Resolution-PC 90-260r.r~~; ~ ~ ~. ~ ri ~ ~ . , ,
.. . . . .~ .. ~ ~ . , . . . . . .. . . .. . ~~~~ ~ i . ~ . f 1 ~ t ~",~~}N..~~~
~~ t . ~
!R ,:
1'
.
~,9:..'~":;,~ / ;~,,
RCSOLU7~ION NQ._ PC9Q-260
A RESAI,UTION Ol~ TFIE AP!AEIEIM CITY 2~LANNING l".OMMISSIQN
'PHAT PETITION FOR VARTANCE NO. 4095 HE GRANTEU
wHEREAS, thQ Anahoim Ci.~y Planning Com.miaeion did recQive a
. verifiAd Petition for Variance for. cE-Ltairi rer~1 pr~perty Pituated in the City
of Anahoi.m, County of Oranc~e, Stato of California descri.bed aes
LUT 20 OF TRACT 125~6 AS PER MAP RECORD~D IN BWK 57J
PAGES 10-1f, OF MTSCFLLAN~:OUS MAPS IN THE OFFTCE OI~
SHID COUNTY.
WHEItEP.S, the Cfty Planning Comroieeion did hold a public heari.nq
at the Civic ~e~~tor in the City of Anrahai.m on November 5, 1990, a~ 1:30 p.rn.,
notice of said public hearinr~ huv.ing boen duly qiven ag require~ by law and fn
accordance with the provisione of tha AnahQim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and coneidar evidonco for and againnt said propaeEd variance and tq
inveatigat~a and make fin@ings an~ recommendationa ln connpction therewith; and
WHEREAS, eaid CommisAion, after due inspectLon, inveetiyation
and study made by itself and in ita behal.f, and after due consideration of all
evidence an~ r.epnrL-s offered at daid hear?ny, cloee find anc.i determine the
~'ollowing ~acts:
1. That the petitionc:r ~,ropocaes waivHre ~L• the following tc
conatruct a 55.5 font hi,yh, 9,~~14 sq,ft, sinnle family re~ider-ce:
~~T~_ ~9.23.062 O~Q - t~a~;num stru~tural haiaht.
:~.:23 _06 .0 0~ (25 feet permitted in the 5cenic Corridor;
and 18.84.Oa2r~~ 55.5 feet proposEd)
2. That thE+ above-;r~ntioned wniver io hereby grantod on the
banis ihat there arN epecial circunistances ~pplicxble to the propsr~y
~oc:sisting of *he unusual grade differer~cQ oi the lut whe.reby tha bc~ilding
height to the finiehed grade at the pe~•imeter of the building ie 35 feet
although the building haight ae mea~~red to the flooc of the baeement ig 55.5
feet higt., and ~urroundii~ga whic,h doQe nat appty to other iden~ically zoned
prop~srty in the sam? vicictiity; r~nd L-hat nzrict ~ppllcattUn of the Zoninq Code
~!~privee the property ~f privil+~ges Qnjoyed by othQr propertLce irt thc~
i.~entical zone and claeeitication in the vi:;inity.
3. That thPrc~ are excc~ptional o~ E~xtraordinary c~ircumatancea or
conditiono npplicabl~ to the property involved or to the int~,nd~d unQ af tho
Property that do nut apply genorolly to tha property or cl~aon of ue~ i.n tho
eamc vicinity and zone.
4. Thar, the r.equ~Ated variance i.s necessary for the
preeorv~L•ion and enjuyment of b oubetantial properky rigyt p~e~oosed by other
property in the eame virini.ty and zune, and d~nieci to the pr~perty in qu6stion.
t"R1036I~SP _1_
PC90-26(!
,;~~;+'~, ,~~+;~
5. That the roqueeted varia~ice 4~i11 r-ot be materi~lly
dotrimental, to the public welfare or injur:loue to the prc~perty ax improvamente
in euch vicinity aad xone in which ~ho proper~y ie located.
6. Z'hat nu ana inc~icated their.• preeencA at eaid piablic hearing
in opp~sition; an~ that no c~rrespondence waA r~ceivad in oppoAition ta ~ubj~ct
petition.
C~~IFORN~ ENVI~20NMENT~,L~UA~ITY ~CT FINA~t1G: Z`he Planriing Diroctor
c~r hie au"~horizad rspro~santntive hae ds~termined thxt th~ proposed project fa11e
wi.thin the definition af Cuter~orical Fxamptiona, Claee 3, ae definAd in tt~A
State EIR Gui.delir~es and is, therefora, categ~rtcally exempt fr~~m tho
requirement to prep~re an E:ZR.
NOW, THEF2EP'ORE, BE IT RF:SOLVED that th~ Anaheim Ci.ty Planning
Commi~eion doee herc~k.~ grant dubject Petiti.or~ for Vari9nce, upon the following
conditione which are hereby found to b$ a nQCeaeary prerequisite to the
propoeed uea uf the eubject pzupezty in order to pr~aerve tho eaEety end
general welfare ot the Citizer~s of the City of Anaheim:
1. * That ~rior to iesuacace of a building permit, the a~nropriata major
~horoughfare and bridge fee ahal.l bo paid to th~ City uf Anaheim iz~ an
am~un~ as opecified in the Mayor 'Phoroughfar.e and Firidge Fee Progrgm for
the Foothiil/Eaatern Transportation Corridor, as establighod by C.i.ty
Cauncil rc~eolution.
i. * That pz.tor to ideunnce of a b~:i:ldi~g permit, the appropr.tatd traffic
signal aseeasm~nt fee ~hall be paid tc tne City aP Anahei.m in an amount as
aet~bliAhed by Cit~ Council resolution.
3. * That firQ oprinklere ehall be installed r-e roquired by th4 Fire
n~spartment .
4, * That subject property etiall be es~rved by underground utilitiea.
S. That aub~ect property nhall be dove3opQd Nub6tnnti.ally in accordaiiee with
plana and epecificstion9 eubmftt.ed t;a the City o;~ AnahRim by tk~Q
~titioner and which p~ans ar~ on fiLE wi'~h tho Planning Dep~rtmc~nt marY.od
F:xhiblt Noe. 1 through 5.
G. ~hat pri~r to ieo»ar.ce of a building permit ~r within a period of one (1)
year fr.~m the date r~f this redulu~ion, whi.chever occurc fir.et, Condition
voA. 1 and 2, at~ove-mentioned, ahall b9 complied with. ~xtr~nelonc~ for
fuzther t.ime tr, camplete oaici conditionn may be gra.itied in accordance with
SQCtion 18.03.U90 of the Anaheim N.unicipal Cod~r.
'l. That prior to final building ar.u zoning inepectione, Condi*_ion Nos. 3, 4
and ~, above~cr,.~nr~oned, ~hall. be cc~mplied wiih.
-2-
PC,40-260
,: "~
.. .~ , i ~. ~ ~ ~ I. ,(~ ~,1, t _ ,~: , ~1~.%11. a~,
~ , . , , . . . :7 .. . I ' , . ° ~ "1 '~ ~t ~ ,~~~'~~~
,r~~~
~~~' + ;~~~< :>~x
'~ ~
8. * Tha~ approvnl of thio appli.catian canet.~tutea approval of, the propaeed
rectuoat anly ta th~a e~.':ent that it :omplies with ~he Anahei.m Municipal
Zoning Code and any ather applicable City, 3tate and Federal regulatione.
Approv~L duaa not in~:l.udo a.ny action or flndinge a~ ~o complianco or
ap~roval u£ th~ request rogarding any a~her applicable ordinanc~,
regulatian or .requiremsnt. Cottd.tinne markgd with an asterir~k (*) are
rc~quired by establiohed 1aws, codc~s, r9gulations and agraemente and are,
therefoxe, not eubject to negotiation.
8~ IT FURT:iEFt ItESOLV~D tha~ the Anr~hei.m Ci.ty P~a:lning ~ammiec~fon
3oes heYSby find ancl determfne t11at adoption of L•his Reeolution io expresely
predicated upon applicant' e compliance wit.h e~cli ancl ~11 of the c:onditione
hereinabove emt furth. Should any such conditione, oi any pF~rt th~sreof, be
declared inval.id oz~ unenEorcet~ble by the final jadgment oE any cuu~t cf
competent juriddiction, then thie Re~olu;.i.n, and gny approvals tierein
contxined, shall be aeamed null and void.
THE FOREGAING RESOLL'TION ~~rae ad~ptad at the Planniny Commieaion
meQting of November 5, 1990. ,
/ . . ~~. ~.. . j" • ,.:1-,. ,. G'C-.i-••~c • i ~
C[iATRWOMAN, ANAHEIM CITY /PLANNZIIG COhiMISSION
w ~
ATTE~7's .
~~~~~ f '~ / ~~ 47
SECRETAR , ANAHEIDS CITX PLANNING COMMISSTON
STAT~ OF' CALYFORNIA )
CQJNTY AF' ORAN~E ) ee.
CTT~' OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Elazx ifl, SocrPtary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commiasion, do hcreby cQrtify that ths forogoing rQSO].u~i~n was passed and
adopted r~t x moeting o~ the AnahQim Gity Plannir.g Commiaeion h~ld on November
5, 1990, by the f.ollowing voto of the membare thereof:
AX:.S: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, BOUAS, FELDHAUS, EIELL~'~R, FIENNTNGER,
MESSE, PERAZA
NOE;S: COMMISSION~RS: NUNF
ABSEPiT: C7tdMISSIONER3: NONE
/~
IN WTTNESS WFiEF2EOF, T have hereunt~ Het mx h~nd th.ts _(
day
o f ~ y~.~.~~. , 19 90 .
` _ n ,
//
, ~ ~
.- '
S~CFcETAR[, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS5TON
' '
-~-
PC90-260