Resolution-PC 92-108RESOLlfTJ9N NO. PC92-108
A RESOLUfiON OF THE ANAHFIM CITY PLRNNINd COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL US~ PERMIT NO. 3537 BE GRANTED, IN F'ART
Wh1EREA3, tlie Anaheim City Planning Commisslon did receh~e a veritied PotRion for
~:~nnditlonal Uae Permit tor certaln real property shuated in the Ciry of Anahefm, Cou~y of Orange, State
of CalNomia, descrlbed as:
P11RC~L t: 7HAT PORTION OF SECTION3 1 AND 2, TnWNSHIP 4 50UTH,
RANC?E 9 WEST, Aa SHOWN ON A MAP OF THE PARTITION QF THE RANCHO
SAMIAGO DE SANTA ANA, WFiICH WAS ENTERED SEPTE~IIBER ?1, 1ati8, IN
900K B, PAGE 410 OF JUUGiNENTS OF THE OISTRICT COURT OF THE 17TH
JUDlCIAL OISTRICT, IN AND FOR LOS ANGELES COUN?Y, CAUFORNIA, AND
INCLUDING A PORTION OF T11E EDUAHDO POLLOR~NO ALLOTMENT IN 3AID
PARTITION, AND THA7 PORTION OF I.OT 2 OF TNE DOMINf3UEZ ESTATE AS
SHOWN ON A MAP FILE~ IN BOQK 4, PAt3E 14 OF RECQRD OF SURVEYS IN
THE OFFICE OF TFiE COUNTY RFCORDER OF ORANGE COUf~!(Y, CAUFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: THAi PURTION OF LOT 2 OF THE nOMINCiUEZ E3TATE AS
SHOWN ON A MAP FlLED IN BOOK 2, PAG[ 15 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS IN
THk OFFIC[ AF 7HE COUN7Y RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Clry Planning Commtssion did hdd a publlc hearing at the Civic Canter in the
City of Anaheim on September 9, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public har(ng havinp been dWy gNen
ns requlred by Imv arxl in Acr,oro~nce whh lhe provistons of the Ar~aheim Municipal Code, Chapter t8.03,
to hoar arxf conakle~ ~~Ido~ce ta ArM agalnst sakl prr,~p~~od corxlRfonal use permit and to Investfgato and
make 8ndings and rxanmencfetlaia ln connectbn thorewNh; and
W?1EREA3, sakl wmmfaslon, after du~ fnspectbn, inveatigation end ~tudy mado by Rse~f and
in i1a behali, and aker sfue consfderetbn c~i all evWenco and repoRS dfered at sakl hea-fnfl, does 11nd and
determine ihe fdlowing fatts:
1. That the propoaeA use ~a proparly o~ lor which a condHionni usa pormit ~s atrthortzed
t~y Mahaim Munkipnl Cafe Sectfona 10.21.U50.t05,18.21.050.t 10 erxi 18.21.050.270 to permk the phasAd
expansion d dn oxisting church, school and preschool facAlty with waivAr.s o( tfie fdlowin~:
(q) ~~jjQ~ 18.06,050.0~12
t 8.06.050.0~$
18.5~~~
1@.4~ Q@4
A~St.l.B.?1.i~1L'
(8) S~C?lON 18.2t.OB .2 ~20t-
~C) ~~„1A.QA.060.013
~iNm11m numhet of_Q~-kf11Q s09CB5.
(~ requirud: ~4 proposed
l~iwmQ.sln~tuml..he(~h1 ~
i
(~gg; edjacait 1o SAr~ta Ma Canyon Roas~ raqulrad,
~g~g ~acfa~lnq;
,'~_~ edJac+~nt tu ~~domon Dr-v~e required, t t trees
•xhqhp; and
,~ t~ ad~acent t~ ~Conuamine Roed rsqu;rncf, g~,~
oxktin01
CA t 6Q'dMS.wp .~ . PC92•i ~8
p ~ N ~gnq r . gpyyi~ r~arkin~ lot landsc_flnlna.
~ ~ '~g~-`~ (g~ rkina lot o antere And t t trees requir«i;
~S lot danters and 7 treos proposed)
2. 7hat the above-mentioned parking waivor (A) Is hereby granted becausn there will not
be an Increase In tramc Conqestion In the Immedlate vlcinity nor wlll sald walver advorsoly aHect any
adJoining land uses:
3. Thal the granting of the parking variance undor the conclftlons imposed will not be
detrimental to the peace, heaith, satety or ganeral welforo nf the cittzens of the CiSy ut Anal~olm;
4. 'fhat the peak hours o( operation for th~a proposed church uso end school use for which
the p~rking walver ly roquosted do not overtap;
5. 7hat the abov~•mentioned wafver (B} Is heroby denlod on the besis that It was doleted
fdlowing public not{ticatfon;
S. That the abovF--mentinned waNer (C) Is hereby denled on the basfs that there ara no
speci~l circumstances ppdicable to the proparty such as size, shepe, topographY, ~ocatfon and
surroundings which ~o not apply to other identically t.oned property in th~ same vicinity• and that strict
appllCatlon oi the Zontng Code does not deprfve the proporly of prNileges en~oyed by other properties in
the fdentic8l zone and daseillcatlon In the vicinity;
7. That the existfnp Church, achool, and pruschool facUiry ere aurr~ntly operating under
conditional use permR approval wfthout detriment to udjaceM residencoa;
g, That tho propox~cl use, as gr~ntad, wBl not edveraely aNect the adjolning land uses arxl
the grcwvth and devMopment of the aroa in whbh It ia pror,osed to be located:
g. 7hat the traNic gonerated by the aroposc~d use, a:~ Qranted, wtil not impose an undue
bu~en upon the streets and highways dosiQr.erl erxf imprcwecl to carry the t-aH~c in the area;
tp. Yhat ttuxe are apeclal circumstencea app~f Q oe~ f a@m~~Y zY~ ~o~~~eSB~~
topoyra~hY. location ~r aurroundinys, wh~h do noc apply
viciniry;
11. That atrict appllc:atbn ol the 2oninfl Code ctopri~~>n the {xopoRy of prNil~ges ~n~oyecf bY
othtr~ propeAlss urxler fOentical zoning classNicatlon in the Wcin~y;
~ 2 Tt~a~ ~ho six~ ancf shape M the sub~oct proPertY Is edaquate to allow th9 (~II devdopmer-t
M the propowd use fn n manner rwt det-imental to the surroundln{~ area. rwr to Ihe pebc~, heatth. aa(oty
w generul weltare ol the cltizens ol tho Clry d Anahelm;
13, 'thet the qrantin0 0~ the conditkx~al uae PermN under the ca-dhbna imposecf wNi not be
det~fm~sntal Io the p~ce, health, salery arxl flerxRral w~lfare af tha citfzon~ ot ttw Clry d Arwhe~m: and
14. That no a~e inc!lcated thek prosence et s~k1 PudM ha+"~f~9 In oppo~ftbn: and Ihat no
corrasponclance waA rocetved M opposnicxi to the auWect pathbn.
.2_ PCli2•108
ChLIFQANIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACZ~INDING: Tfiat th~ Anaheim Cfty Plunning
Commis~lon has reviewed the propostil to pormit the pt~ased expnnsion o} an oxistfng church, school and
,Qre3chool facflity with wabors oF minfmum number of parkinp apaces, maximum structurai heiyht, minimum
landscape requirements ~nd required parking lot lendscaping on An irre{~ularly shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximetoty d.23 ecres located at the southeast corner of Santt~ Ana Canyon Road and
Sdomon Drive, havinp approximate frontages of 290 teot on the south sido of 8anta Ana Csanyon Rond
and 650 teot on the east skie of Solomon Orive, and further doscribed as 5900 East Santa Ann Canyon
Road; arxi does hereby approve tho NepatNe Declaration upon finding that the declaretlon reflects the
independent ~udgement of tho lead agency nnd that It has conaidered the Nggativc Declaration together
w~th any comments recelvod during the publlc review psocess arxJ further finding on the baals of the inlttal
study and any commente recefveci thet tliere is no substantial ovidence that the pro~ect will have a
signHicant eNect on the environmant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tho Anaheim Cfty Planning Commissian does
I~ereby grant subJect Petitlon for Cor~ditional Use Permit, fn part, upnn tho following concitions which aro
hereby found to be a necessary preroq~doito to tho proposed use o( the subJect prc~perty (r. order to
proserve the sntery and general welfare ot the Citizers3 of the City of Anaheim:
t. That streot Iiqhtin4 fnc(Ilties aiong Santa Ana Canyon Road shtill be installed, es requir~d by the
Utilities Caenernl Manager, In accordanca yvith specHfcations on tile 1n tho Clffice of the Util(tlea
General Manager: ond that security In the form o- a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit or
cast~, and In an amount and form satistactory to the City of Anahetm, shall be postecl wtth the City
to guarantee the satia(actory complotlon of the above•mentionsd improvernents. ~ald secu~ty shali
be posted wlth the City of Anaheim prior to Issuance of a buI!ding pe-mit. The abovo•roquired
Improvemonts shall be Installed prior to occupancy.
2. 7hat the drNoway an Solom~n Drlve shall be reconstructed to accarnmodbto ters (t0) foot rAdius
curh retuma as requirdd by the City Engineer In coMormanco wtth Engtneering S4anclard No. 137.
3. Tt~at a i'lan Sheot for sdid wayte storage nnd cdlectlon and a Plan for ror,yclinp ahall tw aubmftted
to the DepeRment of Maintenance for revtow and approval.
4. That sub~ect prupeny shall bo devetoped subatantfally in accordar~ce with plans and specilicat(ons
submitted tb the City ol Anahoim by tho petitloner and whtch plans ard an tile with fhe Planning
OopaRment marked Exhfbft Nos. 1 throu~h 9.
5. That prlor to issuance of a buiWing permit or wfthin a perial of o~e (i) yoar irom the dato o( thls
resdut(on, whichevor occurs tirst, Coi ~dft~on Nos. 1 and 3, ebove-montloned, ahall be complloJ wkh.
Extonalons for }urther time to complete said conditiona may be grc~ntod In accordnncu with Sectlon
18.03.0~0 ot the Anaheim MuMClp~l Code.
6. That ~xlor to firuU buAdinp ar-d zoninp fnapectiona, ~tion Nos. 2 arxi 4, above•mentfoned, shall
be complie~ with.
7. That approval d thla applicatbn conalNutaa epproval ot tho propoaed request only to tho e~cteni that
R complles wNh the Anahoim Municipai Zoniny Codo and any othor appllcable City, State and
F~de~al ro~i~laUnns. Ap~xavei doea not include arry octfon or ftrxitnps as to com~llan~ce or approval
ot ~he requeac repardinq any ahe~ nppttcaa9 orcltnance, regulatfon or req~lremern.
BE IT FURTHER RE50LVED tha- the Anaheim Cfty PIrr~Ing Commiasbn doe~ harc~by find end
dotormino tfbt edoption of this Resdution ts oxprestly predfcetod upcx~ appicarN's compllancA wNh eact~
and aii o( the c~x~ditlona Fmrelnabove aot forth. 3houfd any such corxfitbn, or any Fwrt thor4-of, bo
dodared Irnalfd a uneMorceade by ttre final ~idflmeM d any cairt cS competent ~urisdfctbn, then this
Rufsc iilulfon, nnd arry epprovalt here(n contelned, shafl be doemod null anQ void.
-3- P{:92•108
1
TWE FOREGOINQ RESOLUTION was adopt t tl P~lnnind ommisslon meoting of ,
September ~, 1992. ~ ~ "
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIIVI CITY PLANNINC~ C~INISSION '
ATTEST: / ;
~
~r.+ d.,~~
• EC ARY, ANA~~~~iTY PLANNING I:OMMISSSGN
~ ~
;
STATE OF CAUFORh1A ) ~
COUMY OF OHANGE ~ sa.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Janet L Jenaen, Secretary af the Anahelm Cfty Planning Commiaslon, do hereby certi(y
that the toro~oing resolutlon was passsd end adopted at n moeting of the Anahefm City Planning
Commission held on Septomber 9, 1992, by the following vote of tho membern thereAf:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MESSE, P~RAZA, 7AIT, ZEMEL
NOES: COMMISSIONEFiS: NUNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIQNERS: NONE
VACANCY: ~NE SEAT
IN WRNESS WHEREOF, I have hgreunto set my htmd this ~_;~ day of ~
.,/~ 1992.
~ AEfARY, ANAH I CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.4 PC92-108