Resolution-PC 92-137RESOLUTION ~0 P ~2-137
A RESOI.U710N OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PIANNINQ COMMISSIO~
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NU. 4205 BE DENIED
WI•IEREAS, the Anaheim Ciry Planning Gommisslon ctid receive a verM(ed Petition lor
Variance tor certaln real proparty sftuated in the City of Aneheim, County o( Oranga, Stete of Calitornia
doacribed as:
THOSc PORTIONS OF PARCELS 8 AND 9 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILEU IN
BOOK ~22, P/1GES 37 TO 41 INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, AND AS
AMENDED -~` THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECOR~ED
DECEMBER 15. 1989 AS INSTRUMEN"i N0. 89-6007~5, OFFICIAL RECORDS,
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDEA OF ORANrE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, SNOWN AND DESCRIBF.U AS PAR~EL 1 IN THAT CERTAIN
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT F'LA7 NO. 196, REGORDED SEP7EMBER 22, 1989,
AS INSTRUMFN'f N0. 89-50~23, OFFICI.4L RECQRDS.
WI;EREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission did holc! a publfc hearing ~t the Civic Center in
the City of Anahe(m on Navembor tfi, 1992, at t:~0 p•m., notica ot said public hoaring h~ving been duly
g(ven as roquired by law and in accordance with tho provislons ot the Anaheim Munir,ipal Cocle, Chepter
18.03, tu hear and consider evidence (or and aya~nst said propused variance and to InvesttflatE ~nd make
finding3 and ~~ecommendaUons in connection therewilh: and
WH~REAS, said Corr~mias(nn, a(ter due inspection, Investigation and study made by Itself
and In tt~ behelt, and after due consideration of all 3vid~nce and reports oNered at sofd hearing, does iind
arxi determtne the tollowing facts:
.. That the petEtfoner proposes waiver of the fdlowinfl to construct nn additional 20 sq.R. ws~~~
sign:
sAr~;ons 18.05.091.020 - ,~2ci~um n~mber ot ~ermitled wall sians.
~r d 18 64_062-_-04Q (t wall sinn oer store t~ont entrAnc4 permitted;
~ p-oposed)
2. That the abave•mentioned wafver is hereby denied on t~o basis that there are no spectal
ci-curnstancas eP~~ o ather klenf~ callyr z~nQCf properti~s fn the vcfnity,~raphy, location or surroundin9s.
which do not eppty
3. 7hat strict opp~~cal~o:~ ot tho 2oning Cocle does not deprive the property ol privilopea
enjoyed by other proporties under kfontical zontng claasHication (n the vfcinky; and, iurlher. that subject
pr~!+orty was previousiy ~ranted e minlmum 5unding aotback waNer so existln9 wall algnage is closer arxl
more vislt~te to the adjacont h!ghway than it would ba H the setback wafve~ had not been grantod.
4. That there Prct no excep:iona~ or extraarSinary circumstances Q^~ a~~~°^IiA~ roca n~ or
~he propeny irwolved or to the fntendecf use ot the property that do nnt ePaY 9 Y P PQ Y
ci~ss o1 uso in +ha same vfcinity arxl xene.
~. 7hflt Iho ruquested ~~ariance ia ~rt ~QShQ s~~motvic nity~ancf ~zono, ar-d deniedn o~he
substamial propurtY rlQht posaessed by other prope y
proE-e-ty in quostion.
~ _ PC92-137
~ R 16C~3MS.wp
y.~.
6. That thR requested var(anc~ would be materially detrimental to the publlc welfare or
In~uriou~ to the proporty or improvements in auch viciniry and z~ne fn which the property Is located; and,
further, that there !s already An undesirablo prolfleration ot slflns in the eroa.
T. That na onA Indicate~J their presenco at sald public hoar!ng In op~ositlon; and that no
correspondonca was receNed In opposftion to subject petition.
~4l.IFORNIA__E,NVIR~7NMENT.~QSJA4~~' A~F!fJDlNG: Tt.a Planninfl Director or his
aulhorizod repre&ontatNo haz detarmined that the proposed proJect falls within tho detinition of CatogoricAl
Exemptions, Glass 1 t, as definecf in the Stato EIR Guidolines and Is, thereiuro, categoricatly exempt trom
the requlrement to prepere an F.IR.
NOW, T!-IEREFORE, BE Il' RESOLVED that the An eim City PlAnning Commission doe~
hereby dony subject Petitfon iur Variance on tho bdsis of the a( re ention~d ii ings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOM was edo / theiPlanr~ ~ommission meoting of
Nov~mber 16, 1992. ~ ~ '
, ANAHEIM CI'(Y PLANN
bTTEST:
:.,,. ~ . ~ ~ , ,~ ~_,-
S~GRETARY, ANAWF.1 ~~ITY PLANNINCi COMMISSION
~/••' /
STATE OF CAIJFORNIA )
COUN'fY OF ORAN3E ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
!, Jonet L Jansen, Secretary of the Anahelm City Planning Cammission, do hereby certify
tfiat the f~regning rasdution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anahefm City F'lanning
CommissEon held on November t6, t992, by the tdlowing vote oi the membors thereoi:
AYES: CflMMISS10t~EFlS: BRISTOL, HENNINGF.R, MESSE, PERA7A, '~AI7, ZEMEL
NO~S: COMMISSIONEfi,~,: NONE
ABSEN'i': COMMISSIONERS: NONE
VP.CANCY: OPJE SEAT
IN WiTNESS WFIEREOF, t havo hereunto set my hand th~g~_day oi ~y.,;y ~r.;_J
t <J.'~2.
~' ~.~.~..:: ~ .... ~:, ~ - _ . ,
' SE(;HETl1RY, ANAHEI CITY PIAPlNING GOh1MISSION
,2. PC92-137