Resolution-PC 90-252~
RESOI~UTION NO. PC90-?~~^=
A RFSOL'U':'T'~N OF 'PHE ANAI3EIbt CITS' .NING COMMTSSION
AME:QDIf:G CF,RTI~TN CONDI'L'IOr' _ APPRC)VAL OF'
RrCLASSI:IL'ATION Nc -89-4~0
WHERk~.AS, on F'ebruary 17, 19Q9, _. Planning Gommis3ion approved
R~c,laesifica~ion No. 8a-~4-90 under Rer~olu~ _>n No. PC 89-67 and in conjunckion
with Condi.tion~l UAS ~ermit N~. 3026 tr ~classify aubject prop~rty from tt~e
RS-72Q0(MHP) Zone to the R~-A-43,000(M: ~'Lone to ret3in the expansion o£ an
e~.is~ing mobilQ home/trailer park by addiriq 14 ~~dciition3l trailer/r.eazeational
vehiclQ spar.en on pr.operty located on the sou~h side of tdiciway Drive
approximatQly 400 fc~t weet; of th4 cEnter~it-~ of AnahQim Boulevard ~nd further
desrribed ae 200 ~9e~t Midway Drive.
WHL;REAS, Re~olution Nu. PC89-6'], adnpted in conjunction with 9ubject
reclas~if.i.c:ation, ? nclud~d thc fal lowing condita.on wtiich wa.~s req~~ired to be
complied v,ith pr.;.or to introduction of an ordinance rezoning t.he pro~eri~y:
"'l. T:~at an abandonment aha11 be requested and approvad for Clementi:~~
Stz•eet . "
WHE1tEAS, on April. 24, 1989, the Planning Commis~aion a!.,provad amendment
of said Condition (ae re~ueste3 by the applicant) uncier xeeol~.tion No. P~~9-118
to read ae followa:
"7.. That an abandonm~nt ahall be requested for CiementinQ S~reet; and that
a bond may be po~ated with the City of Anaheim in a~orm and amount:
appr~vQd by th~ City Engineer; and completian of said abandonment by
the petitiontr."
WH~REAS, the pstition~r lias reqiieyted daletion of said Cor~dition No. 1
as cantained in R~eol~;tion 1Nas. PC89-67 and PC89-llfi.
'AHF:iEAS, the Cily Planning CommiQ~ion did hold a public hearing
at th~ Civic Ce~~ter in the City of ~naheim un Octnber 22, 1990, at 1:30 p.m.,
n~tice of ~said public heaxing havirig been duly given as reqvir~d by law and in
accordance with the proviaiono of the Anaheim Municipal C~da, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidencr~ for and againet satd prop~eed variance artd to
_nve~i:igata and make findinga and reaamm~ndations in connPCtion therewith; and
~JHEREF#S, Hai.rl Commisaion, aftier due .tnapHCti~n, invedtiyation
~znd study ma~e by itE~lf and in its behalf, a:id after duo coriAideratir~n of all
evid~-:nce and report.s offerecl at naid tiearing, ~o~~ find and d~t~rn~ine tl~e
following facta:
~. That nc.~ one indica~ed the.ir p~esenc~ at said public Piea.ring
in oppoo.iti_on; anc'i tha+:, no correspandence was recelv~d in oppo~ition to
a~ibject petit'~on.
2. '~'h~t the Public Wor.kr/:;ngineering Department was not oppc~sed
tu the r~~quF,at .
1024i2S
:;
^~
\'Y
0.~
,~r~
-1-
pr90-252
t,1'
~l`.wuwo~a;u ... ~ .. ~,,.::krr , , . , r~
. . , . . .. t~•....~i n.'iS1, . ....- ~ ....... , ~~ . . . .. .,., .•~ .~. ~ '. - ,. ... . , . t. '/ I~t~ 74,4~;~~~!3~~4~y1M"~,rc
~ . .. : : ~,~!k
~~~;
F~iX~il.~' . ~pi~N~'~~, .
.i . . . . ~ ~ . ..
~ NOW, Z'HER~FORE, BE IT RESOLVEU thaL i:ho Anaheim City Planning
~ Commisdion doae hereby dc~Zetc: Conditinn Na. 1 uf Reaolution NoA. PC89-67 and
PC89-11,3.
,
TFf~ FAREGOING RES~I,UTION wae ~dopted at the Plenning Cqmmi~sion ~
meeti.ng of Oct~ber 22, 1990. '~
; ~ . -~
; i ~ i ~ '/. ~ /~ ~r .
: ;'`i' :c,~, t`~<~. ~ '~ , '~ /? ~~
:~ •. ' _: ~ 1 -v ~,'VJ..~ ! -.,c.%
~ CHAIRWOMA~, AN)iH~'I.M CITY PI~ANNING COMMISSION
~
~
~ ATTEST
~ ~r..~,~~..'---1L. ` ~.._ , .
~ S~CRLTAFtY, ANAIiEZM CT'.~Y PLANNTNG C,~~`OM~; ~N
;
STATE fl^ CALIFORNIA )
COUNT~: OF ORANGE ) sD,
CIT~' GF ANAHEIM )
I, Edi*!: L. Harrir~ . S~cretar.y of the Anahe; rt ~i;.x planning
Comr.~ission, d~ heroby r.P,-±~,F f ~; ~;. ~n~ ioreaning rer~clutJ.on was paesed aiid
adopted at a meQting af thE Anaheim City 'rianninr Gammis~ion held on October
22, 1990, by the £ollowing vote of the membera there~f:
AXES: COMMISSIONE1tS: BOYDSTUN, EtOUAS, f•iELLYER, HENNINGF.R,
MESSE, F~RAZA
NUES: COMMISSTONEiZS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSI~aN~R5: FELDFiAU5
I ~IITN~SS WH~REOF, I have her~uiato ~set my hand ~his ~~ day
°F _ .~, 1590.
`'"; v5~., /..~ ~/~, ,
~ _1~k~~ -~-~-~~r -
SECI2ETARY, ANTHETM CITY 1'LANf1"i61G CO:iMISSTON
_..:. ~
-2' PC90-252