Resolution-PC 92-69g~LUTION No. PC92-~s
~;ir~ ~LUTION OF THE AN.AHEIM CIIY PLANNING COMMIS~i~N
TFIAT I'~ I'10'4 F GR RE~IASSIFICATION NO. 91-8c^-2~ E3'iE C3RAf~TED, UNCONDI710PJALLY
WHEREAS, th~a Anaheim City Pl~nning Commission did receive a varified
petition fc.. Realassifiaation for resl prcperty situ~ted in thfl City ot Anahelm, County of
Qrange, :.~:ate of California, described as follows:
PARCEL 1: tNAT PORTION OF VINEYARD LOT Hal OF ANAHEIiN, IN THC CITY
UF ANAHEIM, COUNTY UF ORANGE, STATE OF CAUFOHNIA, AS 8HOWN ON
A MAP P.~CORDED IN EIOOK 4, PAGES 629 AND 630 UF DEEDS, REC~flO~ OF
LOS A(VGELES COUNTY, CAUFORNIA, UESCRIBED A3 FOLLOWS:
PARCELS A, 8 ANO C, AS SHOWN QN A MAP FILED IN BOOK 19, PAG~ 8 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFIGE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER Of• ORAN~aE
COUNTY, CAUFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: SEING A PORTION OF VINEYARD L~T H-4 IN TWE G17Y OF
ANAhIFIM, AS SHOYVN ON A MAP fiECORDED DIN BOOK 4, PAGES 629 AND 630
~F DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANr,LE3 COUMY, ~AtJFOFiNIA MORE
PARTIGULAAIY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE POINT IN TNE CEN(ER UNE OP SOUTH IEMON STFiEF.T,
OISTANT THEREON NORTH 15• 28 45' 1NEST ~.36 FEET FiiOM TkE CENTER
UNE INTERSECTION OF SAID CEhiTEa L1NE WITH TNE CEN7ER LJNE OF
STUECKLE AVENUE AS SHOWlJ ON A MAP OF THE STUECKLE SUBnIViS10N
RECORDEO IN BOOK 8, PA(iE ~t.'. OF MlSCEU/1NEOUS MAP3, AECORDS OF
OitANGE COUNTY, C.AUFORNIA; THENCE COiVTINUINC NORTH 15' 28' 45'
WEST, ALONG 8ti1~ CENTER UNE OF LEMON 5TR~ET, t~:8.08 FEEf; THENCE
NORYH 74° 2?' r10' 'FAST, PAfiALLEL WfTH THE CENTEFI LINE OF 3TllECKLE
AVENUE, t33.t5 FEET;1'HENCE SOIIfH 15• 30' W' EA31, tA8.08 FEE7; THENCE
SOUTH ~4• 22' 00' WESf PARALLEL WITH THE CEN7ER LINE OF STUECKLE
AVENUE 133.24 FEE7 TOl HE POINT OF BE(iINNlNii.
PARCEL ~: '~HAT PORTION UF VINEYARD LOT'H4', IN THE CITY O~ ANAkEIM,
COUNTY f~F ORANCiE. STATE OF CAUFORNIA, A3 f'~R MAP 7HEFiEOF
RECORDE'0 tN a00K 4, PAQE3 629 AfVD 630 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS
AN3El.E3 COUNTY, CAI.IFORN~A.
WHEREAS~ the Ciry Planning ~ommissinn did hold ~ public hearing at the
~ivic Center in the City ot Anaheim on May 1~, 1992 at 1:30 p.m., notice of safd public
hgaring havin~ beon dulq given as requirea by law and in acco~dan~e with the provisiong
of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and
against said proposc3d re~assificauion an~ to investigete and make flndings and
recommendations in conneciion therowith; and
CA 1504MS.wp -1- PC92-69
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspe~tion, investigetion ~nd study
made by itself ~nd in iis behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and report~
offored at said hearing, does find and determine tne follr~wing facts:
1. That the petitioner pmposes reclassificatiun ~f a portian of subject
prop~rty from the CH (Gammerciai, Heavy) and CG (Commercial, ~enernl) .Zones to the
C~ (Commercial, Limitod) Zone;
2. That t~e Anaheim Gener~f Plan design~tes subject proparly ior
Ceneral Commercial and Low-Medium 6ensity R~sicientiel land uses;
3. Thai tha t~questod reclassificati~n of pro~~osed Lot Nos. 4, 5, 6 and
7 from the CG and CH ?.ones ta the CL Zone is in Conformance with the Gener~l Plan
land use designation;
4. That the proposed reclassifiaation of subject property is nec:essary
and/or desirable for the orderly and propQr development of the community;
5. That the proposed reclassifictition of subJect praperty does properly
rolnte to the aones and their p6rmitted uses locally established in ciose prnximity to
subjsct property and to the xonos anci their permitted uses generally established
throughput the community; and
6. That no Ane indicated their presence at said publ-~ hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subjoct petition.
CALlFORNIAEPVVIR4NMENIA~.QUALtYACTFINDING: ThattheAnaheim
Ciry Plann~ng Commission has revir;wed the proposal to reclassify a portion of subject
properry from the CH (~ornm~rcial, t~eavy) aiid CG ;Commercial, (3eneral) Zanes to the
CL (Commercial, Umitod) ~ane to est~blish a 7-lot subdivision tor commercial and
residontial uses with deferment of required strAet improvemen!s; subJect property
consists of apprcximately 3.97 aGres baundod by Wator 5treet to the north, Anaheim
Boulevard to the east, Stueckle Street to the sauth and ~emon Strest to the west
(exCluding two parcols loc.~ted on the northoast c~rner of Stueckfa Street and Lemon
Street ~nc! on ths northwost corner of Stueckle Street and Anaheim Boulevard); and does
hereby approve the Pleg~tive Declaration upon finding tha'. the declaration reflects the
independent judpement Qf the lead agency and that it has considered the Negetive
DeCaration togather with ~ny commAnts received during the public review process and
further findi~g ~n the basis of the initial study and any comments received that thore is
no subst~ntial avidence that the project will have a significant effect on the ernEronment.
NOW, THtRErORE, BE IT RES~LVED that th~ Anaheim City Ptannin~
Commis~ion ~aes hereby ~pprove the subject Petitio~ tor Reclass'~cation to authorixe an
amendment to the ~oning Map of U» Anahoim MunicipAl Code to exclude the
-2- PC32-69
i,M ,
above-described property lrom the CH (Commercial, Heavy) and CG (Commercial,
General) Zones and to incorporate s~id describ6d ~roperty inta the CL (Commorcfal,
Limited) Zone, unconditi~naily.
BE IT FURTHE~t RESOLVED, that approval of this application con~titute~
approv~l of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim
Muni~ipal Zoning Cade ~nd any other applicable ~ity, Stat~ and Federal regulations.
Approval does not include ~ny action or findings as to compliance or ap;~roval of the
reyuest regarding any othor appl(cabin ordlnance, regulation or requirement.
BE 17 FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a
rezoning of, or a commitmont by tho City to rezo~e, the subject ;~roperty; any sucl~
rezoning shall requiro an ordinance of the City Council which shall bo a lagislative act
which may be approved or deniod by tl~e Ciry Council at its s~le discretion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commissfon meeting
of blay 18, ~992. ,
~
~ ~ ~...,,,~ ~/,~' ~
CHA.I AN, ANAHEINI f:ITY?~LANNI CO 510N
ATfES7~
~i,
, (.~d_v /1 _ .( i~l ~~ ,r.,. •. ~ _
SECRETARY, ANAI-IEIM CI'T'~ pLANNING COMMiSSION
STATE OF CALI~09NIA )
CC)UNTY QF O~ANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, So~retary cf the Anaheim ~ity Planning Commission, do
hereby aertity thet the f~rafloing resolution w~s passsd and adopted at a meeting of the
Anaheim City Planning C~mmissior~ hefd on May 18, 1~,'92, by the fo!lowing vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BRISTOL., HE~L'fER, PERA7~-, 1CMEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MESSE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HENNINGER
lN WITN~SS Vl-HER~OF, I have ha`eunta sot my hand this __,(~ dey of
,,~1- , 1992. / )
~ `~ : ~ , ~t" ' ~,~-~`'~-c.. r.~-.
~~
SF_CREI'ARY, ANAHEIM CITY PL4N NG COMMISSION
-3. PG92-Q9