Resolution-PC 91-77~
FtT'SOLU~'ION „~f0 _.F'~91~~
~
A R~:SOLUTION OF THE ANAlIEIM CTTY PLANN'I.N~ COMMxSSION
'1FIA7' PGTI'CION FOI2 VAT2IANCE; NO. 4131 8E DENTFD
WHEREAS, tk~e AnahHim City Plann.tng Commisnion df~l r.aceiva a
veri~i.~d Pel..ition £or Vari.ance f.or .:ex~taln real proporty aituate~? ir~ the C.ity nf
Anzhc~im, Count:y of Orange, Stat::-. of Calif.orni.a de~cribeu a~:
f,C'1' 9 O~ TRACI 445~7 AS SH~P]N ON A MAP THGREOF R~CC~RDEI;
TN EiQUK 17, PAGL 3f3 nF MISCrLLANE:OUS t4APS, RECORDS Uk'
ORANGE COfINTY, CAI,TrOF2NIlA.
WIiEREe1S, ttie City 'Planntng Cammi~soion ~9.id hcil.d a public hearing
at ttiQ Civic C~nter in the Ci.ty of Anaheim on June 3, 1991, 2991, at 1:30
p.m. , notice of aaid public tic~aring having bc:en duly given ae~ requi.r.ed by law
~;nc] in accordunce with 4he proviaiona of th~ Anaheim htunici~al Cude, Chapter
1II.03, tu h~ar. and conaider evidencF~ fox and aqafn~t gaid propo~sed varianca:
atld t~ invec;tiyate and rr,~~e f.L!idings a~id rE~c:ommendatior.s in connection
th~_~rewith; and
w«ra~3AS, :a~i~.l Comnzi~FSion, after d~.~~ inspectiun, inveatigation
an~l study made by it~elC znd in ita behalf, and after due considerut•ion of all
E?V1Cif.?RCC: ~nd r.eporL-s cEftrc~d aL c~.3id heariny, doF~s find and determine the
`ollowing fejct:i:
1. Tha~ t:he pEti.~io~ei- pr.opoees wai.vers of the following to
c~~n~c':ruct a aecond dwcll.ing unit in con',t:nction with an exi~ting pingle-•family
recid~nce under authority oi Cod~> Section 1£3.01.02Q.02G:
(,~) S[?C'CIC~N 1f3.34.o63.C1~ - M~nimum ~rruct~~ral setbac;c.
(15__te~t fr.om Claudina Street rectu.ir.ed;
l_3 fect_ exi~sting)
(h) S.I•:C^'ZOff _1_H_ 3~:,OF~;s_.U?7 - Min.imum ,yarcl rr_quir~rcent.s
(5 fee~ r.e.quirc~d from blank hu.ildiny
w._il l to north c1lltl we~C property .li nas ~
0 Eeet proposed)
~c) Si;c:mION__18_34,OG3.03~ - Mi.r~im~m rF~rreatir~-ial-lei?ur~ area.
(20U_ES~f¢. per unit requii•ed;
27_9 ~c~.ft. pro~og~d for Fropoeed unit
.1nd nane propo~sed for exi~ting un.i.t_;
(d) :,F_C'P~[c~N 13_.34.~6!l. - Per}_it~ed ~nr.roachm~site.
(g~-rki,~_are_in not ~ermitted to encroach
.neo ..~nt ~etbackj !~ne_ ~en parkfncL~-~ace
proponed Ln F:ll.awortli AvenuQ ~t~th~ck)
(c~~ ;~E:(°PIQN_ 19_.:14..Or~~i. ~G7 ~ R~g!_~.ired vehiclc~ arceafl~
( veh i~lg back~n~ o~to_ ~s ubl_ic HL~CEt~:
prnh:.t~iterl; 1~~~~rki,2g ~3Daee pruposed ca back
Un~c~ F.11.f~wo-~t'ti Rvn-1u9)
c:R2201MP -1- P(:91° 1'1
~~~~~' ~-~'.n
;?. :J'haG ttie ahove-mentioned waivere~ ~Zre h~reby der~ied on tha
baR3i~ thlt thE~rc are no ~xcept:ional or. oxtraordinary circumatancoe or
c~nclil;fone applicabla to tt~e pro~erty involved or. to thG intondod uoe ot thc~
praper.ty th.~~ da not apply yeneeal.ly to th~ property Qr clase of ur~e .in tho
saine v.icini.ty and zorie.
3. 'fhat L•he r~quastEd variance is not nQCesaary foz th~
pr~oervation and en joyment oC a~ubo~ani:ia]. property right pc~naesc~Qd by ol•hc~r
prnperty in the r~arne vic.inity at~d zc~ne, zc~d denied t~ th~ property in
qu~etiot~.
4. That ttie c-cque~r.ed vari.anco ;~ill be mater.ial.ly deLrimental
t:~ ;:he publ.ic welfare or injurio~ie tu the property or improvementa in auch
vicinity and zone in wh.ich ~he property i:a located.
5. Ttist no onc3 xnciicated thc~i.r preaence at eaid public hearing
in oF~~~ocition; znd Y.h~it nu c.~rrespondence wa~i recelvad in oppositi~n to
subject petitir~tt.
CALiF'OF2NIA ~NVIRUNMLPITAL___Sz_UALITY ACT FINDTNG: ~1'hat t:h~ Anaheim
City Planning C~mmis»ion naQ reviewrd the propor~al for woivQra of minimum
structural rzer_bar.k, minimum y~ rd 1sCjui~Cr'ir_ii~s~ mini~num recreational-leisure
ar.t~a, permittc~~i ~r.c:-:,aulimF~nr.r~ ar~d r~qtiired v~hicle accesa i:o constrtict a
ser~r..I dwell inc~ ~;nir.. i n co~~ :n.r,r9.r~~~ ~.,ir.l: . n exi~ ~_ .~: ~~in~le•-family rec~id~nee
on a rectangularly-sh.~p~~~.i par.ce.l of lan~i conE.iEtinc~ of ap~~r.•oximate.ly 0.13 acre
located at the norrPiw~~t COL'I1F3I' OP 1;11swortli Avenue and Claudina Straat.,
havir.g apprc~xi.mate :~ontages of 51 teet on th~ north si~:le of E1].aworth Avenue
and 1?0 feeL- on thc~ wc~st sidr~~ of Claudina Strac~l and further d~scribad aA
125 Ear~t 'r'.llsworth Avenu~; and :,'cr,d hereby apprave the Nee7aeive Decl~ration
up~n f i ~•-?:;,y ~nat ir haF cc iai.dered ttie Pleyativ~ Dec:laration L•cgeth~r witf~ any
:.~~mment~ r~caived du: i.ng r_l~e piiblic review procec~~ and further finding ~n t-he
bzsis l:hat the initi.al :~tudy and ~ny commente received that there is no
~ubstantial E~vidence that tt±E~ pcoj~ct-. will have a si.gnifica~:t~ eff:eet on thP
envir.onment.
NOW, 7'HERI:F()R~:, BL•' IT R~SOLVEll that the Anaheim City Planning
~om:,~isc~i.on do~s }:ereby deny ea~~bject Petit.ion fur Vari~nce ~n the basia of thc~
aforemznti.onF~d findinrn.
TE1E FUREGOING RESOLUTION wa~ ~dop~ed at the Plarining Commieaion
n~peL-ing ot .7ui~e 3, 199.1. , ,
. ~,, , ,r ,; ~~
~~~; / ~i
, ' ~ ~'.-~< --,(-~f.r-.•;~!~ /-,.~.~ ; -.L'Lfi ~ ~-Li _
CFiATRW MFO 1N, Al1AH~:TM CI~ANNING CnMr.ISSZC~N
A1'T. E5T :
i
1,~., ~ '
}~'~ ~_...!.~:' ~ ~ ",: _.",ti.~--•'.~..1~:.,._ __..^ . ~
5~C'~tETARY, ANAH~IM CITY PLANNIN, C~7M:^lISSIc~N
-2- nC91-77
A,'rt'Y~
STATL; OF CAL~II'ORNIA )
COUN7'X nE' ORANGE ) as.
CI'fY U,: ANAEiEIM )
~~~
I, Jan~t L. JenAni;, Secr~tary uf thc~ Anaheim City Planniny
Commin~i.oii, do her~by cexti.fy t.hat the forogoing re~talution waa paonecf and
adoptc~d at a rr~eE~ting uf tho An~-h~~im City Planning Commiesion held r~n Jur~e 3,
1991, by thQ folluwing voLe of. thF~ rr~pmb~rn thereof :
AYFS: COtdMISSTONFRS: HUUAS, B'ELDIiAUS, IIEL~,Y~R, HGNI~7INGL'Z, MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONFRS: BOIDSTIJN
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f.'EFIA'I.A
IN WITNESS WHLR~OF, I have her~unto r~eL- my hand thi o~,~,~,._ day
~ f---~•'..1...r_..-____•-' l 9 91 .
'/ r 1 !..~~ f:~r~ •''" , ~ ',/
~ Y~~
S?:CP.ETARY, .'~V?1F~ LE" M FLANPIING COMMISSION
. , . ...:: ':':"111
-3- PC91-77