Resolution-PC 90-97:''',~i~
~iE:Si~L~UTIQN~TJQ~ .F'~QQ_~7
A E2ESOLUTTOl1 01' THF; ANAEIP;TM CITY PLANNiNG CUhL~SISSION
TIAA'~ PE1'ITTUN FaR CONDITTOi~l1~L USE PE;ItMIT N0. 3269 BI; DEt7IED
WEIEttEAS, t1iQ Anativim City Planninq Commission did roc.eiva ~t
voriLi~ct n~tition Eor Co,~dit.ional Us~ P~rm.it for certain raal proporty
situa~eri in ~he City cf Ar~aliaim, ~ounty ot• Oranye, SCatn of Cnlifornia,
desr_,r.ibtad as;
PARCEL 1: THE NORTFI 6U F~:ET OI' THE SOUTH ].20 FF,ET AF
TH~ NpRTH ?.G4 Fc.ET OF THE EAST 10 J~CCtF.S UF TII~ SOUTH
20 ACRE:i OF TFiE SUUTfiEAST QUARTF,'R OF THE NORT'HEAST
QUARTFR Or SBCTI02~ 2a, TOWNSHIP ~1 SOUTH, R~1NG~ lU
WB~T, I~J THE RAPICHO LOS COYOTES, AS SFIUFIN ON A MAP
RECORD~D IN E~OK 51, PAGE 10 OF MIaCELLANEUUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAIJ COUPITY,
~XCEPTxxc TFIERF:~ROM THAT PORTZON INCLUDF'II WTTHIN
TRACT 292t1, AS 6HOWt~ ON A MI~P RECORUED I:7 F300K 95,
PAGES 13, 74 ACID .L5 OF MTSCELLI~~EOUS MAPS, RF,CORDS QE'
SAID COUNTY,
PARC~L 3: TfiE SOUTf1 60 F~ET OF L'FfE N02Tii 264 FEET OF
THE EAST 10 ACRES OF THE SOU7'FI 20 ACRES OI' THE
SOU1'HEAST tiUAKTER Oe THE L7QRTEiEAST QUAR'rER UF' SECTION
Z8, TOWtdSNIP 4 SOUTFi, R_'~t1GF. 10 WEST, ItJ TIiE Rl-NCftO
LUS COYOTES, AS SFIO~1tJ OtI A MAP ~ECORDF.D It7 BO~K 51,
PAGE 1~ OF MISCELf.I.TJEOUS hiAP;, RECORn3 UF ORANGE
COU2iTY, CALIFUf2NI11.
F.XCEP'['ING TiIEREFROM TIiA': PORTlON I~ICLUAED WITHIN
TRACT 292f~, AS :::;OWN pri A tdA? RECOFDF..D ZPf 1lOOK 9~,
PJ~G~S 13, ].4, AttD 15 OE MISCFLI.A!lEOUS t~iAP~, tt~CORUS
OE' SAID COUNTY.
WFiEREAS, the City Plar~n.iny Commiss.ion did holcl a public laoarinq ,1t
Lh~ Civic Ce:~tor in the City o[ A~iaheim ~n April 23, 1990 at 1::3U ~.m., notice
o£ said public hearing havinq b~en ~luly y:ven as require'1 uy la4 3nci iy
a~c~rdance with tho provision~ of t:he J~naheim Municipa] Code, Ch~pte. 1tI.U3,
to tiear and con:,icif~r Qvidence for and a~.3ain,r, ;,aid p:•oposed cor~dittonal use
permi.t anrl to investiyate and make f.ir,riings and re~comrr,enilat;ons in connection
there~,~ith; and
WfiERF;AS, said Commission, aft~r ciue in;,pect=~r., invest;c~ation and study made
b! .il•self and in its be}~r•lf, ~z:d a[ter due can•lic?araCion oC all evidence anc3
;eportc~ nftered at said h~~4rincJ, doea find and deterrr~ine the fo:lowing fEacts:
1397r
; ~:,
r
-1-
eC90-97
1. That: the proposed usa is properl,y onn for which ~
conriit3.ona.l usa par.mit is ~uthurirod by 3~naheim Municfpal Cocl~ Sections
1~.4~1.050.O1U nnd 1II.44.050.~30 ~o pexmit expansiori nt a public 8ance 1~a11
wft•h ~n pramisra-s~lc3 and c~nsum~haan of lic~tior in ati existinq rest~ura:.h..
2. That tt~e proPosec] Eixpansion is horQby deniad on the basls
thaC the current ~~;e z, ri~~G opc~r~iting under ~hc3 c;ondations 3mposocl by
Condi.tional UsQ P~c•miL No. 30~9 anc? ttierc~ are cornFlaints ~bout noi.se from
rstiicientiz.i n~ighbors.
3. That t.2ie propos~d usc~ wf11 adverscly affect rho adjoining
lar-d uses, espec.ia].ly Lhe n~arby ro,idencQS, ancl th~ growth and developmenl of
~he a~•~a in •which it is ~~ror~:,oc3 to bo located.
4. That ~hQ s.iz~ and sha~~ of th~ sito pzaposed for th~ use zs
not adequat~ to a11ow l•he fu11 cicvelopment o: the proposed use in a manner not
dotY•imental to th~ part:iculir area nor to the poace, t~oalth, safety and
c{oncral wclfare of th~ Citiz~ns of the City uf Anaheim.
5. That L'he yranting of. th~ Condi~ior.al U~e Permit, will bQ
det.rimrental ~o t}ie peace, hQalt.}i, safety anci gonertil welfarQ of tho Citizens
ot the City of Anaheim.
6. ~'haC the traffir, qenera~ed by the propo;,od use will im~ose
an unaue burden upon the ,tr~ets an~3 highuays designed and improved L•o carry
the trafEic in thP area.
7. That 7 people inciic::LFCi ttieir pr~s~nce at said public
h~:~ring in opposiCion.
~A.~~c~t~~JI~_ E~ViE2n2iM~1'TI,L _QIlALITY,. A~'r ,~I..I)~Ny: That thcs At3aheim
City Planniny Commiss.icn :ias revi.~wcd the prop~:,al o p~rmir tho expans.ton of
a public dance hall with on pr~mise-:,ale and corisumption of liquor in an
existing i•est3urat~t oci a rQCtangularly-shapQd parc~l of land coasisting of
ap~,roximate.ly 1.1 acres, having a frontage of approximately 253 feek on the
wQSt sicle of E3i•ookhurst SCrcet, tiavinq a ma;;imum dapth of approximately 330
feet, being lacated anproximaCely 260 :eet norCh of tho ceiiterl.ine of Orange
AvNnue ~nQ furthnr dosr;ribed as 501-509 Sour,h BroukhursC Stre~t;; and doea
hereby deny thc~ t~~qativo Declaration upr,n f.indi»g thai: it has considered th3
2t~gative Declaration together wlth ~,ny commnn~•; r.QCei.v~ed during the public
review proc~:ss anr] further fin;tin~ on '.he b~sis oE r.he initial study and any
comments receivecl t}~at 2:t~Qre j.s substant.iai e~idc~nce that the pr~;~cC will
t~ave a si.gnificaiit ef£ect cri the r,nvirontnst~t.
NQW, TNr.R~E'ORE, IIE IT [tESOLVL•'D thah the :,naheim Ci~Y ~lsnning
Comm.is ,ion doos hereby d~ny siib ject f etition fur Coniiitioni7. Use Pexmi t., on
l•hr, basis of thc afor~+mnntior.ec] Eindings,
°2" PC90-~7
T}IF FOREGOTNG RLSO~UTION was a~oplE~d a~ Fl~nninq Commission
meeting of April 23, 1990. ~
,~., ,I ` i ~ ~ ~~ /
~_~..~:_.~'C=~.'=-~:-~-fr~-~ ~C..___--.--
CHI~'[EtMAN, ANAF1uTM CITY FLANNING ~".OMMISSION
ATTES7.': -
.__.~..~ _. 0~'.c!ic.-! ~ _ .. /~~i(~t~ .
7
S~CRETARY, ANAH~Ih: GT1'Y PLANNIP~G CObfMISSiON
STATE OF CALI-_'ilRNIA )
COUN:CY OF URANGE ) ~ , ,
CITY QF 11NAHCIM )
T, Edith I.. Harr.is, ~~cretary of the Anahe:i-n C.ity Planning
Comraission, cio liereby cerr.iEy rh~;t the foregoin~ resolution was passed and
adoptod at a meetirig of t}i~~ Anaheim Cik~ ?.~lanning Cammission held on April
23, 3.r,90, by the follow.inc~ vote of tho members ttiec•QOf:
AXGS: COMN.ZSSIO:JERS: fiOUAS, f30XDSTUf7, ['EGDHAUS, t•IERBST,
MC IIURNEY, ME55E
NOES: COAltdISSTONE;RS: NOlIE
AIISEN'P: COMMISSIONERS: HEI,I.YF,R
I~T WITNESS WFiER~OF', I havo I1QI•eunto sQt my hard this ~-= da
of 1990. i y
---- ~
/ --- ` ` --~~r~_1~ ~ -
~ ldl~.~~
SECRE A~Y, AHAY.EIM CITY PLANNING COMM'LSSION
~3' PC90-9?