Resolution-PC 91-441~~~'~':q
Ft'. SOLUTION N~. PC91-4~1
Fr,.~'a',~
A RESOLUTION UF TH~ ANAHEIM CITY PL'ANNING COMMISSION
THAT F~T7TION FOR CONDITIONAL USF. PERMTT IVO. 339$ BE ~RANTkD
WHFkEAS, the Anahcir~ City Pl.anning Commiss.iun di.d recc~ive r~
verified Petition for Condltiona7. UaQ Permit for aertain rc~al propgrty
oituated i.n the Gity of Anaheim, County of OranyP, State o~ California,
deac:ribed as:
TH~ EF,57'ERLI 210 FEET QP '~HE 50UTHEF2LX 125.00 FEET OF
LOT 4 UF ORCHARD PARK TRACT, LN THE CITY OF ,ANAHETM,
COUNTY OF C~RANC,E, STATE OF CAL'lFORt7IA, A5 PER MAP
RECORDF.D IN EOrJK 7 PA~F Ei, OI' MISC~LL?1NEOUS MAPS, IN
THE OFFIC;E OF '.CHE COUNTY RFCORDEP. QF SAID COUNTY.
WHIiRE~1s, ttie City P.lanniiig Commi~aion did hold a publio haaring
at th~ Civi.c Centnr i.ii the City af A.naheim on March 25, 1991., at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of aaid uublic hearing having be!en duly givcn as requir~d by law and in
accordance with the provision~ of the Anaheim Municigal Cade, Chapter 18.Q3, to
hFar ancl cor~~xder evidenc:e for and ayainet oai_d propoaed conditional uee permit
and L-a inv~aL-igate and make findinc~s and .recommendations in connection
~hsrewith; and
WEIE:trRS, saic.y ConunisA.ion, after due irispection, in~eotigat.ion and
st~tdy mad~ hy it~3elf. and in i_t.~ behalf, and after due coneideration of all
evidence and rer~orta offerr~d at aaid hearing, daes find and det~rmine the
foll.~~wing facts:
:1. 'Phat the propcsed uae ia prnperly one f~r which a conditioaal
use pexmit is autl-~orized by f~naheim Mtulicipal Code Sectian 1E3.21.05~.110 to
permit a chur.r_ti m~etinc~ f:~cil.it-.y.
2. Th~:it Lhe propo~ed us~ wi.ll not adverAely affect tt!e ad~oining
land u~e~r~ and the gr.owth and deve.lopmenL• of the ar.ea in which it ie propc~eed tp
be locat;ed.
3. T1~at thc~ ~ize and ohape of the eite p.roposed ~or tho tiee io
adequate to al.l.o~u tt~e full development of th~ prop~~ed use in a manner. not
detrimenta.l t~ the part:icul~r. area nor L•o the peace, health, sat•ei:y nnd genflral
welfare of thc c:itizE~na of. tt~e City of Anaheim.
4. That the ra~:anting aE the Conditional iJse P~rm.it under the
co~iditior,r~ imposed, if any, wi.ll nc~t be detriment«1 ta the peace, he~~th,
safety and gEneral wc1£are of the Citizenr~ oi the City of Anaheim.
5. That th~ traffic generated by the prc~posed use wi11 not
impose an undue bur.den up~r. the ~treFt~r and hiyhways deoigned and improved to
carry L-he traffic in the area.
~
CRl.14GMP •-1- PC9J.-44
~i'~'-`~+1 r'~1
~•~
6. '1'hat r~o one indicated their presgnce at ~sid public heariny
in oppoaitian~ and that no co.xrNep~~ndence was r.eceived in oppaeition i:o the
subject peiitiun.
CALIF'ORfIIA }i,NVII20NMFNTFIL~ U? A.'L•.[TY ACT F7[1UING: That th~ Anahr~.im
City Planning Commisaion has reviewed th~s proposa2 t~ permit a church meeting
facility an a rcet~~ngular.ly•-ahapec] parcel of lancl coneieting of ap~roximately
0.54 acres having a frontage: of approximat~ly 125 fe~t on the weet eide of
H~raor Boulevard, having a maximum depttt of appr~~ximatQly 169 teet, beiz~g
located approximately 20U fee:t aouth of the c:znterline of Sou~h StrPet and
further described a~ 819 S. HarUor 6oulevard; az~d does hereby approvo the
Negative ~ealarat.ion upon find.ing thai: it ha8 cor~~~.aerea L-Y:E: Negati.~ve
Declaration t~g~ther wit.h any ~~amment:s recei.ved during the public roviQw
procese and furth~:r fi_ndi.ng on the basis that thn initial study and any
comments receivecf that there i.s no subatant.Lal evidence tha~ the pro~ect will
have a signifi.c~ant eifeck on the ~nvironment.
NOW, 'THERLF~IRE:, BE IT Hr~CLVED t:hat: the Anaheim riL•y Planning
Commian.ion doea t« rebv a~•ant -~ubject Petition for Gonditional Use Permit, upon
tha fa2lowinc~ c~n~l.ition~ which are tiereby found to be a nacessary prerequi.sitQ
to the proposed u~e of the subject p.roperty in order ~o preserve the aafety and
generaL w~lfar~ uI the C~tizens of th~ City of Anah~im:
1. * That the 1F~qa1 owner of aubjec~ p.roperi:y ahall irrevocably o~fer to
dedicate to thE~ Ci~:y of Anat~eim an easement sixty (60) feet in wi.dth fz:am
thP centerliri~a of the ~tr~et along Flarbor Bnulova.rd for street wideni.ng
pur~ooes.
'l. * That plans stiall be aubmitted to the City Traftic an3 Tranepartation
Manager for liie review and approval ahowing confarmanae with the latetit
revir~ion of F'nginee~ing 5tandar.d Plan No~. 436 and 602 pertaining to
parking s~tandar.d~ and driveway location. Subject property shall
thereupon be deve.l~ped and mai.ntaineci in conf.ormance with said y~la.ns.
3. Tha~: the driveway on Harbor Boulevard ~ha11 be reaont~txuctcd t~
accommodate fifreet~ (.l5) foot rad.iue curb rel.urnc~ in conformancP with
~ngineering Department Standard:~.
4. * That fire ~pr.inkler:s ~k~a.ll be inatalled c3~ requirQd by the Fire
Depurtment.
5. Tt-at the exi~t:.ng trash en~lo~ure sha].1 be demoliahed ancl .replaced wt.th
a~~e bu.il.t in ac~.~rdance with City Staiidard~.
G. * That ~Ju~ ~o th~ ch3nge in oc~upancy, the exist.i.r~g ~tructure shall c~niply
wi.th the minimum ntandardc of thz City of AnaY,eim, including the ~Jnifnrm
f3uildiny, Plucnb3.ng, i:.lec';.rical, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by
the City ~: An~~hc:im.
-2--
PC91-44
: ~
~
v~
,.~«
,~ ^ , - ~'~~i
~ ~«l~~~r` . ~i
7• * That the propor~al sha11 compl.y wit.h a11 aigning requiremen~s c~f the
~s-A-43,000 ~~Ft~s.identi.a~, Agricul~ural" Zone, unle~a a variance allowing
~i9n waivera io approvFd by thE c:ity Council, Plann.ing CommiBeian or
Zoning Adm.inisl-.rator.
$• * That ttte ~:,-aite landscapl.ng and i.rr.igation aystzm sha11 be refurbiehed
and maim~ained in com~~lianco with CiLy etanda.rds.
g. That t~ubject property ahall be deve].oned ~ubstantially 3.n xccordance with
plans and specificationa submitted to the Cit
Petitioner arid whi.ch plana are Qn r-, y °~ Anaheim by the
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, t~e Wlth ~h~ Plann.tng Agpar~ment
~•~• ~'hat prior to isvuance af a bui.lding permit, ur prior to commencemen~ of
ttx~ activity herein 1p~~roved, or withzn a period o:E otie 1
date c,F thia resolution, whic:hever ~ccura ~irst, CAndition Nosr lrana~2e
above-•mentioned, shall b~ comnl.ied wirh. Extenaions for fur.~her time tr~
complete oaid conditi~ns may be granted .i~i acc~rdance with Section
18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Coda,
11. Ttiat ~rioz to commencement oF tt~e activity herpin approved ur ta f±nal
buildir.g and zoning it~speCtloq~r whi.chever occurs firet, Condition ~ias.
~' ~' 5~ ~~ g and 9, abave-mPntioned, ahall be ~amplied with,
12• *"Chat approvai of thi~ ~pplication constitutes approval of the gropos~ad
request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other ~pplic„ble City, State and Fecleral
1egulatians. Approval doeF3 not include any action or findings as ta
comp).iance or approval of t!~~ r~quest re7arding any other applica,b].e
ordinance, reguJati.on or rPquirement. Conditions marked w.tth an aateriek
(*) are requ.~req k~y ~stabli~hed lawo, codea, r.e~ulatione and agre~merits
an~ ar.e, therefor•e, not ~ubject to negotiation.
BE Ii' FURTFIGR RESOLV~D that ,:he F-naheim City P.lanning Commt,seion
d°~y hPreby find and determine that ado~iion ot thie Reaolutian ie pxpresaly
pred?.cated upon appll~a~lt~s ~ompliance with ea.ch and all of L•:~ conditione
herFinsbove set forth. Sh~uld any such co-:diticn, or any part thereoP, be
d<aclared invalid or uncnfor•ceable by the fi~ial judgment, of any court of
competent juri~diction, then thi~ Kesal~.iori, and an
contained, shall be c~ee~ned nul: and void. Y aPProvals herein
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIO~I wae ado~ted at the Planning l~ommioeion
meeting of March 25, 1991.
!.
~,
:
,,,' , , ~, ~. ~;: . ,__.__
~ '' `y,` , _ _~=.t. : , /,
- ~. ~-~ y '' „" " ' l• / ~' ~ J. - t._c <. r ~.
CHAIRWOMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLA N.ING COMMISSION
AI'TEST: -J
------ - .~t~-l•~ _~~~l~G(.~1: i..(_ ~
SECRETA , ANAHEIM CITY FLANNTNG f'OMMISSION
~~~
P~91-44
l~~
f
STATE Or CALIFORNIA
, . . } '~+::~
~\ !
COUN'I'Y OF ORANGL ) s s.
CITY OP' ANAHEII~S )
I, ~ciith L. Harria, Sacretary of. th~ Anaheim City Planning
Cammieeian, do her•eb,y certify i:hat the .foregoii~g .reoolution wae paeaed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anahei.m Cit~~ Planning Commiseiori held on March 25,
1991, by the fallowing votc- of the membe.re th~reof:
AYES: CONlMISSIp23ER5: BOUAS, BOYD57'UN, HEL.i,YER, HLAININGER,
MESSE, PLRA7,A
NOES: COMMISSIOI~ERS: NQN~
ABSFNT: rOMMISSIONERS: FELUFiAUS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i tiave h~r.ounto ~et my hand this t~~"'`~ day
of _`~:~ L _ , 1991. • .
_,"-(~C~., ~ :t-~--~
SECRETARY~ ~1.NAHETM CITY PLANNINCy CUMMI3SION
-4- PC91-44
{'r. ,
, , ~~~ ~:~