Resolution-PC 92-72.~SULuYior~ No. Pc~
A RESOLUTIaN OF 'fHE ANAHEIM CI1Y PLAfJNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONnITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3517 BE GRl+NTED, IN PART
WHEREA$, the Anaheim City Planning Commi3sinn did r~ceive a verifi~d
Petition for Conditional Use Permit for certain rAal prope~ ry situated in the City af
Anaheim, County of O~~ange, State of Calffornia, described as:
TFiE SOUTH 158.00 FEET OF THE WEST 343.00 FEE7 OF THE NQ~7FIWEST
QUARTCR ~F THE SOUTHWES7 OUAR7ER OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF
SECTIAN 14, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANCH 11 WES7, IN THE RANCHO L03
COYA7ES, IN THE CITY OF AVAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER IaAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, t'A(3E 11, OF
ti11SCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE UFFICE OF THE CpUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
ORItNGE COUNTY.
WNEREAS, the City P4anning Commission did hold a public hearing at the
Civic Conter in the City of Anaheim un March 23, 1A92, at 1:3U p.m., notlce of said public
hearing having been du!y given as required by IaN and in accx~rdance with the provisfons
af the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and
ag~inst said proposed conditional use permit and to invest ;;ate and make tindings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and that said public hearing was uor~tinued to
the qvril 20, Mny 18 and June 15, 1992 Planning Comrnissicn meeting; and
WHEREAS, said Cornmission, aRer due inspection, investigatian and study
n~ade by itseif and in its behatf, and after due consideration of all evidence an~ reports
offered et seid hearing, does find and determine th9 following tacts:
1. That the petitioner reguests approvai nf a conditional use pormit
under euthority of Caie Sectfon 18.32.OSC.045 to permit an 18-unit condominium
complex with the following waivers:
~A~ .~~ction 18.32.Qg? d~2
(B) Section 18.B2.0B3.0~
(C) Section_~8.62.OSO.Q10
~mus~tru~iur~L-.~.ht•
~inim: ut1 I~n~1Q~c~Ad gg C~k adleCent t0
sinp~e-ta ily residential.Z4II~.
(~Q~gt required; 10•1~ feet prop~sec!)
CR1518MS.wp -1- PC92-72
(~) Soctip,~,7.08.036 - r,ivate ,SSr.eet irr~orovement
Required: .~8-foot wide ~avement nlus 4-foot
~yj~ sid~wsalks on botb _gj.d~,q r~quir~d;
(Proposed: ?itoo wide ogyement plus 4-foot
wide sidewalk on one side)
2. That the requested waivers (A) an~ (C) are hereby deniod An the
basis that they were doletod by the potitioner follawinA public notffication and !n
connection with the submitt~l of revised plans far an 18-unit project.
3. That although the petitioner submitted rovised plans eliminating al! the
proposed waivers fram the RM-2400 Condominium Standards, tho Planning Commi~sion
determined at the public heariny to approve waiv9rs (B) and l~), abovo-mentioned, in
part.
4. That waiver (B) is hereby approved, in part, to (a) Permit a minim~rri
seventeen (17) fnot wide landscaped setback along the south proparty line by moving the
buildings located an the southwosf portion of the property three (:~) fset closer to snuth
proporty line, and (b) Romoving a rtsinimum of three (3) feet from the face af the buildin8
loca:ed on the southeas~t partion of the prope~rty thereby mairY;Hining a minimum twenty
(20) foot wide landscaped setback and providing an additional three feex in width for the
priv~te street, as stipulated to by the petitioner at the public hearing; on the basis tha!
there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as size, shap~,
topogrephy, locati4n and surroundings whlch do not apply to other identically z4nAd
oroperty in thb same viainity; and that strict appUcation of the Zoning Code deprives the
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the identical zone and classiflcatian
in the vicinity; and furthor that revised pl~ns shall be submitted by the petiti~ner as
stipulated to at the public hearing incorporatiny the above-mentioned changes.
5. That, in conformance with Seation 17.08.650'Conditfonal Facc~ptions
to Chapter" of the Anaheim Municipal uode, waiver (D) is hereby granteci, in part, to
perRiit a minimum two:Yty oight (28) foot wide private street consisting of a minEmum
M~eMy four (24) f~ot wide pavement witli a minimum tour (4) foot wide walkway on only
one (1) sfda, c+n tl~o basis that there I$ a special circumstance applicable to th(s praporty
consisting of limited size theroby prohil~iting development in ~nfonnance with stenderds.
6. That revised ptans, a- approved, result in very minimal impacts to
adjoinin~ single-family neighborhoods and that no second-story windows or balcony/
deck arees will intrude o~ the vis~iai privacy of tha sin9le•femily residences.
~'. That the revisad plans, as approved, will enhanca the subject property
as well as pressrve the character ~f the surrounding singte-tamily nefghbortioods.
8. That the proposed use i~ properly one for which a conditiortal use
permit is authorized by the Zoning Code.
.2. PC92-~2
~. That the proposed use, as grAnted for 18 units, will not adversely
affect the adJoining land uses and the growth ard development of the area in which it is
~roN~~sed to bd loc~tod.
10. That the siz~ and sha~e of the site for th~- proposed use, as grantod,
is adequato to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner no4 de4r!mental
to the particular area nor to the peace, hea"h, safe4y, and genaral weifare.
11. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impos~ an
undue burden upan the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic
in the aroa.
12. That the granting nf the conditional use pe-mit under the conditions
imposed will not be detrimental to the peace, healt!~, safety and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
13. That eleven (19) people in opp~sition and threo (3) people in favor
indi4ated ~heir presence at said public hearing; and that na correspondence was received
(n opposition ta the subject petition.
~ALIFORNIAENVIROfVMENTALQUALIIYACTFlNDI~; ThattheAnaheim
Ciry Pl~nninq Comrt~ission h~s reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property irom
the RS-A-~3,00(~ (ResEdential/Agricu!tural) Zone to the RM-24Q0 (~iesidentfat, Muitiple-
Family) to permit an 18-unit (previously 19-unit) conoaminium complex with waivers of
maximum structur~l height, minimum landscaped setback adjacent to single•family
residontial zone, maximum site covarage and required private stree3 improvement on ~
reatangulerly-shaFed pa: cel of land consisting of approximately 1.03 acre, having a
frontage of approximately 160 feet oR the ea~t side of Knott Streot, having a max(mum
depth ot approximately 290 feet, being locateci approximatvly 350 feet south qf the
centerline c~f Ftome Avenue and further described as 842 South Knott Street; and does
h~reby epprove the Negative Doclaration upon nnding that the declaration reflects the
indepe~ident judgem~nt of the lead agency a~d that it has consideresi the Negadve
Declaration together with any comments received during the publia review process and
further finding on the basis ~f the initiat study and any comments received that thbra is
no subsisntial evider~ce that the proJect will have a signiticant eHect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FiESOLVE~ that the Anaheim City Planning
Commissfon does horeby grant subject Petition tor Conditianal Use PermR, ~n part, upon
the tallowin~ condhions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequ3site to the
~Sropo~ed use of the sub~gct property in order to preserve the safety and general weNare
ot :he Citizens af the Gity of Anaheim:
1. That prfor to issuanc~ of a building permit, the final tract map shall be subrnitt~d
to ~nd epproved by the City of Ar.aheim and the Orange Courrty Surveyor; and
then shall be record in the Office ~f the Orange cqunty Recorder, in accordance
with Seciion 66499.30 of t~e Subdivision Map Act.
-3- PC92-72
2. That every condominium units shali be addrassed on Knatt Stre~t.
3. That prior to the first final building and zoning inspoction, the driveway on Knott
Street shall be constructed with minimum ten (10) foot radius curb returns in
conf~rmance with Enginr~oring Standard Detail 137.
4. Tha4 prior to the first final buildin~ and zo~ing inspection, the sidewalk along Knatt
Street shail be reconstructed in accc+rdanca with Enginearing Standard Detail No.
110.
5. That a Plan 5heet for solid waste ~torage and collectEon and a plen for recrycling
shail be subrriitted ta the Department of Maintenanco fur review and approval.
6. That clothes washer and dryer hookups shall be incorporated into each
condominium dwelling unit ~nd shall be speciflcally shown or~ the plans submitted
for building permi~s.
7. That any tree planted on-site shall ba replaced in a timely manner in the event that
it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead.
8. That subject proporty shall be developed substantiaily in Kccordance witli plans
and s~pecifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by th~ petitioner and which
plans are on iite with th~ Planning D9partment marked Revision No. 1 of E~chibit
Nos. 1 through 6; provided, however, that:
(a) A minimum seventeen (17) foot wid~ landscaped setback shaU be
maintained botween the south proparty line and the buildings located on tho
southwesf portion of the property;
(b) A minimum twenty (2Q) faot wide landscaped setback shall be maintained
betw~en the south prop9rty line and the buildin~ iocat~d on the southeast
portion ot the property by r~moving a minimum of tt~r9e (3) foet nom the
tace of said building in order to widen the proposed private street; and
(c) A minimum twronty eight (28) foot ~vide privats street shali be provided
consisting of a m(nimum twerrty four (2a) foot wide pavement with a
minimum four (4) foot wide walkw~y on one (1) side.
9. Thet prior to issu~nce a4 a building permit or wit'~in a period of one (1) year irom
the date of this r~solution, whichever occurs ~i~st, Condition Nos. 1, 5 and S,
above•mentione~i, shall be compJied wfth. Extensic~ns for iurther time tA complete
~aid cc~nditions may be granted in accordanco with Section iS.c)3.090 of the
Anaheirr Municipai Code.
10. Thet prior to final building and zoning inspections, ConditEon Nos. 3, 4 an~ 8,
above•menwoned, shall bo comptied wfth.
.d- PC92-72
11. Tliat approval of this dpplfcation constitutas ~pproval of the praposed raq~est only
to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code ~nd any
other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does nat include
any action or findinqs as to complianca or approval of th9 request r~garding any
oth~r applicabio ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commissfon
daas hereby find and determine that a~~ption of this Resolution is expr~ssly predicated
upon applic~ant's compifance with each and all of the ~onditions hereinabave s9t forth.
Should any such conditinn, or any p~art thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by
the final judgment af any c~urt of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
'~HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Co~rmission
mee;ing of Juna 15, 1992. ~ ~
/~ , -
~t~~.
~--~~ :: "
CFI~11RMpN, ANAHEIA4 C, PLA INC OMMISSIC~N
AITEST:
~ ~GC/7~t~~llit~QJ c~i~/uB.~
SECRETApY, A AHEIM CI1Y PLANNING COMMISSION
ST~ITE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY QF ~RANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHLIM )
!, Margarit~ Solorio, ~ecretary of the Anah~im Gity Planning Comrnission,
do hereby certify that the forogoing resolutiun was passed ~nd adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on June 15, 1992, by the followfn~ vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BRI~701., HELLYER, HENNINGER, MESSE,
ZEMEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AF3S~NT: COMMISSIONERS: ~ERAZA
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand lhis /~'~~ day of
C-~ Clf~r ,1992. _
~
~- ..
J' ~~r~/z uc.c~~~i,~~t~~
SECRErARY, AN EIM CITY PLANNING COM(WISSION
-5. PC92-7a