Resolution-PC 91-87~ ~ ~~~~.w
RESOLtJTION NO,~,~PC9J.-87
A F2~:SOLUT:LUN OF THE AN1~HrIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TFI}1,T P~T:[TTON FOF2 CONDT'PTONAL U5~ P~RMIT NO. 3420 BE GF2ANTED
WH~FtEA~S, the Anaheim City Planning Cc~~nmi.~sai.~n d.Ld receive a
verified Petit.iun far Conditiona~_ U9e Permit for ce.rtain real property
si.tuatod in ~he City of Anaheim, County of Orznc~e, Stai:e of California,
dr~r~cribed a~:
LO'TS 10 & 11 OF TRAC'1' NO. 2903 IIJ TEi~ CIT'1 OF ANAl3EIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, 3TATF OP' CALIFnRNTA, }1S PER M11P
RECURllED TN BOOR 99, PAGES 21, 22 AND 2J,
MISCELLr1NE0US MAPS, II1 THF.' OB'FICF. OI' 'PFI~ COUNTY
RECOR.llER OF' SAID COUNTY.
WHFR~AS, th~ City Planning Commisoi.on did hold a publia hearing
at the Civic Center iri the City ot Ailaheim on June .17, 1991, at X:30 p.m.,
notice of ~aid public hear.i.ng havinq bePn duly yiven as required by law and in
accordance with the provieiona aE the Anaheim Municipul Cade, Chapter 1£i.03, to
hear and consider evidenc;~ f~r and agai.net said proposed cnnditiona~ use per.mit
~nd +;o inve~L•igate anci ma1~c find.ings and rec~mmendations in connection
tt-ercwith; and
WHEREAS, :,aid Cnnunis~.i~~n, after due in3pection, invescigation and
etudy made by itrself and in ite behal.f, anU atter ciue cunsideration af all.
evidence and tepoz't;s offered at said Yiearing, doey iind and dPtermine ~he
folluwing fa4ta:
1. ThaL• t11e ~roposed uoe ia prop~rly one for whic~h a condi~ional
u~e pe~:rmit is authorized by Anr.iheim M~nicipal Code Section 19.44.050.195 to
permit a convenienr.e mzrket.
2. 'Phai: th~ propuoeci uae will nnt aclveraeJ.y ~tffeet the adjoining
land use~ and the growth and development of the area i.:i wtiir.h it is proposed to
be locaL•c~d.
3. That the size znci s~hape oE r_!ie site pr~posed for the use io
adequate t~ a].low the full devel~pmEnt of the propoHed ~.ioe in a manner not
detr.i.mental to thc~ pari:icular are~, nor ~o L•he pearo, h~ulth, aafe~y and genezal
welfarF3 of ch~ ~itizena of the City of Anatieim.
a. That the ~ranting of the Conditional Use Permit under thQ
conditionA impoeed will not be ~etrimental. to the pc~~ce, health, eafety and
general welEare of the ~it.izens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That thF traffic gen~rated by the propo3ed use wi11 not
imposQ an undue burden upon the BtYPE:t3 and highwaye deoiyned and improvod to
carry the traff.i~ in the area.
6. That
t~earing in appoeLtion;
the aub~tct petitior,,
CR1214M~
~
» .
~~
-1-
PC91-8i
ttir~e (3) p~ople indicate.d thc~.ir ~resence a!: said pubLic
and tha~ no correapond~nce waa; r~ceived in oppor~i*ion to
~~~ ~
CAI,IFORNIA ENVlRONMENTAI,_QTJALI'PY ACT FINDING: That tho Anaheirn
City Planning Commisaio~i hae roviewed tt~a propoeal to pormit a convenience
~narket on a rectangularly•-ehapecl parcel ~f ~.and coneisting of approximately
Q.57 acre looa~ed at tl~e northeaet carner of Kate.lla Avenue and Bayleae Stroot,
having ~pproximate ir.ontages of 190 feet on the north eidQ of Katella Avc~+nue
and 139 feet on the eagt eide o£ Bnyless SLreet and further described as 1~23
Weet ~Catella Avenue; and does hereby a~Z~rUVe t.hc Negative Declaratian upon
finding that iY, has conaide~red t:he ~t:ive Declarati.oii togett~~r with any
commenta receivpd ~iur.ing the publi.c r~ proce:3s and f.urrher finding on the
baais L•hat the in±.tia1 study and an; :c~mments received that there ica na
eubbtantial evi.dence that the nroject wi.ll have a~signiftcant effect on the
envir~~nn.~ent .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE ~T RESOLVI:D thzt th~ Anaheim City Planning
Conunission daes hareby c~ra.r~t subject Petit.ion for Conditional U+~e Permit, upon
the fc~l.lowir~g conditions which are t-~ereby found to be a neceseary prer~quieite
to thc prupoaed uoe ~f the subject proparty in order to pr.~eerve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizena of the Gity af P.naheim:
1. * That traah gtora~7c, ar~as ~hall Ue rcfurbi:~lied to the eati.sfaction of the
S~reet Maintenance a~d S~nitati~n Bivision to comp3.y with epproved pl.ano
or- £ile with eaic3 divit~ion.
2. That prior t~ tsauance of a bui~ding permi~:, a so].id waate mtinagement plan
wi.th recycli.r~g capabili~iee Ynal]. na approved by the Straet Maintenance
and Sani.tation Divi.si.o:i. Upor, accupancy of the pro ject, said plan ehall
commance and ~hall rema.in in full eff.~ct a~ requirEd by eaid Divi~i.on.
3.* That no ~aet-food eervi.ce faci.litiea :~hall bF~ permitted in subjact
convenience market ur:leba a variance for parking ia approved by the City
Council, Planni;ig Commi.e~ion ar ~oriing Adminiatrator or unl~se suff.i.cietlt
Code parking i.a prUVided.
4. The nn al.coholic bevec~zgea c~hall be sol•~ on the ~ubject property.
5." Tt~at the propogal eh:zll comply with al.l si.gning reoiiirement.s of the CL
"Commercial, L:lmited" 1.one, unlese n variance all~wing eign waivera is
approved by tt~e City Cuuncil, P:~anriing Commisaiori or Zoning Administrator.
6.~ Tha*_ the un-eitc~ landecap.ing and irr.igat:ion eyatem ahall be refurbished
and maini:ained icl compliance with City s~andarda.
7. That aubject praperty ~ha?1 be developed substantially in accardance with
plans anci epecificaL-ions ~ubmitted tc the City of Anahelm by th~
pEtition~r and whic.h plana ar~~ on fi.J.e with the Planning Departm~nt marked
Exhibit Noa. 1 and 2; pravi.cied, howaver, that the damaged fence etlall ha
r.~paired.
t3. '3'hat prior tu commencement of. the activity authorized by thiv resolutic~n
or wLthin a pexiod of one (1) year from i:hQ d3te of this zesolution,
whichever occure f.i.rat, Canclition N~e. 1, 2, b and 7, abave-mentioned,
ahall b~ conipli~d with. Ex~enaiona for furtit~er time to complete sa.td
c~ndifii.ona may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the
Anaheim Municipal Codc:.
-2_ PC91-£17
:'r y C
~•k }~ M?s' !•1
r~
9. That the houre of oper.r~tion eha11 be 7:00 a.m, to 9:00 p.m. pli~s one 1
additional hour (until 10:00 p.m,~ ~or ~~~ploy~~$ ~r~ clrase-up and loave the
premiess.
10.* That ap~roval of th:~a a
pp.lication constitutea approval of the
request ~n],y to ~}l~ Q,;tQ~~.~ t,hat: it compl.ies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zaning Code and any oChr~r applicable City, State and Fedc~ral regulations.
~lpproval does not include any acl:tori or finding~ as t~ compli~nce or
approval o: the requec~t regarding any uther applicable ardinance,
regulation or. requirement. Gonditiona m~zrlced with an asterisk (*) aro
requ.ir~d by ~stablishad laws, codee, regulatior~~ and agre~mentA and are,
tharefore, not eubject to nego~tiaki~n.
BE IT FURTHFR R:ES07VEJ that the Anaheim ~ity Planning Gommiasion
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resoluzion is ex
pisdicatpd upon a,pplicanL•'s c~mpliance with Pach and al.l cf tho conditione
hereinabove aet fort}~. Should ariy such condition, or any pazt th~xeof, be
der,lared inval.id or unenforceabi~ by the f.inal
competAnt iuriedi.ctian judgment of any court of
, then thi» Fteaolution, and ~ny approvaln herei.n
cuntaj.ned, bha21 be deemed null and ~void.
THE FQREGniNG RESOI,L'1~ION war~ adonted at the Planniny Comrnissior,
meeting of June 1'7, 1991.
.~' ~~~ ~' ' .I ~' ~
..,,%' ~ `~~ ' . tCl.t:! ; --- 7tx: ~.(Il.~~,.C.~-.,t,;
_~~
CFIAIRW biAN, ANAHEiM CI'l~ PLANNING COMMTSSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ -
e E J ~~~ "~ _-~=~.~2:.r:~-~-.;--' _
."'ARY, ANAH~I2~,'~~TY PLIINNING COMMTSS70N
i,
(_i ~ ~
ST}1TE C1F CAL~IrORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGL ~ ~&,
CITY OE' AIJAHc^,~M )
I. J~ne~ L. Jensen, Sec.r~tar~, oF tho Anaheim Ci.ty Planni.ng
Commise.i.on, do hereby cextify ~hat th.? ~c,regoing res~lution wa~ paaeed aYid
a~o~ted at a meecinq ~f the F,nahF~im C~ty 21ar.-ai.nq C;ommisr~for; hcld on June 17,
1991, by tt:e fc2lowiny voto c~f the memb~ra thereoi:
AYP•.S: CUMt~1ISS:ONERS: ROUAS, 1~'ELDHAUS; HrLl:.YL~R, H.F:NNINt~ER,
MrSSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSTONERS; BOYOSTUN
Af3SENT: COMDSTSSIqNF,RS: NOtJE
~~
(/ ,?
--'~~.~.-~ _._.~:''L.:_.._~~:~:.Y..9.y:'~ _______-._.
s~ ETARY, ANAHEl~i 4?'ITY P:,ANNINr, COMMi55TON
, : ,i~
ItJ WIZ'N~SS WFiER~OF, 7 hav~ herE~~:,~;~~ $,;t my yand this ,L~1~ day
of ,~~~ . 1991.
~_.___
-3-
PC91-87