Resolution-PC 91-189J'.' .
~~~~f f~~
Rr SOY.UT70t1 ~O. YC91 ~£iy
~ I2k:SOLUTION OF THG ANAI•IEIM CITY PY~AN:IING COMMI5S7AN
'.('I~IAT PGTIxiON FOR VARIAN~F NO. 4156 D~ GR7INTED, IN PAF2T
WEIE;kEAS, L•YiQ AnahPim City Planning Commiseion did receive a
v~r~P.ic~d F~c:tit9on f~z Variunce Eor cer~~-iin real pr~per.ty situat~d in L•ho ~it:y
of' 7~riaheim, Caunty uf Orange, Stat:e or California described +~~:
PI~RCEI, 2, 11S SElOf4N UPI A MAP r_TLED IN BOOK E34, PA~ES 5
TO A INCLUSTVE C~~' ~'ARCEL MAPS, TN TH~' OT'FTCE OF THE
COUNTY FtECORUFF2 OF QI2pNG~ COUNTY, CAL7F'ORNI,^,.
WHER~A5, tt~e CiL-y P1lnning Commi~sion did hold a public hearing
at thQ CivS.c Contc~r in tl~e Ct~ty of Anaho.i.m or~ Navember 18, 199]., a~ :i:30 n.m.,
notic~ of r~aid puhlic heari.ng having beFn duly c~iven a~ roc~uirpd by law and in
,3ccord~nce wL~h ~he provi.xion~ of the Anaheim Muni.cipal Cude, Chapter ]f3.03, to
t-.~ar an~ wonaider Qvidence for and ayainst said propo~ed var:.anre ancl to
inve~tfaate ~nd mako finai.nga and r.~cocnmc~ndatione in connecL-.i~n therewitll; and
Wf?I"sREhS, eai<1 Conunifleion, after due inspeetian, investigation rsnd
etud:~ m~~~~ py itc~eif and in iL•s behalf, ancl after du~ cot~sideration of all
eviden~e and re~orta oEfered at ~aid hearing, d~e~ fi.nd and determine the
fol.la;aing fzacta:
.l. Tt-a~. ~~tit.,o:ier rEqu~~t.~ W,yvar of tbc follo:aing t~ con~truct
2 fxF~,~tandtng, tlouble-t~~ced, 75, o ag. [t, rnonument oiyns and additional wall
elgno Eor ~hree unita i.n conjune:t;ion with a previously approved :lU•-unit
conunercial r~t~Sl cenker:
(~) Sk'.CTxUNS 1~3.05.091.010
lf3 _U5~U91. Ql l
1E3.05.091.014
,IFi.4h_0(~7
nnd ~E3.C{~1.Oo2.U40
- Per.mi~.:ed ah~pLna center identific~z~fon siqn,~.
(Or.~ ai- nQl?~faced`20 ~g,ft. monument aig:~
dinplaying thc only at~o~>ing csnter namr~
pei-mitted per atreeL• frontage in the Sceni.c
Garridor;
One each double-faced1 75.6 s!~ft. monument
oj.~~Ti on Impexial Fiighway ancl La Palma Avenue
ciiQplayinc~ maximum of ~3 tenant namee par facp
pc•opon~d )
(g) SFC IOP~S 18.05.091.020 -~ax.tmum nun~b~r of wall,aians.
18,44.067 S1 wall siq~er tenant pNrcaiktc~d in the 5cen+c
~Zn~,~,~:8 . t,~n, OG2 r O~tO Corridor;
,i _~3fqns_Eor 1 tenant, and 2 Esi ns each for_
? ten~-nt~ propc.~sed)
r~:],357~J -•1- PC~1--1a9
~~ ~
2. That th~ abo•~re-nientianed waiver (A) pc~rt•aining ta monumerit
signs haa 'r~eeri eliminr~tQa, and that wt~iver (B; ir~ hereby grarited, in part, to
aliow ~wo (2) aign~ fo~ only t;ne end unita i.n thc~ ehoppina centAr in addi~ion
to their fr.on~ antra~nce olgns ;~ermii:ted by Cod~ oc~ tbe baein that therQ arR
specia]. ai.r.cu,nnhanoes ~applicablo to tha property E~u~;h as oize, atiz~pQ,
topagrapliy, ld~catiian ar~d aurroundings whi.ch do nct apply to nther i.d~nti.cally
zoned ~rc~p4rty in tho eame vic~.n.i.ty; and that atrlct application nE the Zoning
Coda d~jriveo the property of p~ivil~ger~ enjoyed by other prager.tie~ in the
i.dentical zano und c].asuificatian in t1iH vicin~.ty.
3. That thEre r~re exr_~rpltonal ar ~xtraordinary circumatancoe or
conditior~e ~:pplicab~,~ to the p2•opQrty involvad or to tho intei-ded use of tha
property that Qn not apply ~ener.ally to thQ prap~rty or cla~s of u~~ in L•he
eame vicinity ana zon~~.
4. Z'hat tho requeate~ variance ia nECeaRary for the presQrvatton
and enjoyment of a~ aubataritial property right puFSer~aQd by oth~r p.ropar~y in
the saroe vicinity ancl zone, and eleniod t~ the property in queation.
5. ThaL tl~o r.equested variance wi.ll not be materially
detri.m~ntal tn tho public welfar.~ or injurious to L•he property or irnpr.ovementn
in such vicinity and zonc~ i~1 whi.ch the property ~e located.
6. Th3t n~ olie indi.cated their prE~enc~ at eaid pub.tic hearing
in opposition; and that no corre~pondence was rc~ceivod in uppo~a.tion te sub;r.;t
petS.t~ion.
CAL~I~9;RNTA ENVIkONMENT~I,I_. OOALITX ACT FTNDING: Thr~ Planning DirectoC
nr hie authoriz~sd repreaentative hae detE~rmined that: the pro~osQd projec.:t Ealls
within the d~finitiun of Ca~egosical rxemptions, C1afls 11, aa defined in the
State F.IR Guideli.nes and is, th~r~fore, catPyr~rically exe~r~pt from the
requiremQnt to prepr~re an ~IR.
NOW, 'PHER~~ORE, E3E IT RESOLVED that the Anahei.m City Pl~zi:ning
Cammiesion cloee h~roby grant oubject Petition for Var.iance, upon the .Eollowing
conditiona which are hereby fou~id to be a neces~ary prerequiaite to thp
propooed use of the eubject property in order ta preservQ the eafety and
yrzneral welfare of tho Citiizen~ ~t ttae Citx of Anaheim:
1. t That lighting of aic~nzge for aubject prop~~rtl shall be prahibited bQtw~~n
the houre of midnigl;t ~1nd 6:3U a.m. 1s epecifi~d by Zoniti~g Code Sect;ion
1f3.05.091.052 unleea a. variance i.e appliF~d fcr. aci~3 grantnd.
2. That c~ub ject pr~p$rty ehal.l be cievelopecl suba~antiall}• in accordancQ with
p;ans and epeci.ff~:aL•iona eubmiL-ted to the Citl of Anaho.tm by thQ
pe:titic~n~r and w}~.ich pl.an3 nze on filr~ •uil~h th~ Planni.ng Departmen~ mtlrked
Fuhibit Nos. 1 r.hrougli 5; provided, hr :ver, that thQ ad~itiunal sign~
p~rmitted by thi.o variance are limited ta one (1) additional wa11 sign
each fur ohly the c~nd unite in thr~ ~hopping c.-~nL•er (in addition ta the
~r~nt entrance wa1Z s~gna ~ermittnd by Code).
3. That plana aubmitted for.• bullding pnrn~ita ahull nhor~ conf.ormance ~~it:h
Ectgineering 'Standr~rd Pl.an No. 237 pertainiriq to si.ght diotanco visibility.
-?.-
PCyl~if39
, s~:t.,n'-,: ,,
~~_.+,~,,~t, .
~';:;,',`~
~. 'rhat ~~rior to ieauancc~ of a building permiL• or witlliii a period of one (1)
year from ttie date o# thia r~AOlution, whichever occurA fi.rei:, Gandition
No, 3, above-mentj.onod, ehall be complied with. Extenr~iona for. furth~r
tim~ ~c complete r~a.id cond.itions may be c~~:anted in accorctance with S~ction
18.03.090 of the Anahei;n Muntcipal Codo.
5. Tha~ pr.Lar to Final building and zoninq inapectiona, Gondi~ion No. 2,
abo•,r~-m~~ri~ton9d, ~hall bP camplied wi.th.
6. * Th~~~ a~proval of r.hie a~;~lication constitutos approval of thc~ pr~poc~~d
regue~t only t~ tno extent th~L- .it compliee wi~h the Anaheim Munici~al
Zaning C:ade znd any other applicablp City, St~te and F~deral regulatione.
Approval doos not inc,lude ~ny action or findin7s aa to compl.iance or
2pproval o~ the requeut; rogarding 8I1~ ~kher applicabla ordinance,
regulation or rc~quirament. Conditions marked wi.th an Asteri~k (*) are
r.equire3 u~ est~bliehe~ laws, codea, regulationa and agrc~emento and are,
th~refore, not• subject ~o neqotiation.
FiF IT FUF2TFIER RESOLVEI~ i:hat th~ :~naheim City Planni.ng Cor,~mfeoion
doec~ hereb,y .Efnd and determine that adoptian of thia RasalutiU;~ .ts r~xpresaly
predicated u~~oi~ applicant'~ complittace with each an~3 a11 of ~he conditions
herainabove net for~h. Shnuld an~r euch cc~ndiki.an, or any part thereaf, he
declared inv~~lid or unenforcPabie by the final ~uclg~nent of any court of
competent j uz ~ad3.cti.on, thcn this ite~aolution, and any appz ovala herein
contained, bhall be deEmed null and roid.
'PH~ F'OREGOING RESALUTI~~N wa~ adopt-ed at the F~lanniny Commission
meEting of Nov~mb~r lA, 1991.
~,.r'~i' l --~.. lb ~ ~~:~~.~`.~C ~ ~,~t ~'_._._
G'Fil~IIRMAN, ANAHEIM C~ PLANNINt; CpM2SISSZpN
ATTEST:
` ( G ~_" ~~ ~t ~,.~_____° -- -
S1;CRFTARY, ANAy~IM (:I'fY PLAC7NING COMA;ISSIUN
STATE OF CALIF'O::tNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ~~.
CITY OF ANAEIETN, j
i, JanQt L. Jensen, Secre~aL•y of the Analzel.m City Planning
rommissiQn, do herQby certlfy th~t the foregoing reoolution waa passod and
adopted ~t a meating o£ the Anaheim City Ylanning Commiseion held on November
18, 1y91, by the following E~ote of t:he membera therecf:
AYES: COM!'.I5SIONGRS: BO~AS, HELLXER, H~NNIfJGEK, tdESSE:, PERAZA, ZEML.L
tJOES: COMIdISSIONEP,S: t~70NE
ABaENT: COMMZSSIONF.IiS: ElRI5TOL
IN WITNE55 WFIERGOF, I have herounto set my hand this _~~ day
of ~~-- ,c~.,,,,~.}.a,,L, 1y91.
- ` ~ «-'~-~r --cc~-r-._.!~'i-~t n y
SECft~TARY, .ANAfiETM CITY PLANNING CAMMISSIOh
-3-
PC91-189
„^