Resolution-PC 91-42i~.. ~ i
RE~QLUT~Olj~NO. PC~1_42
K«~~+
A Rk~SOI,U7'70N OF~ THE ANAHFIM CITY I'I~ANNiNG COMMIS:;ION
THA7' PETYT.LON ~OR CON~JITIONAI. USE FEFtMIT N0. 3395 SE DFNIEp
~aFI~RFAS, tho Anahei.m CiCy Planning ~ommieeion ciid reueivo a
verifi~d F~e~t- i.tion for Cc>ndi*.ional Ileo Permit for certain real praperty
r~ituated in the City v•; AnatiQim, Courit.v nf Orr~nge, Sta~e of California,
der3cribHd ae:
T[iAT I~QRTF.UN QF' L~T 19 OF` ANAHEIM EXT~NSION, IN TH~
CITY (~p ANAHEZM, COUNTY OF ORANGF., STATE OF
CALT:uRiIIA, AS SHOWN ON A MA,P OF SURVF.Y HY WILLII~M
FIE+l~EL, A COPY OF 97HICH IS SHOWN IN BOOK 3 P?1GF6 162
THROUCH 164 INCLU5IVF, OF LJS ANCELES COUNTY MRPS, IN
THF. OFFiCE: Or THE COUNTY RE;COf2DCF~ UF Ol2ANGE COUNTX~
CAI,IFpRNIA, DESCRIBF[1 AS FOLLO~~TS:
E3ECINNIWG A'~` PFiE~ INTERSECTION OF !'HE EASTE;RLY LINE OF
SAIU L(~'~' 19 WI7'H A LTNE TtiA2' IS PAFtALLEL WITH ANA
UISTANT NOR?'NERLY 50.00 FE;F.T MEASURCD AT RIGHT ANGLES
FROM TEiE CF.NTER LINE OI' BA.GL P.OAD AS SHOWN ON SAID
h1AP; Tii~NCE: SOUTH H9° 56' S2" WFST }1LUNG SA.ID PARALLEL
LINE A DISTANCE OF 25J.U0 FEET; THENCE Nt~RTH 15° 10'
70" WEST PAPALLEL WITFi T'IlFi RASTERLY LINE OF SAIq LUT
19, A D.I5TANCE O I~' 331.48 FF.ET; 1'HF~NCE NORTK 74° r39 ~
5a' EAST 241.3a FGET 'f0 TfIE EASTERLY LINR OF SAID LOT
1`~~ 'PFiEf7CE SOUTH 15° 10' 07" RP.ST 396.68 FEET TO THF
POINT
OF' f3GGiNNING. .
t~[iER~AS, the r.ity pl,~nning Commieaiun did hold a publLc hdar.inq
at: the Civic Center in th~ City of Anaheim o.~ March ?.5, 1991 at 1::30 p.m.,
notice of d~id oublic h~a~inq having been duly given as requ'red by law and in
accor.dance wfth thc~ prov.tH,unA o: the An~heim Munici.pal Code, Chapter 18.0~,
to hear and conoidQr evidc~nce fur nnd against s~i.d proposad conditional uso
p~!rr~it and L•o inventigar_e and makc~ firl~inyd ~nd rer.omn-,endatio~a in connection
therewith; ~nri
WFiEREAS, naid C:ortunisnion, aft~r due ln~pection, invt~etigation
and ot-udy mar.ie by itaeif and in ito behaZf, and af.cc~r duP r.oneideration of all
evidence and rep~~rts offered 1L• oaid henrinq, doeo find and detormLne the
foll~~winy facte:
j• Th~t: th~ propoeeci ueo is pro~rl.y or~e c~r which ~
condiCion~~l uHe ~;ormit i.e ar.thvrized by Anahei.m Mun<.ci~al c:ode S~r.tl.on
1E3.61 .O,1..507 eo pc~rmiC the uut~=! ~1~~ atoraqE of r.oofing mnter. ial and larqe
c~qui~menL•/trucke f~r e roofing contractor.
2. That the pr~~pc~aed use io hcrreby denic-d on i~~. b~trs!.g that it
~1.3A had an advc,r~e afiect on the a~ljoining reoLcientfal lnnd ueeo and th4
gxowth and deva_lapm~nt of thu aiea in which it io located.
~:R1 :44ME~ -.t -
PC91-42
~~'~
~
3. '~;~st tho npocif~.c .location (ad;~acgnt to reeidential uaee)
ai~d the eizo and shnpe of the eite bPi.ng ueed !e nc•ti adequa~e ~o allow thA
f~~ll development of the uee in u manner not dotrimonta]. ta the p$rticular area
nor to the peace, he~ltl~, eafeCy and gener.al wvlfare of thH CiL•izene ~f the
City of Anahai.m.
4. That the yranti.ng of t:he Conditi.onal Uso Permit will be
d3trimental ~to ~11A np~c~:, hQt-lth, eafety t~nd g«~neral w~lfare of tho C:itizene
~f thc~ C.t~y of Anaheim.
5. Thx~ twer~ty-five (~5) pr3ople indicated their preaenca at
Fsui.d public hearing ir~ ~pposit.i~n; and ttiat no curreapondenca w1a received in
uppnc~±tion L-o the eubjAr.t petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIFONMEN.'~AL_~,UALIxY ACT FTNDING: Tha~ tho Anaheim
City Pl.anr-icig Conuniesi.on has revi.owod the propoeal ta pormit the outside
~toraye cf i-oofing ma~orial and larqe equipmPnt/tructics for a ruofing
contrzctor on a rectan~~~ltrly-ehaped parr.el of land coneigting oP
apprc~xf.~nately 2.02 acreo t~aving a fzc~ntage of approximately 254 fer~t on the
norLh nide of 6u11 Road, having a maximum d~pth of approximately 32A feet,
being located approxi.mately 667 feet west of ~he centPrline of StaCe Callege
Daulevard and further. described as 1617 E. Ball Road; and doea hmreby deny the
Negative Da~laration upon findiiiy tnat it haa consider~d the Neqative
Declaratfon together ~~rith any convnent~ received dur.ing the publir review
proceae and further findi.ng on the haaia tl~at tha i.nitial study and any
comments recoived thaL there ie r~uba~anrial evidence that *_he projer.t will
have a signlf.icant Etffert on the environmQnt.
hOW, THEREFORE, BF. IT RESOI.VED that. the Anaheim City Planning
L.ommi~eion does h~reby deny aubject Peti.tl.~n fcr Condi.tional Uee Permit, on
the baeia of thci aforementioned flridings.
TNG FOkGGOING RF.SOLU'TIOPi was adopted at the Plac.ninq Commieeion
meeting of Marct~ 25, 1991. ' ,
___..~~`~'~ `' ' ~. .~ . ~R%~, ' f~.`c~~_,V
CHAIRHIOMAN, ANAHEIM C7TY PLAriNZ~iG COMMISSION
ATTEST: / ,
~ ; ; t~~ ~f~- ,_._. ,~ ~ - t:.i . t. ,~~:,. _~.._
SECRETAEiY, APIAHEIM CIT'l PL.}1t+NINC COMHI5SION
-2-
PC91•-42
;.
~ ~~`
,r~ib4qq
~J•I ~
s~rA~r~ oF c~-z,IFORNIA >
COUNTY OF ORANC3~ ) gt~.
CITY UF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harric~, Sacretary of the Anaheim City Plarining
C~mmiseion, do hereby cc~rLify that the foregoing reaolution was paeeed and
ad~pted at a meeting uf the Ariaheim City Planning Gommieai.on held on March 25,
1991, ny the following vote of L•he membQre thdreo£:
AYES: CC~MMTSSIONERS: BOUAS, BO]DS7'UN, HELLYEF2, HENNINGER,
ME:SSr, PERl',ZA
NOESt COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AEISE;NT: COMMISSIQN~.RS: F'~I,DFIAUS
IN WITN~5S WHGFtEOI', I havo hereun.to ~et my hand thia ? f day
af _~~~~ ---~ 1991. ~ ~
` ~ ~., ~lc_
_~_ ti-- .~ .~
STCRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI?iC, COMMTSSION
; ~: ,~.: ~~ ...',~:_I~?~j
-3- PC9i••42