Resolution-PC 90-265~~ '; 'K
RESQLUTION NU. PC9U-265
A RES~OLUTION OF THE ANAiiEIM CITY PLANN7NG CAMMISSION
THAT PETITTON FOR VARIRNCE NO. 4~96 F3L GRANTED
WH~REAS, tne Anaheim City Planning Commi~sian did rece3.ve a
v~rifled Petition for Var.ianco fox certain re~l p.r~perty situatod in the City
of Anahsim, Coun~y of Orange, state of Califarnia clESCZibed as:
`THAT pa12'PION QF THE EAS:I' HALF OF THE FRACTIONA~
HCIRTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHTP 4 SOUTH,
R.ANGE 1Q WEST, IN TH~ FtANCHO SA21 JUAN CA:TUN DE SAIVTA
RNA, PARTLY TN THE CITX AF FULLERTAN, AND PARTL] II3
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY nF ORAt7GF, STATE GF
C}1rTFORNIA, AS PER MAF R~CORDEI7 IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF
MTSCELLANEnUS M7~PS, IN TIiE OFI'ICE OF THE CUUNTY
REG!'?RDER OF' SAID COUN'P'l', DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
HEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH 'LINE OF ~AID
NORTH47ES'P QUARTElt SOUT~S 89 A~GREES 42 MINUTES 00
S~COI3DS WEST 722.00 FEET FROM THE NURTE3EAS'P CARNEF. OF
SAID NORTHW~ST QUARTLR; THENCE SpU'PH QO UEG22EES 20
MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST PARALLEL WITI9 TiiE EAST LSNE OF
~ SAiD NORTHWEST QUART~R 905.00 FEET TO A POIN7' ON TEiE
CF.NTER LINF. C~F DURST STRFrT; T~IENCE SOUTFi 89 D~GR~ES
42 'TNUT~S 00 SECONllS WEST PARIII.LEL WIT:i THE NORTH
I~INE u:' SAID NORTHW~ST (~UAR'T.ER 2q0.66 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH QU ~:~1?~REES 26 MINUTES 55 SECONDS ~AST PARALLET~
FiZTH SAIA EAS'1' T,TNE 8.00 FFFT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES
~12 MTNUTFS 00 SLC~ND5 WEST P}1RALLEL Wl:TH SAID I~'ORTH
LINE 367.10 F~;ET TO THE WErT LINE Of THE EA5T HALT' OF
SAID NQIt'rHWEST QUAR'PER, BEINC THG CEN2'ER LINE CiF LEMON
STE2EET; THEP7CE NORTH 00 D~:GR~~S 23 MINUTES 25 SECC~NDS
WEST :4I,UNG SAII) WEST LINE 660.OC F~ET TO A POZN'.C WKICH
IS DTSTANT SOUTH 00 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST
253.00 FEET FROM TIiE NOR"i'HWEST CORNER C1F THE EAST HALF
UF SAID NORTEIWEST QUARTER; 'I'HENCE NORTH 89 nEGREES 42
MTNi7TES OQ S~COPIDS EAS; PARAI.LEL TO THE NOI2TH L'!NE OF
SAID NURTHWEST QUART~R 228.00 FEE:T; 7.'EIEP~CE NORTH 00
`' DECP.EES 23 MINUTES 25 SLCONDS WES`P PARALLEL WITEI THE
WEST LINE OF THL EA`~7.' EiALP' OF SAIU NORTHWEEST QUARTER
253.00 FEF.'r 'f0 TEIE NOR'i'H LTNE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER; }3ETNG THE CENTER L:LNE nr Of2ANGETHURPE AVENUE;
a, THENCE NOR'TFI $9 DEGREES 42 MTNUTES QO SLCONUS EAST
ALOi'JG SATD NURTH LIN~ 37$.75 FEET TO T.HF POINT OF
, BEGINNING.
SAID iAND IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE FkEA SHOWf7 ON A MHP
F:LLED IN DOOK 5, PAGC 9 Of RECOI2D OF SURVFYS, IN TFiE
c)FF:LCF. OF T[~E: COUNTY I2ECORDEF OF SATD COUPITY.
c~ioaaza~
^,.
~-
-~-
PC90-265
r ,,~F~
.. , .. . !,,'1
~~
O
~~
;::
~•~.~..~~~..
~ '~~ ,,,r~;i:~,q
~ ~ ~
~~~
WHEREA3, the C:ity Planning Cammiseion dic~ ;~ol,~ a publ.ic hearing
~t the Civic ConL•er in the Ci~;.y of Anaheim on Novamb~r 19, :19~0, a~ 1:30 p~m.,
notire of said public hearing having been dul.y g3.ven ae zequire.d b,y law and in
~ccordance wi~:Y~ the ~roviaione of the Anatzeim Muciicipa.l ~.~de, Chapter ~.8.03,
to hea: and considpr evidence for ai~d againat said pr~~~+oBed vaL•ir.nca and to
investigate and make fi-~di.ngs anct rQCOmm~nd~tionc~ in r,~nncac~tian therewith; ar~d
WHER~AS, said CammiESion, ~fter due inapQCti~ci, investigati.r~a
and studX made by itaolf and in its behalf., and af.tez duo consideraLion of all
evidenae and repc~rts affQred at eaid hearing, dooA find and detc:rmine the
foll~wing fac..e:
1. ':ha1: the p~titioner p.r~pas~s waiver~ of thQ fo2lowing to 3dd
a G8 sq.ft, cabinet to an ~x.isting 34G sq.ft, pule ei,qn:
Sectiana 18.05.Oy;~.022 - Maximum ar.ea of freestandi.ng ~iqn.
and 18.45.067 (350 ect•ft. permitted; 408 sc~.ft. prnp~a~fl)
2. That the abov~-mentioned waiver i.s Yiereby granted on i:he
I.iasic that there are special circum~~ancee applicable to the property such as
aize, ehapa, topography, lacation and surroundings whlch do not: ~pply to ather
iden~ically zonPd property in tlie samr3 vic.inity; and that atric~ application of
the 'Loni~ig Code depr.iv~as th~ property af priv.ilegee enjoyed by other properti.es
in the identical zone and claseiflcation in the ~vicinit,y.
3. That the~e are exception~~' or extraordinary circumstances or
concli.tions ~ipplicable to tt~~ pr~perry ~.~olved or to the intended uae of th~
prop~rty t.hat do nat apply qenerally to *.he property or cla~s of us~ in the
same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requeated variance ia n~cessar,y ~or the
pres~rvatiran and enjoyment of a~ubgtani:ial prop~rty r.i.qht possess~d by other
property in the Esame vicinity and zor~e, and den:~.ed to the propert,y in questioti.
5. That the requeei:~d variance wil.l not be materi~tlly
detrimental to tl~e public o~elfax~ or injur.ioue to th~ propQr*.y ~r improvomenta
in euch vi.cinity and zone in which ttie pronertX is locai:o3.
6. Tha~ no ono indicate~ their F~resence at said public h~ari.ng
in oppoaition; arid that n~ correspondenca waR received ~.ri oppoeiticn to subject
pet.ition.
CALTF'ORNJA ENVIRONMENTAL_QUAI~I~rY AC`1' FINDING: The Planning Director
oi hi~ authorized representa~ive ha~ determ.ined that tho propaeed groject fa11s
within tho defi:~ition of Cateyorical ExQmp~ione, Cla~s il, as detined in thQ
State EIR c3uidelinQS and io, therefore, CStfBCJ0l-ically exempt from th.e
requirement ±o prc:pare a.n ExR.
-2- PC90-265
.. . ... . /~GI
_ ,
~,
~ ~; ,;
,~~-~~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ ~
r
';
i
NOW, THEREr^ORE, f3E IT FtFSOLVED that L-he Anaheim City Planning
Commiaeion does her.eby grant subject Petition for Variance, upcn the following
aonciitionr~ whien are h~ereby .faund to be ~ necea~ary prerequisit~ to the
proposed uee of thQ Hubject pioperty in ordor to prQeerve ~the safety and
gen~ral we].far.e oP the Ci.tizene of the City of Anaheim:
1. * That thQ conetruction ~uthoriz~cl by thia resolation sh~].1 b~ sexved by
undeiground utilities.
2. 'rhat the ].egal owner af aub~ect pr~perty shall maintain a minirnum twe].ve
(12) foat eeparation betwean all portiond of the structure and high
v~ltage power lines thaY are adjac~nt to or aoross sub~ect praperty. Any
egutpmQn~ used in thca construct:ior~ an~ ~aintenancg of ft~cilities loaated
a~i subject groperty shail not be rat~ed within ten (10) feet af
overhead high voltaqe powEr liries, de required bX the Electrical
Engineering Divieion.
3. * That i;.rash etarage areas ~hall bp refurbished tn the oatiafaction ~f the
Street Naintenanc~ and San.'.tation Division ta c~:mply with appraveci plany
on file with said divisi~n.
4. Thnt sub3ect property ahall be develcped aubstantially in accordanr,a with
plans and spe~ificationo ~ubmitted tr~ th~ City c~f Anaheim 'py the
p~titioner arid which plans are an fi1~ with the Planning Departmen~
mar}cQd of Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
5. '~hat prior to fin3i ~uilcli.ng and zoriing i.nspec~ion~ or within a~'~eriod of
on~ (1) year from the date ~f this reDOlution, whichever or.cur4 first.
Cnnditian Nos. 1, 2, 3 arcl 4, aoove-mentioned, nhall bp comFlied with.
6. * Tiiat. approval of thie application r,ansLituL•es approval of the propased
requeat only to the extent that i~ complies with ttip Anahe.im Munici.pal
Zoning Code and any other appl.icable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does nat in~lude any actian or findings as to
compliancQ or ~pproval of th~ request regarding any ~~her applicable
ordir.anco, regulatlon or requirement. Conditiona mark~a with an aster:is3c
(*) sre required by establiehc~d lo.wa, code~s, Y~gulationa and agreementa
and are, theref.ol:e, not subject to negotiation.
B~ IT F[1RTHER R~,SOLVEU that the Anaheim Ci~y Planning Conuni+~sion does
hereby f.ind anci determinp that ~doption of thi.e R~solution ia expressly
predicated upon zpplicant's compl.iance with each and all of. the canditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such cor.dit.iona, or any part there~P, be
declared invalid or unenforcoab3.e by tho fina.l judymant oE any court of
rompatent jurisdi~:tion, kt~er~ tt~i-g Reaoltition, and any approvala herein
cnntained, c~ha11 b~ deemed nu11 and void.
_3_
PC90-265
;,
;;
, 's,'~;
r - - --.. . . ~-...+~.v..
.
_
-,
~
~ a
~ ~ ±:~~
~`~~
N . ' ;~;~Y`~?~
4, . % x,
. ~ . ~ i J
~,f
THE FOREG~ING R~SOLUTION wae adopted at the Planning Commis9ion mesting '<;
of ~lovember lg, 199~.
- ~/ / "' ~" /,/ '~f
/~;~
:~«~
%~ , ~ ` 1`"_"
;
-:C
J~~
.
J
~
. ~
~.
,_.~~..
~HATRWOMr~N, ANAHEIM CITY
P'LAN~ NING COMMTSSTCIN
ATTEST:
; /y/~ .~',~
.
'~
~ /
'
~
'i
~ /
/
"//`
i)~ : ~~/~i
~
! SEC
RX pR0 T~M~E
r AN~FiEItQ CTTY P.LANNING COMM:LSSIO~I
, c_ ; -
STATi OF C1~',zFOR1~YIA )
COf)NTY OF OP'.NGE j as.
CITY OF AN1~FiEIM )
T. ~7anet L. Jensen, secretary fro Tempore a£ ~he Anaheim City Planning
Commiseion, do hereby cPrtify that the foreg~ir~g resalution was gassed ana
adopted at a meeting of the Ariaheim City Planning Cortuliisafon held on N~vember
19, 19y0, by the foll~winq vote of. the members thereof:
AXES: r,r~MMI5STONERS: BOYDSTUN, BOUAS, FET,pHAUS, P~RAZA
NOES: COMMIuSIONERS: HELLYF:•2, HENIVING~R, MESSE
?1BSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
rN 'WITNE~S WFiEREOF, I nave here~anto seC my hand this '~ .:~''~' day
of ~i. ; • ~; ~- _. 1990.
~ i~' :~`~ ~ G~t ~ J,~
) 7F ' ~ _~
~G~, ...~_.. C;~~._~ ~,.,_, -~ x-:
, S~CR~TARX PRU '~EM~~ORE ~
" AI~'AHFI2~ CITY 1?Z;ANNTNC COMMTSSION
-4-
,;
;
'I
:,
~.. :
PC90-265