Resolution-PC 90-274;~~
RFSOLUxION IVQ. PC90-274
~~
A RE50I,UTTON OL' THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAZ' PEZ'ITION FOR COND7TIONAL US~ PEF2MIT R0. 3365 BE~ GkAIJTEb
~
,.;~ n~~s~a~
t
,;
':~~;
, ;';
SdFiEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commiseian did roceive a
verified Petition for Canditional Use Permit gor. cnr•tain real p.raperty
aituated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, 5•~ate nf Cali.fornia,
~ deecribod As:
F~ARCEL 5, IN TF1E CITY OF ANAHETM, COUNTY OF Ol2ANGE,
S'!'AiE OF CALIFORNIA~ AS SHOWN ON A PARCE.L MAP rILEA IN
HOOK 2 PAGE ]. GI' PARCEL M}1PS, ZN T.3E OFF'ICE OF THE
CUUNTY RECORDER OE' SAID COUNTY.
WHEFtF,AS, thc~ City PZanning Commieoion did hold a public hearing
~ at the Civic Cer~ter i.n the Gity Uf Anaheim on Dec.ecnber 3, 1990, xt 1: 30 p.m. ,
notice of eaid public heazing tiaving beec~ cluly given as requi.red b,y law and in
;
accordanr:e with th~ provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 16.03,
to hear and coneider svidence for and againsL- ~aid proposed conditional use
pdrmit and to inveetigate and makE findings and r.~calnm~:-dations in connection
ti therewith; and
WFtEREAS, oaid Commisaion, after due in~pection, inv~stigarion
and stucly made by itsplf xnd in it~ ber~alf, and aftor. dua coa~idgration of all
Qvidence and roporto offerod at s~i.d h~aring, dc~es find and det~rmir,e the
foltowl.ng facte:
1. Taat thQ proposed uee ia properly c~ne for which a
conditional use permit ie authorized by Anaheim Municipa~. C~d~ 5eation
18.03.Q30.010 to retain a 324 aq.ft, apray booth.
2. That the proposod une will nor. adversely affect the adjoining
land unee ~nd ttic~ qrowth and developme^t of tho area in which i~ ie proposed to
be locat9d.
3. That the ~ize and ahape of tn~ eite proposed for the uee is
adequ3te to allow the full dQVelopment of tha ~roposed use tn a manner nut
r.: detrimenta~ to tha particular area nor to the peace, health, safoty and general
wel£are of thE Ci.tizene ~f tt-e City of AnahQi.m.
,:
4. That tho granting of the Conditional Uee Permi~ under thR
conditions imposed, if any, wi.ll not be dekrimental to the poace, health,
AafeCy and gor-eral wolfare of the ri~cizena of the City oE Anahaim.
5. That ttie traffic generated by the pro~oeed uee will not
impose an -indue burd~,ii upon the c~treete and higho~aya de~igned and imprnved to
carry the r.raffic in the area.
C1t1055MP -1- PC90-274
.e
,; ~~
.~
;;>s,
;a
~:'!~
•n
, K~a~.~
.~~1~
~; ,
6, That no one indicated the:Lr pre~ence ~t eaid publia hearing
in opposition; and that na correopondence wae recrjived in opposition i:o ~he
eubject peti.tion.
CALIF'nRNIA ENVIRONMENTAL~UALI~ C~' IrIN~D N,G: That the Anaheim
Cit.y Plannin~,7 Commiaeion hao reviewed the ~,rap~Aal to retain a 324 sq.ft.
apray booth on a rectangulazly-shaped parcel of land ron~isting of
approxima~ely 0.~3 acre having a frnntage of approximately 1Q~ feeL• on ~the
eae~ ~id~s of National Stroet, havixig a snaximum dep~h ot appr.oxi.mately 185
fee~, being 1.acated approximately 180 fee~ north af th~ een~erline. of Liberty
Avenue and further referred to aR 1808 Narth National StreQt; anrl does hareb,y
apnr.ova thP NegAtive Declar.ation upan finding that it hae ~•oneidezed •~t~e
Negative Declaration togettier with axiy commAnta r.~ecaived duz~ing the pubiic
rev~,eW prncese and furth~r finding on the ba~io that the tni~ial study und :,~ny
commentA received thai: there i~ no eubetantial ev~dAnc~ that. tho projact: wi17.
have a eignif icanL- effect on the env3.ranment.
NoIJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEq that the 7.,naheim City Planning
Commieaion does hereby grant subject P~tition for Canditior~al Use P~rmit, upon
tha f~ilowi.ng conditi~nR which are hereby founcl to be a. necessary pr2r~quis.ite
to the propoeed ueo of the du~ject prop~rty in order ~o preserve the eafety
and genr~ral welfare of the Citizene of the City of Anaheim:
,
1. That a fire hydrant ahall be insi;allod and chsrged ae required and
approved by the Fire Department.
2. * That f ira ~prinklere shall be in~talled Por •the apra~y paint booth as
rQquired by thg Fire Department. Saic~ booth e}~all also be protectad fzom
the waather by a roof atruct~ire approvad by the Fire nepartment.
3. Thr~t th~ owner/developer ahall obtain a pEarmit from the Fir.e Departmc~nt t~
oporat~ the spray booth.
4. That subjoct property ehal.l be cisvel.oped eubgtani:ially ici accordancn with
plane and epecificationa eubmit~ed to th~ City c~ Anaheim by the
petitioner and whicli plane are on file with the Planning Aepartment markecl
Exhibi~ I~ds. 1 nnd 2.
i.
5. That the o;aner of eutject ~roper.ty 9ha11 aubmit a lettar to the Zoning
Uiviaion requesting t~rminat.ton of Condirional tlse Per.mit No. 1970.
6. That Conditi.on Noe. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, above-mentio-~od, c~ha11 be completc~d
within a period of ni~ety (90) daya fram the da~e of thia r_QOOlution.
7, * That ai~proval of thia applicatiun conatitutes approval of ~he propoged
requeet only to the extent that it compliea wi~th the Anahe3m Mur.icfpal
Z~ninq Code and nriy other applicable City, State and Federal ~-Qgul.ati~ne.
Approval doee nat includ~ any action or. findinge as to co~npliance or
approval ~f the requ~st regarding any other applicab].A ordinance,
regulation or. rec~uirament. Conditionfl marked with an aaterisk (*) az~
required by es~abliehed lawe, codES, regulation~ ancl agreements and are,
therefore, not eubjact to negotiation.
-2-
PC90-.27d
,,~~1~;
':';r
lrt
~~.'v
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ',:r s> 1`i~°"'~"p~
~;. ~~ iu ~1i~
~~
~ ~ ~~i `~~
~, '~ ~a ;,,
~~~~:
BE IT FURTHER RESOI,VED that the Anaheim City Planning Commiosion ;;,;;
doea hereby find and dotormine that adoptian of thie Reaolution i~ expzensly
predicated upon applicant's campliancQ ~~ith each and all of the condit3.one
hereinubove set forth. Sh~uld any auch condition, or any part thereof, bQ
d~:clared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment oE any court of
cnmpetent jurisdic~ion, i:han thie R~so].ution, and any appr.avala herein
coritained, ahall be d~em~d null ~tnd void. `,
:~
'rHL I'ORFGOING RESOLU'~ION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of DeoQmber 3, 1990.
' l' ; .:~; , ._~~.._..
-- -'. -- ~ri-.~_~,-- -: (~-t c <., ''~,~ , ''f: ~1: ; L;:.•'..i. c. /..:.-'
CHATRWUMAN, ANAEIEIM CITY P ANNII3G CGMMISSION
}1TTEST:
~
~ / .
C CRETARY PRti T PORE
APtAHEIM CTT~ LANNING COMMISSIGN
STATE OF CAI~TFORNIA )
COUNTY OF OFtANGs ) ~s.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
z, Janet L. Jenoen, secreta.r.x Pro Tempora of the Anahoim City
P].anning Commiasion, do he.reb,y certify i:hat the foregoir.g res~lu~i~n was
paased ar.d adoptQd at a meating of th8 Anaheim City Planning Commieaion held
on December 3, 1990, by the following vaL~ of the membera thereof:
AYES: CQMMISSIONk;RS: BOUI~S, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, ~SLLYER, HENIIINGER,
MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONFRS: NON~
AB~EN~: COMMISSTOt:' x~: IJONE
','~
IN 4'vI'1'NF,~S WHEAEOF, i have har~euntu set my hand tha.s ,~ day
~~~~g~_ ~ 19 9 0 .
~ ~~--~ ,~ , ~-*' ^~.----.~.-~
~ ~ RETARY PRU T~M/P /E~
C~-~ IAHETM CITY F~L~I~FTi~1~TG COMMISSION
' „t,!Y
~.,', .
-3-
PC9~-274
`;:
:,.,.
:~~1I
~t~~
~~