Resolution-PC 90-230• r
RE;~OLU_'1'ION NQ,~P,~;10•-2~Q
A~rSOLUTION OF 'PI~E ANAHEIM CTTX PLANNING COI~fISS:iON
THAT E'ETITION FOR VARIArICF Nq. ~1063 BE DENIEU
WHEREAS, thr~ Ana2ieim City P:lanning Commission did recei.ve a
verxtied PQt;:itic~n for Varianco for certain real pxoperty situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, S~ate of Cali£ornia described as:
TH~: NOFtT1iERLY 300 FrFT OF THE NORTFi~AST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUAFTER OR TH~ NORTHWES7' QiTAktTER OF C~CTIbN
23, TOWDTS~IIP ~~ SOUTH, R]~NGE 11 WES~', IN THE FANCHO LOS
COYOTES, AS SEiUWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11
; OI' MI:iCELLANEOUS M~-FS, RECORU5 OF ORANG~ COUNT'I,
~ CALIP'Ofi:N.LA.
AIHEREAS, tho City P].anning Conunission did h~ld a public hearing
at the Civic CentQr i.n the City of. Anaheim on Septe~nber 10, 1)9~, at ~.:30
p.m. , nati.ce of sa:id public hearing having been duly qi.ven as required by law
and in accordance with the provisions of t.he Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
18,03, to 'he~ar and consider evidence for ~+nd against said propose8 variance
anc3, to :investigate and rnake findir~.r,s ar~d recommendations in connection
therewiL•h; and
WEiERE1.~, said Cornmission, af:rer due inspection, investigal:ion
and study made Ly itself and in its bohalf, ~nd after ~ue consideration of all
Qvidence ar.d reports ofFQred aL said liearing, does find and determine the
~allowing facts:
1. That the petitio~,or proposes waivers of tha fnllowing t~
establish u 14 unit, 15 iot RM-3000 condominium subclivision:
~~,) C~c~;.i~n_1ti.,~1~Q,61~2. - Mini~m~m t~il .3.nq ; itg~rea.
(~CQQ~qtf~, pei dcvelJ.ing uYiit required;
2,9R2 sgttt., proposod)
(H) S~.c!~Qn 1$,~~1_,Q¢_~?`~ - M.in3mum lan~c~~~e_~-t~4'~•
(2~. feet requi.rad adj~oent to R~-7200 zoni.ng to
east and ~oul•h; Q_to 'LQ .e~i. pr.oposed)
~.1"~ ;'i:.A'1:.:~~~
+ ~F
~
~
~ .. ~;
2. That the above-mer.t.ionQC1 waivers arQ herehy don.iasQ on the ;-,~
basis th~it.: the praject was denied.
r 3. That there are no exceptioiial or exLraoxdinary circum~tanceQ ,,.~
or condit ions applicabl~ to the property invo].~rea or to the intended use of tho ~ ~
propart;y t:hat do not apply gonerallz~ ~o t}ie property os alans of use in L~~e ~
same vicanity and zono.
A. ThaL the r4queste(1 var.itince is not- necassarf for the
presarvation ar.d enjoymer.t of a substantis?. ~proporL•y r.ight: posseLSed by other
property i.n th~s same vzcinity and zone, and Ctexzied to L•h~ prop~rty in questiun. _
" 5. Thak thQ requested ~~ariance will bo mat:erially datrimenral :._.
to the p~~blic wcslfr~re or injuriou3 tio *.he pr~portg cr i.npr~vsments in auch
visinity clnd zonc: fn which tha proporty is lac;+ted.
-1- PC90-230
1646r
y, i
'~'
~
j , ..f, ,
. , ,~
1 ~
'__ _ ~ , ... . . . . " , . . ~ . . . . i i~. n.A~~4.P. r11Lb~
~ .
~I 1 ~ ~.Y~ ...t..: . ~ '. ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , i~ ~~ ~ ' . ~ . , .
,~' .. .. . . ,..~ , . ,.... ' ~ . . I,ily~~;~i~~~
• ~tiFr'~tit ~
6. Tyah n,o ane~ indict~ted their preyence a~ said ~ublic hearing
in appositi~n; nnd tihat no correspond.once was received in opposition to subject
potition,
~,LXI' RNIA ~P,/'[RONME~ITAL ~~1ALITY ACT FINDTNfi: That the Anaheim City
:.t Planning Commission has reviowed the proposal t-o ostabl:i.sh a 14 unit, 15 lot
i.i 1?M-3000 condominiutin subdivision with waivers qf miiiimum building si~e area and
~' minimum landscaped sc~tback on a rectangularly-sha~ad parcel of lana ~onsistxng
of ~approximately 165 feet on the south side of Ba].l Roacl, hav.inq a maximum
depth of approximately 247 foet, being loca~ed ~pproxi.mately 530 feot oast ot
the cer~terline af Oaktiaven Driv~ and further described as ~23A West Ba11 ~:oad;
' and does hereby Rppr~ve the Negativo Decluration upon findizig tlzat it has
considered ~he N~gativo Declaration t~qeL-har wzth any comments received during
the public review procQSS and f,urther f.inding on the basis of the ini~ial
study and any comments rQCeivod khat ther~ is no substantia'1 evidence that the
" project wil]. have a significant effect on ~he environment.
; NOW, 7'H~REFOR~, EiE IT RESOLV~n that the Anaheim City Planuing
Cnmmission does herebp deny subject PetiCion i'~r Variance ~n th~ basis of the
~ aPorementioned findi:igs.
T.FiE E'OREGCING RESOLUTION was adopted at the I'13nnin~ Commission
meQting of SeFtomb~r 1U, 199U. -~
~/~ -, , ~
• ,~~ = ~~ a ' /~ ~~~`~' t~„/ ~_._
CEiAIR~MAPI, .ANAHEIM CYT~~LIINNIIdG COMMISSION
ATTE;ST~
~.
SECRE. RY, ANAHETM CITY PGANtdIN~ COMMI'SStON
STATE OF CA~,IFOftNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) gg,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~ I, Edi.th L, Harris , S~cretary of. the Ar.aheim City Planning
r~ Commissi on, do hereby cartify that the fnregoing resolutio•n was passed and
; adopted
`'
' at a meeting of Che Anaheim City Planning Commission held ~n Soptember
x0,
!990 , by the following vote of the membsrs thereoF:
.AYES:
~ CUbiMISSIONERS: gOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HE;Nl~'INGER, MESSE,
P6RAZA
TIOES: COt+fMISSTONERS: }3UUAS, HF,LT~YER
A$SENT: COMMISSI0:IERS: itONE
/
IN WITIr'ESS WIi~R~OF, I haue Yiereunto set my hand this _~7~ day
a~ - ~ . _ . 1990.
.~_.__ ~ ~~~~~}'~"''"'
,:
SECRF.TARY, ANAHEIM PLIINNTNG COD4dTSSION
'Z- PC90-230
~
4