Resolution-PC 92-104R~SOU.~TION NO PC92•104
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMi9SION
THAT PETITIUN FfJR CONDlTIONAL l;.~iE PEaM1T N0. 3541 BE GRAtVT[D
WHEFiEAS, the Anahefm Ctty Planning Commisslan did raceivo a veritisd Potition for
Conditional UsA Permit tor certain real properry s(tuated fn the City of Anaheim, County of Qrange, State
of CaliSomia, dgacribed as:
ALL THOSE PAR~CEI_S OF LAND SNOWN ON TEIVTATIVE PARCEL MaP NO. fl0-
125, BEING PORTIOnS OF THE LANGERBERGER TRACT, RECORQED IN BOOK
1, PACiES S50 & 551, UF MISCELLANEOUS RECOFiDS, IN THE OFFICE O~ THE
COUNTY R~COR.cR OF LOS ANGCLES COUNTY, CAUFORNIA, TOGETHER
WITH POiil'IONB OF THE ORIaINAL'fOWN OF P.NAHEIM, AS SHOWN ON 11iE
MAP HFCOHDED IN BOOK 4, PACaES 629 8 G30, OF DEEDS, RECQRDS OF
SAID LOS AN^vELE.^, rOUNTY, TQuETHER ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
Ei, PAGE 35, OF MI3CELLANEZ"J3 MAPS, IN 7HE OFFICE QF THG COIiN iY
RECORDEf' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA, ANn TOGEfHEn W!TH
POATIONS OF P~IRCEL MAP NO. 86•142, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OrFICE
OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANCiE COUNTY.
BEING S'r10WN AS PARCEL 2 AND THOaE PORTlONS OF CHESTNUT STREET
TO BE ABANDONEO FOR TH~ PUNPUSE OF CREATlN(3 PRIVATE STREETS, ON
SAID TEM'ATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 90-125.
WHEREAS, tha City Planning Commission did hold a puW~c hearing at the Civic Center
fn the Ciry of Anahoim on September 9, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., notice ot safd public h~ring having been duly
gNon es required by lew and in accord8nce with the proviabna oi the Anahe(m Mun(cipal Code, ~hapter
18.03, to hAar and conakl¢r evkfence !or ~nd against aafd proposed concihfonal usa aermft and to
investiqate and mak~ iinciir~s and rocommendatfais in connectlon thero-vith; and
WHER~AS, aekf Commlasion, efier due insper,tlon, Investigatlon and st:xJy mado by itsolf
and In Its bohalf, end aftnr due consideratbn of atl ovklonce and reports oPfered at saM hearing, does Hnd
and dotermine the fdlow.ng f~cts:
1. That the proposed uao Is pruportY ono for which e corxJkional use permit Is
authorited by Anaheim Mun~ipal Cale Sectlnnt8.44.050•300 to permk a 800 sq.h, o~ndoor dlning aron
In con~unctlon wUh a pravicntaly epproved ro~aurdnt having ornRremieQ eale em1 Consumptkxi ot alcahdtc
beveragus:
2. That tha p~Aoposed use wMt not ncl~ :raely aHect tha ed~~infng lerxf uaes and th~
growlh and devotapmern o! iho area in v~hkh It fa proposod to be located:
3. That aub{oct proposs~i vn11 be compatiWo wilh and c~mplimer!tery to aurrourxling
~arx1 uses:
q. Tret sub~oct roquest !s apprwed for a perbd ot two (2) yaen unt0 Soptem~r A,
1E~94 fo dMOrtMne wholhor Ihe oufdcx~t dMirq erea ts compAti5le wNh ~uneund~np IanO us~;
~R15~OM3.wp .1. PC~2•104
5. That the slze and shApe ot the site ior the proposed use is adoquato to allow tho
full dovalopment ot the proposed use in a marnier not detrimental to the p~rticular area nor to the peace,
hnalth, s~ilety, and genoral welfnro;
6, That suHiclunt parking exists to s~ttlsfy the additional parking demand created by
tho additional square footaga of the outdoor oating area;
7. That the traHic genorated by the proposecS use will not imposo an undue burdon
upon tho streets and highwnya dosigned and Improved to carry the traifir, i~ the area;
8. That the grant(ng of th~ conditlonal use porrr~it u;uier the conditions imposed wlll
not be detrimental to the paace, health, safety and qeneral welfare of the citizens of the C'ry of Anaheim;
9. That !he Redev~lopment Commission recommondod approval of sub~ect petition;
and
10. That no one fr.d~cated their presonco et the pt~blic hearing in oppositlon; snd that
no corrasponciencs was received in oppositlon to the subject petition.
GALlFOR~~IA EN~^RONMEhTAL a{,jr~,ITY ACT FINDING: That thd Anaheim City Pittnning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permk e 600 sq.R. outdc~or dinfng arda tn con~unction with a
previously epproved resteurant having on-~remise sale and consumption oi alcohc~lic beverages on a
rectangu!aity shaped parcel of land consistinfl of approxirrwtoly 0.2 acre locatecl at the northeast corner
ot Harbor Place end I.Rmon Slreet, naving approximate irontages of 42 foot on tha north sido of Harbor
Place end 123 foet on the sast aide ot Lomon Street, and fuAher d~sc-ibed as 195 West Harbor Place;
and does horoby appra~e the Nogative Declaration upon finding that the declaratlon ra0acts the
Indopandont judqement ot the lead agency ~nd that it has considdred the NegatNe Declaratlon togethc~r
with any comments receivod durinq the publtc review process arxi tuAher ilnding on the basis ot the Initial
study anC eny comments received lhat there Is no substantlal evidence that the proJect will t~ave a
signKicaM ~Nsct on the envfranmerd.
NOW, ?HE9EFORE, BE It fiESOLVED that the Anaheim Cny Planniny Commi3sion does
he.-eby p-ant sub~ect PetNion tor Concfitiorwl Use Permit. upon tho (~lowing conditians whtch are hereby
found to bo a neceasary prerequfsNo to the proposod use of tltie aubject propRrty in order to preserve the
safety and genoral wel(aro of the Gtfsens of ihe Ctty of Anaheim:
t. Tna4 sub~oct proporry shnll bA developod substantiAlly in accurdnnce with plann and spec.ifications
submNtocl to the City of Anahoim by tho petiticmer ctnd whEch plena are on fila with the Planniny
bepaAmen: marked Exhibit Nos. t through 4.
2. Thot thore xhol~ b~ no dttect pedastrten access to 1he outdoor dininp area trum the public sidev~~alk.
AII accesd to the outAoor dinlnfl ereas ahall be adoly throuflh the restaurent.
3. 'fhat prior to commencement of the actNity her~in approved, or prbr to !inal building and zoninQ
Insp~ctbna, or within e perlod a( ono (t ) year Irom the date of this rosdution, whichover xcurs Iirst,
Cor~dribn No. 1, abave•montloned, ahall be comptted wfth.
4. 'flu~t subJect use pem-it shalt sxpire twa (2) yeara frorn the date d this rea~lutioc- on September 9,
tf194; pro+rided, howovor, that tlmo extansfons m~y ba roGuestecl tn connectlon witi~ a publlc hQering
to sfetormine wholhor the outdoor use is com~atide with surrounding land uaos. II timo a.~onsfuns
are approvecf, che uso may ca~tfnuo fa Ihe addhlo~l apu.:Hied time•
,~. P(.'+J2• 1 Od
5. That approval of this epqlicatlon constitut~s approval ot the proposed roquost only to tha extent that
it complles with the Anaheim Municlpal Zoning Caie and any othor Applicable City, State and Federal
iegulation~. Approval does not Includ~ z~ny action or tindings as to compllance or approvAl of tho
requASt regarding any other applfcable ordinanco, regulation or requfrerr~ont.
BE {T FURTFIER RF.SOLVED that 4he Anehelm City Piannin;~ Commlaslon does h~reby find
and dotermino that adoptlon of this Resolution Is exprdssly predicated upon appNcant's compliance with
e~ch end nll of the conditlons hereinabave set forth. Should any ch cor~ditlnn, or any part thereof, bo
declered irna{id or unen(orceable by the ilnal judgmont of any urt of compotoni Jurisdic~tlon, thon this
R9solutlon, And any opprovAls heroin contained, shAll bo dee od null ond vo .
THE FOREGQIN(i RESOLUTION was ad ed t th pla g Commisslon rneeting of
Soptember 9, t992. ~
~
---.--
CHAIRMAN, ANAFIEIM CITY PLANNIN(3 MMISSI
ATTEST:
..~
RETARY, ANAH ITY PIANNING COMMISSION
37ATE OF CALIFONNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANaE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Janet L Jensen, Secrytary of tho Anaheim City Plann(ng Coinmissfon, da heroby certffy
that tha foreyo(np resolution was passod and adopted at a meeting of ihe Anaheim City Planning
Cartimission he~d on Septomber 9, 1992, kr/ the fdlowing vote of the members thoreof:
AYES: COMMIS510NERS: 6R1ST01., HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA, TAI'1', ZEMEL
NOES: COh1MISSIONERS: NONE
AEISENY: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
VACAPICY: ONE 3EAT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~•~ day of
, t 992.
' /i~v1M.+~
C'~` RETARY, ANA CITY PLANNINC~ COMMISSION
,3, PC92-1 C4