Resolution-PC 91-37~.;!ia~r;,
RLSOLUTION NO. PC9?.-37
A RESO*.UT'IUN OF THE ANI~HEIM CI'!'X PLANNING COMMTS.~.:C~N
TI3AT PE;'.CITTON FUF2 VARIIINCF NO. ^.111 BF DENTEU
WHEREAS, L-he Anah~i.m City P.lanning Comm.iaAion di.d raceive a~
vQr.ified P~titi~n for Var.iance f.or certain real propezty situated in ~he City nf
Anaheim, C~u~ity af Orariga, State of California ~eacribed ae:
PAFtCEL 1 AS SHOWN O~T A MAP FTLF;D TN BOOK 3;, YAGE 15
~F PARCEL MAPS, TN TH~ QFFTCE OF THE ORANf:~ COUNTY
I1E CORDER .
WHERF~AS, the City F~l.anning Cammisaiori did hold a puUiic hearing
at thc: Civit: Cvnter in the City of Anaheim on Marr.h il, ].991, at 1:30 p.m.,
r~otics of said publ.ir. hearing c-aving b~En duly given as reqwLred by law and in
acrpraance with the provfaion3 of ihe Anahoim Municipal Code, ChApter ].8.03,
to hear and ootlsider evi~enc;e for and againe~ ea9_d proposed variance and ~c~
investigate and make fi.ndinq~ and recomrn~ndations in conn~ction therewith; and
WFiERCAS, ~afd Comniiseian, after due i.nopection, investig3tion
ana study madQ by itaelf and iti li:s b~half, and after due consideration of alJ.
evidence and rep~r.te uff.ered at aai~ hearing, does find and determine the
followir-g far.ts;
1. That; ttie petitia-~er prupoees waivera of the following to ret;a~in
twc illegally conatructed apar.~ment unit~:
(A) SECTTUNS if3.3~}.U63~U22 - Minimum atructural._ EPtback.
and 18_34.UG~ (9 feet xequired; feet: exieting)
(Ei) 5F~TIONS 18.f~6.05U.0121 - Minimum number of parkin~s~aces.
lf3_Uv.080 (70 requireci; 66 Ex.ietiny and proposed)
a.nd 1f3,~34.G6F.,.0 u
(C) SECTlON 18.94.06~.032 - Minimum flnor area of dw~llint,~unit.
(700 ~cx_ft. requi_red for 1-bedroom unita;
onP 696 s~7. fl. 1-k~edroom aF~artment existing)
?.. That the above-mention~d kaivare are hereby denied nn the basie
that ther` ar~ nc~ epecial ci_rcumstanc~a spplica~ie ~o the propertf aur.h as
~t~e, shape, top~graphy, lacation and surroundinge which do not apply to other
idenzi.cally zonad p.roperr.y in tha eame via~.nity; and that gtrict z~~+plica~ion of
the Zoning Code does not deprive th~ property of privileg~e enjoyed Y~y other
properti~e in the idEntical z~ne and claseification in ~he vicini.ty.
3. That ther.e are no exceptiunal or extraordi.nary circums~ancea or
conditione applicable to the prope~ty invalved oz• to tt-e intended uHe of the
proporty that do not a~ply generally to the property or claeo ~f uee in the
aame vi.cinity and zon?.
CP.1235MP -i- PC91--37
>7fit1~5 ,~-.YR;~
e.,
4. 'Phat the r.equer~tr.~d vari.anc~ in not neceeaarx f~r ~th~ pr~oer.vation
anct enjoym~nt of ~ aub~atantial. praparty riyht poese~eed by ~ther property i.n
the e~me vicinity ar-d zane, and ,9Hnied to the pr~perty i~i queatlon.
5. Tt~at the roquested variance will be materiz-'lly detrimenta~l to the
publi.c weliare or injurious tca the property or. im~rovementa in such v.Lcinity
and Lone in which the properry ie located.
6. ThaL• one (1) per.r~~~n indica~td their prNSence at said public
hearing in oppa~ition; and t:hat tic~ correepoi~dence wag received in oppoeitlon ta
subjact pet:.tinn.
GALTFQRNIA ENVIRONM~N'fAL QUA~~TY Ar,T FINDTNG: That th~ Anaheim ~ity
Planning Commission has revi.ewed the proposal f~r waivere of minir,tum atructural
aetback, minimum numbsr nf parlci.>>g epacea ancl mir.imum floor areu af dwelling
unit to r~tain two i.ll.egally conf~tructed apartmPat unit.e on a i•aotangularly-
stiaped parcel of land cdr.sieting of appruximately 1.0 acre having a Frontage of
approximai:ely 220 feet on ttte ea~:~t eic~e of Nutwoo~ 5t:reet, having a n~aximu.a
depth af approximataly 203 fe~t, bei.nq locatad appror.imateyy 325 tee'c r~oxth of
the centerline of Tamara I,ane and turther described as 1668 South Nutwood
Street; and does Fier~by approve the Negative Declaration upon finc~ing that it
har~ cc~naidered the Negative Declariii:iori together with any cammente reaei.veci
du.ring Lha public r.evfew procese z:nd further finding An tl.le baeis that the
initi.al study and any conun~nts recei.v~cl that :,here is r.o dubatantial evi.clence
that the project o~ill have a aigni.ficant eftect on the environment.
NOW, TIiEF2~FOR~, AE IT RESOLVED Chat the Anaheim Cit}r Planning
Gommie0ion doee hereby der.y eubject F~~tition for Variance on the baais~ of tYIP.
aforementioned f.3.ndings.
THF EOZtEGVING RFSOJ.,U~PION wa~s adnpted at the Planning Commiaaion
meeting of March 11, 199].. ~
~-~- -~- ~/-~-~-(.~ , ~,,~/ ,/, ~_~--` ~:~=~1:~-~c~.~L.~ r..-
CHnIRWOMAN~ ANAFIEIM CITY LANNING COMtdISSTON
ATTEST: ~ , ~
~-r• ~ ~7 /
..~'
t_- r ..
;-~ ,~..~ .1~~~~~
SECRI~TARY, ANAF3EIM CITY P'LAN~ITNG COb1MISSTON
-2-
PC91-37
f;~
~
~
. , .. ..,
;. ,;
' ':iF~ 1`: 1 .
S~ATE OF CAr.,Tgp~NT~ )
COUNTY O~' ORANGE ) 8~.
CITY OF ANAHETM ~
:[, Edith L. i~~3irie, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisaion, ~o
h'~xe~y cortify that ~he foragoing r~solution wa~ paased and adopted at a
meetinq of the i~riahpim C3.ty ~laz~ning Commiaeion held on Dtarrh 11, 1991, by ~hg
following votQ nf the membere thereuf.:
,:.,
AY~S; COMMISSTON~;RS: BOY~5TU1V, HELLYrR, IiENN2NGER, DfESSE
NOES: rp~IS&IONERS: NONE ~ kE~A2A
~B5E~1T~ COMldISSIONERS: BOLAS, FELDHAU:;
:~N WITNESS WFIEREOF, I havP heer~unto g~~
of. „~ ,~ , 1991. mY .hand this ^ %,~;~r~ ~~y
l '.~ ~. '
~
~r ~~' , c~..~.~
SECA.c,TAR , ANAHEIM PLANNING CGMMISSTON
~;