Resolution-PC 91-134~;: r ~.~
:1tESOT.UT:ION ~IO._ PC91_-134
A R~SOLUT70N OF THE ANAHEIM CITX PLANNIVG CUMMTSu:CON
AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIUNS UL' APPItOVAL OP
CONDTTI~JNAL USE F~~RMIT NO. 209Q
F7HEREAS, on June ?., 1980 the Anaheim Ci.ty P.lanni.ng Commisaion grar~teci
ronditi.onal Uae Perruit No. 2090 under Reaolution No. 1~G80-92 ta pEritiit a pub].ic
dance hal.]. in the ML zone a~i praperty located ~:,n the e~st side of Kr.~e~aer
Boulevard, having a maximum d~pth of appraxi.mately 'l16 fe~t, being lc~cated
approximatEly ?_42 feet south of tt-e center.line of Cororiado 5treet and further
der~cribed a3 1J.E~ N. Kraemer Boulevard; and
H'HER~AS, i:e~olution No. FCBO-92 includen the following conc~i.tion:
"5. Ttiat the use i~s tiereby granted fur a p~riod of nne (1) year,
evbje:at to Leview axid consideratiou for p~s~sible exLeneions of
time by the Planning C~mmission upon wrl.tten request by the
petitioner•, if iL• ir~ dPter.mineci that t.he use ha~ not had an
adver.se impact on the nearby us~s."
WHEREAS, the p~t:itioner hae r~~3uested amendment t:o said Condition No.
5 ta permit, a retroactive extFn:~ion of time or del~tior, af t.he conditian to
reta.in a public dan~e hall..
WHEI?EAS, the City Planning c:omr~iasion did hol~ ~ public heariny
a~ the Civic CentEr in the Ci'ty of Anaheim an August 26, '_~91, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hea~:ir-g having been duly qiven as rc~u~.red by 1aw and in
ac~orclance with l:he pr.ov:.sions of the Anahe.im Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, t~o
hear and coT~sider evidence for and again~t said propo~ed amendmGIlt 311C7 t~
investigat~ and make findin7~ and recommendations in connection thereorith; and
WEIEREAS; saici Co:nmi~si.on, afte: due inspection, invFSt:gation and
st.udy made by itsc~lf and in its beh~lf, and afL•er due consider~tion of alJ.
evidence and renorts off~red at yaid heari_ng, does find and determine the
following fact~:
1. That said permit i.s being Pxercised ici a manner not
dEtrimental to the partir_ular az-~a and a~:rrounding land u~es, nor to the public
peace, h~alt.h, ~af~ty and genera]. welfars.
2. That aubjer.t use has been operated for a peric~d ~f 11 years
lin cnnnection wiL-h time ox~ansiona haviny bc:en gran~ed) in a manner not
ueti-iment;al to the imm~diate area and land us~s as substantiated by the Code
Enforc~nient Diviri.on.
3. That a thre~~ ( 3 y year tin~e extensior. woulc's enriblc the
Planning Depar.rment etaf£ atid Planning Conuni~a.ion L•o review the use
peri.o9ically.
4.
in opposition;
~ubj~ct petition.
CR1278MP
'Phat n~~ one indicated their prasence a~ said puk~l.ic hearing
and thar Tl~~ correspondence was r~ceivcd in oppoaition to 1h~3
-1-
PC91-'134
~
r..;~
f «:p~~
CALIF'OFtI3IA ENV7RONMFN~'AL QUALITY ACT FINDINC,: That the Anaheim
City Flanning Cuinmiqeion hae revi.ewed the ~,roposal to permic a retroactive
extenhi.on uf time or daletion of condit:S.on of app.roval requiring ar.nual timc
ExtFnoiona to relain a public daacF hall and dcee herQby f3.nd that the Negativo
Declaration pr~vioualy apprnved in connectinn with Conditional Use Permit No.
209~ ia adequate to aerve aa the rtguirAd environmental documontation in
connection with thia requeat.
NOW; THEREFORE, ET~' LT R~SOLVED that the Ansheim City Planning
Cammission doFa hcrrby arnend Corid.ition No. 5 of Re~olut.ir~~ No. PC80-92 to re~ad
as followR:
5. That the use is hereby grani;Pd for a period ~f three (3) years,
unL•i1 A~.igunt ?6, 199h, subject to revi~w ar~d consi~l~ration far
j:I0IIf31U~f: exf:en,~iona of. time by the planning Commissi~n at a
~u:~iic i~~uri.^.ry up~n written requeat by the ~etitioner., iP it is
d~i:ermi.ned tnlt the us~ '~?~ not had ~n adverae impar.t on the
nearby usea.
subject to t:he followiriy condi~i~n being eatiafied
1. Thzt within a period af ninety (90) daye from the date of triis rP3olutian
thc legal propQrty owner/deveioper ahall. meet with the Electrical
F.n~~ineering Division to resolve the ieaue of requir~~ atzeet light
inat.allation.
BE IT P'URTEiE12 RESO.'LVED that the }~nahQim City Planning Commi,ssian
does herpby find and det?rmine that adoption of tliie RQaolut.i~n is expressly
prpdicated ugon applicant's r.omplian~e with th~ r.ondition hereinabove set
forth. Should sucti conditior,, or any part~ thereof, be declared invali.d or.
un~nforceab].e by tY,e f.in~l judgment of asiy court of comp~tenC jurisdictiun,
t.hen this F<~eolucion, and any approvals herei.ri contained, ~hall he ueecned null
and v~id.
TIiF F'ORFGUING RF.SOI~UTTUN was adopted at the Planning Comi*~issi~ri
meetinc! ef August 26, 1991. ~
, ~fj ~.1 : ~~ ~ ~'~~l
CHAIRWQM:~N, ANAH~IM CITY ANNING COMMTSSION
ATTEST:~
_~ (~ u'.{~G~• Cx % f G~(it~~...r~, -
SECR~TARY, ANAHEI24 CITY PLAfIP7ING COMMISSTOTQ
-2- PC41-134
; ~ ~ . ~ . ';a'.
pv"'"!.M1 ~ - ~ i
~;
STATE OI' CA.LINORIQIA )
CUUN'I'Y OF OR}1IVl,~ ) ag,
CITY QP' ANAHEIM )
I, Jai~et T~. Jens~n, Ser,retary of i:Yie Anaheim Cit.y Planning
Commi~~i.~n, do heraby certify ~hat the for~gaing r~solixi:ion wad paflead and
adopt~d at a meet~ing oE thc~ Analleim r_ity Ylanning Commission held on Auc~u~t 26,
1991~ by ti~e follo~r~ing vote oi ~he mambers theroof:
}1X~S: COMM'ISSIONFRS: BOUAS, BUY'DuTUN, F'ELDHAU5, :iELLY.ER, HENNTNGER,
M$uSE~ ~ ?F RISZA
NOES : CO24MIbS20N~RS : NO1VE
AIiSr2:'~~ COMMISSIONERS: NONE
~ IN WTTNE~S WHEREOF, I havc hPreur~to set my hand thie ~r ~, day
of ~~~~~~ ~ 1991. , .
~ ..~~/
~ ,~ ~:-~-~.,
SECR.ET.ARY, ANAFiEIM CITY }'LANNING CpMMSSSION
rtiJ z;'~2.~~~ (`),`?,*/'"-t'•+.~
~(J
~. ~
,~~
-3- PC91-134
",
`~
:~~: