Resolution-PC 92-67BE.SS2Ll~Q~NO. PC92-67
A RESOLUTION OF 7H~ ANANEIM CIlY PLANNING CrJMMIS510N
THaT PFTITIUN FOR VARIANCE NC. 4178 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plan,iing Commission did receive a v~rified
F'etition for Vdrianae for certain real properiy situated iii 1he City o~ Anaheim, Coijnty of
Orange, State of Californi~ described as:
PARCEL 1: TPIAT POR710N OF TH[ RANCHQ SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, LYING
WITHIN SECTION i2, TOWNSHIP a 30UTH, AANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINa
BASE I1ND MERIDIAN, IN 7HE CIN OF ANAHEIM, CQUNTY OF ORANOE, STATE
OF CALIFORNiA, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 4 AS SHOWN ON A MAP RCCORDED
IN BOOK 63, PAGE 5 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECOFlDS OF SAID ORAN(3E COUMY.
AND
PAR(;EL 1, AS SHOWN ON R MAF' FILED IN DOOK 63 PAGE 5 OF PARCEt. MAPS,
IN THE OFFICE OG THE COUNTY RECORDER OF $AID COUNTY.
WI-IEREAS, tho City Planning Cammission did hold a pubfic hearing at the
Civic Center in the City ~f Anahdim on May 4, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., notice oi said public
h~aring having been duly given as raquired by law and in aceordance with the provisions
uf the Anaheim Municipal Code, Cnapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and
a~ainst said proposed vari~nce and to investigate and make findin~s and
recommgndations in connection therew-ith; and tha: said pubtic hearing was continued :-
4he May 1 S, 1992 Planning Commission meeting; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aiter due inspection, inve~tigation and ~tudy
made by itself and in its behaff, and aftor due consideration at all evidc~nce and reports
offered at said hQaring, does find and determine the f~lluwing factg:
r
1. That the petitioner proposes w~ivers of tha tollowing to retain one 6-
foot high, 60 sq.ft. shopping center identifi ,atir~n sign en~+ to construct a second o"-foot
high, 60 sq.ft. shopping center identific~tfon sign:
(A) SEGTIONS 1.~,},,.05.Q91 01Q - 1'~rmiited tvn~ of freestan~ina sfanaao.
18.44,Q67 (One sf~ale-faced 20 sq.ft. 3-'~r h his~h sign
,~d 18.84.Q62.04 per strs;6t frontage permittad in the Scenic
CorriCnr; Two ~uble-iac~~Q.,~q.tt. 6-foot
,~ sig~ ;~ on twa frontages proposed)
(B) ~CTIONS 1~.n5.093.A3~ - Permitted loc~j,on of frePstendioa Sl9ns.
~q4,Q~ (1~Ain mum ;,j~Jg~S~backs: gQ% of lot fror~tage
~,! 18.84.C62.040 irom side property lines required (2a feet from
east property line and 66 feet irom north
property line]; .~~94+ and ~; 96 proposed (:].5..i~t
and 37 feotj)
CR~1502MS.wp -t - PC92-b7
2. That there are special circumstances applicable ta tt~e prc~perty
consisting of topography and shape which do not apply to o;her identically zoried
properiies in tho vicinity because the existing hiilside topography Gombined with the
irregular properry shape and driveway locations obstructs the uiew to the sliopping center
thereby justifying waiv~rs (A) and (B);
3. That strict application ~f the Zoning Code deprives the property ot
privileges enjoyed by other properties in identiGal zoning clas3i~cation in the vicinity
because Uther commsrcial centers in the vicinity have identification signs which als~~
identity tenant~ ther~by justifying the proposed sign sizes in ~onnection with waiver (A);
and
4. That no one indicated thoir ~resence at said public hearing in
opp~sition; ard thai no correspondence was receive~ in apposition to subject petition.
~g~JF~'ZF~NIA ENVIRVNMENTAL aUA IL TY A~LF_lIy.QJNSa: The Planning
Directar or his authorized ropresentative has determined that the proposed projoct falls
within the definition of Catec~ori~al E>;emptions, Class 11, as defined in the State EIR
Guidelines anci is, therefore, categoricsliy exempt from the requirement to propare an EIR.
NOW, TH~REFORE, BE IT RESOL\~ED that the Anahoim City Planning
Commi.ssion does hereby gr~nt subject Potition ~or l/arianco, upon the following canditions
which are hereby found to be ~ necessary prerequfsite to the proposed use of the subJect
p; operty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anahoim:
1. 'T'hat the driveway on Ganyon Rim Rhad shall ~e reconstructed to the satisfactior~
of the City ~ngineer.
2. That sidswalk access ramps shail be installed on both sides of the driveway along
Anaheim Hil1s Road, and that a sidewalk access ramp shall be installed and the
sidewalk reconstructed at the noRheast corner af Anaheim liills Road and Noh!
Ftan~h Road.
3. Tha: plans ~hall be submitted to the Ciry Traffic and Transportation Manager for his
reviaw and approval in ~ccordance with Engineering Standarc! N~. i37 pertaining
to sight di5tance visibility.
4. That subject property shall be developed substPntially in accorrfance with pl~ns and
specifications submitted to the City nf Anaheim by ihe petitianer and which plans
are an tile with tlte Planning Depart:~~ont marked E:<hibit Nas. 1 and 2.
5. That prior to issuance of a sign pormit ~r within a pariod of one (1) yeer from th~
date of this resolution, whichever occurs tirst, Condition No. 3, above-men?ioned,
shall be Complied with. Extensions for Further time to complete said conditions may
be granted in accordance with Section 1~.03.n90 ot the Anaheim Municipal Cods.
~2. PC92-67
6. That prior ta final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 4,
abovs-mentioned, shall be compHed with.
'/. That approval of this apqlication ccn~titutes appraval of the proposed requ~st only
to the extent that it complies with tho Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and ~ny
other applicable City, State and Foderal regulations. Appraval d4es nat include ~ny
action or findings as to compliance or ~nproval of the request regarding any other
applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE I'T FURTHER RESOLVED that the anaheim City Planning Commission
does horeby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly prodicatod
upon applfcanYs compliance with oach and oll ~f the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such cordition, or any ~art thereof, be declarod inaalid or unonforceable by
the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdictlon, th~n this Resolu4ion, and any
approvais harein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Plannfng Comrnission
inoeting of May 18, 7~392.
i-'~. ,,
/ L ~ G'~ i ;~ ~
C AIfiNIAN, ANAHEIM Ct PLANN NG COMMI ION
ATTEST:
~ ~ ~ ~>
.~ ~ / -
,~ ~.C~~,Cc. ?S :~2u-~
SECRETAF~Y, ANAHEIM CI NI~INNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFOHNIA )
COUNTY OF QRANGE ) ss.
CITY AF ANAHEib1 )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commigsion, do
hereby certify that the foregoing r~solution was passed and adopted at ~ meeting of the
Anaheim City P{anning Commission heid on May 18, 1992, by the f~llowing vote of the
mernbers thereof:
AYFS: COMMISS(QNERS: F3QUAS, SRISTOL, HELLYER, FVIESSE,
PERAZA, Z~MEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CrJMMiSSIONERS: HENNlNGER
IN WITNESS WNEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand 4hig _,~ '`~~., day of
1~~. ! _, ~ ssz. ~ -~ .
~ r' c ~ ~'tiL
SECREf'AR , ANAHEIM CITY Pl.ANNI G COMNpiSSiON
-3. PC92-67