Resolution-PC 90-284,'"'„~
~ ~,
. ~ ..,~~~~7~~
RESOLUTION NO. PC90-2$4
~
~ ~ ~ i~'~~
:;~i,~
~"r,,t',
A RESOLUTION Or.' TEIE ANAHEIM CITY. PI'.,AIdN:ING C~MMISSION
THAT P~TI~TON FOR V~RIAPI~~ N0. 4103 rsE GRANTED, IN PART
WHEREAS, th~ Anahoim City Planning Currmission did recoi.ve a
v~rified Petition for Vari~nce for certain real property situater~ in the City
o:[ Anaheim, County of Urange, State r~f Cali_fornia d~ecribed a~:
PARC~L:i 1`PHROUGH 8 TNCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN nN PARCF.L MAP
Nc~. 87•-446 AS PER MAP F'rLED IN bOQK 253, PAGES 41, 42
AND 43 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE VF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF' SAID COU~VTY'.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comrniasion did hold a public k~earing
1t the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on December 17, 1990, at 1:30 p.m.,
notic~ of Aaid public hearing havicig baen dul,y given as reguired by law and in
aacordance with the pravi.siona ~f the Anah~im Muni.cipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and conside.r evi3encF for and aaainet aa.ici propoaed varianc~ and to
investigate ana mak~ findings and rscommer~datians tn connection thesew.tth; and
WHEREAS, said Commise_Un, after due inopecti.en, investigation
and study made by itself and in ik.E behalf, and a_ter due aoj~aid~3ration af .~11
evidence and reports of£~r~d at said hearing, 3oes find and determine the
follow.i.ng fact~:
1. T1~est ~he pet.itio.ner_ rRC~ucst9 wai.ve.te of. the f.allawing to
canatruct 3£reestancl.ing signu under. xuthority of Section vT.2.C.5 0£ Spa_cific
Plan No. 88-3 (SP 88-3):
(Aj SE~TIQNS 18.05.~98.011
and 18.73.02~-.]0~
(B? SECTIONS 18.05.093.023
and 18^ 73_ 020-100
- Dtaximum nUmb~~: of freestandincr sione.
(1 permitted; G propoeed) ~
- Pc~rm.ittE~d loaation of freestzndi.na r~ian~.
(minimum 120,:feet sQtback £rom intarior
property lines required; 25 and 93 ~~et
propo~eci for 2 eigna)
(C} SECTIOtJS 18.05.093.U231 ~ Mi,nlm;~m di,starirQ between freestandina aiana.
and 1f3.73.07.0-100 (;~00 feer_ requireci; 103 and 200 feot proposad
between 3 aigns)
CR10?OJJ
-1-
PC90-204
,;
;:;
:;~
,:,a
: ~;,,
:, y~;
l ~""t,~ ~~~
2. That tY:e above-mentionnd cvaivera (A) ~nd (B) ara hereby granted on
the baais tha~ therQ .-re dpecial airoum~tanr.ee applicable ta tha proper~y such
as ~ize, ahapa, topography, location ~;id aurroundings wkiirh do n~t apply L~
o~:hQr ideritically zoned property in the same viainity; and that strict
app.licatian af the Zoning c:or~e dQprivea the property of ~rivileges enjoyed by
other proper.ties in the tdentical zuno and c].as$ificativn in the vicinity.
3. That the abave mentionQd waiv~r (C) ie .ereby dQnied on the bas.is
th~c the proposed pnl.e sign is not in keeping wi~h the m~nument siqn previouely
a.pproved in c~n~uiiction ~vith the original sign pragx~m for SP 88-3.
~}. That tt-ere are excep~ion~l ~r extr.iordinary circ~imacancee or
cundiL-iona applicable ta i.h~ propc~rty involved or t~ the intend~d uae of the
property th~t do not apply generally ~o the proper.ty or clasg of use in the
aame vicinity and zone.
5. Th1t the r~quested variance ae granted, ig ~,ecer~aary for th~
pr~aer•ration and enjoyment of a~ubst.antial property right possee+eed k~y other
praperi:y in the eame vj.cinity a.nd zone, and denied to the property in question.
6. 'Phat the r.equested variance aa qranted, will not be materially
deLrimeiital to i:he Y~~.iblic welEare nr injurious to the property or improvemente
in such vicinity and zone LI1 which the propeaty ie located.
7. That r.c~ ann indicated thoS.r preser:ce at said public hearing ;.n
oppasiiian; ar.d that no correr~pondence wae rece'_,red in opposi.tian to eubject
petition.
CALIFOItNIA ENVTRONMENT.AI. UALI'CY AGT FINDIlVG: The Planning Direc~or
~r hia authorized repreaentativP has determined that the proposed prqject fa11a
within the definition of Catego.rical Exemp~iona, Class 11, am defined in the
State EIR Guide7.ines and i~, therefore, ~a~~gorJ.cal'iy exempt from the
requirement to prepare an GIR.
NOW, THEREF~7RE, IiE IT RF.SOI,VED that the Andne+~n City Planntng
CommiesiaYi dae~ hereby grant aubj~ct Petition for Variance, upon the folloc,ring
canditiona which are her~by found to be a neceaeary prErequisite 'to the
propoaed uc~e of the c~ub ject property in orcler to preserva the aafety and
gori~ral welf.are of the C'ttizens of the CiCy of An~heim:
1. That an ~~n~ubordinated covenan~ in a f~rm eatisfactuzy to the City
Attorney anci Zoning Divieion sh~ll be rF~corded wi.~h the dffice of the
nrailge C~unty RQCOrder f:o guaran'.:ee that the entira mixed uge complox
approved in connection with SP 88-9 shall be managed and mnintairied as
one (ly in~:egral parcel for purpuaeca of par.kin~, vehicular circula~ion,
signage, land ueage and architectural contr.ol and that the covenant wi~.l
be ref~renced in all deeds tran~ferring a11 ar any part of the property.
Z. That subjQCt property ehal.l be developed aubotantie.tly in accordanoe with
plans and specifics~tions aubmitted to the Ci~y of An~heirn by the
petitioner and whi.ch plans are on file with the Planni,ng Dapartment
mark~d Exhibi~ Nos. 1 thrc~~gh 7.
CR1Q70JJ
-2-
, „~~. .~,~,~~~:~~
_ ,rep
i
PC90-284 ;. ~
,?!
~
~
, ~ ; ` j' i',~~<"i+f. ,
^", y~~ ~
, ~ .~~~~ f~1'ii
d
';
3. That prior to iosuance of a building p~rmit or within a pc~riod af ane (1) ~
year from the dato of this resoluti.on, whichever occura firet, Cundition t
110. 1, above~mantioned, ehall be complied with. Exteneione fcr fur~her ~,
time to compldte ~said canditions may be grantad in accurdanca with Sectian ,
16.03.090 nf tihe AnahQim Municipal rodd. ~
4. That prior to f inttl building and zoning inepe4tiane, Condition No. 2, ~
aUove-m~i~tioned, sha11 Ue comp~.ied with. `~
5. Tha~ approval of thid ap~licati.an conntitutes ap~roval of thr~ proposed
request ocily to the extent. that it complies with the Anaheim Municip_1
Zoning Code 3nd any other applf.cable City, St~~te and FEd~ral rpgulatione.
Approval doe9 nat ir~clude any action ~r ti.ndings ae ~o ~~7~',l~l.iartce c~r
approyal ~£ the requeet regaz:ding any other applicable ordinanc:a,
regulation or. requirement.
BE IT F'i1RTHER RESOLVED that the Ai~aheim City P1~nning Coi~unission doee
hereby find and deter.minp tha~t adopt:ion of thia tiecolutian is expresaly
~redicated upon ap~licant's eompliance with each and all of the conditions
har~inabove set farth. Should any such condi.tioris, ar any part t.i-ereof~ be
declared invalid cr.• unenforc~abls by L-he final judgment of any aourt of
competent jLiriediction, thEn thiH Reaoltition, and any ap~rovals herein
c~ontainQd, shal]. be deemad null and void.
TH~ FOREGOING RE~OLUTTON was acl~pted at the Planning Commiasion
meeting of December 27, 1990. ~. ,.,
% t ;~, ~ ~ , :.r.. ,~ 1_.4 ~~ ~ ~ ;
H TRWUblF1N, AMAEI~IM GITY PLANN~NG t~OMMISSION
AT'PEST: . ~~ ~.
~ ~ ~'' ~ ~___._.~
SECRE RY, AN:~HGTM CI'PY °L}1NNING CGMMISSION
STATE OP' CAZIFOHNIA )
CUUNTY OF OFtANGE ) eg •
CITY OF ANAHE]'M )
r,' Z, E;dith L. Harris, S~cre~ary of L-he Rnaheim Cl.ty Planning
a,
' Commission, do hereb~ certify that the foregoing reROlution was pasbed and
~ adopte@ at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Ccmmission held an DQCe~r~ber
„ 17, 1990, by the fcllowing vote of ~he memhers thereof:
RYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUA:, [iOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HELLYEFt, EiENNZNGER, MESSE
PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NUNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONFRS: NO:IG
J ~.~i~ aax
IN WITNFSS WH~REOF, I have hereunto aet my hand thi.a
, ;
of ~. 199Q~ - ~
/ ~ f
~
SL:CRFTARY, ANAHEIM C?TY PI~APiNING CQMMIS5ION
CP1107QJJ ~a-
;; ;
~':, ,
.,
.
~`:.'~ ~ . . . . .
YC90^284
. ~ . . ~~,i ~~~~
,"1.
, ,~