Loading...
Resolution-PC 90-224~ ; ' '' y ~ ~f'"''y~ ~~'~ ' ' } ~''Y,~~~ +. ~ ~ ' ~~d ia ,ti ;~; ~{ 8.~ ~4 ~I Q~T NO . PC~~.?_~ }, A RCSOLUTIUN Q~' THG ANAHEIM CIT.Y PI~ANN2NG COMhfISSION TFIAT PETITTON FOR RGCL~ASSIF'TCA'PION N0. 90-91••11 BE GRAN1'EL WH~REAS, tha Anaheim Ciky Planning Commi~aioii dic~ raceive ~ ~~r~rified petition for Roclassification for certain real property oituared in the City ~F Anaheim, County of Orangc,, Stato of California, clescrihed as follow~: PARCELS 1, 3 AND 3 OF F'ARC~:L MAP N0. 86-321, IrT TFiE CTTY GI' ANAHEIM, COUNT.Y OF ORANGE, STATE OF i;ALIFORNTA; OF MAPS RECuRDED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, ROOK 220, PAGES 42 APtD ~13, AS AOCUMENT N0. a7--289796 ODT MAY 22, 1~07. AND PARCFL 1 QF LOT LIP~E ADJUSTM£NT PLAT N0. 139, Itd THR CITY ~F l.NAHETM COUNTY OI' ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; RECORLEC? AS OUCUrfENT N0. 85-423~158 IN THE COTINTY OF ORANGC ON P~OVEMHER 1, 1985; BEING A DIVI~IOtJ OF PAFCE[.S ~. AND 2 OF PARCE:L MAP N0. 84-259 FILED '!N BOOK 196, PAGES 8 AND 9 OF MAPS FECORDFD IN THE COUNTY Of' OKANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNZA ON F~BRUA.RY 1, 1985 AS DOCUMENT N0. $5-038118. WHGRGAS, tk~e Ci~~ Plaiininq Commission did hold a publtc hearing ~t the Civic Centar in ~be City of Anaheim on September lA, 1990 at I:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having beon duly given as r~c~uired by law 2-nd in. accordance wiCh the provisfons oE t~ie Anaheim Municipal Codc~, Chapter 18.03, to hear ~nd cunsider evidenca tor and against said proposed rec.tacsification and to investigata and make findinqs and rECOmmendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Comm.ission, atcor .ue inspc~ction, investigation nnd study madQ by itself and in its behalt, anc; after due cons.{deration of all e~i~'ence and reports offored at said h~arinq, daes find ancl detormine the Collo:ri.ng facts: l. That the pe~itioner proposes roclassification of subjoct properry from the C--R (Cnmmvrcial, Recroation) Zone to the ~0 (Commercial, O~fice and Profsssional) 'l.or.e. 2. That thc~ AnahQim Gener~~l Plan designates subject property for Business Office/Service/Indu~tzial land us~s that may be implemented by CO zonir-g. 3. That tho r,roposecl r~~classificaCion oE subjcscC property is i. nocessar;- and/or clesarable for the ord~~rly anrj propQr dovc~lopment o~ the community. ,.; ,f ~ r. .; ~;~ 1640r -1- PC90-224 ~ `; r: `'ci ` ~ ! 4 j., . ~ A?~. , ~,,y~ i~. ~.,,., ~ ri~..,:.:. , _.;~:.... ~~ . ..::. .. .. ... ~. ~,.~ ~, ,. ' '~,.~ :".:.w'.' vrti ~ ,:~~a• . . ' ~ . , ~ . .-,~_.r~ ~: .' .~~.. ~.~;: .4 . ':'.~~ i'..:'-''_..:.3a:w~i~:.~^31ttlCet ri~ !~~{ 1 . ~~fM~ 4f~~{ 1 ti~~8 ~ . . . J~:~~2~ ~. `t ~ 4. That Lhe proposed ioclasttitication oE sub ec;t properly retate ~o the zones ancl ~hGir pormi~ted u~~s locally esL•abli hed ~in close proximity ~o subjec.t progerty ttn~ ~o the zon~s ~nd their permitted uses genox•ally oskabl,ishnci throughout tho community. 5. That ~wo (2) parsons indfc~ted th~ir pr.c~s~nce nh said publir, he~ring ia opposition; und thak a pet;ition cont~ining approxima~ely 2g signaCures ~tid onQ lattQr were receivPd in c;~position ko subjoct petit.i~n. ALI ~tNZA ENVIEt NMENTAL ~~1AI,TTy ,~T FINDIN : c:ity Plarininq Commiss3on has rev.iewod t~e ~roposal to reclassify subject property from the C-R (Commercial, Recroa~i~n) 2one ~o the CO (Commercial, Off.ice and Pro.Ees3ional) Zon~ on an irregti.larly-shaped parcel uf land conaisting cf approximato'ly 11.5 acras (compriaing 9 paraels) havi.ng approxirnately 4g5 teet of frontage on the southeast sic~e of Katella Ava_nue 3nd being locatQa immediarely northeast of the Al•chison Tapeka and Santa F~ Itailroad rig2~t-of-way; and daos h~reby approvR the Negativ~ Declaration upon finding that it has considered the Negative Dec:laration tngother wfth any comments received c~uriziq the public review pro~ess t~nd fur~her find.inc~ un the basis uf ths initial stiidy and nny camments r.ecpived that thare is no subsL•antial ev.idence tliat the projQCt will havQ a significant effect on the environmPnt. N~W, THERE.FUI:F;, fiE: !T l2~SOLVED that: t}ie Anaheim C.ity Planning Commission does heroby grant su~jecL• Petition f'or Reclassification uncondikional3y and, by ;;o doing, t}iat Title :.8•• Zo~iing of the AnahQim Municipal Code be arnended to exclude r.he ~sbove-desaribed property fram the C-R (Commercial. RecrQation) Zon~ and to incorporate said describQd property into the Co the CO (Commeir.ial, OEfice and ProEessional) 7.one. THE ~'OI2EGOING RESpI,r1TI0:1 was adopt~d at the Plnnning Comm.ission meeting of Sept~mber 10, 1990. ~ ~ , ~ _., ~ '.~ ~ ~.. .~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ~___~%1L~.~--~~ ~.~L~ CIII,IRW6MAN, ANAFIETM CITY P[,ANNING COI~IltifI^a N ATTE~T: ~ C •--- -1~~[S~1111 ~~ / / ._, __.r• r-------- ~FCRBTARY, ANAHEIM CYTY P[.ANNING CGMMISS:ION ... .. - . . „ . ~ . , . . .. ' .. • . .. . . . . . '..~i, i+~i ~ ~ ~i{~i~t~, , t 7~~ ~~ , .;'J p r~ 5-" ~ `'' ~~~SL~ ~ ;,,~, i ~, ;'r. A ;~ STATE OF CALIFCRNIA ) •1 COUNTY OF ORANGG ) ss. '} CIT'Sl OF ANAHEIM ) ';, :; I, Edith L. Flarris, Secretary qf the Anahoim City Plaz~ninq Cc~mmission, d~ '''; hareby certiiy th~t the foregoing resolu~zan Nas passed aiid adopted at a ~a meeting ot tk~e Anaheim City Plannirig Commission held un 5eptembor 10, 1990, by the followiny vate of the mambe.rs theraof: '~' ; :~ AYES: COMMISSTONERSs BOYDSTUN, BOUAS, FEL~UHAUS, HELLY~R, HENNIldG~R, [~ MESSE, PFRA7,A ~`~ tI0E5: COMMISSIONERS: NON~, ~Y AFsSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~ / ,,- f IN WITNESS WFiEREUF, I have her.eunto seL my r~ana this ___~~~~:~_ c]ay o f____ ~, 19 9 0. --- `~~~ ~~.C~ ' '~~i Sc~CRETARY. AAIAHEIM CITY' PLANNING COMMISSION : :j. r'`; ;'f ;~ `ti ~~+ '~ . . 4;,, ;g -3- PC90-224 ;` t „s ; "a. ,~ `~~ _;, ~ ''r'..~~ _ _ , J~:;.~;:a4~~ w ,,.~'r:r'f.~~k~:~'.sXbE .~`,