Resolution-PC 90-61~
; ;,
,~
RF'$Q~~rIQ~1 N01~'_~.~~-~1
WH1E12~AS, the Anaheim (:ity Plannzng Commission did receive a verlfied
Petitioit fpr Recl7ssaficati.~:~, of certain real properly situaCod in thQ Gity of
Aiiaheim, CouriL-y oL Or.ange, St~te of Ca:litornia, descr:ibed as follows;
A RESOI.UTTON OF ZFiE ANAHE7M CITY PLANN'iNG CO~fI3SI0N
TIiAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIL'.LCA'i'TON N0. 89-90-44 IIE GRANTED
ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTiON OF S~IU LAND LYING SOUTHERI~Y OF THE
CENTERLTN~ Or JACKSON AVENUE D~SCFtIFiEA 7N INSTRUMENT RECORDED
SEPTEhtBER 29, 1977., .T.N BOOK 9824, PAGE 282, QP~IC.T.AL P.ECORDS.
PAFCEL 2: LOT ~ IDT BLOCK 23 A.ND THE WE~TERLY 9.92 ACRES OF I,OT J IN
SA2D ALOCK 23 OF THC C;OLDEN STATE TRACT, IPI THE CITY UF 3,NAAgrM, AS
SFIOWN ON A MAF RECORDCU IN BOqK 4, PAGF.S 66 AND 67 OF I~tISCFLLANEpCS
MAT'S, R~COP,DS OI' ORANGE COUNTY.
THB ET.STERLY L1NE OF SAID y.92 ACR~S TC BE PARALLEL WTTH AND 1~ISTANT
WESTF;RLY 217.50 FEF;T FRpM THE EA.~'iTERLY. LTNE QF SAID L~OT 3.
E}CCEP~ING TH~RGFROM SAIU 1Q.00 ACRES 2HAT PORTICN DESCRIBED IN A
DGED TO FRBEWA'Y IidDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC., A CALIFOR'NIA CORPORATION',
R~:CORDED DECEMIIEF. 12, 1960, IN 800K 5594, PAGE 24'1 OF OFFTCIAL
I2ECOK~S .
ALSO LXC~:PTING FROM S,\I)7 '10.00 ACRF:S, THAT PGT2TIOI'v' D~SCRIB~;ll IN A
DEGL~ TO THE STI~TF ~F CALIFORNIA, R~CORDED JAP7UARY 9, 1'd6q, IN BOOK
687fi, PAi,E lu4 OF OFr'ICIAL HE(;ORDS.
ALSO EXCE:PT. THAT P~RTION OF SAID !',ANll LYLNG NORTHERL'1 OF THE
CE2~TEPLIPlE OF JACKSON AVENUF DESCRIBrA TN INSTi:UMFNT R~:COF;DED
SEPTEM6ER ?9, :19'I, TN AOOY. 9£329, PAGE 282, OF OFP'ICIAL RECUFiDS.
4 EXCEPT TEIERErROM ALL~ OIL, GAS, MINEP,AL~; AND UTHER HYDROCARHON
SUI3STANC~S LYIlIG BELOW A UEPTH OF 5C0 FEr'P WITHOUT ANY RIGHT TO
ENTER UPON '.CHE SURF'A~E t)I' THE Sf1IISiJRFkCE OF SI~ID LAND ABUVE A DEPTH
OF 500 FEET, AS PROVIDED 'IN IPiST.R1JMENTS OF RGCURD.
e
~~
ti•
~r %t' ~ .
'r,~
~t~~ ,,I
WFIERBAS, the City Planning Commi.ssion did hold a public hearing at
~:he C.ivic Cente: in the Clty of Anal:eim on Marc;~ 12, 1990, ac 1:30 p.m.,
notic~ ot said publ'_c htaring havinc~ bEen duly givAii as required by 1aw and in
accor~ance witli ~he previsions of the Anahein Municipal Code. Chapt;er 18.03,
to hear and consider evi.dence for and against saxc~ proPosad reclassification
and tu .invostigate and make findings and rer_ommQn~ations in connection
therewith; and
1331r
-1-
PC90-61
'~~~' ,
,,,~ . ~;,i~i;{i,
WI•IEkEAS, said Comm.ission, after due i.nspection, invostiga~ion and
stizd,y madc~ by itself and in its boh~lt, and aL•ter ciue considerat3.on ot all
evidence and reports offc~red at sa.id heari,ng, does tind and determinR the
following L•acts:
~• Tliat th~ pQt.itionE3r propo,es r~cYassif.ication of suliject
groperty C.rom t2i~ FtS-A-•43,000(Ol (Itesidential/Agricultural-Oil Proctuction
~- Over:lay) zon~ to tho RM-1200(0) (..esidential, Multiple Fami.ly-pi~ pxoduction
Ovc+•rla~) ~r a less intense zone.
2. That. the Anaheim G~neral Ylan Clesign3tQS subject property for
medium density land use,,
3• That thE nz•opQ,ed reclassificati~^n of subje~ct ~rope•rty is
riecessary and/or dc~s:irable for the orderly and proper dev~;lopment o~ -;he
~ communi i:y ,
i
'~• That the proposed rec.lassificati~n of subj~G~ property does
properly relate to the zones and -_heiz• permiCted uses locall}~ est•ablishe~3 in
clos~ proximity to subject property ~nd to the zones and L•tieir p~r.mi~ted uses
qener.ally established t_hrougY~out the cum:nunity.
a. Tt.at one person ir.dicated theix presor.ce at sai9 public hearing
in ~pposit.ion; and tihat n~ correspon:ience was received in opposition to
subject petition.
~ALIFQRNIA L•NVIRQNidENTAL___~T~ALs;pY A~Z',__k'TNL? Nf : Th~;. '~P Anahpir~
rity Planning Commission has reviewad thQ proposal to reclassi~y subject
propei•ty f!'om t2ie RS-A-43,Op0(p) (RQSidenCial/Agricultural-Oil Production
Uverlav) zone t;o the RM-].200(0) (ResidEn*_ial, Multiple ramily•-pL; prnduction
UvQrlay) or a less intense zoi~e arad to pe:mit th~ cunsL•ruc,.ion ot
"aFfordable" 80-•unit deck-type housin ~ an
minimum building siCe area per itwelling unitrandnmax mwn`fencQt}te ghteon an
irregularly-s;ldped parcel of ].and consisting of appr~ximat~ly 1.78 ac:r~s,
having a frontage of zpproximatFly 230 feot on the :;outh si~e of Jac~son
Avenae, hnving a maximu;~~ G~pth og apploximatoly 310 faet and being located
approximato].,• 1,1G5 feeh eas~ of the centez•line nf park Vista ~tceet; ~n~
does hereby approve a mi~icated Negati~~ pe~laxation and adopt the Mitigation i
Monitoring Prngram pursu~nt to Section 210$1.6 of the Pixblic Reaources Coc?e
i
on the basis that the Plann.in~ C~mmission has coz~si~ered the proposal with
the mxr_igate;3 Negative Uer.l~ration and ~
tagether with an acconiPanying Moi~itcring Program, ~
y comments received duriny Che public rpview pr.~cesy, and
further Einding on the bas.is of the Initial. Stucly that through th~ ,
implement~tion of tha Mi~igation Monitoring Piogram, .i.dentific~3 environmental
impacts related to upgrade o£ tlie sewer sy;,tUm and the cleanup of tl~e soils '
as w~~l ~s t}le proc~tclv.res for well aban~ionment and pro~er venting, can be
reduced to ~ levc~l of inr,ignificance.
~Z Pc'on ~1
;~~,,.
NOW, THERF;B'OR[;, FiE TT FtESOLV'Eb ttiat the AnahQin~ City Plannir.g
; Commisszon does hereby ~~rant; subject Petition for Recl.assil:ication a~1d, by so
doing, that Titie 18-Zonirxg c~f the Araahaim Municipal ^ode be amen3e~ tn
Qxc'lu~e the abov~3-described propor~y from thE~ RS-A-4a,0~~0(0) (R~ssid~gritia~./
Agricu~.tur~7.-Uil P.roduction Overlay) ?one ;~nd t:c incorport~te said clescribed
property znto the RM-•~.20Q(0) (R~asidQntial, Mu1~:Yple Family••Oil Pwoduct~on
pverlay) Zo2io u~on tl•~e f~llowing canditions which ara herebv found to be a
;~ nacessary PI'@1:~C~Li151tE~ to ~:.he p.ropasecl use oL• subject pro~er.ky in o;:d9r. to
pr~3ervQ the sa.fety and yenoral walfaro of tho Ci~a.zc~ns ol: th~~ City of
Ana!ie im :
l. That prior to introdacr_a.~,n of an o~dir~~x;~cee rez~n3.ng subje~:t prop~r.i.y,
the legal p.roperty or~nEr shall ~repare an~~ re~cor~ an unsuborciinat~~d
, c~.~vFnant limiting occupa;~cy of each apurtmer:.L uriit t.o no more than two
(2) persons (other than ~Yiildron under the age of. two [2] ~~,parsy paz•
bed:°oom. 5ai~3 limitation shali be i~icluce~3 in ~ach leat:e/renta'1
agre,~men~. A copy of the covenant sha11 be sub.rxttcd to and a~proved 'by
, the i:ity Attorney prior to recardatiun with ~•.he O~fice o£ the Oraiiqe
County Rec~rder. A copy of ~he recorded covenant ~t~all be furni~hed to
~ the Zor: ~.ng Divis :on.
2. Tha~ an unsubardinatod ~ovenant shall be recorded with the Offzce of the
~ Oranga County Recorder agr~~eing to pr~v:idP the r~nter o£ each dwe:ll:.ng
unit wilh wr.itten S.nEorm~t~ion cbtained from the School District(s)
>>erY,~ining to ~ossible overcrowded conditions and bu.sirag st:atus of ths
s~hoc~1(s) serving the dwelling unit.
3. Thst pri~r to the intro3u~:tion of an ordinance rezoning subject
L~roperty, Coridition Nos. 1 and 2, above-m~ntioned, shall be c~mpleted.
The provis.i~ns or righrs grarited by ~his resolu~ion sha11 become null
and void by action ~E the Ylanning Cammission unless said conditiar~s ars
cor~plied witlz witnin one (1) year fr~m tho d~te of i;h.is rosolution, or
such ~~urt;t-Qr. time as tlze Ylanning Cammission may grant.
'';':~
-3- iPC90-61
.pu~~q•~.~.;i ~•;., .,~i.'.: ,~ ~~r~.. .
,_ ~, ,..;~ ..,.
~~ . . . ,...,,~~._.. . ~ ,,. ~,.,. . .~..,~ .~~-~,• p.`
. .r ., . ,i .~ .. ~ ~. ~ . ~ . ~
.. .,.~ ,. .~. , .,, .i:,,
'I .' . . ~• .. . . , ~ ~ .. . ' ~ . . , ~1 .. . ( ~"v~ ~1' L~,~~IaMdln~.4.r~iic~
~«(~~ t
. . .-,~'~'i
.. .. ~.~;;{.~a --; i"
4. 7'hat approval of thi~ application constih,utes approv~l o~ the proposed
request only to L•he extent tnat it cornplies with ~ne Anah~im idunicipal
2onin.g Code and ~ny otY~~r applic~blQ City, SL•ate and Federal
regulat.ions. AP~rpval ~~ioes riol include any actian or ~indings as to
cc~mpli~;nce or approv~~.l of tho requast regarding any other ~pplicab~.a
ordinar,ce, •regulation ar requiremen,t,
B~~ IT FURTHER RESQLV~D that th~ Anaheim Cihy E'lanning Commission
does hereby find and determirie that adoption of this Rosolution is expressYy
predicated upan a~p].icant's cnmpliance with ec~ch and a.ll of the conditions
h~reinabove sot forth. Shqulc~ nny such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared ir.valid or une:iforceable by the fina~ judgment of any court of
coi-petent ~urisdiction, then this Rosululion, r~nd any approvala ho.rein
contained, ~k~a11 ;ue deem~d null and void.
~I3~ FORLGOING RESOLUTIO~i w~ts adoptsd at t;k~e Planning Commission
meet.ing of March 12, 1490.
, ~ ';; 'i ~;~ ~
f,_ .-/~f`f;..~,~, ` 1~-_~.,r."~.c;..C:~_~ ~.,~
T
~ ~ CHZ.IR6S0I~YAN PR.O T~M?0~~ ~~ ~ ~
y
~ APIAHE7:M CIZ'X PLANNING COMMTSSION
ATT~ST;
~„_
- ~=L=~~= -~-'~--}~vt~~ ~~.U^----------
S~CRETAR:', A27AHEIM CTTY YLANNINC COMMISSION
STAT~ UF C:,LIFORcIIX~ )
COT~NTY OF OF:7~NGL j ss.
CiTY OF ANAHEYM )
I. Edith L. Fiarris, Secretary of the ~naheim City Planning
Cammission, cio hereby cerCi£y that tihe fareguirig resolution was pa~sed and
adoptQd at a meeting of the ~\nal•leim City Y13nning Commission he.ld on March
12, 1990, by the fullowii,g vote of tbe momJ~ers L-hereof:
AYES: CObIIYtISS70tiERS:
NAES: CQMMIS~70NERS:
ABSENT: COMMCSSIAPIGRS:
; . IN PIITTT~SS WF
of. ,~ , 199U.
BUYnSTUN, BOtTAS, FELDHAUS, MC HURNEF, ZQESSE
HEL~LYEt:
HFRF3ST
iGRGOF', I have horeuriL•o set my hand this .~. r~~
Y
~, ` ~
~~~_ f~' ~ .
_-~~~~
S~:CR~TARY, T,NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMh1ISSZON
-4- PC90-61
tt, . . ;, _ ~