Resolution-PC 91-45p; a'.ts~
FtESOliUTION NO. PC91-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNING CONMTSSION
TH~1T PFTITTt]N FOR Vl~?I?.NCE NO. 411fi BE GRAN7.'ED
WI•]ERGAS, the Anzheim Cat1 Planning Conunisaion did xeceiv~i a
verified Pet±ti.on far Variance f'or certain real propexty situatsd in L•lle Ci~y
of Anaheim, Coun~y of Orange, State of California d~scrihed as:
PARCI~;I~ A, IN THE~ CITY OF ANAH~T2Q, COUNTY OF ORANGE.
~TAT~ OF CALIFUE2NIA A5 SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 4~
PAGL~ 15 nF PAP.c:~;T, MAF: IN THE OLFICE OF' 'PHE COUNTY
Rb,_URDER OF SAID CQUNTY.
WHr'REAS, i:hp Ci':.y P].anning L:omre'_ssion di.d hold a p!lblic heaz~.ng
at •the Civic Cente~r in the City of Anahaim on March 25, 1990, at 1s3~ p.ro..-
r~atice of c~ald public henring having been dul.,y ctiven aa reguired by law and in
acco.rd3nr.e with "tie pr~ovision3 of the F~naheim Municipal Gode, Cliapter 1u.03, to
hear and consic3er. evid~nce for and ayainet n~xid propoaed var.Lance and to
invpstiqate and maY,e finding~ ard rerommendatians ir~ connecti.on therawith; and
WFIk,REAS, ~:-ii.d Commission, atter due inspection, inve~tiga~ion and
utudy m3a~ ~y i.t~elf and in its betia7.f, and aftar duc coriai~er~.tion o.f a11
evidence and re~orts o.Efered at :,aid h~aring, does fir~d and d~termi.ne the
following facts;
1. That the p~~ti~ioner pral~oeaR waiver nf the f.ollowi.ng to
construcL- a 32 nq.ft• freestandi.~ly sign:
SECTIONS 18.05.093_C??3 - Permitted .lo_r.ation of fr.e~~standing a~.
18.Q5 _098 (11,'7-foot :~etback from Houth property line required;
and 18.6_1_057. 1-~_?.-f.oo_ setbac;~ pr~pUSec'.)
2. 'lhat tlie above-men~ioned waiver ia hereby yrant~d ~n thc~
basio that ther~ are :special circumatanceo applicable to the property euch as
size, shape, to~or~raphy. ~ocation and surroundinge whir,h do nat app.ly to ot~er
ident=cally zoned property in the c~aaie vicinit.y; and that str.ict appl~.catian of
the Zoning Code deprivc~~ the pronerty of privilegea enjoyed by o~ther p::opertieo
in th~ identical zon~ and cla~fsif~cation .in th~ vicini~ty.
3. '.i'hac ther.~ are excepi:ional or ex~raordinary circumatancee
~r condi.tions applicablc~ tc~ th~ property ir~voloed ~r t~ the in~onded l:Of3 of. ~he
property that do not :~pr~ly generally to the proper.ty ur c~aes of uc~e in the
same vicinity and zunr.
q, That the requP~c~d variance ie necoF~sary for the
preservati~n and ~n;joyrner.t ot a substantial property right poeb~ssed by ottler
pz•operty in the aame vic:inity a~id ~one, and denied to the propurty in qu~etion.
,. That ~he reguested variance wi:l] n~t be materially
detrim~ntal t~ the Yublic welfare or injurious to the property or improvement;a
it~ such vicinity anci zone i.n whi.ch the nroper.ty is located.
~R1147MP
_i_
PC91-45
~
w:,;~,~~
6. Tti~~t no ane indica~ed tn,eir. ~reaence at eai.d publia
hearing i7 op~osikion; and that no correspondpr.ce ~a~ze received, i.n oppaeition to
suhjec;t petitien.
CALTFOI?N7A Et~ViRO~IMENTAI. QUALITY A~T E~ IA?DING: The ~lanntng Director
pr hia e~.uthorized reoresc~r~~~~ive has determ.ined t~i;~~. the prc~poaed project £~lls
within the de~init.ic~n of Cai:egor.ical Exemptione, Claae 11, ae defiaed in the
StatP E7.R Guidelines aizd ie, there:Eore, cai:egorically exempt from the
requir.eme.zt. to prepare an EI~t.
N~~~~, ~PHEF.FFGRE, }3E IT RESULVF,D that the Anaheim .;ity Planning
Conuni~si.on c!oes hereby grant subject Petition for Vart.ance, upc. , th~~ following
canditions which are her~by faund to be a n~cassary prc 3quisite to thn
proposed uae of t:he cubj~ct property in order to preserve thQ saf.~ty anci
general welfare of tl~e Citizens of the City of Anah~im:
l. That caubject property ehall ~e developed pubstantially in accordance with
p.lana and spec:i£icati.ona eubmi'ttsd t~ the City af Ar~ah~im by the
peL-it.icr.?r and wt~ich plens are an file with the Planning Department n~arked
Exhibit No. 1.
~• That the c~xisting pole 3ign which can be aeen irom ttie fr.eeway shall he
rc:furbishc.d ar~d painted.
3. That prior to final building and zoning inF~o~ctions, Condition Nos. .1 and
?., above-inentioned, atiali be complied with.
4. That approval of this appli.catian constitutea appr.oval of tha proposed
rec~u~st only to the exter-t that- i.t CnlTlplla6 with the Anatieim Municlpal
Zoning Coda and any other applicaUle City, State and Feaeral regulatione.
Approval daes not include an}- action or. Findinge as to compliar.ce or.
approval ot the reque~t r.egarding any other applicabls ordinance,
regulation or ~e~~uirement.
BE IT Ft:TR2'HER R~;SOLVED tha~t ~he P.naheim City E'lanning Commisnion do[~s
herepy find and determine th~zt adoption o£ thi.s RESnlutian is c~xprtssly
~+r~dicated t:~~oit applicant' ~ ~ompliarice wi}h ~ach and all of th~ conditions
hereinabove set forth. Sliould any guch con3itions, or any part thereof, be
declured invalid oi- un~nforceable by the final judgment of any court of
cc~mp~ten,t jurisdictior~, th~=ri ch.i~ ReaoLution, and any appravals herein
~ontain~d, ~tiall be dc~e.med null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESULUI'IOIV wae adopted at thE Flannir~g Commiseion
meeting of March 25, 1991.
. ;;
' -r r ~ ~'' ~~ ~~"Z-y f./~ ',C~4~..,'
~HAIRWOl~N, ANAf•IExM CITY PLAfNI~ING^GOMI~TSSION
ATTEST:~ /.,
Y~ ~ ,!~ ~
.. -''~ -! ' .t~_.LL1~'~~C'~~'t- ~~
SECRETARY, AI3AH~IM CI'PY PLANNING ~^.UMMIS:iION
-'2 -
PC91-45
~;
*'.F
i'p
'~'•a
,,
~~
.; ``%e"~ ;.u'
s~rn~~ or cA~7~oRrii~
COUNTY OF OP.AN~3k; ) :~s.
CITY OF ANAHESM )
T, ~dith L,. Hurria, Sacretary ~f ths Ar.aheim Citv Planninq
Commi~oton, do hc~reby cr.rtity th~t th~ foregoing ree~lution WBtJ pas~ed and
adoF~ted at r~ me~tiny of. the Anaheim Ci.Y.y P?.anr.ing Cummiaeion he7.d on March 25,
1991, by L-he f.o.llowing votE~ of the member~ thoreof:
RYLs: COMMTSSTONERS: BOYL~STUN, F30UAS, Hc^.LLYFR, HENNINGEP.,
MESSE, kL:FtAZA
NO~:S : CUN,MI;,S I~JP7GRS : [~ONF.
Af33EtJT: COMMISSIONERS: FF'.LDHAUS
IN WI'"t~LSS WiiEFtF.OF , I hmvc~ ht :QUnt~ set mX hand thi~ `~(~i <, day
of D~.~------- , .1491.
.~
%1 ~
` ( ~• ,
~
~
~
'
-- ` ''_'~' ~?t Y- ~-~'l._.*_,
SF.CRETARY, ANAHE:M ~
CITY PL}1NNING COMN:ISSIQN
-3-
PC91-45