Resolution-PC 90-242'"'~.~
~
t ~i~'G~~,~
t 1 ;'a ~ .?,1
~ a •.',;~
.~
~2ESOLUTXON. NU, FC9 -242
A RESOLUTInN OF THE ANAFiEIM CTTY YLANNtNC3 I:OMMZSSION
;''-IAT p~TITION FOR CON~ITIUNAL USE PERMIT N0. 3340 ~lE pENIED
Wki~REAS, ti~e Anaheim City Planning Comminsion did rer.eive a
vdrifiod Petition for Conditional Ues Parmit for cortain rbal pronorty
t~ituat.ad in the Ctty of Anaheim, Coun~»y of Oranye, Stata af Cali.fornia,
de~ocribed ae:
~'ARCEL 'l OF YARCEL MAP NO. 79-285, AS SiiOWN ON A MAP
FILEU IN BOOK 143, PAG~ 31 OF kARCEL MAPS, IN THE
OFr'ICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDGR OF .",AIq URAIQr~ COUNTY.
WHGREAS; the City Planning Commi~oion did hold u public heAring
at the Civic Center in L•he Gity of AnahQim on October 8, 1990 at 1s30 p.m.,
notice of said p~blfc hQaring having been dul.y given aa rec,uired by law and .`ln
accordance with the provieiona of th~ Anlheim Municipal Code, Ch~pter 18.O:f,
to hQar. and r.oneider eviden:e for and agains~ enid praposed conditional use
permi.t and to inveati.qr.te and make fSndings and r~commQndations in connaction
theYewi.th; and
WHE:REAS, said Commi.nnion, afte~r due i~iap~ctinr~, investigation
and etudy made by itself and in ita behalf, a:~d aft~r due conYfderation of all
evidence ~~r~d reparts offered zt oaid hearing, does find and determine th4
follow.ing facte:
1. That the ~rop~aed us~ ie proporly one for whi.ch a
conditional uee pormit ic: authori2Qd by Anahc~im Munic.tpal Code Section
18.44.05~.160 to vermit a 46-u nit motel with waiver oi tho followi~g;
~A) 5ECTIONS .18.95.093.023 - P~:zmiktea loc:stion of reesta~ d n ,~g,~.
and 18.44.OG7 (Q4-~qqt eetback from eagt proper~y line
rPquired; ~O~eet propoesed)
(A) S'f O~I S ,18.05.09 .~,_,024. - Maxim~.~.heiuht o`. fzeeflrandl.na ~ iQne.
s+~}d 18 • 4~„L~~'7 (~ f~et pQrmitted withfn 750 feeL• of
renidential structurea; QO feet propoead)
(C) Si:CTION ],~.44.Q62.,~11. - a mum c~tructural t Q ht.
~~~~~ purmitted 1~ f~ret fram RS-7200 zoning
to the nortn; Q fE'P.t propca~d)
4~) ~~2N .?,~_ .i.~3~~~ - Reaul.red setb~c~.
(minimum ~,4 .`aot lar.dr~capQd betb3ck required
adjacent to RS-720U zoning;
Q to 7_ et propusa~i )
1014AS
-I-
1'C`JO-242
-. r~
.~
~ ,t
f~
,::" r -,.'~
r by~. r .,~
' ~
~?.I
2. That the pro~oded use is heraby doniad on ~he bagie that
~h~rA nre no Eipaci.al circume~ancoa applicable t~ L•hc~ property euch as gize,
shapo, topog.raphy, loaution a~d t~urroundingg wt.i.ch du r~ot apply to o~her
idanticaTly zonc~d pro~erty .in the s~me vi.cinttyj aud that atriat appl.tcati~~
of the Loning ~~d~ doa~ -~ot deprtve the property of pXivileqee er.)oyed bX
other propc~rtios in tho id~ntical zone and clasuification in tl~e vici.nity.
3. That the roquaoted waivera (A), (F3), (C;) and (A) are r.erQby
denied becauf,a oubjoct u~e parmit wae doniecl.
4. That t}ao propooed uoe wi11 adveroaly afEect the adjof.ning
land ueea and tt~e growtti ancl development of ~:hs area in whic}i it is pxopooed
to be lor.ated.
5. That the aize and shape of the a~te prop~9ed for the uee i.:
not udaquat~ to allow the Full dQVelopmont of the pr4por~Qd uee in a manner n~t
detrimental to th9 particular are~ nor to the _o~ace, haalth, oafeCy and
genpral walf~ra of tho Citizeri^ of the City of F-naheim.
6. That thQ c~ranti.ng of the Conditianal ~~sg Permit will be
datrimontai to tho pc:ace, h~alth, aafety ar~d general. welfarQ of the Citize~s
of the City of Anaheim.
7. That thP traffic genercited by t1~e propoaed use will impose
an undus buxden upor- th~ ~treeta and hi~hwaya deAigned and improved to carry
th~~ traffic in the ar~a.
8• That oix (b) people indi.catcd theii• presence at euid public
hearing in opposition; ar.d thati na corrasponaence wAa received in o,~posf.tion
to the Aubject petitioci.
CF~LI '~O,~trIjl E„~VIRONMLNT'AI, JUAL,ITX ACT FI D NG: That the Anaheim
City Planni.nq Commieoion haa reviewed the propoaal to permit a 4G-uniC motel
with waivers of pormitted location or fr.eeatandinq sign, rnaximum heiqh~ of
freeatanding sic~ne, maximum 9~L'UC:ural height and require~ Ac~tback on a
ractanyularly-9haped parcel of land consier.ing of approxim3tely 0.54 acre,
having a:rontago of a~proximately 210 feQt on the no.cth aidR of Lincoln
Aver.ue, havin9 a cr.nxi.mum depth ~f 215 f~et, being located approximatQty 225
feet eaat of che centerline of Uel ALr. stroot and further deecrfbed as
2II6G Wget r,inco2n Avenua; and doee hereby disapprove rho Ne~atfve Der.laration
ugon finding L•hat it haa con9idexQd th~ NegativQ oeclarat.ion togethc~r with a~y
commente received during tl~e public review nrocess and furthar find±nq on thK
baeie that tliQ initial at~~dy and any commQnts rgcQived thaL• there ie
e~betaritinl evidQr.ce that tlie project will have a siqnificant sffect on the
environment.
NOW, THER.~',FOftE, BE IT RE~~OLVED that tha Anah~i.~n City Planninq
Commiogior~ do~a hereby dQny subject Petition for Condit'_onal Use permit, on
the baeia nf tho afaromentinn~d fi~:tinga.
-2- PC90-242
.0
f'~,i~ ur :'r'~.''. .
~ ~ n
. . . ;ra ~ ! ~~ ~ ~~
_ _ . ~ z"~' ~
. . , . . . . ~ . ~
~ rrEa ~ff t ~x,l ~,"',~A ~ ~ ~, ~j~ ~{
~;~~ ~ , t f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~
~~~~,~~5 ~ ~,~
~ r;~
~~~~,~~ ~ ~ r~.
~
, _
THL~ FOREGOING AF50LUTION wa~ adoptic~d at the Planning Commiagion
meetin~ o:~ Octobar. 8, 1990. / f-)i;~ 1 ~ ~,
.L_::y t Le c `. ~.,~ . ./~~ ~".. .~'~ ~ ~
CHAIRW6idAId, ANAFiEIM CITY Z'I~ANN3NG COMMIS3ION
r'':; ATTESTt )
~'i' .~G-~ ,1 ~~~~''~"~'~ ~
__~
~,`~ S~CFtExAR , ANAFIEIM CITY PY~ANN'[NG COMMISSION
~TATE OT' CALIFORNIA
COiTNTY UF OF.ANGE ? B8•
CTTY OF A1vATtErM )
I, Edith L. Harria, Socretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commie~ion, do hexeby certify that the fuxec~~ing reso.lution wae paBeed and
adopL•ed t~t a meeting c~f the Ar.aheim City Planning Commisnion held ~n O~tobor
8, 1990, by the fallowing vote ~f the membera thereof:
AYES: COMMIS5IO~ERS: F3UUI-S, Ii~JYDSTUN, FELDHA[i5, Hr.LLYER, ~iENhINGER,
M~,SSE, PEFt717~
NOES: COMMISSIONF;RS: NONC
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER~: NONE
IN WIZN~:35 WHERF.OF, I have hereunto aQt my t-rind this /~ .~~+ day
of ~ , t9~0. ~ .
~~ ,.i ~, -
.
SECRETRRY, ANAHEIM CI'~ LPY ANNING COMMIS3ION
~3_ PC90-242
~~:
! . 7
,,~ v
~
A,~~~~'y ~ ~M~
~ .~~"rin Y' ~,1.~a•S:J'Ri~