Resolution-PC 90-36
RE~4~I~~'.~oN rt~~_ ~G9_.4-~
A R~SULIJTIUN 4C TFIE ANAHEIM CITY PLAKNING COt~4fISSION
TFiAT FETITION FOR V1~RIANCE N0. 4018 AG GRANT~D
WEi~RGAS, t1iQ nna}ie.tm C~.ty Planning Commis3ion did receiv~.~ ~,
vur.ified PeCitlon f.or Variance ~ac cert~.in rc~al proper~y s.ituatecl in the City
of Anatieim, Countyr of Oranyo, Srate of Californit~, descxibod as tallowss
LOT 2t1 UF 1'RACT NU. 1194, IN TEiE CITY Ok' ANAfIFIM, AS
SEIOWN ON A tMP :fHGItEO~ RECORD~D IN $OOK 38, E'AGES 1
ANU 2 0"r' MISCEGLAr~Ol15 MAPS, RF,CORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Cfty Planniny Cammisaicn dicl ho~d A public hearing
~t, r.1ie Civic Centez in th~ City o.f Ana}ieim on January 15, '1990, at ].:30 p.m.,
notic~ ox' said public heaxiny havinq been duly given as required by law and ii~
accordanc~, wfth ~he provisions of ~he Anaheim Munici,pal CodP, Chapter ].8.03,
to hear and consider evictence for and aqainst sa.id proposed variance anCi to
inveskigate a:~d mnke E;.nciinqs and rocominondations in corinec~ion therewitri; and
said peL-iCxon was cont.inued to t}~e Plann.ing Commission meQtings of January i9,
1990 and F~~b:uaiy 12, 1990; and
WHERIsAS, sei~3 Commissi.on, t~ft~ar due inspection, investigt~tion
and study mada b,y its3lf and in i.L•s behalC, and after due cunsideration of all
evidence and r~:ports offered ~r said hearinq, does Eind and detRrmine the
following fack:t:
1. That r_he petitioner rei~uests waivers nf. ~he f.ollowinq to
establish cummercial officc~ use of a residential 3true;ture:
(a) S~S~ION .~.~.44.03~Q34 - R_~'.~uirgd 1S~S,~:9~! 9f~~r~c~i~r~~rA~•
(Parkiny to rg~r of struckirc ruqufrod;
~nrking to ~isi_~ of structuro propo+s~ct)
( b ) ~E ~ + ~4_N ~.1_4~ 4 g~.9 ~? . .Q__1_.t •• t~! i n_:~.1~P~___,R-~-r u~~1:~~L. _.~.~.~~s'~G~ •
~nS; ~~,~4,Qf,3:Q4s (required: 2Q, fcset_~._[r1lini~num----._.~~ f~~
~a_r,_~~a~~ll from single farnily residentfal
zoning for 10 f~ot hiq}i biii :dinq;
existinq: ~___fQ~t~ __ ~~Jo 1n~~iSCBpingx Erom
RS-7Z00 zoning)
(c) ~ECTlt~~~$_~44~Qr~.6LQ3'l_ - FceSlit:~~~1_3mP&~Y.4_m~.t]~4~88~~114.s'~~•
(r~equi:ed: fj_~~~,_~yh~_~2.1!SZS~k.__W~~l. behini:
5-foot sgtback ralon~ Midway Manor;
proposed: ~ _Et~~~~h_?~~lq~~C a~~l to~pped aith
~_. f_t~Lh.~.gt~ r,ro4gh~.~, c~r~ )
t292r
_,~ _
P.C 9U-36
i
: ^
,.~i,
~ ,~
2. That the above-moarionod waivora ~re her~,by grantod on tho basis
thaL thore ~are ~p~r.inl circumstances a~iplic~-blo to the property ~ucti as aize,
shape, t~pogr.~~hy, larALion ~nd surroundings which do not apply to other
ident~ically zon~~i property zn tho ~ame vicinityt and L•hat strict aYplicatiun
of the Zoning Code depr3.ves tha proporty of privi;ayes enjoyc~d by otihex
propert:ies in tho iiiontical zone and classi~icat.3on. in tho vicinit;y.
~3. %t-at th~re are exc~pti~nal ar ~srraordinary circumstancQS or
conditions applicabla to rh~ proporty involved ar to ~ho in~ended use of the
proper~y thc~t do noC ap~1y generally to th~ properc.y or class of use in the
s~mc~ vicinity and zone.
4. Thar. tho roquRSt~d variaxzco is necessur.y for the preservation
and enj~ymant of a substantial praperty right possossocl by other properCy in
the same vicinir_y and zane, ~nd clenied to tho property in quostion.
5. That the roquastaci va:iance wi11 not he materially deCrimental
to the public welfare or i.njierious ~o rhe ~roperty or improvemeiit3 in such
vicinity and zone in whictx khe property is locat4ct.
6. That no one indicated thnic• presen~e at sa:d public hearing in
opposition; and that no corrQSgondenc~ ~aa:, rc~c:oived in opposit:zon to subject
petition.
~~.i, 7F NIA R27VZ~tQ~~~N~AG f2UAL~.T~ ACT ~'~NDIN~: 2hat the Anaheim
City Planning Cammission has rQViewed Y.he proposal to roclassify subjoct
property from the RS-7200 (Residential, Sin~Jle-Family) 2one to Lhe CC.
(C~mmerci.al, LimiteG) Zone and waivars of: required location of parking area,
ioinimum structural s~-tback and required improvam~nt of parking aroa to
establish a commercial use in a residential structure on a
rectangularly--shnped parcel of land cnnsisting of approximate2y 0.3 ar.re
lo~~~t4d c+t tha ao~ithwesL coruer oF Anaheim Boulovard and Mids+ay Ma:ior, havinq
approximat~ froiitages of 111 fadt on the west side of Antiheim Boulevar3 and
114 Eset on Che south side oL Miclway tdanor, ayzd further dsscribed as 883
South Anuheim Boulev~~rcl; and doos he:eby approvQ L•ha Hegat.ive Declaration
upon finding that it has considered the Negative Dociaration togQL•her with
any curnment.s recoived during the public reviQw process and itirther flnding on
the b~sis of tl~r~ i.nitial study anr] any commants received that tl~ere is no
subst:~nkial avid~nce thaL• the prujQCt wi1l have a siqnificant effQCt on ~he
environment.
NUW, 'PHERF,F4RE, flE IT RESOLVED ~hat thc~ Anaheim City Planninq
Commi~siun doos hnreby grant subjoct E'etitioci for 'iariunce, upon the
Eollowiny cond:r.S.ons which are hgreh; found Lo ae a necessary prere~~aisite to
the proposPd ~ase of the subjecL properky in order to preaerve the safety and
general r+el~are of tY~Q Cirizens of t;~e City of An~-heim:
l. Th~:t sidewalks shall be in~r,alled along Midway Manor as require.~t by the
City Engineer and :n accordanr_o with 3tandard plans and gpecificationR
osi Eilc~ in the Office of the City ~ngineer.
2.* Th~t if a drivQ~ray is germitt:ed Lo bo locatied on Anaheim H~ulevnrd, said
drivc~Hay uhall be aonstructa~a with ten (10) foot radius curb roturna as
c~equ.tred by the City P,nqin~er in conformancE ~+Ith. ~r,gineo: inq Department
Scand~rd No. 137.
._z_ 1~C 90-34
2.* That prior ta issuance of a building permit, a traffic aignal ~sae~sment .
foo aquali.ng the ]il:for~nc.H batwoen th~ residential and commercial
assesament foes .hal.l be pai~ to the City of Anaheim xn an amount as
~stabl~ahed by Ci~y Counr,il re~ol.ution.
3.* That plans shr~ll he submi.Lt~d to the Citx Traffic Fngir.eer for Y-is
revic~w and approvaJ. sliowing conEormance with Enginee~ring S~anc3ard Plan
Nos. 436F ~nd 602D pnrtaininq L•o parking a~anclards. Subjact properL•y
shall thereupan be davolopQd ~nd mainta:ined in con:ormanco wfth s~id
plans.
d~ ^'~^at £3ro sprirkl.ers s1xa11 b~ instelled as reRuired by the City F3re
U~ ~artment.
5. That ;~ fee f.or 3treet: 1i.ghi:ing ~,ur~oses alor.q Anahe3.m IIoi:levard shall be
pzid to tha C.i~y of. Anaheim in an am~urit tas established by City Council
resolution.
6. That a£ee Por strocat trQt~ purposes 31onq Anahaim Houlevarr.l and Midway
Manoz sha11 be~ paici to the City of Anaheim in an amount as established
by Cir.y Coiinci.l resolurion.
7. lhat street liqhtinq facilihiQS along Midway Man~r shall be in~talled as
requirod by the iJtilities Geneznl Manager in accordance with
spacification~ on file iix th~ Office ~f the UtiliCies General Manager;
or that security in th~ £orm of u bond, cQrtificaie of deposit, letter
of credit•, or cash, in an amount and f.orm sa~isfactory to the Cit•y of
Anakieim, shall be posted w:ith khe City ko gunrantee the satisfactorx
completion of ~he above-men.tionQd improvement.. Said socurfty shall be
postc~d with tk:e CiL•y of Anaheim prior to i.ssu~nce of e buildinq p~rmit.
The aU~ve-required improvementa zhall -~a installed prior to occupancy.
8. That subject prnper~y sha?1 be servecl by ~~nderqround uCilities, unloss
otherwisQ apnrovRd by ttie Goneral Manaqer ot the Public Jtilities
Department.
9. k That gates shall not be installed across any drive~,ray in a manner Wlitch
may advorsRly af:ect vahicular traffic in thc~ adjacent public
stre~t(s). Installation of any qacos ehall confarm to tihe Enginoeri.ng
Stt~ndard Plan No, 402 and shall be subjact to the roview ancl approval of
the City Trb~~.ic Enginear prior to issuance of a building permit.
10.* That any locka~le peclestrian and/cr vehicular accesa qates ahall be
~quipped wit;h "::nox box" devicns as r~-quired ancl approved by tha City
Firo Department.
_;~_ I~C 90-36
. . ~ ra~,',r
11.++ That trash storag~ arens shall br~ providod and maintained in a
lucation accap~a~~e to the Street MainF.enance ~nd Sanit•Ation
Division and in accordance w.it;li approved plans on Eile w3.th suid
Divis~on. Such 3nformation shall be spe~iC3cally shown on the
plans subrnitted far nuilding ~~rmtts.
12•* 'Phat al?. a:ir condiCion.ing Lacilikies and ot}ier roof and grc~und
mounc ~quipmen.t shall be properly sl~;~1~e~ from viow, and tho
sound ~CEered from adjacont resir~entia] properkies. Such
ici~forn~~: o;~ shall be specif.icc~llx snown on the plmns su:~mitt:ed for
building germits.
13. "' That due to the chanqc~ in usa and occupancy of tlie huildin
shall be submih.ted tu the ~u~.lc3ing D.ivision showing compliancepwith
the minimum standaz•ds of. thP City of Anaheim, including the Uniforrn
l~uilding, Plumbing, Llectri,cal, Mechanical and I'ire Coaes as
adopted by the City of Anah~im, Tha approprit~te permits shall be
obtafnod for any necossary work.
14'* ~'hat a aix (6)~foot high masonr~+ block wall sha11 be conskructod
and mainhained alonq rhe wost propexty lino and thc three (3) fAOt
block wall propospd witti three (3) feet high v~rought i~on shall ba
constructed five (5j £~et soukh of khP •r.orth proporty line;
providad however, h.hat thQ City Tr.aff'.ic Engineer shall 1-ave the
authority to reduce thQ height of t:he wal~ ta protect visual
line~_o£_sight whare p~~esCrian/vehicialar circulati.on .intersect,
Said block wall shal~ be olantad and m,:~intained with c~inging vines
t~ eliminato graffiti opportuniti~s, Said waZls shall be
~pecifically ~hown o:, tlie plans sub ii.ttod E'or buildir.g pgrmits.
1~•~' That any proposed parkang area light.tnr fixtures adj$cent to any
residential property shall b~ down-lighto~l with a maximum height ~~
twelve (12 j fQet . ^aai~! l.ightinq fi.~rt;ures st-all be directPd away
from adjacont rc~sidential property lines h_o protect L•?,e residential
integriCy oL tho arQa and sha11 be, speciEically shown on the plans
submitted ror buildinq p~rmits.
16• * That tho proposal shall comply ait;h all signing requi resnents of the
~~• "Commercial, LimitQd" Zone, unless a vartanco allowing sign
rvaivars is approved by tlie Cir.y ('nunc{1, P].anni.ng Commission or
Zon:ng Adm.inistr.ator,
17• T11at any freestandin ~
g ~i9n on subjeck pro~erty shall be
moiiument-type not excQed.inq four (4) teet in heiqht and shall be
subject ko thQ review ar.d approval of •.:he City Traffic Eng.{~,~~r.
1~.* Thak Cha on-r~fte landscaping and ir~
refurhishad and maintainod in complic~nce with`City standardsh~ll ~Q
ly• That oubject ro ert
accor~anco wtth pl ns ~ndgspecif cations esubmikt d~bto~thoa Cit og
Anrsl:ei.m by the petitioner an~] which plans ~re on file wi.th ythe
Plannfng Dep~rtmont rrtarked R~vision iJo. 1 of Exhibft No. 1.
-4-
P~ 90-36
~
~
,
t
~':: ;
,.,~: _
~ ~~~ 1
2~. ThRt pri.or ~o commancemenr of- tho a;tiv3.ty authorized by L•his
resolutian, or k~riar to issuance o~ a building permit, or within a
perioci of one yeax from t}~e date o~ this resoYution, whichevor occura
PirsL•, Condition Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, JI.4, and 15
abovo-mentioned, shal]. b~ complied with. ~x~snsians for further time Co
completQ ~aid conditi.ons may bE~ y~rantod in aacordar~ce with Section
18.03.090 of thd Anaheim Municigal Code.
'll. That priAr to the commencemenl• of the aativ3.ty authorizea by thi~
resoluti~n, ~r kinal bui.lding and zaniiic~ inspections whichevor occurs
f.irsC, Condit.ion Nus. 1, 9, 7, 0, 14, 18, and A9 above-mentiio:ied, 3ha11
be complied wi _Yi.
22.* That approval oi' thi.s application constitutes a~provai of L•ha propoaed
roquest only to the extent hhat it complies with t:~R Ant~heim Municipal
Zoning Code ancl any othQr applicable City, SL-ate and Fedei•al
regulationa. Appr~vu.l cloes noC incJ.ude aiiy actien or finding~ us to
compliance or apprc,val of the requesk regarding any other applfcab:le
orclina:~ce, regu~ati.on or requirernant. Conditions marked ~rith a»
at~terisi; (~) are req~iired as established laws, cudes, regulaL•ions and
~greeme:~Cs and are not subject to negotiati~ns.
BE l'T FURTHF.R RE;S~LVED that t:hc~ Anaheim City Planning Commisaion
does hereby fir:d .and determine th~t adoptfan of this Resolu~ion is Qxp:esEly
predicated upun arplicant's coinplianco wirh eaah and a].1 0~ the conditions
heseinaUavc~ sot fort`~. Shoulc~ any suc}i conditions, or any p~rt thgrec~f, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by th~ final judgment af any court of
campetent jurisdi~:tion, thon this Resolution, and any ap~+rovals h~rein
contained, shall be deomod null ~nd void.
TA~ FUREGOING RESOT.UtION was adpoted at the Planning Cemrnis3ion
meeting of February 1'l, 1994.
~- ~ ~~ ~C~-1 ~~~~ ~ ~ ~- ,-E~d.-.~c r~ ;
' =-~~ 1 I~~ C c ti....
CFiAIRFl)MAN Pi2Q TEMPORE, ~
ANAHEI61 CITY I~LANNING COM2QISSION
ATTEST: ~
~-~ ~~~ v .
~ ~ ~..___ ~-- ati~, ___
SECRETARY, ANAFiBIM CITY i'LANNING COh4fISSION
-5-
f~ •.
PC 90-3G
.i
1,~
~
,.~.,.
~
.,,,.,~,~.,,,, .
S1'A7'E QF CALIFORNIA
~OUN7.'Y OF ORANG~ ) ~~.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
'2, Edith L. Harris, SACreCary of the Anahe3.m City Planning
Comm~t;~ion, do hereby certify that the :forenoing rosolution was passsd ~ttd
adoptocl ac a meeting of t~he Anaheim City Plann~ng Commission held on I'ebruary
12, 1480 by ~he following vate o£ the members Chazeof:
A'YES; COMMISSIONERS: BOU2~5, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HELLXER, HERBSI',
M~S ;E, M~ BURNaY
NOES: COMMISSTONEftBs
ABSENT: COhIIr1ISSI0NERS:
~ I!t WITNESS WFIEkEOF, I h~ve h~rQUnto set mg h~nd this ~1~
° ~~~~. 7.990. daY
,
__--~ ~.
' ~......___~ ~~
S~CRETARY, ANAHEIM CIiY PLANN~NG COtr4~(ISSIO-Y
~~" PC 90-36