Resolution-PC 92-12RESOLUTION NO. PC92-12 '
`i
I
A RESOT,UTION GF THE ANAHETM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 4100 BE D~NIED
WIiF.REAS, the AnahEim City Planning Cammiasion did receive a
verified Pet.ition for Variance for certain real proporty aituatecl in the City of i
Anaheim, County of or.ange, state of California described A8:
THE EASTFRLY 109.16 P'EET OF LOT 1 OF TRACT NO.
236, IP1 TFiE CITY OI' ANAHEIM, AS PER MAP RECORDF.D
IN Ei00K 13, PAGE 11, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
REGORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAI,IFORNIA.
WHCREAS, tlle City Planning Commission did hold a public hQaring
at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim or~ Uecember 16, 1991, at 1s30 p.m.,
noti~e oE said public hearin9 having been duly given as rec~uired by law and in
accordance with the provisiuna of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, il
to hear and consi~er evidence for and against said propc,sed variance and to i
investigate and make findinga and recommendations in connection therewith; and ;
that said public hearing was continued to the January 27, 1992 Plann.ing ;
Cummission meeting; and
47FIEREAS, asid Commiaeion, a£tQr due inspection, inveatigation
and ytudy made by itself and in ita behalf, and aftez due consideration of all ';
evidence and reports offered zt said heari.ny, dces fir~d and determino th~ ;
following fact~:
1. ~rhar. the petit•ioner proposes waivers of tho following to c
construct a 1,138 sq.ft. addition (2 bedrooms, garage and carport) to an ~
;
existing duplex:
1
(a) SEC1'SUN 18.32.063.0;2 - Minimum atructural s~tback.
(15 feet adjacent to La Verne Straet required;
8 feet exiating and propoaed)
(b) SECTI~N 18.32.063.U22 - Minimum vard reauirement.
(13 feet required al~ng north propor~y line;
~or,e t-o 7 feot existing and proposed)
(c) SECTIONS 1f3.32.06A - Permitted encroachments into rQauired Yarde.
and 18.04.O~13 (Parking space nut a permi*ted encroactiment into
15-foot yar.d alony La Ver.ne Street;
1 open _parkinn eoacg encrour.hiny 11 feet into
yard proposed)
(d) SECTION 18.32.063_032 - Minimum recreational/le.isure area.
( 350 sa. ft.. per uniC require~:;
245 aq.ft. pruposed)
CR1405P!S -1- PC92-12
2• Tha~ thie a~ove-mentionQd Waivera are hereby denied~
3• That there aro no exceptional or axtraordinary clrcum~tanoae
or conditione applicablo to the propertY in~olved or tp the intendod use oj the
prol~erty that do not anp~Y generally to the property or claes of usQ in the
same vicinity and zone•
a• Thati the requestod varlance ia not necessary for the
preserva~ian arid anjoymont op a substantial pzoperty right po~seeeed bY othoi
propertY in the same vicinity and zone~ and dQniod t~ the property in 4~l~Btion.
5~ That the requeeted variance will be matorially det•rimental to
the puplic welfar~ or injurioua to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which t~~e pLOpertY ia locatod.
6• That no one lndicated their pre~ence at said public hoaring
in oppoeitiont and that no correapondonce was received in oppoaition to eubjecC
petitiot~•
CALI~pgN1A ENVIRpN BNTAL ~UALITY ACT FINCIN~; That the Anaheim
City planning Commission has reviewed the pxo~osal to construct a 1~~38 equare
foot addition (~ bed:ooms, garage and carport) to an exietiny duplox with
waiv~rg of minimum structural set5ack, m.inimum yard rQquiremenl:, parmittod
encroac•hrnents into required y~rds and minimum recreational/leisuze area on a
~~Ctanqullrly shaped parcel ~g ).and c~nsieting o£ approximatolY ~•13 acre
lacated at• the ~nrthweet corner of La Verne Stroet and Lemon Street, having
approx imate frontag~s ~f 105 feet on the north side of L,a Verne Street and 50
feet on the west side ~i Lemon Stree~, and further dQSCribed as 901 and 903
North Lemon ~treet; and does herebY aPProve the Negative Declaration upon
finding ttiat it has considerad the Neqative Declaration togetiher with nny
comm~nt~ receivea during the public revi~w proceas and fur~her finding ~n tho
basi~; that the initial Study and any comments received that therc~ is no
substantial evidence that the projQCt will. have a significant ex£ect on the
envir~nn~ent.
NOW, THER6FOR~, gE ST RESOLVED that the Anaheim City ::anning
cummisginn doe3 hereby deny ~ubject Petition for Variance on the basis of khe
a-forementioned findinge.
THE FORE~OING KESOLUTION waa adopted at the Planning Coinmiesion
~^eetin9 of Janu~ry 27, 1992. /~-~
~~~ ~~ ~-~
.~
CHATAMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLA IN~ C SION
ATTggT%
~0(.~.c~l.... ~___ ~~---=~ ._-.---
SECRr T RY, ANAygIM CITY PLANNING COMMIaSION
-2- PC°?.-1?.
STATe or• CALIFORNiA )
COUt7TY OF ORANCR ) as.
CTT1 OF AP~ANEIM )
T, Edith L. Harris, Secretar~+ of tlie Anaheim City Planning Commiseioi~,
do h^reby cortify that the furFgoing rer-olution wae paeeed snd adcpted at a
meQtLng of the Anaheim Ci.ty Planning Commission held on January 27, 1992, by
tt,e following voL•e of the members thereof: ,
AYES: Cnt4M:SS101iERS: 4i0UA::, DRTSTOL, NE:.LYEP, MSSSE, PERAZA, ZF.NEL
NOES: CON~MTSSIOt~ERS: tiOtt~
ABSEt1T: COMDIIdS20t.~RSs HEt~t7ID1GER
I1~ WITtJF.SS WHEREOF, I have hereunt•o set my hand tt-la /o ~^' day
of ~ ' 1992.
~ r` ~ !l tiw'~'~'ii
SHCRF.TARY, At~AHE1M Pi.ANtJING COMMISSIOH
.J_ P~92-12