Resolution-PC 90-53r~~~~~.T.xari rr~,_ ~,~A~_ 5.~
. It~SOT~TJTION QF THC ANAH~TM CITY F'LANN3.NG CJMt~tISSIQN
~:C PE;TITA'ON FOR RECLA5SIFICATION NG. A9••90~ 42 LiC GRATTTCU
~tKEFtEA.S, the Auatie~_ro City ~lanning Comrr~ission did zeceive a veri.£ ~ed
peti.ti~~ ~or. Reclas5ificat:ion of cax•tain raal property situated in the City of
Anahgi,~ County of ~range, Sl•at.e c,f Calit~rnia, d~~cribed as follo~as:
APPttOXIidI#TELX 1.09 ACRE BOUNJ~D c~Y PEARL STI2EET TO
THE NORTH, W~ST STRF.~T TO TI•IG EAST, THE AI,LEY SOUTH
OE' PEARL STREF,T TO TI~E SOUTFi AN~7 CART~~TOT? A'VENLIE TA
THE WSST, AS SI~I(iWN ON E'XF~IBIT A.
WHF.REAS, khe CiLy P.lanning Cc~mmission did hold a publir hearing at
the Civic Center in tha Ci.ty of. Anah~iti7i on Eebruary 26, 199~ at 1:3Q p.m.,
no~~^.Q of said pub).ic heariric~ havi.ng heeiz duly r,iv~n as rQqaix•ed by law arir~ in
accoraa.nce with the provisions aE t'ie An~~heim Muni~~.pal Code, Chap~er lE~.U3,
tp Itear and cansider evidence L•or and against said proposed reclassiL•ict~tion
and to invest.igatn ancl make findinr3s and recnmmyndations in connection
therewit:h; and
WHEREAS, said Commisyion, aftQr dt~e inspeccion, inve:.tigatioii and
study mad~ by iisel~.t and in its betia:tf, an~ aft~r due con~ideration of all
evidgnce and repori:s offered aC said hearing, doas find a.;~.l datermine tre
f-ullowing facts:
1. Tnat thF Planning CQmrnission ~roposes reclassiiic3tiori o£
.,ubject property from RM-1'l00 (ltes..d~ntial, bSultiple-Family) to t,he RM-?40C
(ResidenLial, Mult:iple-Family~) or a less intens~: zone.
7.. That the AnaY:eim General Ylan desagnates subjQCt property ~or
Low-Medium Density Residential iand 115E.'u.
3. That the proposer3 rec'_assifi.cation of subj~ci: propert;y is
necc~ssury and/or desirablp fnr the orcierly and proper cievelopment oF the
co~nmuriiLy.
4. Ttiat the nroposed reclassification of subject pra~Qr~y does
properly re2ate to thc~ zones and their permitted uses locally estab:li,~hed i.i
closa Prrximity to subjQCt property and tn the zones and their permitted uses
generally established throughouL• the commur.ily.
5. That no ane indicated their prrsence at said gublic hearing in
opposition; and that nn carresp~ndence was recgived iLi opposition to subject
petition; and tkiat £ive (5) persor-s .in favar• of st~b.ject request were ~resent
~t the p~~blic heari.ng.
~
1310i• -1- PC90-53
~ALIFQRNIA ENVI...R NMrN 'AL ,~1TJAI~ITY _F~~T_,. F3N~r: '.l'hat the Anahaim
Cit,y Planning Commissian has rev9.ewed th~ pr'opAEEt1 to reclassi~y sut~jec~
pz•operty from RM-1200 (ResidenCial, Mu1tip1Q-I'amily) Z~ne Co the RMti24q0
!Resi~en~i~l, Mu:ltiple-I'amily) Zone on proporty cunsiSting ~~f approximntely
1.09 acreg bouncled by Pearl Streol: to tl» north., Wost 5traet to the east, the
alle,y south of Ye~rl StreeL• tc.~ the sc~uth and (:arleton .Avonuo i:o the wes~: and
doo5 here~y approve the NegativP Aeclaration upon fincling• ehat it has
consider~d the NegaL-i.ve Declaration toqether with any ~ommenl-c r~peived
durinq the public review proaess ~nci further finding ot~ tli~ ba51s oE the
initial study and any comrnents TE'CP.1.V~C1 r.k~at L-;~ere i~ no s~.LsNant.ial evid~nce
thnt the project wi11 have a sign3.ficant c~~feet on C2;e envirunment.
NOW, THFREFORE, BE TT RE5QLV~:D that the: Anahe~m Ciry Planning
Comrni5sion does k:erAby grant subject Pctition for Roclassi£icataan and, by su
doincJ, that Titl~ 7.8-Zoning ~f the Anaheim btunicipal Cude be amended to
excl~:.le the above-describc~d propcrty L•rom the RM-1?.00 (Resident;ial,
Mu] tiple-Family) 7,one ancl ta incorporate said Qescr:bed propsrty ini:o tlie
i2M-2~100 (RosidonL-ia1, Muitiple-F~imily) Zone upoiY th+~ fnllawing condition
wkii~h i.s hereby zound Lo be a necessary prereguisiCe t.o the pr.oQosed use of
subjc~ct pr~perty in ordez to preserve the safety anci general w~lfare oF thQ
Citizens of khe City of Anaheim:
1. T.hat iritroduct~iari of an ordinance razon_ny subject propert! is
contingQnt upan City Cuuncil approval of Ganax'a:1 P].an Amendment No. 292
r.edeaignating the property to Iovr MediwTi Density Residentia.l land uses.
B~ IT E'URTHEI2 R~~UL~VGD th~t Y.i:e Anaheirn City Planning Cammission
does hereby find and determine k}1at adoption of thxs Hasolution is expressly
predicated u~on applicazit's comp.liance with each and aJ.l of the aonditions
hereinauovQ sat forth. Shauld any such cor.ditions, or any pa~t thQreof, be
declared invali8 or u~iQZiforceable by the Pirial judqment of any r,ourt o~
~~mpetent jurisdictior, thc~n L•his 12esolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and vc~id.
THE FOREGOJ.NG RESOLUTI~N was adaprQd at the Planning Commi.~sio:i
meeting of February 26, 199Q. ~ ~~ 1
.~., ,' /_l.._.'~ "_ ,~' .~'=~ --------- _-
~ ,•
~~-,~--
CFiA RMAN, ANAHE] CITY PLAt~NING ('OtYL~tISSION
ATTES~' :
N ~/1 <.- //)) ~~~~ ~
~_--~~.-~.Y/l~% ~i._ ~~j(.Sr 1.L~_._-.-
,l.t._----~- -
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CiTY PL'ANNING COMMISSION
-?. --
PC94-53
1., -,.
'"~,
~
r,+""^,
STATE 0~ CALI~'ORD7IA )
CO~JI~TY OF OR7~NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAFTEIM )
I, Edikh L, Harr:~s, ;ec:retury o~ the ~.naheim City Paanning Commigsion,
dc~ herc~by certify thati the foregoing rQSalution was passed and adopted a~ a
meetix~g ~f the Anahc~im Ci~y Pl.ann:ing Commission neld on Feb;ruary 2~r A990, by
the f~l~~,Wing ~~Y.e of the rnembers thRreof:
~Y~S~ CQ2~fISSIONERS: }3UXDS'SUN, BOUA~, FBLDHAUS, IiCLLXER, HE~2BST,
MC BURNCI', MESS~
NO.ES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
:~BSEN'~: C:QMMISSIONERS: NCN~
4f ~~N WITr1ESS Wi3ERBOF, T liave hereunto set my hand ths.y ~~~
. 1990, da~.
~~~-~.~:; ..~ ~ "" 1 _ ~ .
SECI2~T'A1fY. ANAiIE:IM CIT:L' PL~ Z:i1~'~ hQ~ISSI~ 0
N
-3-
P~90-53
~L;L', ~
l'~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~