF THE SOUTH 160 FEET QF THE EAST
135.32 FEET OF LQT A OF TRACT ~10. 97, IN TF3E CITY OF
ANAHEIM, CCIUNTY GF aRANGE, 5TAT~ OF CAI:TFORNIA, A.S
SFiOWN ON A MAP TFiEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 11, PAGE 3S,
MISCELLANEOI3S MAPS, I~EMON STRRET,
WFIFREAS, the City Planiiiny Comm.ission did hold a pub].ic hearing at
the Civic Center in th~ C:ity oF Anaheim on August 27, 1990 at 1;3A p,m.,
notics of said publi~ hearing 2iavinq beer. duly given as required by law and. in
accordance with rlie provisions nf the Anaheirn Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear anfl cons.ider evidence for an~] against sai.d praposed conditiunal use
permit and to inves~igate and make finding~ and recomm~ndations in connection
therewi*ti; an~3 that said public hearing was continued to the September 10, 1990,
Planning Commission me~zing; and
WHEREAS, said Coromi~sion, afL•er dua inspecticn, inves~igatipn and
atu~y mada b.y itself and in its behalE, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports ,a.ff~red at said hearing, does find and deter.mine ths
follovring Eacts:
1. Tl~a~ L-he proposed u.~e is properly one f.or zvhich a condational
usQ psrmit i~ authorized by Anaheim Muziicipal Code Section 18.03.030.010 to
permit a tire shop rrith inst311ation in ~he CL "Commercial, Limited" 'L~n~ and
with waiver of Lhe following:
SECT_T.ON ,1H.~4.Q~i04Q - Minimum bui.l~lin~ set~~k.
{ 1~ f~,~,t-._ requirQd along Lemon 6Lreet;
nQn~ proposed)
2. That Lhe requested waiver .is hereby grazited on ~he basis that
there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as size,
shape, topography, loca~ian anfl surroundinqs which do not apply t~ other
identica:l7.y zoned property in tho sacne vicinity; and that strict a~~lication
of the 7.on:ing Cocle deprives the properY.y of privileges enjo1~ed by o~her
propei•t~.e;; in t:~e identical zone anr3 classificatioii in the vicinit,y.
3. That the p:aposed use wi11 not adversely aff•ect the adjoining
land us~s and tho growth and devElo~+mer~t oL• the area in whicli it is px•~posad
to k~e located.
4. That r..he size and shape c~C the site proposed for the use is
adequatQ to allow ~he full deve:lopment oL- the proposed use in a mannar not
detrimeti~al to the particular area nor to thQ peace, liea~.th, safety anci
general welfare of. the Citi,^.ens of. r_he City oE Anaheim.
1639r -1- PC90-223
~.. ,..
~are~
~~
, ~ ~:y ~~~~~„fi
~ ~'r~ .,,
;
~ ~, t~
`:t::,.
5. That the granting of the Cund~tional Use Fermit under the
condition;; imposed, iF ~ny, will not ba detrimantal to tl~ie peace, health,
saf.ety and general wE].farQ of the Citiizens of the City of Anaheim.
' 6. ThaC the traffic generated by the proposed use wi11 not impose
an un~ue burden upon the streets an8 highways designed and imgroved to carry
6 ~lie trafFic in the ar~a.
,
1 7. Th~t nn on~ indicated tiheir pr.esence at said publia hearing in
opposition; and that no cnrr~spondence was received in opposiL-ion to t~ie
subject pPtition.
~ALIF'ORNTA ENVTRONM~NTAL QLTALITY_ ACT FINPINC~: That the Anaheim
C3.ty P.lan~ing Cc~mmission has reviewed the proposal to recla~si.f.y subject
property from the RM-1200 (Residential, Mult.iple Family) to the CL
(Commcrci~l, Limited) zone to permit a ti.re shop with ins~allation and with
waiver of minimum bu3.lding setback on a rectangularly sh~ped parcel of land
cor.sistxng of approximaCely 0.1 acre, having a fr~ixL-ago of a~proximately ~10
faet on tihe west side of Lemon Street, having a maximum depth of
a~~proximately 115 feet, being located appro:cimately 40Q feet north of. ;~'
centerizne ~L Anaheim Boulevard and further descri~ed as 1129 North Lpmon ~'
Street; and does hereby approve the Neyative Declaration upon findir,g that it
has consic~ered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received
during the public review process and further finding un the basis o£ the
init:.ial study and any comments rece:ived that there is no substantial evidence >`~i
that the project will have a szgnificant effc~~~ on the enviror.ment. `;~";
NOW, THEfiEFORE, AE I7' R~:SOLVED that Lhe Anaheym Cicy Pl~nning '~`
~ Commission doe~ hereby grant subject Petition far Cund3.tional Use Permit, :~
u~~n the f~].lawing conditions which are herPby found to be a necessaty ;•`;'
prerequisite to tha proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve
the safety and gQneral welfare of tlle Citizens oF the City oE Anaheim:
;~,
1. * ThaL• sic~ewalks sha]1 be instal].ed along Lemor. 5treet as requared by the
f'ity Engi.neer and in acc:ordance with standard plans and specificat.ions
on file in l.he Office of the City E:-gineer.
2, * That ~he parking arca adjacent to Lemon StreQt sha].1 be screened fram
view in conformance wiLh Zoning Code Sec~ion 18.44.064.010 "A•atorr~obile
Farking Areas".
3. * That subject property shall be sc~rved by undsrground u~ilities.
4. *'~hat trash storage are~s sh~ill be provided and maintained in a loc:ation
acceptab.le to the Street Mainkenance an~l Sanil:ation Division and in
accordarice with approved plans on file with said divisi.on. Such
information sha11 be ~psci£ical7.y shown on L•h~ plans submitted ~or
buildi:~g permits.
5. * That prior to issua:ice of a building permit, the appropriate fees clue
for l~rimary water mains and fire ~rotection service sha11 be paid to the
Water Engineering Division in accordance with Rules 15A and 20 of the
Water Utility Rates, Rules and P.egu:lations.
_Z_
PC90-'223 :
.:,,
`~
, r"
;,; ~
I:'.:s;,
~.~~
~
~
6. * Thai: fire spri.nklors shall be installed as requixed by
Departmen~.
11. * That gates sha11 not be installed across any clriveway in a m~.nner which 1
may t~dversely affect vehicuZar traffic in the adjacent publia stroets. ';.',.
Installation of any gates shall conform to Engin.eering Sta:ndard Plan No. ?
402 and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City TrafEic ~~
Engiiieer priur to issuancea ot a building permit. ~"~:
s;':;
17.. That the water backflow equiprnent and any other large water systern ``~
eguipm~nt ~ha12 be installed tu the satisfaction o~ the i~ater Utility ,.
Divzsion in either: (a) underground v~ults o: (b) behind the straQt `
~`•:.i
setback area in ~ mann~r fu11y scr~enQd from all public streets an~l
al leys . _`i
7. ~ Tl~at prior to issuance of a l~uilcling permit, the appropr.iate trai•fic -," :~
signal assessment fee shall be paid to tbe City of Anaheim in an amount
as established by City Cour_cil resoluti~~ :.
8. * That plans shall be suumitted to the City Traffic Fngineer for his -
rovie~w ana approval showing cor,tormance with. the lat.est revisiAn of
EngS.nPering Standard Pl~n rlos. 436 and 60?. pertaining to parking
standard~. Subject property sha11 ~hereupon be dc:velo}?ed and mainhainea `
';
in coziiormance wi.th said plan~.
9. That thP driveway ~n Lemon Street shall b~: constructed wzth ten (10)
foot radius curb rEturns as requiLed by the City rra7ineer in conformance
with Engineering Standards. Exist:ing broken or cracked driveaays Shall
be removed ~;nd replaced as required by the City Engineer.
10. ~ha~ no outdoor sr.orage of_-, display of, or work on vetiicles or vehicular
~arts shall be permitted. ;;;
13. * Thai, all air conditionin~.7 f3cilities anc~ other, roof and ~7round mounted '~,;
oguipment sha11 b~: properly sYiieldt~3 from view, and the sound buffered `~'?
f.rom adjacent residential pro~~erties. Such inEormaY.ion shall be !'`
ypeci~ically shown on ~he plans submitted for building permits. ;r~
14. •rhat all plumbixig or other similar. pipes aiid Eixtures locazed on ~he
exterior of the builcling shall be l:ull~r scz•eened by architecl:ural
devices and/or appropriate bui.lding materials; and, further, such
informa~.ior~ sha1.1 be specifically shown nn the plans sabmitted fcr
building permits.
15. * Tliat a six (6) foot hic~h masonry bl~ck wall shall ?~e const:uct~d and
maintained along thP residentially zoned ~~roperty lines excepti~~g rha
front se~bac:k where the wall height shall not exceed three (3) feat;
provided, how~verr that L-he City Traffic EnginQer shall ha~ve the
auchority to reduce the h~ighr of the *~all to prote~t visual
lines-of-siyht where pe~lestria;x and/or vehicular. circulation intersoct.
Said block wall slzall De planted arid m~intained witYi clinging vines to
elimiuate gr.aff~.ti opportuniti~s.
:.~~:
~~~
>:i
-3- PC90-223 :,;~`?f
?;a
<, y~
P tS
~.j~
~
t~~{},'
. , ~ ' . '~JIiJ.c
. . .', ~,~i~
' ''
~
~
, ~ , ~ar>~i~~
r,i+';
16. Thar any propoqed p~rking nroa lighLin,q ~I~ctur~s lacat:ed adj~ct3nt to any
residentia.l pro~erty sha'll be domt--liyht~scl witli a tinaximum height of
twelve (12) teat, Sfli.d lightit~g fixtures sha11 be directed aw~y from
adjacont r.a:sidenti.a'1 property lin~s L•o prokoch the rt~sidential integrity
oE the art~r~ ancl shall be ii~~lict~hacl on the pl~ins submitted for buildiizg
p~rmits.
17. * That L•he proposa.l sha1J. co~nply with al.l ~igni:ig requirQmants af the CL
"Comraercial, Limitad" ?.one unle~s a varianc~ allowiny ~ign waivers is
approved by the Cit•.y Council, Planninq Commission or Zoning
Administrator; ancl excQpt as otlierwis~ spc~cifi~d in Condition No. 18,
bolow.
1H. Th~t an,~ exisCing or ~roposQd free~tandin7 sign on subject prop~rty
shall bct a monument-type rtio~ exceeding eiyht (fi) fee~ in !~eight and
sha11 ba subjoct to the :~sv.iew and approval of the Cit~ Traffic Enginc~or
to veri.fy a~equat..z lii~es-of sight.
19. *'Phat the on-site lanc~sc~+pir-g and irriqation system shall bo maintained
in compliance c+ith City sL•andards And, further, that a landscapo plax~
shall be 3ubmitted tc• and approved b,y the Plan-iing Department.
~0. That subject propc~rty sha,1 uQ de~~el~ped ~ubstantially in Recordance
with platis and specificatio,.~ submitr.ed to tho Cxty o: l~naheim by the
peL•itioner and which plans are on file wi~h t:he P2anning ~epartment
marked Lxhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
2i. That prior to issuance oE a building permit or within a period of one
(1) .yer~r from the date of this resolution, wli.ictiever occurs 1Eirst,
Condition Nos. 4, 5, 'l, 8, il, 13, ~4, 16 anu 19, above-mentioned, stiall
be complxed wich. Extc±nsaons for furthar tirne Co complflte sa:Ld
cond.itions may be granCed in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of rhe
Anaheim Municipal C~de.
22. That prior to final building and zr~niny inspections, Condition Nos. 1,
7., 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 20, above-mentioned, sh~]1 ~e complied with.
23. * That approval eE r_his app'licatio~~ c:onst.itutas approval n£ tho propose~d
requQSt only to ttie QxLcnt tt~at it comp2iQS with tha Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code aiia any other applir.ablo City, State and ~e8eral
regulatians. Approval dues not include any 3ction or fi.ndings as to
compli~nce or approval of the request reqarding any othor app.ticab.le
or~iii~ance, rc~gulation or requirQment. Condi.tfons marked with an
asterisk (*) aro required by ostablished laws, c:odes, regulations end
agreQments and are, theretorQ, not subject to neqatiation.
_q_
PC90-223
'~
~ . ~ , - ~; ~1~~
~ ~ ~~.
; t~.
, . , :r
~'}~~
,, ,%
,~,~,
$L IT FURTFIER RESfit,VED thaC, the Anaheim CiCy P.iz~nning Cornmissipn dpes
h~raby find a»d ci~tormtne ~hat aduption of t;hia Besnlution is ex r ,
p ,easly
predicaLe21 upon applicant's complianr.e wiLh ~ACh aad all of ~he candit3ona ~~
herQinabova set Eorth, Shoixld nny auch condiL•ions, or an •,I
declar~j~i invalxd or unen~'orceable by the finc~l jvdgment YoFIIr~n ~h~l•eof, be
competent jur.tsc]ir.tj.on, then thi~ Resolution, an~ an ~ X court of ~~;~
cont~tined, sha11 be deemed nu11 and void. ~' PProv~l~ horein •~
THE FOREGOING RESOLU'tzON wbs adopr~d at the k'lanning Commission moeting ','
~f: Sept;ernber lU, 1g9p, '-:
::~
~, ~ ~, Y,:, ~, ,~
~ ~ ° ~ ~~'_' G+'~tL~-C,~:.t,~ ~
CETATRW MAN, ANAI{EIM CYTY ~PLANNING C~IrAZISSION
ATT85T:
/,1/~l / ~~
--_. Ll~~fi._. ~ " _,!2~t~.~
SECRf:TARY, APlAHE1M C:TY PLANNING COMMIS IS pN
STATE; QF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OE' ORANGI; } ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~. Edith L. Harris, S~cretary of the Ana}lPim City Planninq Commiss.ton,
do horeby cer~ify Chat the foregoing resolti~ian was passed and adopted ~~t a
meetang of the Analieim City Planning Comrnissior. hslct on Septctmber ~0, 1990, by
the fo'llowirig vote of tl~e mamber~ thereof:
AYES: COhR+tISSlONERS: BO!!b ~TUN, BOUAS, FELD:IAUo, F~E~fNI;1GCR,
hiESSE, t~~R~lA
rroES: CUi~fISSI0NER5: HEtLYER
ABSENT; COt~4YfISSION~RS: PIONE
of 4~,,, I~jmN~S3 WHEREOF, I have hereunY,o ~e:. my h~nd this / ~
___.
~«-~~' 1990. ~~_ day
.,- ~ ~ .
~
______ i
SF.CIt~TARY, ANAEiEiM CITY i, NNING CQh4dISSIOrT
,
~
~J~
PC90-223
~
'~*~~~sxi`s~:~' ~ r ~~-,,~ , - .