Resolution-PC 91-85RESOLUTION Nn. PG91-85 ~
A RESULUTION UF' 'rHE ANAHEIM CITY I~LIINNJNG C,OMyISSION
AMENDING CONDITTONAL US~ PERMTT NO. 336z1
WHFREA5, on llecember 3, 199Q, the Planning Commiasion granted
Cond.i.tional Uee Perm.it No. 336~ unde.r R~salution No. Ft"~ /3 to perm.it a
chui-ch faci.lity with o~aiver af mi.nimuin r~umb~r of parking sF~aces and permitted
l:c~ure c~f operatiun on p:aperty l.oeated on the ~~uth side of La Paima Avenue,
having a maximum depth of appr.oximately 761 feet, being located approximately
1~}1 feet weot of the centerline of Brasher Street and further dascribed an
5300-534~ East La Pa1ma Avenue.
WtiFREA~, the petitioner }ias re:questpd amendment to Conditional Use
Perm~t- *:c. 3363 to perrnit a~chool use in additioTi to a previou3ly approved
church, to include a t.hird waiver, as foll~ws, and to amen~ the conditions vf
approval pErtaining to i:ime li.mitati onJ on c:hurch~~ i.n tY~e Cany~n Inclu~trial
Area:
(C) SLCTION5_18.05.050.0212 - I,iinimum numk~er of ~aa-lcin spac~a.
18.06.05C1.0256 (2,334 r:ecluired; 1~152 propon~d)
1f3.OG.050.131
18.06.80
and 18.61.Q66.05U
WHERF,AS, the City Plannin~ Comrni3sion did hold a public hearing
at the Civic Center in the City oP Anaheim on JunE 17, 19~31, at 1:30 p.m.,
rotiae of sa~.d public lzeari.ng having been dul.y given as requirec] by law and in
accordance wi.th ~he provisiona of the Ariahei.m Municipal Code, Chapter 1II.03, to
hear and cun~i~aer evidence for and ag~inst said propo~ed condition~tl uQE~ permit
and to inveat.Lgat•e and malte findinga and recommendatione ~n connection
ther.ewith; and
WH~REAS, aaid Conunission, after due insper.ti_on, investigai:ion and
study made by itseif and in it3 beh~lf, ard after due considerai:ian of all
evidence and repurto o~ferecl rit ~ai<i hearing, doea Fi.nd arid dek~r.min~ thP
following facts:
1. 'fhat thc petiL•ioner pzopases to entablish a 243,836 sq. ft~
(previously 221,OG9 sq. ft. ; ctiur.ch coith acce~eary uses and fac:i.lities iri two
existing ir~du~atrial buildinys.
2. Thut the zequested waiver i.s her~by gran;:ed on the ba~is tha~
the parki.ng waiver will nc~t cau~e an increase in traffi~ conyestion in the
immec:iate vic.inity nor adversely afiec*. aciy adjoining land us~s and granting of
the parking waiver under the canditions imposed, if any, will not be
d~trimPntal to t;h~ p~ace, health, aafety anr~ gener~l welfare of the citizens of
1:he c~ry of Anaheim.
thE basis
no~ification.
3. That the rc:quested uFe to percni.t a sck~ool ie hereby denied on
tha~c th~~ appJ.i.cant withdrew aubjecL• request following public
cni2~.2MP •-i- pc9~-ss
4. That~he proposed amQndment to ~ele~a refer.ence to a ~-Year
time perLod from Coridition No. 11 uf Rasolution No. PC90-273 is r..onsistent with
rec~ntly adapted Ordi.nance No. 5224 Wr~i.Gr~ amencled S~cri~n 18.61.050.614 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
5. That the propos~d u~F, ae granted, would b~ compatible w.i.th
surrounding land uses and that the parking pravided is adequate to support the
church and r.elated uaee.
6. That the i:raffic gener~ted by th~ pr~posed uae, as granted,
will not irnpose an undue burdect upon the ~treel:s and hi9Yiways designed and
i.mprov~d to ca.rry the i.raffic in the ai-ea.
? That no one indicated their presenc:e at 5ai.d public hearing
in oppo~.ttion;' and that no corresp~ndence wae receivod in opposition to the
subject ~~etitiori.
CALIrORi3IA ENVTP,ONMEN=P7~L QUA_LITY ACT F"1'NDTNG: That the Anahc:im
Cxty Planrii.ng Commissi~r, has r.eviewed the proposal to amend Conciitional Uee
p~rmit No. 3363 to permit a scY~oo1 use in addiL•ion to a previouc~ly approved
church with an additi~nal waivr~r of minimum number of purki.ng apacea ar-d i;.o
amend the conditi.one of approva~ ~.~eLtain.ing to time limitations ~or cliurches in
the Canyon Industrial Area azid doea hereby find that the Negative Declaraci~n
previously approved in conciectiari w.ith Conditio»a1 Use Permii: No. 3363 ie
adequate to serve a3 the requir.ed environmental documentation in connection
with thiR request.
NOW, THEF2EFOR~, BE IT RE~OLVFn that the Ar~aheim City Planning
Comminr~ion doea hereb,y granL- subject P~tition to pFrmit a church facility with
~hE fcllowing addil:ional waiver:
fC) SECTIONS 18.06.050.0212 -- Mi_~imurn number of pazkinq s~~ac_s.
1f3.06.050.02G6 (2,334 reauired; i,_15i proposed)
18.06.050.132
1F3.06.00
and 18.61.066.U50
BF. IT rURTF'rR FtESOLV~D th~t the :ullowing specif.ic conditiona of
3pproval shall b~ amended to read:
(. 'That when the St~te of Ca.lifornia Warr.anta for a tratfic signal ar~ mFft,
the cenl:erline of thp Eagterly d~-`_vPwuy at 5340 Fa~t La Palma AvenuF stiiall
be a.lignedremoved ~an~icent~P~a~~a °Withdetandarciecurb,Tguttergtsi.dewalkeand
sha1J. be
landacaping.
7. That M hen the Si:ate of Califar.nia Warr.ants for a traf£ic eignal are met, a
Lr~tfic eiqnal aha?.1 bc~ inatalled at the int~i•section of brasher S+~ree~
and the new eaeterly driveway at 534U East La l~alma Avenue.
14. Tl~at aubject prc~p~rtY shal~. be developed subatantiaLly in accordance ~•rith
pl.ans and ~pecifications ~uhmi.tted to the City of Anahei:n by thp
p~titioner and which plana a.re on file w.ith the Planriing Departmant marked
Rev~ieion No. ]. of Exhibit Nos• 1 titrough 4.
-2-
PC'~ 1-85
~;<f~
;;~`;::;~,~
~.
~~~
15. That prior to isr~uanee at: a building permit oL within a period of one (1)
year from the date of this reaalution, whichever accuxa fir~t, Condltian
Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 12, ak~ovo-mentioi~ed, ahall be co[nplied with. Extensions
for fur.th,er time to complete said conditiona may be grant~d in accordance
~vith Section 18.03.090 ~i the Anaheim Mun~.cipal Code.
1~, That prior to iinal building and zoning i.nspectians, Condition Nos. 1, 2,
S, 8, 9, 10 and 14, above-~mentionEd, shall be complied aiith,
AND, B~ :'P FURTHER RFSOL'VCD t.hat Conditi.on 1Vo. .~1 shall be
deleted ir~ its entirety. Except for i:he amende3 condition~ herein, a11 o*_her
condition of ResoluL-i.~~n No. PC90-273 shaZ.1 remairi in fu11 f'orce and effeci:.
3E T°' FURTHER R~SOLVLD tha~ the Anaheim City Pla.nni.ng Cor,unissi.on
does hereby find and determir,e tl-~at adoption of thie Ftesolution is expressl~•
prEdicated upon applicant' ~ cornplian~e !~i.th ~ach and a1L of tYie aonditiona
hPreinabove set for.th. Should any such cc~nditi.un, or an;~ part thereof, be
d~clared invali_~a or uner.fo~_ce;able ny the final ~udgment of any court of
competeni: jur`~adictian, ~.hen thia Resol~x~.ioa, and any apprc,valr~ herein
coiitained, sha].1 be de~med ~YUll and voi~.
THE FOREGOING RESQL[~TION wae adopted at tha Plarinir-r Commisai.on
meetiny of June: 17, 1991. ~I ,, ~
~ ~~ ,.~~~: ~l% /~ ;1~i•~ i,-~~l-~Lr_•c ~ f _
~HAIR OW~MAN, ANAHE'IM CIT. P~,ANIVING CO2~SISSION
ATTEST:
~ ,~-~~ ~_,,(' ~~
~~ ~~'=~--•-~v-rr_l.~-='.
~ gE •E'I'AFtY, ANAH~,I~ CITY PLANNIIQC COMMCSSION
~.- `~~~
STA:I'E !~F CALIFQRNIA
COUNTY Ur CP?!NG~ ) t~s.
CITY OF ANAfiRIM )
I, Janet L. JpnsEn, Secreta.ry of the Anaheim City Planning
Gommi.sai.on, d•~ hereby certify t;hat the Foregoing resolution was pasePd und
ad~pted at a meeting oi the Anaheim .^.ity Planning Commicaion held on June 17,
1991., by the f.~llowing vote of the membere thezeaf:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: $UUAS, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HELLXER, FIENNINGEP,,
MES6E, PERAZA
AIOES : COMMZSSIONEI2S : NONE
ABSENT: CUA3MISSlONFRS: NONE
IN WITNESS WF?EREOI', I have F~~reunto 3~~t my hand l:his f~~~ day
~ f ~..~~~ ~ 19 91.
~ ~
C~ ~ ~~ _ ,`7 y. ^ -~
7 ~i~ ~ ' i
S~ ETP.RY, F.NAHEIM~" ITY PLANNING CGDL`QISSION
i._
~
-3- PG9I-85