Resolution-PC 90-282'~~~, •,~
,~~
NESO UxIQN NO~pC ~q`2A'l
L.:.x:l
A RESOLUTTON OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING GCMAtISSION
RECO~lMI~N~ING APPROVAL OH' R~QUI;ST I'OR AMENDMENT TO
ORDINANCE NOS. 4EiGp AND 4a61 PERThININ~3 ~p
SP~CIFIC F'LAN NO, 8P87-•1 (Z'FiE FIIGHLANDS AT ANAHEIM HILLS)
^ DEVELnPMRNT A'RGA 6 ZONTN~~,~Np DEV LOPMENT STAND:1RbS
Wher.eun, the Cit
' SPac.~.fic p1in Y CQUnc~l approved 'Phe Highlande at Anaheim Hille
No. 48f0 (to imploment'Zor-ingJnnd Devolo~mentnd ~ubaequentl a
( to implem~nh the Spr~cific Plan SP&7-•1 Zan~s on nu u~t 2 J Y pP~oved Ordir~ance
p Standards) and t~rdinance No, 4851
at AnahP,i,m :iills Specifir. ~Ya~ j ~ °, 19£37,
and a , which includoe Zoning and. Developmont Stantde~rds
Public E~'acil.ities Plan, i~ intended to pravide for the dsvelopmenti of a
tatal of 816 acres to ±.
comrti~rci.al iseRS. 292 n4luds up to ?,147 res.idential unfta 8
8-acre ~lemontary achooldoite; and general ~~pyn apacQ a 5_ ' acrop of
. acre park ~ite an~i an
Whereaa, the pet:itioner requE~tQ an amQndment to Ordinance Nos.
anci 4851 in ~rder t~ develop ~~ ~;b-unil con~lominium compl~x in
6 aa follo~,rs: 4860
' Development }lrea
.
(~) to tranefer 24 dwelling ~anita from Devel~
Dsvelopment Area 6; a~~~ i~ment Arese 4 and 7 to
~~~ ~n amendment t~ pevelopment Area
ntandarda (S~ctLun 17.70,060.04G 6 zoning dnd aeV~lo~ment
and of the A~iahoim Muni.cipal Ct,dRp
WHF,REAa, the Anaheiin Cit
hearing at the Civic ~Qnti~i ~ pl`~~'ni~g Ccm~n.tse.ion did h~ld g
1:30 in the City of Ar,ahQim on ber~mber 17 ~ublic
P•m•. notice of eatd publ.ic hear.ing having been dul 19g~' ati
law ancl in accordance with the Y~iven as requir~td by
~~ Chaptez• 1A,03 provi.oi~ns of
, to hear a~d noneider tt1P Anr-heim Munictpal Code,
~ amendment eviden~•~ ,,~oz a~a agafnet said
to r.he Specific Plan ai~d to inv~scigate and make findinqs and
recommendAtione in connQCtion ther~withj and pr~~°~Qa
WHEREAS. Paid Comr.iission
aL•udy mado by itaelF ' a~`e1 due .inapection, investigatlun and
evidence and in its bchalf, and after due coneicleration of all
follosoing facta:
and reporta offQred ~t e~~,d hearing, doee f.in~ and detormine the
1• Thal ~
~he property r.ovQred b "
uni:que efte Y th~ flpecific p~a~ hao
lacation and aurraundinge~~which wi.llibe~~n topogrRphy,
~~ecfal land ue~ and , hanced by Lhe
Q f de~elopmenta ~t~ndardy of the
peci. ic plans
2• That th~:! plan is conof~tQnr. with the ~
o~ the Ceneral Pinn and with tho purpoe~A,~dQ~ndarde ,
ursd lan~~ uAQ g~~,~Ql~nee therc~in; `
r
CR10$7EN ~
FC90-2p2 j
~
~
s`
t.
~
~
';.q
,:.. ;~ , ,r: , . ~~.
.. . .. ., ... . .. ... ., - . . ... _. ~.. , . ., ,.,t~, dqr:ia,.;~.•a*
. ~ . ~ ~,:.;I•i
j ~'~~ ~
3. That the spocific plan will rQeuJ.t in developmen~ of a
doeiraUle character wk~ich will b~s com~aL•ible with
oxlating nnd proponed dFtvel.oprnoriL- in tih~ ~urraunding
araaJ
4. That the ~pQCifia pl.an contr.tbutQa ta a r~alence of 1Knd
u~ee; and
5. That the epoclfic plan reapect~ environmental and
ae~thetic reeouxces conaistent with econo~nic realitios.
6. 'Ph~~t the prupooEd amendmentd are coneistant with the~
goals and objectivee of Thg Highlands at .Anuhoim Hille
Specific Plan (SP87-]) and the AnahQim Genaral P1an.
7. 'Phat the propoeed d~neity transf~r Qxceacie the 10~
1imi.tat.ion in ~evQlopment Area 6 and repreeQnts a 1'!8
',~ incr.ease; and the proposQd densit!.es fnr Aevelopment
Areae 4, 6 and 7 are in conformance with the maximum
,;' d~neitiea set forth in the Genezal Plan.
ENVIRONM~~l~,AL INtPACT RNALYSIS: That EnvironmQntal Impact Report No.
273 for Thp Highlanda ~t Anaheim Hills, c~rti£ied Jun~ 23, 1987, by the City
Council, addrQRa~~i tho environmental impacts and mitigation measurea associatc~d
~vith the residenttal development of The Highlunds atc An~heim Hil.ls; ar-d thaC
review uf the Ir.itial Study indi~atee thQ number, af uni~a within the project
ar~a will not be increased and that n~ additional impacte will r~ieult from l;he
prupoead Code amendman~p; and therefore, EIR No. 273 i3 adequate to serve ae
the envir.onmenta! documentatir,n for rhe r~ubjact rflqu~Rt.
NOW, TI~E:REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Analieim City Planninr~
Cor.uniasinn d~es hereby xc~commend ~ppr~val cf ~he folluwing acnendmenta to
Ordinance Nos. ~860 and 4fi61 perr.aining to SpeciEic Plan E37-1 for Tho Highlands
at Anaheim Hilla to tr.ansfer 24 dwellin~ tinits from Develc~pment Ar~ne 4 and 7
to Development Area 6:
5ectian 18.70.060.04J bf> ;xmendQd by addingf
(b) Required Lct F'rontag~. 'fhat all lote ahall be permi.ttad
to iru~it upon a private or public acceesway.
Section 1t3.70.~60.040 bp amer,ded tsy adding;
(by Mlnimum Lot width. All luta to be utilLzed a~ v~hicu~ar
accesewayA eha.ll hava a minimum wi.dth of not le~~s l•han
forty~two (42) fQet.
Saction 18.70.060.Od0 be amended b}~ addiny;
(c) Minimum Si.te Araa per Dwelling I1nit. Tha minimum eite
area per dwolllny unit c~hall bo 2,06A rsq+~are feet per
dwelling uriit. However, tihe nverall sitQ area pc:r. dwelling
~inie figure for th~ develupment area as a whoie ahaZl average
no leso than 3,000 square faet per. dwFlling unit.
-2- PC90-282
~PV , , i.. _ . . ,. .. . . ~ _~'1~ . .. ~7 7 YIi,51~~Fr ~t', !~„ , ~~;;~ ,~I~TI'. ~~~c . . Si ~~: ~4 ~ '~f,' ,I
`~.~
, ~ar:,
• e~~'~ti+1
Section 1a.70.060,040 be amended by addinqj
(d) Maximum Structural Hoic~hL-. The maximum heigh~ of any
buil.di.nq sha.ll no~ excaed thir.ty-five (35) feet, exclueive af
rnof structure. Wtthl.n 150 foet of any ei.ngle-£•amily
reeidantial zone, the maxi.mum height ~z any bi~ildirig ehttll
not exceed one (1) dtory, oxcluei.va ~f roaF atxucturo, unleee
detailed drawings are au~milted to, and approved by, tho
Building and Zoning Div.ieion~ Ahowing that no proposed
build.inga greater than o.ne-dtory in hetc~ht visually in~ruda
an any abutting ar adjacQnt eingle-family dwellingf in no
avent, 1-awever, ahall any auch building be loc~-ted lesa than
eixr_~dn (16) fee~ from Any such residential zone bound~ry.
ANU FURTHE~2 HE IT 12ESCLVFD that the fallowing aondition of approvsl
he added tc~ SpeciLic Plan SP67-1:
"That prior to tha i.ntroduction of an ordinance authorizing thie
amendment, the devel.oper st~all reduc~ the nuntber af res.tdential lata
wi.thin Tentative 'Prac:t 12685 from £34 to ')0 by either;
,
,;
~
a) recording ~aid trac~ map indicating a maximuro of 78
residential lcte;
b) revisinq said tiact map inGi~ating a m~xim~arc~ of 78
residantial .loto; or
c) wirhdra~.-.n~~ eaid tent:ative tract map.
T(iE FORF.GOINC; R~SOLUTION was adopted at the: Planning Commiqeion
meet.ing of Decembc~r l7th, 1990.
', `t ~ ~ (,' ' `L,_.._ 1~,~ ~-.; •./' j, f.~ ; , ; '
CFiA I RWOMAN ~
ANAEi~IM CITY PLANiQING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~" w - --
:~ECRETA.RY, ANAHEIM CIT: PLANNI.IG COMMISSIUN
STATE OF c;ALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) As.
CITY OF ANAkiEIt~i )
I, Edith L. Harrie, socrc~tary af the AnaYio.i.m City Planniny
Commiseion, dn hereby certify that L•ho foregai.ng reaolution wae paseod and
adopted at a maetiny of the Anahoim City Plan~sing Conunisaion held on December
1'7, 1990, by the followi~g vote of rhe membere th~reof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERSs BOUAS, SOYD~TUN, F'~T,DS'.AU~, HELLYF.H, HENNINGER
MESSE, FERAZA
IvOE5: COAibixSSIUNERS: NGYE
ABSENTs C.'OMMISSIONEliS: NONF.
TN WITNESS WFIF.RF:OF', I
of _, 199(f .
t
havQ hQrensito uet my h. nd thie ~ day
---- / ~ ~ ~ ~^'t''
S~:CR~TARY,
ANAHEIH GI'PY ~LANNING COMMISSION
.~
~n
~;:j -3- PC~O-28?.