Resolution-PC 90-23R E:$_QLUT I QN,._NO .__ PC _.q U_-.?.~
A RESOLU'I'ION OF THF ANF.NGiM CT.TY PLANNTNr COb4dT.^•,SION
THAT PETI7'ION FOR 'VAKII~.NCE N0. 3993 IIE AEN:[ED
NffIGREAS, thc Anak~eim C.i~y Plann.ing ~onimission d.icl recc~ive a
verif.ied Pe~Cition for. VariazicP f~i• certain real property siL•uatt~cl in the City
of 1.naheim, Coun~y ~f Orange, SY_ate of Californ.ia df:scribed ast
L~OTS '1, $ Arlll 9 OF BI~O(:K 5 OI' TFi~ StfhII~tERFIY;LD ANU
OPPENHEIMER'S SUIIDIVTSZON OF THG SPOLR[~ TRACT AS P~R
MAP RECORD[:D IN BOU[i ].~), PAGE 49 OF MISCFLLAN~OUS
MAPS, IN THE ONrICE OF T1iF. RI:CORAER OI' SAIU COfJNTY.
WFIEREA5, th~ Cit:y Planning Commission did hold a pub:lic h8ari.ng
at th~ Civic: Centar in thfl CiL•y of Anaheim on Octobcr 9, 1909, at 1:30 p.m.,
tiotice oC said public hearing having been duly given as rQquirea by law znd in
accordancc~ w:-th the r,rovisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Cbapt:Qr 1g.;33,
to l~e~r and consider ovidence~ for and ~gainat said propo3ed var.iance and to
investigate ~nd make f.indings and c•scommendations in connectton therewith; and
subjec'c petition wa3 cor,tinued to the meeting:, of tvovember. 6, Novemb~r 20,
Decemb~r 9, 1949, and J~snuary 3, 15 and .Tanuary 29, 1990; ar-d
WHF.KGAS, said Commission, after <lu~ .inspection, invQStigatiion
anr~ sY.udy made by ikscalf anJ in its behalf, and after. due r,unsideration of all
~viclence anii reports oftQred ak :+aid hearing, does find and deterrnine t.he
follouir.g f~,cts:
i. That petitionE~r reauests waiver of the follou-ing tc~
c~nstrur.t a 3-~tc~r~l, 10-:~nit apartmer.t builclinq (originall~; a 4-stort, 10-unit
buildiny):
(A) 5~C'rI0i7~__13,0_61_05Q.,_Q121.- Minimum__ number_.a.f_~~rkxng s~acc..
18 t0fj_.0~}Q
~nc~_.1 ~_,_~~ .~_4~6 6 ,.~_14
(E!) SrCT_~ON_1¢,_3!~_tQ~1,U10 -• Minim_um_.: i.tE~_._s~_r~a___pcr_.clwellic:c~_unz.~.
(1~200_.sq.it,_ rcquired: 1.._iG~._sq.f~:. propo~ed)
(C) SECT_[_QN 1.~.~4,_Q62_,G11 - M~ximum_struc_~ur¢1 itiei.qh~.
t2_~tori~:s_ permitted: Y_~_~4ri~~~ Proposed)
(D) $ECT_IOil_ 18...~~.Qf~3.,.2?.~ -
1251r
Minimum__5icley~~.r_~: _~.~~ba.~k
(~J.._f!-~_~ reqt~ired; R.._fee~; ProposAd)
PC 90~23
~s
~
i~ That the ~bove-menticned waivUrs ~~re herQby clon.ied on the bA5.18
Lhak khe propossd d~xisity .is Coo ~.3ense ta be curn~czL•ible with the character of
the stArruund.inq t~sidential nc~ighborhood ~nc? wou:lcl be ovorbu.ilding rh~
~,ropext}~.
~. T-iat there c~r~ no axception7l or extraordinar~~ circiamstances or
conditiotis applicable t~ thE2 praperty .involvod or to tha intended us~ of the
property that rZ~ not ap~1y yenerally to th~ propertx or class of u3e in the
same viciniLy and zor-e.
4.
prascr
vation Tt~aL- the requostecl variance i;t
and not necessary for thr~
.
proper.L-y in enjoyment of a stibstanLia
the same vicinity und zun
d :l property rigtit possASSQd by nther
e, an deni~d to the pcoperty .in qu~stion,
5.
tlie public That thQ requestad va.r.iance
welfar
Q o
i will be materialll detrimental ta
vicinity and .
r
r~jiirious tu the
~rone in which th praperty ~r impr.ovements in such
e properr_y is locare~±.
6. 'rtia~ 16 per.son~ in!ii.cated their presQnce at said public hearing
~•n O~pOS1C1J71~ and tk~at .3 pet:it.ion conlainiria approximaL•oly 120 siqnatur~~;
r.orrc~por.dence was rece.iv~~d iii oppusitiori to subject pet•ition.
CAf.IFQRNIA ENVIRQNMGNTl~~ _Q~1~L'!T'Y A.C=Z'__FINDI!~G; Tht,i: the AnahQim
Ci ty L'laniii.ng Commission has review~ad the proF~osal to con~truct ~3 3-story,
]0-uni~ apartment building ~xth wazv~rs of mii~i~num nurnber of parkinq spacas
(deletod), minimum site arc~a per dwellir,g unit, maximum structura.l 'n..i~ht and
minimum sideyarii s~tback on an irreyularly-shaped parcel of land aonsistinc1
ot appruximately 0.27 ~c~re, hav.ing a fronCagc~ of a~proximately 70 feer. on the
south side of Pea:-1 Street, havirig maximum dept:h of approx.im~-tely ]..35 feot,
ancl being located appreximately 145 feet wesr o£ thQ centerline of h'est
SCreet and furthor describt~d as 111~, 1112 and 11:14 We3t Pearl Street; and
does hereby appcove the N~sgat•ive beclaratiozi up~n findiny t}iat xt has
cor.sidered tho Neg~tiv~~ Declaration toqether wi.th ~iny comments recoived
clux•ing thv public review process and furttier iin~inc~ on the basis of the
initial. sL•udy ~ nd any commQnts received L-hat L•here ia nc~ substant.ial evidence
that the projecl• will have a si.gnificant e[fect: on L•he envi.r.oumant.
NOD7, THFc~E['OkE, BE IT RF.SOLVED tt~at r.r.:e Anahei.m City Planning
Commi.ssion does hereby deny subject Petit:ion f.or Varianc~ on rhe bas.is of tht:
aforemec~tioned Eindings
TF1F, FORL•'GOIt1G RE:SOI,U'TION was adoptecl ut- the E'lanning Conunission
maeting c~,t January 29. ?49U.
. _: ; ~~
,y _-_ , J: ~ ~
_.__._ ._.. :__....y.;._-.--•(_._..-_,_-;,:--I .__.~________._..~_--
C:FfI,IR:MN, AtJ1~Y.F,IM CITY PLANNTNG COt~tiSSIUN
ATTEST: - ~
r ,~ ~ /
._____.._.__;v.~"~,~"iL`----~ /-~/~t...L.-
~.r._ .._ ._4?,--: ------..
SECRF.'T.AItY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAHi71NC C4t~fJSS[UN
"~ " P(: 90-23
~ .
,l~
„ • ,
STATr OF CALIFOf.2NIA
, ,~;
~Ot1NTY OF ORA23~~: 1 ss•
CITY OF AN~FIEIM )
I, Edith L. Hacris, SecroLary o£ tho Anahoim City P1ann~ng
C~nimi3sion, d~i h~reb~~ cQr~ity thaL• th~ forc~going resolution waR passed and
~doptod at a moeting tjf Chs Anahoim City F'lanni.ng Comrnission h~ld on ,Tanuarv
2g, ].990, by the f~~llowing vote of L•he mambers Ltiereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONFRS: BOUAS, BOYnS~UN, FELUIiAti5, F~ELLY.ER, HERk3S'r
MESSG, MC BURNEY
NOES: COIr4dISSI0NLk2S: NQNE
ABSENT: COh4~1ISSI~NERS: NONL
IN WTTNESS F~H1sRE0F, I kiav~, horonnto set my h~nd this ~~~ ~'" day
of ~~'1l~ , 1990. i~ ' .
~" ~.Iu ~ ~„
~ ~Q~-~.__ ~./~ - ~ /r~.
5F.CRCTARY, ANAHETM k'LANNING COMMISSTON
I.• PC 90••23
-3-
.a. ,. ;i-;;~::~