Resolution-PC 90-275~
R~SOLU'PION Pl<). PC9p-2'75
~ ~,i,pi f I{~
c< ;{,.`I;
~
A REEOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PL'ANNJNG COMMISSION
TF1AT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFTCATZON NO. 40-91-17 BE GRANTT~D
~1Hk:REAS, the Anaheim CiCy Planning Commission did receive ~
vpii£ied petition for~ Reclassification for real prop~ri:y eituatecl in the City
ot Anaheim, County of Orangs, Stat~ of California, c~escri~ed as followa:
THAT PORTInN OF TEiE SOU'LHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUART~R OF FRAC'rIONAL SECTION 24 TGWNSHTP 4 SOUTH,
RANGi~. 10 Wk:ST, IN TH~ RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJUPI DE SANTA
RNA, CITY QF ANAE~EIt•1, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STA'PE OF
CAL:1L'CIFNIA, RS SHOWN ON A MAP RECOTtDED IN BOOK S1 PAGE
10 OF biISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFTCE UF T'r1E COUNTY
RECORD~R OF' SAID COUN1'Y, LX1NG SOUTT~iF.RLY O^ THE
SOUTHERLY LIDIE OF THE LAND DESCR:LBED TN '1'HE D'ELD r0
~HG SANTA F~ RaILRdAD COMPANY (FOFtMERLY THE CALIFOY.NIA
CENTRAL RI~ILWAY COMPANY) RECORDED MAY 4, 1962 I~T BOOK
6098 QAGE 393, Or OF'FICIAI~ RECORDS.
THA'P PORTYON OF LOT 5 TN TRACT t10. 71, IDT THC C:ITX OF
ANAEIEIM, COUNTX OF ORAiQGE, STAT~ pF CALIFORNIA, AS PER
MAp TtECOFtDEU IN BUOK 10, PAGE 22 O~' M?SCELLAN~OUS
MAPS, ~N THE OH FICE OF THE LOUNTY R;:COFtDER ON SATD
COUNTY, LXING PJOR'THERLY Or' THE C~NTERI.INE OF kATEULA
AVENU~, AS UESCRTIiL;D TN THF. OECR~~ OF CONDFMNAT:CON,
RECORDED JULY 8, 1960 IN BOUK 5.i21, PAGE 3y7, n~'FICIAL
RECORDS.
EXCEPT THAT PORTTON OI' SAID LAtdD LYIrG EASTERLY OF THE
~AST LINE OF THE LANU D~~CRIRGn ~N UEED TO MAYJRICR E.
BI''/ENS, ET UX., FtrCORfiEU JUNF :17, 1927 IN f300K 62,
PAGF 45 ~'JF OFFTCIAL RECORDS.
SRID LAND 7S TNCL[JDED 54ITHIN THE AREA SHOWN OlQ A MAP
FILL~ IN BOOK 51, PACfi: 38 OF RECORUS OI' SURVE:YS, IN
TE3E O'r'~ICL OF .°,ATD CUUNTY I2ECORUER.
CRIOGOJJ
-1-
PC90-275
. _„~.r.~;~
~
~'.
~
. ~ ,~FF r~ 4 ~4~~~
~ tM
~~J
~ ~(i
'i.i!11
, .. ~.,~,_,t.
WHEkEAS, the City Planning Commiseion di.d hold a public hearing
at the Civic Cen~er xn the C1ty of Anakisim on Docemk~er 3, 1990, aL 1:30 n.m.,
na~tice ~F aaid publia h~arir.g t~aving been du].y qiven aa i~ec~uis~d by law and in
acccrdancQ with the provioi.c~ne o:E the Anahaim Municipa.l. Code Chapter 18.03, to
hear and coasider evidence for and aqatnEt eaid proposed reclae~i~iaatian and
to ir~vest i ate ~nd
5 make fi
ndin s
and
reco
9 mmenda .
ti.ans i.
n .
connectian th~r~with~
arid that the public hear..ing wao continued to llacember 17, 1990; and
wHERF'AS, said CammisRion, after due inapection, invest;igation and
study mad~ by it~elf and in its beh~lf, arid after due cone3.doiv~:ion of a2.1
evidence and reporta of£ersd at ~~id hearing, does find and determine i:hQ
follawing Ec1Ct8:
.l. That the pPtitionex• pr.opoaes recl~s~ificaticn of qubjac~t
properLy irom the ML (Limited, Tndus~rial) 'Lo,ze to thc~ CO (Commeraial., Offic2
ana Profedr~ional) or a].ess intens~ zone.
2. That th~ An,sheim Ge,~Qra1 Plan designatea ~ubject property fo.r
Bu3iness Of}:ice, Servic~ and Zndustri.al land uaes.
3. 'Phat thP propr~std reclassif.ication nf subjecL• praperty is
nECessary and/or dE~irable for the orderly and proper develc~pment of the
community.
4. That khe proposed rec.lassi.ficat.ion of aubject property doea
properly relate ~~o the zories and their permi.tted u~e~ locally es~abliehed in
close proximity to subject ~r.oper~ty and to the zones and their permitted usea
generaJ.ly establi.:~hed ttiroughaut the communit~,
5. That the praPosed reclaseificatian of gubjeat property
requires the dedication of abutting atie~te 3.n accar.dance with the Circulation
Elem~nt of tYie General Plan, due *o the anticipa4ed ii7crease in traffic which
will be generated by the .intennificati~n of land use.
6. ThaY no one indicated their presence at: sai.d public hear~ing
in oppo~ition; and rha* no coi-r.er~pondence waa rece.ived i.n oppaoition tc~ subject
petit•ion.
ENVIRONMF.NTAL IMPACT AidALXSIS,: That the Anaheim City ~lanning
Com~niasion doe~ her.eby find purauant to the California Env3.ronmenta.l Quality
Act and the State and City CEQA Gufd~lines, that after consi.dering Draft EIR
No. 304 for the propoaed Central Park To~•ar.e project and r.eviewing evidenc~
F>re~~nted; both written and oral, to aupplement Draft EIR Nu. 304, the Planning
Commiar~ion finda that:
(a) Draft E1Ft TGo. 304 i[~ in complfance with thQ California
Environmenta.i Quality Act and the Si:ate and City CEQA Guidelinesj
(b) The project ie con3istNnt wiL•h the intent of the ~ity~s General
P.lar. for the site and will be c~mpa.tiUle with surroundi.ng land
usea;
~ r.
-?° PC90-275
Revieed 1/YO/91
~ ,
~
~
C~
~
~
.. . . . . '. i
1. 'lA.SS'%1't
~ ~:Ih~
. l
- . .. . ~ < ~!
' ~t;l
(c) Draft FTR No. 304 identifiea the fo1].uwing impacts which are
con~idered to be both unavoidabl~: and adv~rae in nature and not
fully miti.gated to a leval of ineigniEi.cance;
o.,
. Transt~ortation/Circulatior. •- Under. project apeci£ia condit3ane, the
siac~een ei:udy interAections wil.l o~erat~ at an acaeptable LevQl of
yerv.ica (LUS) D or botter after mitigatian. HowevQr, under
cumulative cond.itione after mitigation~ ttie intersocti.fln of Sta~e
College Bou].evarc~,'Katella Avenue wi11 oporate at LOS D dur,ing •the
a.m. praak•-hour ai~d LOS F wi*.hout the Pacifico Avenue Overcroeoing
and LOS E ~~ith tne Pacifico Avenue vvercrosaing in the p.m.
peak-hc,ur. Improva:nente beyond tlze critical intersection stanc:ard
woul.~ be required to mitiqate thia intar~ection to an LOS D or
better during the p,m. paZk-haur.
. Air pue.litY - Fven though the threshold £or ~tationary and mobile
r~au•rce emi~siono for an-site uees will not exr_~;;d tihe ar~f:eria
apecified by the South Co~st Fsi.r Qualii:y Management Aiatrict, the
Soutih Coast Air Basin does not meet SLate and Federal atandarde tor
ambient air quality. Thia effect wauld occur wlth or withnut the
project.
FINDINGS•
(c~) Section 15C°1 of the CEQA Guidelinee r~quires that one ar mor~
findings be ~~ad~ for each aignificant erivironmental effects. Tttree
iinding categories are poasible. Sections A, B and C belaw state
each finding, and ~chen ident.ify ttie impact categorier~ E~~r which thee~
flndings are appropriate.
~1. "Changes or alterations have bc~n required in, or incorporated
into, the project which avoid or subatantially leesen the
signi.ficant envir~nmpntal effe~:t ar~ identified in the Draft
F.IR." This f.inding applies to the Following environmental
effects of the project:
. Land Uoe
. Geo.logy/SoileJSeiemir.ity
. Hydrology
. Socioeconomica
. Acoustics
. Public Sorvicea
. Aeatheti.cs
Refer to ~h~ llra£L EIIt for a full discuesion of the above
impa~:ta, the miti.gat.ton meae~ures pre~r.ri.bed and a discuaei.or~ of
impact sigi~ifir~ance after mitigation.
L,:.,_~~,,.... . .. _,..., ,
6. "Such changea or 37.L•erations are within the iesponaibility $nd
jurisd±~tian of anather public agency and nat the agency making
the finding. Such change~s have been adopted by ~uch other
agency or can and ahould be adopted by such other agency."
"'3` PC90-275
Revised 1/10/91
,.
~
;;,~.
,:~ ;;
:;'r~~
tlu~'77~
~.~ ~
.:~i~ .,i..~„~~ i
7l,~~'.{~i~i}~`~yS~~i
~~'~MA .
~ . ~ ' ;1~~~
~~ '~h ~
~
pi~i~
~~
~ ~1~A;
~ r ~i
~
Y • „ . ?>t~
. .
. .!,i
~,~~'. i,;.
. :..,,,,,.
~'h~=e are nn other agPnci~s that have been idan1:ifi,Qd thxou
the EIR procesA which havE
gh
~
jurisdiction over tli,is ~1~~ '
i ,
C. "Speciflc ecotaamic
~ dQC1.11
or c~
~
other c~nsid~rations make
3.nfe~asible the miti~~ation -
~,;
~I',,.'
:
:
measures or project alteznatives
identi.f ~ ?~ ~.n ~;(~e Draft ~~
Ezz~ .;;J
"•''
>
.;
~'
The Eollowing diecusaion
idFntifi
.ss the varioua altez~r~a~ivee
conyidered in t-h.e Draft EIR, follow
d
1
e
b
rationale .tor findin th~g~ Y~n expl2nation of the
g ~lternatives infea
rejecting ea
ib
''`'i
;
s
me,
le and~or
r.
~:: NO PRO'J~C"' ALTER~ATTVF'
; Tl~ir~ alternative aa~umee
~he '~~
''
~
continuation o~
condition.s.
The site would retai
8 ~~
and va~ant area.
n the bank, agr.tcult;ural
useg
Economic benefii:
`''~"
s to the community and the
cur.ren~ Gc~neral Plan object
•~e
~ _
s wau].cl not
3ddition, approximately 2,~64 l~ng_ter
~
n
, m empl~ym~
w~auld not be real.tzed. $
t opportuntti
e
.
This alternati.ve does not, hr,wever
in accr~rdance with. plannin a ' pz~clude future development
d ''
`~'
tl-:e time of 9 n
zuning standards in exi.etenoe gt
perm3.t is$uancE. ~'
,
~;;~
; The No pr.o7ect Alt~,•.,~,, •
ive could be consider.a_ci envirqn•rRnt
si.~~~er. ior to ~hc~
ll ~ ^~
v
~ ~,
,
~ a
y
~nvironmental 4 pr~Ject as it would eliminate thoee
ff.ects of
the :
';{
.
project identified in the Draft
E:[R. Other. effecta may, howev
,
: er, be mor~ siynificant such as
duyt from the aqricultural ,
; operation.
~~pecif.ied in ti~e Draft ~IR ~vould no~ b~ a
t objQCtives
;t'
ccomplishad '
' 7Cnis alternative i '~
' s conaider.ed
ra'ECted infeasible and, therefore
] ber.au9e it iail
,
s to meet any of t-ie
or to provide social end
b
~
economic benefits assoceated
project.
with
the
;~
REDUCL;D OFrIC~ SPACL ALTERNATIV~
T}iis elternakive reduces the tot~l amounh of office/bank $pacQ
bY 22 percent which eguates to an eliminat
• feet or approximatel,y 3 floore in bothi~officeztower~ae~uare
Projeeted tzipo generated would The
percent reduction from the be reduc~d ~0 5,093 (or a 17
w~uld generate 498 Iees employmenteo ~roje~t). 7'his alterna~ive
~lcmanda would be reduced. PPortunities and all r~ervice
The Reduced Offi.c~
Envirnnmental^1 ~ S~ac~ Alternative
Y su~erior because of thn._ is ~oneidered
generated and the zr~dLlc~io.i in impacts u#on~r daily tripa
_.. compar~d to the project. P Public ee.rv,{,cee ~'
-4-
PC90-275
Revised 1/10/91
'i
~
~
~~''7~r~~+~6~ F;:;c,:`• , + r ' E
_ . . . ~'~~
U`r i; ;ry .
. . . . . - . . .. . ~r . . ~ ~``~'~ , ,.o.-.!~ 1A .~
' ~ ' ~~~~~r
I
~ 'T~
This altarnative would not meat pr~ject objer.t.ive~. Th~ R~duced
Offico SpacH Alt~rnntivr~ .te a loeo oconomi.cally Feaeible
alterative for the a~pl3.can2:, tiherefore, ~he site may remain
undevelnped. 'rhie alternntiv~ ia conaidered tr.feaeible and,
therezfnro, is rejecrE~d.
NO RESTAtLN;~ OR RETA~_I,~ ALT_ gp,NAT~VE
ThiF~ altern~itive E~ro~~pA@8 the DAQIEE amount of office and hotel
uaes but would elimina*_e the rgtail and raa~auz~Ant portion of
rhe projQCt. Since na rentaurant or retail uc•~
~lai ly tra, f. ± c tri ~ .. e are propoead,
p genora,.ec~ would be reduced to 8,244
japproximatc~l,y 13 parcent le~n then the proposed projec~). xn
additian, no c~alAe C~zx weuld be generated and the aheence of
retai.l and restaur~nt uaes could lnw~r the hotel occupancy and
thua lower City tranaient occupancy tax rQVQnues.
The No Reataurant ar Rotali AitFrnakive is conaidered
environmentally euperiar d~:e tc~ the fe
Howevei•, ~dditional traffic ma b~ WQL tr.ipe gonerated.
Y gen~ratsd duri~q the lunah
hour, in co~nparison wi.th the propo~ed project. All A~soc~~tad
public servicQ d~mand~ ar!~ sJ..tghtly .lower than the propoee~
projecG (due to raduced oquar~ footage).
Thifl alternati.ve i4 cu~eidereci.infeaalble based upon the above
comment:~ and, thereforo, is rejected.
(p) AND FURTHER, the Pianning commieaion furttier determinP[~ thpt the
benefita uf the projPCt have been wc~ighed againet the unav~ideble
adverse environmenta; Lmpacte and ~urauant to Saction 15093 of the
~t~~te CEQIs Guidelinos, the occurrenc~ of the signiflcant
env.ir~nmc:ntal impactA fdenr.ifie.9 in praft EIR No. 304 ae pet forth
c1~~~~e. may be permitted without further mitigation ~due to the
following ~verriding considerationo:
Zo the e;ctent that ary impacts (includinq, without limitotion,
cumulati~e impacta) attr.ibut•oble to the Central Park Towera project
re,nain ut~mitiqated, surl~ impacte are acc~ptabl~ in liyh* of the
overriding avcial, econamic and other cUnaf_deratione Aet forth
herein. The project alternatives oet forth in the EIR are in~c~aeib.le
for rhese :eanons ~~d jQHg ~~8irable than *.he propoe~d pr.oject.
Additio»a1 mitig~~tlon meanures and t}~a alcArnativea would impoee
li.mitati.ons nnd rQOtrictione on the deveiopmQnt of the CQntral Pazk
Tuwere nroject wtiich would ~rohibit obr.~iining the apecific eociAl,
~conamic and othor ben~ffte of tha projQCt which outweigh the~
unmitiqatFi~ impactc~, ~nd which juo~ify ap~roval ~E thie project.
-5-
1'^90-275
Re ~ioRd a j LO/~l
~
~
~~
;,,~;;'
, ;+
The fnllo~,inq ooci.al, econc~mic and other canei~eratic~ns H~arrant
aFpruval of thie ~zojact notwithntzndinq uny Unavuidable or.
unmii:igatQd i.rnpacto resulting tram tine C~nt.ral Purk Towero groj~ict.
,'~. Jobs and Ecnn~mic Gr~~wkh
Tho praject c~ito ie located tn c:1~eQ ~roxlmity t~~ major frRewray
' and ratlroad oydtema, and ia c~ntxally locatod within the
' Caunty. ThEt ~tto conktnusa tf~Q office e~mphasis creutad in the
Anlt~eim Stadium Buainens G~nter. ~'he projRCt wi11 providQ
appr~xfmatel~ 2,464 omployment opportuni.tie~, and will rooult in
A pooitive fiecal impact an tho Gity'e Generrzl Fund (annual
Aur.plus af S86,306).
Ei. Traffic/Circtilation
Project and cur;~ulative t~ttffic impacta can bo reduced by the
raconunended cnitigation meaaurs~s for the ~ro~ect, but thA
int~raectiun ~f State College 9oulevard;Ka'cella Avenue wtll
corti.nue to operate at ur,ace~ptable levels of Aervice with
mi*.igation for cumulative cond.f.tion~. All feae.ible mitigation
me~suree have be~n recomrncrnded for the px•ojoct. Physical
cor~o*_rainta pr.eclud~ further ci.rculation impravementa at t!~e
aff~cted interaection (Stat~ College Aaulevlyd/KaL•ella AvNnue).
C. Air ~uality
Stiort-tertin conc~truction emiaeions arQ mitigated to rt leve]l ot
ineignificazc~: and ~arban manoxide em.isoion$ ~re reduced to the
axtent fea~iblc~ by #arilitating traffia fl~w, by providina naw
;~obs Ln central oxanye t:ounty and by locaCing a hotcal i.n close
proximity tn busineae ar~d recr.eational facilitfee which wi11
reduce total vehicle mi.lea. Althouyh ~roject-qenorate~d
emifloiori~ are not consi.ciered regionally ~i~nificant, some Stata
and rr~deral dafly air po3.luti.on standarde (l.o., ozone,
particulAtee) are exceeded with o~ without L•ht~ praject.
(f) Sccti.on 21081.6 of the Public Resourcee Code requ±res th~t when a
publir. agency is making the ff~~dir.ge roquir.ed by Section 2:081(a) of
ttie P~blic Resourcec+ Code, the Agency nhall adopt a reporting or
mo»itoring progr.am for the changea to the project which it hao
adopteci or made a con9i.tion of project apprnval, i.n order tc mitigate
or avoid nigniFi,c~nt effocL•s on the snvironment.
The rity hereby finds that the mltignti,on m~aaures (liated in 3ection
:LV - Recommended ~o~diti~nc+ oE App_ov~l) have been incorporat9d into
a Miti;.q~tion Moriito~ ing Program that mQete ttie r~aqoirementa of
Saction 21081.6 of the Publir Renourcea Code and evhotantially
reducns thQ project'o environmRnr.al oifQ~te to ar. acceptable level.
-b- PC90-275
Revi.oed 1/10/91
!~ ' ^~
. , , . - . _ ... -~c•,r vl
~~ ~'~~
~,; tli
7(
(g) Thorofore, ~he Planninc~ Commi,~oion hQreby recommends certifiaation of
F~tIR Na, 304 ar-ci adopte thio Statemont cf overriding Cone~.d~+r.a~iune
an~;t:itigati~n Man~toring Frogram.
NOW, 'PHEREFOA,E, BF IT RESOLVED that th~ Anahefm Ctty Plannin~
Commi.ua.i•or- does h~reby grant eub joc~ 1~etition for RQClaeaific~t.ton and, by gp
, doing, that Ti•cl~s 18~Zoninq nf the Anahei.m Municipal Code be amended to
exclude thc~ above-describad p~;operty from the ML (LimiLed, Induatr.ial) Zon~
and to incor~orate aaSd deacri.bc~d prUp6rt,y i.nto the CO (CommQrc.ial, Offtce and
Profeasional) Zone upan th~a fol~owing conditiens which are herc~by found to be
a nece~~Rr~ prerequisite to thQ pro.poat~d use nf oubj~ct proporty in order. to
preaarve the naFety and gene;:al welfaro of the Citi~ene of thQ ~tty of.
Anaheim:
1. That the ~Qgal ~wner of eubject pro~erty A}13~1 izrevocabZy offt~r to
~9edicate ta the c~ity of Anaheim the follawing e~somento:
~• An ea~emEnt siuty (60y teet in widC}i from the centerline of ti~e
~treet al.ong the project~~ Siate Colleye B~ulevard frontage f~r
etreetc widening puri~osea.
b• An additinnai easemcnt twel~~e (12} fe~t in width alc,ng tha project~s
State College Doulevard frontage, includ.ing a~went•y .fivo (25) foo~
corner zeturn radiun, for Critical Tnteraection ar.d a~reet widening
pur~+oees.
C• An ear~ement ai.xty (60} feet in wfdth from L•h~s center'ltna of thp
atreet along the project'd Katella Avenu~ irontaye for street
wideriing purposea.
~• An aclclitional eaaement• tw~lve (12 ) t~et in ~,uidtb along the project' a
Katella Avenue fr~~nta~e, .incZudLny a twQnty fi•~e (25) foot corner
return radius, for Cr.iti~;~l Interaection anct strost widening
~urpo~es.
e• 11n eaecment for a w~.tcr aupply well ir.cludina provisione for ingreee
anci eqreae aL• ttie nortt~weat cortt~r of Dub ject p.roperty, aa required
by the General Manager of the Pui~lic Utilitfea AQpartment.
2. That t},e eLope eaecmc~nt ~lon~ the project'o State ~~ollege Boulev~xd
frcntage shall be abundon~d. The applicant shsll aubmit an application
for abandonment to the Real Property Section of the Public
Worke/~ngi.neeriny ~epartment for con9~.dQr,atian by the C.tty Council.
3. :hat th~ legnl ownor~s) o£ aubject iroperty ahall execute and re~oz'd an
unsubordinatsd covanant in a form approve~3 by tha Cft.y T.tr.orne;+'s OfEice
wher~in auct~ owner(a) agree not t~ conter~t thr~ formntion of an}•
aaaeebment di$txict(o) which may heroaftw_r b~ f"ormed for the p~~rpone ~~P
financinq the undc~rgr.ounding of utilitiee f.n tlie Anc~tQim 5tadium Nusineae
C~ntur, and which dioCrict(~J could inclu~e aur,h lega? owner(a)'
Pro~erty.
'7r PC90-275
Revfi~Qd 1j10/9.1
fi
~
. , . .. ~ f {i t~j,~~~i
~ 4:r5
, y r,
P.
a. Tha~. prior. to the introduc~ian of an ordinanc~ rezoning c~ubject pro~r~rty,
c~r wittiin a period uf nin9ty (9~7) daya from the dai:e of thi~ resolution,
wt~ichev~r oacura firr~r., the legal owner(sy of subjoct property ehall
~xacut~ And reccrd ~n unaubor.dinated covenanC in a:orm approved by the
City Attorney'a Office whdrai-1 such owner(e) agreo noL *.o conteet •che
forma~ion uf any asae~omont• aietrict(s) which may horeai`tar be formed
purQUant ta the provi~tions of Aevelopr~ent Aqreemen~ No. 83-O.1 between the
C.it}r uf Anat~eim and AnahQim Stadium Roeaciateg, whicti ciietrl.ctls) could
i.nclude ~uch leg~l owner(s)~ property, A copy oP ths rec~rded covenant
sha11 then 4~ eubmitted to the Zoril.ng Diviaian.
5. 'Phat prio.r to introduct.Lon nf an ordinance rezoning eubject property,
Condit.i~n NoH, 1, 2 anfl 3, above-mentloned~ shal]. be completed. The
pruviaionr~ or righta c~rarited by thie reaclution for ~he l~o~el component
( Pr,ase I) r~hall t~ecom~; null and void }ay act~ on of the Planning Commiesion
unle3a ea:_d condlrior.a ar~ campli.e~ with within one (1) yQSr from the
date of t;hia resolution. The remaining pcovisiona or right-~ yranted by
this resoJ.ution 9~1t1~1 become nul.Z xnd votd by action ~f the Planntng
Cammigs±on un~.esA eaid condition~ arc~ cnmplie~a w.ilh within the later of
(i) one yNar from the date of thio resolution or (ii) 180 days from the
~~ ~xpir.atiun or earlier tezrnination of Uevelopmenr 7lgroeme~r. NQ, 90-02,
~'. provided that the terminati.on i.a not due to a defau).t of the lPgal owner
purt~uant to the terms of the: Deve~opmAnt Agreement, x~ determined by the
City af Anaheim. Lxtc~nsions pi time may be granted in dCCJZCif1riCQ with
Sect:ion 1a.03.U90 of the Ariaheim Municfpal C;r,c3e.
G. * That the legal owner(s) of Hubjcct: property ohall be hQld reaponsible for
comp).ying w.ith thP miti~atian monitr,rinc~ proqram ~atablishsd by the City
of An3heim in compliance with Sc;c~ion 21081.6 of the Public Resaurcea
Cade,
7. * That a~•proval ~f thie applicatic~n conetitutea approval of the proposed
reqt~est only to the extent that it compliQO with L•he Anaheim Munfcipr~l
Zoning Code and any other applicable City, Statp and Federal.
regulationa. Approval does itot include any action o.r f~ndinge a~ to
compliance or approvai of the requent re~arding any oth~+.r applieable
ordinance, r.egulation or requit~ement. Co~iditiona marked wi.th a~- asterisk
(*) are requfred by eetabliehed lawe, codea, r.egUlaL•i~ns and agreemente
and ar.e, thereforc, net oubject r_~ negoriatfon.
F3~ IT FURTHEI2 RESOL~IED ~het the Anaheim City Planni~ig C~m~nieaion does
her~by find and determi.no that adoption of thir; Resolution ia Qxpresely
predic:ated upon applicant'e compli3nce with earh anci all of the corditi~ne
hsreinabov~ eet fnrth. Should any a~ch conditions, or any part t.hereof, be
declared f.nv.~lid or unenforceable by the fi;~a.t }udgment of any court of
competant juriedic~i~n, tF~en r.hie ftfesoluti~n, and any appravals harein
cc~ntainQd, ehal.l be dc~emed null and vofd.
-a- rCyo-2;5
Revised 1/10/91
.. ., r
~~,'~t'`%~ ~_;; W ~t..
~r.....~i...
~T ~~ .~; , ~ t ,,', ~ f0~~;~ -0~~'wt7~ h~,~,A ~r~ o .l-~,,
+1~rn~~.'., •' ~'' . _
i .i;:;~
n
~~..
~;~~
THE FURk~G~ING RESOLUT.ION wae adoptod at the Planning Commi.ooian
mec~~ing of Ueaember 17, 1990. ~
. ~! 1, '.• / ' ~1 . ....~
~~ ~~r ,. .l t .' ~ . \ ...• ..~i'' ~ ~ I 1, `.i. .~_ .r
CHAIRWOM.'~N, ANAHEIM GI'f5E PLANNING C.OMMIS3ION
A'tTES r :
~ ~ r _~+ ..~1J11~~___
SHCRF.~ARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMXSSION
STATF OI' CALIFORNIA )
CUUNTY OF OA}~IQCE ) ~B ~
CITY OI' AP~AHEIM )
~
I, Edith L. Har.ria, ~ecretary ot the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do rerpby certify that the foregoing resolution wae pa~;sed and
adopLed at a meetin:~ of the Anahe.im City Planning Commiesion held on December.
17, 1990, by the following vote of the memberd theraof:
AYES: COMDIISSI4Nr:R.^~: BOYDSTUN~ BOUASi E'EI.DFiAU.°i~ HELLYER~ HENNINGER~
MESSE, FEF112A
NOES: CQ:SMISSIONERS: [30NE
ARSENT: COMNiISSIONERS: NONG
IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, I have hereunt~ set my hand this __~~• day
o f y~.,.~ti~_____ ~ 19 9 y~ . I~
~/ J / /_ -~_t...
~ ~~ ON
SGCR~TAFtY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI
_9_ PC90-2?5
Revined 1/10/91