Resolution-PC 92-27R~SOT~UTTON NO PC92-27
A RFSOLUTION OP THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNd COMMxSSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL liSE PERMTT NO. 3489 BE GRANTED
WHER~AS, the Anahaim CiL•y Planning CommiAeion did reaeive a
verified Potition for Conditional Uee Pormit for cArtain real ~roporty ~ituated
in •the City of Anaheim, County of Osango, ~tate of California, deecribod ae:
THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HAL'F OP rHE NORTHEnSS
QUARTER OF THE NORTHW~ST QU2IRTER OF SECTION 28~
TOWNSHIP 4. SOUTH, RANGG 10 WEST~ IN THE RANCHO LA5
BOLSAS~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANdE, STATE
OF' CALIFORNIA, AS PEk MAP RECORDEU IN H60K 51, PAGE 10
OF MISCELLANFOUS MAPS~ RECORDS OF' ORRNGL~ COUNTY
CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THFREFROM THAT POATION INQLUDED 4JITHSN TRACT N0.
32~10~ AS PER M}1P RECORDL~D IN BOOK 113, PAGE 1~ 2 AND 3
OF MISCELLANFG~US MAPS~ RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
}~LSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT POIRTION INCLUDEI3 WITHII~ THE
LAND A~SCRIBED 2N DEED TO THE ORANdE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTAOL DISTRICT~ RECORDED ZN DOOK 4069~ PAGE 188 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID OP#NGE COUNTY.
ALSQ EXCEPT TH~RET'ROM THAT PORTION 1~YIl4a NORTHERT.Y AND
W~STERLX OF TH~: FOLLOWING DE.`'iCRIBEA LiNEs
SEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORN~R OF LOT 37 UF THE
ABOVE MENTIONED TRACT NO. 3240J i'HF:NCL~ ALONG THE
EASTBRLY PROLONGATION OF 'THE NORTH LI:VE OF SAID LOT 37~
NORTH 89° 13' 30" EAST 'l0.10 FEET7 THENCE NORTH 00° 55'
30" WEST 186.00 FEET TO THE l70RTH LINE OF SAID SECTION
~a.
wHEREAS, the City Plsnning Commiseion did hold a public hearing
at tha Civic Center. in the City of Ansheim on Psbrut-ry 10, 1992, at Ss3G p.m.,
notica of sai.d public hea:ing having boen duly given as requir.ed by law and in
accordance with the pr.ovieions OP ~FIP Anaheim Municipal Code, Chnpter 18.03, to
hear and conc+ider evidence ior and against eaid proposod canditional use permit
and to invaotigate and make £indings and rocommendations in connocrion
therewithi and that said public hou~ing wae continuod to the March 9, 1992
public hearingi and
WHEREAS,
etudy madg by itselP
evidence and rep~rte
follcwing facte:
said Commission, after due inopectien, inveetigation and
and in ite behnlf, and aftor due consideratian of all
offered at eaid hoaring, doas Eind and determine the
-1- PC92-27
CR1443MS
~, ~......
1. That the propoaed uee ie propc~rly one £or which a c~nditional
uee permit. ia a~thnrized by Anaheim Muni.cipal Code 3ection 18.44.050.135 to
permit a commercial retail ceni;er conefating of 8,493 sq.ft, o£ ofEice uee, 481
eq.ft. of retail use and 424 eq.ft. o£ reotaurant uee with waiver o.f tho
following:
SCCTZONS 18.04.043,102 - ~1axi.mum £en~e heiaht.
and 18.45~,064 (6 fee permittedJ ~ feet propoa~d)
2. That the requested waivor ie hereby granted on the baeia that
therd are epocial circumstancea applioable to the property conei.sting of
locati~n and eurroundingo, which do not apply to othar idontically zoned
propertios in the vicini~.y becauee aub~ect property ie bardered on two eidea by
reaidential us4e and the propooed 9-foot high blaak wall w111 provide
additional privac,y and security £or esid exieting residontisl useal
3. That otrict application o~ tho Zoning Coc~e deprivea the
property of prlvile~es enjoyed by other properties in identical zoning
claeei£ication in Lhe vi.cinity~
4. That ~he location oE the eubjeat propecty, adjacent to an
urteriai hi.ghway and having a General Plan land use deeignation of Goneral
C~mmer.cial ia more conducive to a commercial use than a rea7.dontial use1.
5. That tha propoaed usA ie preperly one for which a conditi~nal
uss permit ie nuthorized by the 2oning Code, or that eaid uee ie not listed
therein ae being n permittced useJ
G. That tl:e propoaed uee will not advoraely af£oct the adjaining
land uaea and the growth and devslopment of thu+ area in which iC ie proposed to
be located;
7. That the si~e and ehapt+ of the eite for tho proposed use io
adeaunte to allow tha full development of the proposed us~ in a manner not
detrimental to tha particular area nor tc the peace, health, oafety, and
gereral wal£are~
8. That th~ traf£ic ganerated by the Propaeed uee will not
i.mpose an undue burden upon tha streete and highways deeigned and improved ta
carry the traffi.a in Lhe areaj and
9. That the granting of the conditional uso permit under the
conditions impo~ad will not b9 detrimental to the pear,o, health, safaty and
general welfare of the citizone of the City o£ Anaheim.
10, That• two (2) intereated pezeone indicated their oresenca at
the public haaxingJ and that no one indicated thoir presence at sa:.d pub.lic
hearing .in oppooition; and that no correspondonce was received in opposition to
the eubject petition.
-`- nC9'1~27
CA'LIFORNIA ENVIRONM:NTA?~_QUAUITY ~~~°'INQINGs Thet the Anaheim
City Planning Commiselon han revi.ewed the propoeal to reclasoify nubject
pzoperty fro.n tho RS-A-43,000 (AOaidential/P.gricultural) 2one to the CL
(Cemmercial, Limited) or n leea inCenam aone to parmit e commercial retail
center conoietinq of 8,493 equare feet o! otlice ~ee, 481 squara laot ot retail
uae and 42a equare foet of reetaurant uea end with waiver maximum fence height
on an irregularly ehaped parcel of land coneiatinq af appsoxlm~tely O.d3 acr.ee,
having an approximate frontage of 132 feet on the aouth .ide oi Kate:la Avenue
and 3 maximum ~epth of 263 feet, being lucated epproximately ti50 foet weet of
the cant~rli.. Ninth Street and furthar daocribad es 1556 Weet Katellu
Avenuej and does tioreby a~pruve thv Noqativa Declaration upon findinq that the
declara:ion rQtlacta the indepa~dent judqomeot oi tho lead u~ancy, thtr '.r ha~
conaidered the t~egative Daclaretion togather wlth 3ny rommonts received during
the public roview proceae and furthor flnding on tht baoi• that ttio initiel
ntndy and any commente recdived that th~re io no 0ubotantial avidenca that tte
project will have a aiqnificant efiect on the env:ronment.
NOw, THEREF'ORE, DB IT RESOLVED that tho rneheim City Planning
Comminsion aooB hereby grant eubject Petition for Conditional Uee Pormit, upon
th~ follawinq conlitione which aro her~by tound to be a noceooaxy preroquleite
to tho p~opoee~ uae of the euGject property in ordor to pree~rve the e~fety and
general welfare of the Citizena of khe City of Anaheims
1. • That plans ehall be eubmitted to the City Traftlc and Traneportatior.
Manager for hi~ raview and approval ehowing confnrmance with the latest
revieion of Engineering standard Plan Noe. 436 and 602 psrtaininq tn
parking standarde encl driveway location~. 3ubject propQr*.y ohall
thereupon be developed and maintain~d in conf.ormance vith oaid plena.
2. That a Plnn Sheet for •ciid waete atoraye and collection an~ a plan for
recyclinq ohall bc oul~mitted to tha ~~partmant of Maintenence for rovfew
and approval.
3. 21~ft an on-site traoh truck turn-eround ara• •hsll ba provided and
maincained to tAe oatietactlan of ihe Uepartmont uf MaintenAnce. Said
turn-ezaunA arva ahell be •pocifically rhown on plano oulxnitted for
buildinq ~imit~.
•f. • 2hat all air conditioning fncilitios and other roof and ground mountcd
~qvipm~ant eh~ll ba properly rhieldsd from view and tho eo~~nd buffecod
[ram sdyacont rweiderttial properties. Such lnformation shall be
g~ar,itically Ahouit nn the plans oub~ittdA !ar building pnrmlte.
S. That al: plumbf~nq or eti~or •imilar pipon and flxtur~s lo~atpA on tha
exte~lor oL tho builAinq sh+~ll bo fully ~czfana. by orchi.toctural dyvicee
anC/or appro~riate butldinq matoxialot snA, further, that •uch
inCormation ohall be apcr.ifically shovn on the plano submittod tor
bu£Idin~ p~armito.
- J- PC:92-27
6. That lightiny fixturee in any propoeed parkin~ area located ndjacent to
any residontial property ehall be down-lighted with e maximum Heiqht of
tw~lve (12) feet. Said lightinq Fixturee ehall be directe~ away From
adjacent re3idential property line0 to protect tha roeidential integrity
of the Area and ehall bo eo-epecified an cha plane oubmitted fox building
permite.
7. * That the propoeal shall comply with rll •igninq roquia•emente of th0 CL
"Commerciel, Limlted" Zone unleae a verianae allowing •ign waivers !a
approved by the City Council, Planninq Commioeion or 2oning
Administrator, and except aa otherwiee limited by Condition Nv. 8, balow.
8. That any proposad freoatanding oiqn on oubject proporty ohall be a
monument-type not exceeding eiqht (S) feet in height and ehall be eubject
to tha review and approval af tho City Traffic ~nd Trenaportatian Hanager
to deterr.~ine adequate Linee-of-aight.
9. That a lendecape and irrigation plan for aub~act ~:~erty ehall be
oubmitted to tho 'Lnning Division for review and approvnl. nny deciaion
made by the Zoninq Uivi~iort regarding eaid plan msy be nppealed to the
Planning C~mmioeion aTid/or Clty Council.
10. That any tree planted on-eite shall bs replaced in a timely manner i.n tha
event that it ie removed, damaged, dieeaved nnd/or derd.
11. • That ~:hfe Conditional uae Permit !e grent~d •ubS~rt to adoption oi a
zoning ordinancR in connection aith Reclaseificetion No. 91-92-12, now
pending.
12. That nubject property oholl be d~.-~~oped eubstantially in eccordanco wirh
plane and specificaCions oubmitCed to the City of Anghalm by the
pRtStioner and which plane era on fil4 with th~ Plunninq Department
marked Exhibit ;los. : tNruuqh 6.
17. That pri~~ to 180uance of a demolition p.irmit for eny uf the oxtstinq
9tructureo, the nLne (~) fout hiqh block well ohall bw con~tructed and
compldtad.
14. That the exiotinq eucalyp!uo treo~ and avocado *ros• shall D~ trimmPd and
prop~rly maintalneti.
15. 'hat prior to lo~uan~~ of A building psrmit or witrin a pariod of ono (1)
yoar fran the ~ate of tBiv renolution, whichsver occurn tir~t, Condition
NoA. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 ~nd I1, abov~-montLenAd, shall be cwnpliod
with. Excenrtone for f~rther tirtue to canplet~ aald condition• ~ay be
grant~~ ln accordanca with 5ecCion 10.03.490 ot the Anahoim Municipal
Cotl4 .
]6. That prior ta ::nai buildinq ~nd soninq innpectian~, CondiCion t!os. 12
and 14, abovs-~aar~tioned, abAll b~ canpliod wiCh.
-4- PC92-29
~-~~
17. + That approval of tl~ie spplicati.on conetitutoa approval of the propoead
requeat only t•o the extent that it cumpliee with the AnahRim Municipal
Zoninq ~ode a~d any other appllcabla City, State and Fodural
ragulatione. Approval doeo not include any actinn ar findinge an to
comp.liance or approval o~ the requo0t reqarding any other applicablo
ordi.nance, r.egulation or requiremen~. Conditiono mnrked with an aeteriek
(+) are required Gy eetabliuhed laws, codea, re~~ulatione and agreemente
and are, therefore, not subJect to neqotiation.
HE IT FJRTHER RESOLVED =hat the Anaheim City Planning Cortunieefon
dooe hereby find ar~d determine that aAoption o! this Roaolution is expreesly
predicated ur.on applicant'o complia:.r.e with each and all ef the conditions
hereinabove get fosth. Should an~ uuch conditian, or any part thereoL, be
declarecl invalid or unenforceable by the tinal judgmant of any court of
rompetont juriedlction, then thio Reso:ution, and any approvalo herein
containod, ehall be deemed null and void.
THB FORCGU2NG RESOLUTION wau ado~tad at the Planninq Commleoion
meeting of March 9, 1952. ~ ,
~
~r~~, ~ ~ ~
ZitMA~i/ R.NAHE . C TY P NNI CQHMISSION
ATTESTs
n J _ ~,
- -~
S~ ETARY. ANAHGi~M/CLTY PLANNING COMMIS3ION
- ; ~-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COIir~Tl OP OFtANCE ) g~.
CITY OF ANAHF.YM )
I, Janet L. Jenser., Secretary of the Anahei,m City Planning
Cc.mmtneion, do hereby certify that the foregoing reeolutLon wae pae0ed and
adoptod at a meeting at the Anaheim City Plnnninq Commiasinn hpld on Nnrch 9,
1992, ty t:-e fol loaing vote of the mombere thera:,f. s
AYESs COtiMIBSION~Ri=: L30UAS~ BitI3TOI., HELLYBR~ HBNNTNGL+R, NZ8£L,
PERA2A, ZENE:.
TiOESt CONM233IONpR3s NONE
A8SE2iT: COWiIS3IONERSs NOt18
It7 N1TNE83 KHER~Ot-, 2 havo hor~unto ast my hsnA thia ". _' ,fJ~day
af _~j..~~' ~.~. , -.992.
/
~~.-~e " ~==~'` J-,-~ _~ ..--.
S ET14RY, ANIINEIM ;Z'TTY Pi.11!1HSN0 Cd>il1ISSIO1t
-S- Pr92-77