Resolution-PC 92-31RFSOlUTION NO. PC92-31
A RESOLUTION GF TIiE ANJ~ACIM CITY FLANNTNG COMMISSION
THA'P PETITION FOA CONUITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3496 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planninq Commineion d id receive a
verified Pstition for Conditional tlee Permit Eor certain real prcporty
e,ttuated in tF~e City of Anaheim, County of OrRngo, Stnte o£ Cali£ornia,
described ses
THE NOR'rH 11n.00 PEkT OF THE SOUTH 310.00 FEET OF THE
WF.ST 200.00 FELT OF THE SOUTHWF.ST QUARTER OF THE
5JU7'HWEST QUARTGR Ofi SECTION 17~ TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTHi
RAN3E 10 WEST, IP1 THE RANCHO L05 COYOTEB~ CITY OF
ANAHF.IM~ COUNTY OF ORP.NGE~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ AS
SAID SF:CTION IS INDICATED ON A MAP R~CORDED IN 900K
51, PAG~ 10 OF MISCELL'ANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF TEIE
COUNTY REC4RDLR OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiaeinn did hold a public hearing
at the Ci.vic Center in tlie City o£ Anaheim on March 9, 1992, at 1r30 p.m.,
notice of eatd pub 1 ic hearing having been duly given ae requirad by law ar.~ in
nccordance with the provl~iona of the Anai~eim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to
hear and consider ev idence for and againat eaid proposed conditional uee permit
and to inveBtigat e and make findinge nnd recommendationa ia connoction
thProwith~ and
WHEREA S, eaid Commieeion, after due inapection, invsetiyation and
eY.udy mado by itself and in ita behalf, and af.ter due coneider.atlon of all
evid6nce and report s offered at said hearing, does Eind and determinQ the
follow3.ng facte:
1. Th at L•he propoaed uee i.s proparly one for which a conditional
uae permit ie aut horizod by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44~050.195 to
retain and expand a conver.ience market.
2. Tha ~ the propoeed uee will not advereely affect tho adjoining
land useg and tha growth and development of the area in which it ia propoaed to
be located because tt,e propoeed convenienae market is compat ible with said
surrounding land u see und the propooed houre of operatian (Se00 A.M. to 11:00
p.M.) will diecour age the type of luitering oiten aaeociated with convonionce
marl~et e i
3. Th at the size and shape of the eite for the propoaed use is
adequate to allow the fu11 development of the propoeed uae in antanner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, eafety, and
qeneral welfarQ;
CR1447MS -1- PC92-31
4. ;hnt the trnffic qenerated by tho prop~oed uae will not
impoea an undue burden upon tho u~c~ete and highwayu deeigned and improved L•o
car.f the treffic in the area bacauso the propoeed convenl.Qnce market •xprtnaion
will not generate any additional parking demand beyond those required for
oxis~ing retail uooaj and
5. That the gr.antinq o: the con~~tional uxe permit under the
conditiona imposed w~il not be detrimental to the p~aco, health, oaiety and
qeneral weltare of the cttizens o! the City of Anaheim.
6. That no ona indicated their pr~0ence at ~aid public haarinq
in ~ppoaition~ and that no correapondence wae receivod in oppoeition to tlio
eubject putition.
CALTFORt~IA ENVI~iNMFNTM UALITY ~CT_P_INU2N(3s That the Anahoim
City Planninq' Commiesion hao reviewed the propneal to retain an~! expsnd a
convenience market on a roctangu3arly-ahepad parc~l of land conuiating of
approximately 0.35 ecre, havin9 a frontage of apptoximatoly 110 leet on the
oast eide ~f Brookhurnt 3treet, h~ving a maximum depth of approximately 140
feet, being located nvproximately 200 feet north of the cantorline of Ball Road
and further described an 944 South Srookhuret Stroett and doea hQreby aporove
the Negative Declaration upon findinq that ths d~claration raflecta tAe
independent judgement of the lead agency, and thnt it ha~ coneidurad the
Negative Declaration together with any c~mment. receivQd durinq the ~uLlic
review proceea and furt:~er finding on the baeie t'~at the initial eiudy and any
co:rvnente roeeived that there ie no evbstantinl Q~idenco that the project will
have a eignificant effect ou the environment.
ttOw, THEREFOAB, AC IT RB50LVED thst the 1~nahein City Plenning
Commiusion doeo hereby grant eubjRCt Petition for Cenditional Uaa Permit, upo~
the fol.lowinq conditione which are heroby fo~nd to be a n~eoosary pr6rnquloi!o
to th~ propoeed uee of the e~~b~ect pro~rty in order to pre~+~arve th~ ~afety and
qcneral we:tare of the Citizone of the City of Anaheim:
1. ~ That no fast-food sFrvice f~cilitias eh~ll be permitteA in nubject
convenieT~ce market unlasn a variance for parkinq to approved by the City
Council, Planninq Commio~ion or Zoning Adminivtrstor oc ~nleo• outticienC
Code parking fa provided.
2. 1~hac a plan Sh~aet for golid waAte rtorn~e end roll~ctlon and a plen for
recyclinq vhali tr~ aubmt!ted to t1o t'opartment of Maintonanco fur raview
and approval.
3. •'That tha on-gtte lendscapinq and irriqation sy~tan shall bo maintalnod in
campLlanse w.ith City Atandards.
4. Tl~at any trea plantad cn-~ite ohail bQ roplacad in a timoly mann6r in the
event tFai i~ lu rs~r:ov4d, damag~d, dloeaneA a~J/or ~daad.
_2_ PC4i-31
5. That gubjoct property ehall be developud substanY.ielly Ln accordsnco ~--+~
plano and apecifications oubmitted to the City oE Anat~eim by tli~
petitioner and which plane are on file with the Flenning Department m~rked
Exhibit No. 1.
6. ~hat priur to cort~sncement of the activity herein approvad, or prior to
13suanc~ of a bi~ilding p~rmit, or within a period of one (1) year from the
date of thie resolutton, whichover occuro firet, Condition No. 2,
abovo-mentlonad, ehal.l ~a coinplied with. Exteneiunu for further. tlme to
c~mplete eaid conditiona may bo grani•ed in accordance o~itli Section
18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Cude.
7. That prior to cor,unencement of t•he activity herein approvod, or prior tc
flnal buildinq and zoning inspection0,whichever occuro firut, Condition
No. 5, abnve-mentioned, ohall b8 complied with.
8. That the budiness hours of operation ehall be :rcm Bs00 a.m. (earliext; to
11:00 p.m. (latest).
9. • That approval of this applicatlan constituteo approval o! the propoaed
requeat only to the extQnt that Lt compli.ea wii,h tho Anahoim Municipal
Zoning Code and ary other applicable City, Stato and Federal requlatione.
lpproval doea not include any actio~~ or findinga ae to compl.iance or
appreval of the requesl• regarding a~~y other opplicable ordinance,
requla4ion or requirement. Conditlona marked with en aa~~ariek (•) ~rg
required by eutabliehed lawa, cocluo, regulations and egzaements and are,
ttier.efore, r.ar, subject to negotiation.
HE IT EURTHER AESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commieeion
doea hereby find and determine that adoption of thio ReOOlution i0 expreae.ly
pr~dicatecl upon applicant's cnmplianca with each and all of the conditiona
hereinabove aet forth. 5hou1cl any euch condition, or any pnrt thereof, be
declared invalid or unen~orceablr~ by the finat j~~dgment of any co~.i~t uf
competent juriedictton, then thin Resolution, and eny approvxls horein
cor~tained, ohall ba deemed null and vof.d.
~fHP. ~OtiECOIt+c3 RE50LUTION wao adopted at tha Plannlnq Cort~mfa~:.on
maetinq of Harct~ 9, 1992. ~ J /
.
~+ ~i
' KIFNAt1, At111NEIl1, S P NI COMMI33ION
AT2'F.RT:
i~., i.~~y ~~~ ~)!~C/1~-~
EECA .?A' At71HBIM CI?Y PLAt1it1IP6 CO?SHISSIQN
-~- PCg2-31
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF G:2ANGE ) es.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Marqarita Solorio, Secrotary of the Anahuim City planniny
Commiesi.on, do hereby certify that tha toregoinq reeolution wae paeeed and
adopt•od at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commiosion held on March 3,
1992, by the following vote of the membors theroof:
AYES: CUMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BRISTOL, HELLYER, HENNIN(iER, ME33E,
PERAZA, 2EMEL
NOESt COMMISSYONERS: NONE
AE35ENTs COMMTSSIONEKSs N~N~
~ IN WITNE&S WHEHEOF, I have horaunto eQt my hand thia ~/~`('day
of ~^,~, 1992.
~, / <
c.''~~ ~ . i ( . ,~S'S7) C ; ,L,p~
SGCRETAAY, A HEI?! CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION
»q_ PC92-31