Resolution-PC 92-36A RESC~~.UTIUN (.~F THE ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
'TI-IAT k'ETITIQN FOR CONDITIQNAL U5E PERMIT NO. 3507 ~E DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planriing Commissian did receive a verified
Petition for Conditiontil Use Permit for certain real property sftuated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Urange, State of California, described as:
THAT PORTION OF ']:'HE SOUTHWEST QUAR'T~R OF THE
N~?RTHWEST QtJAR.'l'ER OF SEC'I'ION 23, TOWNSHIP 4
SOUTH, RANG~ 10 WEiST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JY.JAN CAJON
DE SAIVTA AN A, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
S 1, PAG~ 10 OF MISCLLLANEOUS MAPS, IN T'HE OFFICE Or
T~iE ~OUNTY RE~GRDEI~ OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED E1.S
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT TH~ INTERSECTION OF TH~ CENTER L.INE
OF CERRIT~S STFtFET AND THE CENT'ER LINE OF U. S.
H~GI-~TWAY 101 (LUS ANGELE5 STRCET), AS SAID
INTERSECTION IS SHOWN ON A MAP FII.ED IN Ii00K 35,
PAGE 34 OF RECORD OF SLIRVCYS IN 'CHE OFFICE Or T'HE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAII~ COUN'I'`', 'THENCE NORTH 6°
55' 00" WEST 221.61 .E`E~T; T'H~NCC EAST 300.37 FFET,
PAFtALLCL WI'I'H THE CENTER LINE c~P CERRITOS STREET;
TH~NCE SOUTH 220.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF
CERd~ITOS S1'REET; THENCI: W FST 273.G8 FEET A.LONG SAID
CCNTER LINE TO THE POIN'a' UF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT 'fHAT POR'I'YON THEREOF LYING WESTERLY OF
THE FO~.LOWING DESGRIBED LIIvE:
BEGINNiNG AT TH~ INT~RSECTION OF THE
NORTHEASTEitLY LINE OF THAT CERTAItl S'~'RIP OP I.AND
60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, DESCRIBCU IN 'fHE DEED 'CO THE
STA'I'E OP CALiFC~RN1.4, FZECORDED 3UT~Y 1Q 191h IN BOUK
258, PAGE G6 OF DEEDS, 'WITH THE CENTCK LINE OF SAID
CERRITOS AVENUE; SAiD INTERSECI'ION BEING ON A
CURVE CONCAVE WES'I'ERLY, F~AVING A RADIU5 OF 630.00
FEC'I'; Tf•IENCE NORTHERLY ALONG S~JD CURVE 1'O A
LINE PARALLEL V~lITf-i AND N0~2TI-I~RLY 20.~A FI:ET FROM
TH~ CENTER LINF OF SA.ID CERRITOS AVENUE, A RADIAL
CR145S1~4S.WP -1. PC92-36
LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 82° 54' 41" ~AST;
T'rI~NCE CONTIN~[JING ALONG SAJD CURVE, 50.81 FEET
TI-~RO~JGH A CEN'TRAL ANGLE OF 4° 37' 14" TO THL~
SOUTHERLY COI2NER OF LAND DESCRII3ED IN THE DEED
TO T~IE STAT'E OF CALiFORNIA, RECORDED APRIL 13, 1929
LN BOOK 257, PAGE 4G2 OF UFrICIAL RECORDS; T~-IEiJCB
NORTI-i 6° SS' 00" V1~ST ALONG THE EASTERLY iINE OF
SAID LAND OF 'i'HE STATE Or CALIFORNIA, TO TH~
NOitTHERLY LINE t~F SAID I.AND ABOVE DESCRIT3ED.
WHER~AS, the City Pl~tnning Cornmission did hold a public nearing at the
Giti-ic Center in the City of Anaheim on hlarch 23, 19'~2 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as i'equired by law and in accordance with the provisiuns o~
the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, ro hear and consider evidence for and lgainst
said proposed conditianal use permit a~id to investigate and make findings and
recommendatiens in connection therewith; and
V~-HEREAS, sz,id Commission, af.ter due inspection, investigation arid study
made '~;~ itself and in its behalf, and af.ter due con.sidcration of all evidence ancl reports
offerec, iit said h~aring, does find and determine the following facts:
1. 'I'hat the proposed use is properly one for which a condit.ional use
permit is authorized by Anal~cim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.010 to perniit the on-
premise sale ~nd consumption of alcor7lic beverages in conjunction with a cocktail lounge
wiih limited food service and live entertainment (bikini dancers), and with waiver of the
followin6:
5ection 18.Q{~.060.010 - R~quir~~ number and si~gof t-ack j~ ~tdin
1$.QS.~4$4 .sR.~T•
,~~I 18.44.066.070 (~, required; ~1?~ proposed)
2. 'I'hat there are n4 sp~~ial circumstancss applicable to the property such
as sir.e, shape, topogr~phy, location or surroundings, wrhich do not apply to other identically
zoned praperties in the vicinity;
3. That strict application of the 7oning Code daes not deprive tlte
prop~rly of privilcoes enjoyed by other properties under identical zoning classific~tion in the
vicinity;
4. That the proposed use is properly one f~r which a Conditional Use
Permit is authorized by the 'Loning Code;
_2_ PC92-36
S. That the propo~cd use will advcrsely affect the adjoirung las~d uses and
the growth und development ot the urea in which it is prc~posed to be located because the
general area surroundin~ th~~ northeast corner of Cerritos Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard
i~ undergoing a transition from indu.strial to commercial land uses; and because of the
nature and intensity of othe;r recently-appraved commercial uses in the area (i.e. indoor
swap meet, billiards center and a single room occupancy hotel), there may be stn adverse
cumulative im}~act on the imrnediate area over a long term period; and that facilities where
~icoholic beverages ;~re served in conjunction with live entertainment and/or billiard ~enters
have thc potentiul to cause additional expenditures uf local resources related to crime
prevention;
6. That thc ~iae and shape ~f the site for the proposed use is not adequate
to allow the full deveiapment of the proposed use in a manner not detrimentai to the
particular area nor i~ thP peace, hP11tn, safery, and general welfare;
7. That the traf~c gencrated by the propo~ed use wiU impose an unclue
burden upon the streets ~nd highv.~ays .;esigned and improved to carry the traffic in the area;
8. That the granting of the Conditional Use P~rmit will be detrimental
to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of thc citizens of thc Ci:y of AnsihPim; and
9, That sur (6) people indicated their prpsencP at said pu~lic hearing in
opposition; and thlt no correspondencP was receiveJ in oppositior. to the subject petition.
,~ _t~ RN'A CNVIRONIVLENTAL OUALI'~Y ACC~NG' i nat the
Anaheim City ?lanning Comrr~i~.sion has reviewed the ptoposal to ~ermit the on-premise
sale and consumption of Alcoholic beveragcs in conjunction with a cocktail lounge with
limitcd food serv~~c and !i ~e entertainment (bikir.i dancers), and with waiver of tequired
number ~nd sixe of truck loading space~ on an irrsg~ilariy-shap,d parcel of land consisting
of approximately 0.95 a~rc :ocatcd at thc northeas: rorner of Ccrritos Avenue and Anahcim
Boulcvard, having approximate frontages of 247 feet on the no~ti~ side of Cerritos Avenuc
and 175 fect ~n the c:~t sidc of Anahcim Boulevarcl, ~-r~d further dPscribP~ as 1490 Suuth
Anaheim F3~uleward; und dnes hereby appruvc the Ncgative Dcclaration upon finding that
thc dcclarntion reflects the indepcndcnt judgcment of the lead agency and that it hs~
considcrcd the Negative Dec:aration tngethcr with any commtnts received during thc public
review prcke~.~ and furlher finding on thc b:ixis ~f the initial StUdy and any comm~n~g
rece~ved that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect
on thc cnviromncnt.
-3- PC9"?.-3G
NOW, THEREFOkE, HE I'T RESOLVED that the Anat~eirn Ciry Planning
Commissi~n docs herebv deny subject Petition for ronc;~tioital Use Permit, on t~ie basis of
the af~rementioned ~ndings.
'TIiE FOREGOING RFSO[.U'~'ION was adopted at the Plunning Ca~tmission
meeting of March 23, 1992. ~
~. .,,~t.. .?~'
CF N, ANAkIEINI C P l+?I . CUMMISSION
ATI'EST:
r /'G~ --
fiErltG''AF , AHEIM CIT'Y PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORhIA )
COUN'TY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CI'I'Y OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita S~,torio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, -Jo
hereby certi~ th~t the foregoing resolution was passcd and adopte~ at a meeting of the
Anaheim City Planning Commission held on March 2.3, 1992, by the following vote of the
members thcreof:
AYES: COMMiSSiONGRS: BAUAS. BRI`"POL, HELI..Yf:R, NENNfNGER, MESSE
PERA7A
1VOCS: COMM6S:5IONIERS: NONF
ARSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MESSE
IN WITi~IESS WNEREOF,1 have hercunto set my hand this 6~~ day of
, 1992.
~
~~_~~z ~c`"~ ~Sb~o~c..~ __
SECRETARY, N 1M CITY YLANNING LUMMISSIUN
..~_ ~C42-36