Resolution-PC 90-226. . . . ~ .. . . ' ' . . . ".I '~l~r4S~''7T~,"fy~
i ~`. f jg
~ ~ ~ ~~~
~ ,~,~
R.~4~.~?14~_:_._p~22~.25. ~
~,
y
A RESOLU'rTON Ok THE ANAHEIM CITY PL\NNTNG COMMIS5ION
THAT PET:~TION FOFt CO1dDI7'IONwL USE P~R'riTT N0. 3322 BE DENYED
WH~RFAS, the AnahQim Ci~.y Planning Commissian did receive a ~;;~
veriiied PeLition ~or Conditional Use Permit for cortain real pro~erty situated ;
in the Ci~y o£ Anaheim, County uf Oranqe, State of California, described as: ~~~
;~
PAP.CEL 1., I2v TFIE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGF, ,l
S'.CATE UF CALIF'QRNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILLD IN SOOK ',`j
lA3 PAGE 31 OF PARCEL bil'~PS, IN THE UFFICE OF THE COUhTY "!
RECORDFR Or SAID COUNTY.
Wii~REAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pu}alic hearing
at the Civic Center in the City of. Anaheim ~n September lU, 1990 at ].:30 p.m.,
notice of said pub.lic hearing having been d~~].y qiven as required by 1aw and in
accordanco with the provisions of the Anaheim biunicipa.l Code, Chapter 18.03, ~o
hear and consider evidence £or. and against said proposed conditional use po.rma.t
and to inv~stigate and makQ findings and rPCOmmendations in connection
i:herewith; an.~
WHEREAS, said Cemmi.ssion, aL-tQr due inspection, invastigation and
study made by itself and in it:• behal£, ancl after due considera~ian uE all
evidence and reports oL•fered at said hearing, does find an~l detormine the
foll~winq facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
~~se permit is author9.zed by Anaheim Muniaipal Code 5ection 18.Q3.a30.010 to
~er.mit an air rifle and pistol range in the CL, '~Cammercial, LimiLed" 7one.
'l. That tne propns~d use i:. herob_•~ deniFd on the basis that ',`
subject property is located neax• residontial P~:operties ~nd this use would not
be compatible with the surraundi~g land u~as.
.;
3. That Lhe proposed ixse wi.ll advsrsely affect the adjoining
land us~s and the growth and development of the ~rea in which it is praposed to
ne locahecl.
4. That the six~ and sY:ape of the site proposed for the use is '~;
rsot adQquate to aYlow the full cleveloornent o`. the proposed use in a manner not
detrimQnta~ to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety anfi goneral ;,~`
welFare of the Cit3.zens of the City of Anaheim. ~
5. That the grzntinq of the Conditi~nal LTse Permzt would be ~:
detrimental to thQ peace, hPalth, ~ateky and genera:l we'lfare of tl:e Citi2ens of
the City ~P An2heim. +:;
:~~3
6. That thQ CruEfir_ g~nerated by the proposed usc~ will impose an '~'f
undue burden upon t:he streets and highways desiqned and improved to ~:arry the '.
~;
traffic i.n tY~e aroa. "
7, That two (2) peaple indicated their presence at saicl public
hParing in oppositi.on; and that a petit~ion with 2R signaturos and a letter in
oppo:.ition to subjecL- petition .rere rec:eived.
1692r -1- PC90-226
P :~: ~:r~:4•:, ~
~. ~ :~ ~~, ~,i
~~' ' ~`"~
~ o
;
~
~
, '~
. ,'
~
CALIS~RNIA EN'VTRONMENT,~I L QUAL'!T.'Y ACT FTNDTtdG: Thr~t the Anaheim City %,~
;~
P].anning Commi3sion has reviewad khe proposal t~ reclassify subjeci: proLerty ;
fr.om the CH (Commerci~l, Ho~vy) Zone to the CL tCommercia]., Limited) Zone to ~
permit aai air rifla and pistol range on a rec~angularly-shapecl paxcel uf land ~
consisting of approxlma~oly Y.3 acros located at tho norrhaast corner of Lincoln ,,
I~venue and Bel Air StreeC, having ~pp.raxima~e EronLages of 220 feet on the north ~
side oi Lincoln Avenue znd 261 feet cn the east sid:;~ of Bel Ai.r Street, and ;'~
., turther described as 2897 West Lincoxn Avenue; and doe~ hereby aQprove the ;'~
;1
" t~egative Asc].r~r~tion upori f.inding that it has considered khe Negative '
~
'
''~ DecYarat:ion together with any comments received durir~ the
g pubZic review process
' ~
;
,
~ and further f
inding on the bas3.s of the 3nitial study and any camments received .
"~'
that there is r~o subscan~ial evadence that L•he projoct will have a significant ,'±
~ftect on the Qnvironment. ~i,
NOW, THERFI'ORE, B~ IT hE50LVED thaC the Anaheim City Planninc~
Commissian does hereby deny sub,-ject Petit,ion for Conditional TJse Permit, on tho
basis of the aforemenL•ivned findings.
THE FOREGOING RF50LU~'ION was zdopt~d at t.he Pl~nni.ng Commission '
meeting of SeptemAer 10, Y990. '''~
~~../ .~Cc..~ ~ ~ „~
-~ ~/ /~ I ., r~3 4%%~~.v/I.GC~J _
i~~~~
CHATRMAN, ANAIiETM CITY PLANNTt7G COMI~lISSION
A,'TEST: _ /~ "
/ ~.a
SCCFETA Y, ANAHFIM C:IlY P ANNZNG COMhtTS~;~:l'ON
~
1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF QRANGE ) ss,
` CITY. OF ANIIHFIM )
t
~ ~, Edxth L. Hr.~rris,
Comcnission, do hereby cQrtify thak
adopted at a meaL•inq of thd Anaheim
1~, 1990, by tha fol].owiny vote oF th
Secreta:y of tb~ F.naheim C.ity Pxannir~g
the ~oreqoir.g resolution was passe~ and
City Plannir,g Commission he'lci an ~ephember
e mem~ers tliereof:
AYESt I;OMMJSSI0NER5: BOUAS, BOYD5TU.N, FELDHAUS, HELLYER,
i MESSE, PERAZA
NO.ES: COhII~SISSIONERS: IiENl7INGER
, ABSENT: COMMISSIUNEfiS: rfONF.
IN 'WITNESS WHE12E0?, I have hor~~urzto set my hana this V~~/~+
day of ~~~Z~s =-'. 1990.
SECI2ETA Y, A~TAHBiM CIrY PLANNTNG COMM:[SSION
-2- PC90-2?6