Resolution-PC 90-37~,S
~.
WHExEAS, th~ Aiiahoim City Ylanning Commission flid reaeive a
veriEied Petition for Variar~ce for ce:tain real property s3tuate~d in tk~o City
af Anahoim, Cuunty af Orange, State of California, doscribed ay follow~:
LOT N0. 3 OF TRI~CT N~. 127.A7, AS SFiOWN ON A 5UBDIVISION MAP,
RECOr~D~D C~N SEPT,F,'MRL•'R 30, 1985, IN BOOK 545, FAGES 9 TO 10,
INCLUSTVE, OR MTSCELLANLOUS MAPS, IN 7.'HE OFFICE OF TFTL' ORANGE COUNTY
RECORDER.
`. ,~
~~sQ.t,~r .~i QN N~~?~~~~Z
, ~ '~~~
~ ~ °r,t.
,f~.,
A ItESOLUTION OF THE hN).H~IM CITX PI~ANNING COMI~fISSION
Tf:AT PETTTION FOR 'ARTANCE NU. 4021 BE D~NIED
FTHER~AS, L•hc~ City Plar.ning Commzssion did hold a public hearing
at tho Civic Center iii the Cfty of Ar.ahoim oxi January 29, 1990, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice oF said public hearing raving b~en duly given aa raquired by law and ix~
accordance wi~h th~ provisions oL• the .Aria2ieim biunicipal Codo, Chapter 1.8.03,
to hear ni~d c~i,sider Qvidor~ce for and agairist said proposed variance and to
invest.igace and makA findings and recommendations in connection therswith; and
said petition was continued to the Planniny Commission meeting oE February 12,
J.9901 ~nd
WH~RE~.S, said Commis;ion, after due inspectian, invostigation
and study made by iL•self and zn :ts behalf, and after due consideration oE all
evidence and reparts off.~;•o~ a~ said haaring, does find and deterc~ine the
fallowinr facts:
1. rha~c the patiti~cier rec~uosts waiver of the followir.g to
retain a grounci-rno~xnted satollite dish:
,~yEC.TION lf3s$4~092.R~~(. - Pr9hil.Zi~g4?~C.rQ~1sl~Qun~gd eaui,.ping}~~•
(permitLede nQ~r~r~ gr ground-mountgSi._~~~~~l,~g
$,i,~h~s in the Scenic Corridor Ovcsrlay Zone;
Qxisting: Q~Q 8-fQ~t~_ ~ia.mQter, 9~9~_hic~
groutid-mounted dish)
2. That: th~ proposed waivor is hereby der.ied on tiae basis tha~
there are no axcaptional or axtx•aordit,~ry r.ircwnsCances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of Che property
that do not apply generally to ttis property ~r class o~ use in thN same
vicinihy and :onc~.
1.297r -].- PC 90-37
_ ,:,;
*
~~ ~ t~M
~,
~
..;,~,
3.
preservation That tho roqu~~ted variance is
and onjoyment of a subs~an~3
a1 not neces~ary :Eor tho
propQrty in
~h~ samo .
propea:ty
vicinity and zone, and deni
d xight posseased by other
e
~o tho property in guestipn.
- ~.
the public Th~L
welfare tho requos~ed var3.ance w.ill be
or injuriouc~ t matarially doCrim~ntal to
viciniry and
zone ;n a the prop~rty
which the or fmprovementa in such
propeity is lucat•ed.
5. That no ono indiGateii rheir pros~nco at saic~ public hearing in
opposition: and that no coxrespond~nce •was xeceived in oppo~ition to subjgct
pe~iCion.
_~.LIFQR~JIA EDTVIRUNM~NTA1; O,LJ,ALITY A~T F~~NSz: ThQ Plannir~g
Dirertor or his au~horized representative has determined that t,he p.roposQd
pro~ect falls within the definition of Cat~gorical ~xemptions, Class 5, as
defined iri the State EI.R Guideline~ and is, therefore, cat:egoricai:y exempt
from the rc,qu.irement to prQpar~ ~~ ~rg,
NOW, TH~R~,rORE, BE IT R~SOLV7?U t.hat the Anaheim City Pi.anning
Commis~ion does hereby ciezy subject Petitio_•~ fnr Variance on tre basis of. the
aforemer~tioned findings.
T.HE E'OI2CGOING IlESOLiJTION was ad~pL-ed at tlie Planning Commission
;neeting of robruar~ 12, 199~.
/.-~ ~.> ~~? ~,.,~ ~'"'
- f~t,rj ~ ' , ' ~~~tt~t-C ~~,,~7
~
CHAIRW MAN pR0 T~MPOR~;, i
ANAHEIM CITY PI,ArINTP1G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
r' ~~_~, r~ ~ / , ,
~~ .~_ ~.'~~LG~ ~ ,~
.~~tit- ..
SEC~ET'ARY, E1N/`,HE P1 C 17 LANPJ I NG COMtq I~SS I ON~
-2-
..~ . ::
~
~~ 90-37
;,~
„
,
,:` ~
r
>
o,
~~
~
w
""~
i
~'±
;~
:~:
,'; ; i c~ rr~FV
, r r ,~~~
rj
!~'~~
?;,
5'SATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITX' OF ANAFi~~IM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary oF tho Anaheim City~ Planning
Commission, do hereby certify thar the foregoing rc~so:lution was passed sn~9
adopted ~at a meeting of the Anaheim Ci;.y Planning Commission held on F~bruary
12, 199fJ by the fnllowing vote of the mc~mbers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, H~LLYER,
MESSE, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSTOIJERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
tN WTTNESS WHGF2FOF, I have hereunto set my hand t~hls ~S~ day
of ~~(,d, 1990.
~ ~~ ~ ~
•- "~ Q ~ ~ --~/ L~t..-~-m.i
S~Cf~ET~R.Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANIIING COMMISSION
~ t,
-3- Pr 90-37
:'.;~
~ -~
, ; ~;v,'l ~r ;~,"~,~ ,.
' . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ .. ~ . , ~ . . .i ... ~~:1.:._.':'!.1t~