Resolution-PC 92-10f,.•:..,
R~SOLUTI N NQ. PC92-10
A RESJLU'PION OF TI1E ANAI3EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TNAT PGTITION FOR RECLASS'[FICATION NO. 91-92-10 dE GRANTED,
AS MODTFIED, UNCONDITIONALLY
wF1EREAS, tho Anaheim City Planning Commisaion did receive u
verif.ied pe~ition for Rpclassification Eor resl property eituated in the City
of Anaheim, County of oranye, state o: California, deecribed ae follo~ues
TNAT PURTIOlI OF TNE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOU'TH~AST QUARTER O:' SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP ~1, RANGE
10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS CQYOTGS, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATF. OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN 600K 51, PAGE 10 OF MISC.EJLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED Au
FOLLUWSs
F3Er,TNPIING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH i.INE OF THF.
NUA1'IIF.AST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE SOUTHEA!iT QUARTER
(SE 1/~3) OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHTP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10
WEST, S. 8. 8. & ri., TN THF. 121~NCHn LOS COYOTCS,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAID POINT
OC• BEGINHINC; [iEING 477.6 FEET EAST OF THG NOATNWEST
CURNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF 'IHE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE lJd) OF SAZU SECTION; TNENCE
EAST AI.ONG THE NQRTFI LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST (NE
1/4) 119.4 FEETp THENCE 50UTH, PARALLEL TO THC WEST
LIP7E OF SAID NORTHEA3T QUARTER (NE 1/4) 364.82
FF:E:'f; TFiENCE WEST PARAY.LEL TO THE NORTH LINF. OF
SAID f10RTH I.TNE OF SAID liOliTF1EAST QUARTER (NE 1/4)
119.4 F'r'6T; TFIENCE NORTH, PAF2ALLEL TO 'fH£ WEST LINE
OL' SAID E70R'I'FiEAST ~UARTER (IJF. 1/4) 364.82 FEET TO
THE PLACE OF ElEGItININ(;.
WHERL•'AS, tho Cir.y Pl~nniny Commiseion did h~ld a public hearing
at t:he C ic Center in ttie City of Anahefm on DecomUer 16, 1991 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public heariny having be~n duLy given ae required by law and in
occorclancp with the piovi~tons of the Anaheim Municipal Cod~, Chaptor 18.03,
to heai and coneider evidQnce for and againeC said proponed raclasaification
and tn tnventiqaee and :nake findinga and rarummendations in ccnnactior.
tt~eiewitti; and Chat uaict public hnnring was conkinu~d to the Jnnuary 27, 2992
Plannina C~mminniosi meet.iny; and
wFI~~ERS, natd Commiaelorti, after dun i~apectton, Lnveotigaeion
and ntudy made by itflelf ancf in ita bohalf, ancf after dt~e cQnoirieratiun ~f all
avidencR and reporta offare~i ut esid hsaring, doe~~ fir.d anc~ dot~-rmine tho
fo2lowiny f~r,t3:
i. That tha poeitioner propone~ rec:.~asification df nut~jact
pronerty tro~ the RS-A-43,OU0 (R~nidnntial/Agricultural) Zone to ~_h~ AM-2400
(Rn_cid^nttal, M~iltipl<t-Fa~iily~ c~ h leos intnnv~~ znnR.
~:R1403":S -.1- PC92-10
2. That tho Planning Commiesior~ detormined at the pub'Lic hearing
tha~ subject proparty ehoul.~ be reclaseified to the RS-5U00 (Residontial,
Single-Family) Zone rather than to the RM-2400 (Roeidential, Multlple-Family)
Zona.
3. That slnce ttie adoption of the Genoral Plan in 1969, the
Planning Comm.issi.onJCity Council have viQwed the General Plan as being flexible
within the ranyes speci.fiQd. Thia is retlected in Y.he intrcduction to the
Genera.l Plan .from whi.ch otates rhe following:
"The Anaheim Ceneral Plan ie nok a preciee plan and does not ehow, nor
intend to show, the exact land use pattern which will in fsct occur.
Inetead, it indicatos the qeneral location of land uaee and the
interrelaticnshipn ~f varioua land uae patterns a~ ohown on the
Gener<zl Plar~ Land Use Map. The Plc+n conetituten ~n exprosnion of
current City objectivee, Princ.ipleh, Standarde, Propooals and Policie~
and provides a basia from ofhich deciai~ns ralating to spec±fic land
use prupoaa.ls can be made."
4. That the Planniny Commiasion has recommended ~p~roval of
General P1an Amendment P7o. 32h to tlie City Counr.il to redeeignate subjact
~roperty from the L^.w Uenaity Residential land usea to the Low-Medium Denaity
ReAidential land uees.
5. Tliat the pru~osed reclaesification of subject property, a~t
rev.ifled, ie neceaeary and/~r desirable for the orderly and proper dovelopmont
of the community.
b. Tkiat the propo~ed roclass:.fication of sLbjoct propQrty, ae
r.evi.sed, does pro~erly relate to the zones and their pgrmitted ur~ea locally
establiahec: in clooe proximity to subject property and to tho zones and their
parmit~ed usc~~s gQnerally estahli~hed throughout the community.
7. That the proposecl roclassification of subject pro~,erty, aa
revi3ed, reyuires the dedicatiion and improvement of abuttir~q stre~ets in
accordance with che Circulation Element oi t.e General Plan, dua to the
anticip~ted increase ~n traffic which will be genernted by the inteneification
of land une.
8. That thirty-two (32) people in opposition and four (4) peopl~
in favor indicated their prc~aonce at the January 27, 1992 pub.tic hearinyt and
that no cor~•~aponr~ence waa received :n opposition to autioct petition.
CA:~ FoRNIA ENVIRONMENTAL _9UAiITX ACT FINDING: That the Anahoim
City Plf~nning Commissior haa rQViewad the proposal tc~ xeclaasify aubject
pr.operty from tha ftS-A-4~,000 (AESidontfal/Hgricultural) Zonu to tho RM-2400
"RcaiclenCial, Multiple-Family" 2one and which propoeal was approvc~d fc~ RS-50U0
"(teaiclential, 51r.71e-Family" 2oning, to permit a SG-unit "effcrdabl~t"
conci~minlum c~mplex ~~ith waivera of minimum buildiny ~ite area p~r dwolling
unit :-nd ~r~xirrum Htr.uctural height on n rectangulnrly-ehaped pnrcol of lond
eonaiattr.g of approximately 0.9 ricrH having a frontaga oE approximately 219
Feet an th~ south eidr. ot Urange Avenue, havinq o maximum de~th of
_~_ PC92-10
a•~proximately 332 feet, bQ.ing located apprnximately 715 feot west of the
cent.erlino of Brooknurst Street and further describod as 2260 West Orange
Avenue; and does hereby approvo the Nogative Declaration upon finding that it
haa c~nsid~red the NegativQ Ceclaration t~yether with any oomments receivod
during the public review procose and further finding on the baeie that the
initial atudy and any commente roceived that thore is no aubatanti.al evidenc4
that tlie pruject will have a aiynificant af£ect on the environmenL•.
NOW, TEiEREPORG, dG IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commic3sion dooo hereby approvo ttie subject Petition for Reclaseifi~ation, ae
modifiecl, to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal
Code to exclude the abovo-desciibed property from the RS-A-43,000
(Residenti<<1JAgricultural) Zono and to incorporato eaid deecribed proporty into
th~ RS-5000 (nesidantial, Sin91e-Family) 2one, unconditionally.
BE IT FURTIiCR RESOLVED that approval o£ thia application
constitutes approval of the pxopoeed r.equest only to the ext.ent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and sny other applicable City,
State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or
findings as to compliance ~r approval of the request rogarding any other
applicable ordinance, regula~ion or requirement.
~E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that tltia resolution ~hall not constituta
a rczoning of, or commitment by thA City to rQZOno th~ oubjact propertyj any
nu~h rezoning shall req~iire an ordinance of ttie City Council which ahall be a
legi~lative act which may ba r+pproved or denied by the City Counr,il at ite sole
diacr~tion.
TNF. FOREGOING RESOLUTION aa adopt~d at the P a ing C~mmission
.~ , ~
meeting of Janu~ry 27, 1992. _~,,.~ ~- l~ ~~ ~ ;
C~HMAN, ANAtiEIM CTTY PLANN G ~OMM SSION ~
I
AT'fEST:
_~~/d~,.~ ~_ '
~ 'KE'fAkY, ANA~M CI'PY PLAClNit~G COMMI5SION !
STATE OC CALIF'ORPtTA )
COUNTY Oi~ ORANG£ ) 6~•
GITY OF ANAHF.Ild )
i, Janat L. Jenaen, Secretary of the Anat~eim City Planning
c;om~ni.oaian, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was pnsoed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning CommirseLon held on January
27, 1~?y2, by the followinq vote of the members ttiere~f:
nyE$; COtdMI55IOClER5: DOUAS, DRISTUL, HELLYER, MESSE, PERAcA, 7.EMEL
t70ES: COM2IISSIOPlF:RS: PiONE
A' S~.ti't: CUtdldISSIOtJERS: HEt7ttI~iGER
Itt WSTt7ESS wNBR6UF, I have hgreunr.o set my hand this ~~~ d8Y
of. ~ _ ,Y, 1992.
~`~:CRETARY, AN M CITX PL11Nt~1P1G COD11dTSSIOti
v~
-3- PC92-10